Tyndall Centre Update: Mitigation
… potted account of some recent research
Kevin Anderson
Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil ...
Finally,
“… this is not a message of futility, but a wake-up call of where
our rose-tinted spectacles have brought us. Rea...
“When I look at this [CO2] data, the trend is perfectly in line with
a temperature increase of 6 degrees Celsius, which wo...
My headline conclusion:
Stabilisation at 2°C remains a feasible goal
just
… with economic (oikonimia),
but not financial (...
Research Areas
 District heating (esp. CHP)
 CCS/Renewables –planning, stakeholder/public perceptions,
 Bio energy (lea...
Shale gas
- Environmental/Social issues can be mitigated
- Climate change implications cannot
 Shale gas & natural gas ar...
Shale gas and UK carbon budgets
Emissions from combusting ~10% of British Geological Survey’s
central estimate of the Bowl...
Nuclear
New Tyndall Report into nuclear power within the UK
http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/tyndall_evidence.pdf
T...
Shipping
International Maritime Organisation (IMO) tasked by UNFCCC to
develop Climate Change response
(emblematic of most...
“Mankind is on the horns of a dilemma. … our collective way of
life [is] eating away at the very support system that enabl...
Shipping
Two flagship mitigation policies of the IMO
are:
 The ‘energy efficiency design index’ (EEDI)
 The ‘ship energy...
Anderson and Bows, 2012, Carbon Management (2012) 3(6), 615–628
Superimposing IMO/ICS plans/projections on their
high-leve...
90-140MtCO2
Superimposing IMO/ICS plans/projections on their
high-level commitments
Anderson and Bows, 2012, Carbon Manage...
90-140MtCO2
~1300MtCO2
~1900MtCO2
Superimposing IMO/ICS plans/projections on their
high-level commitments
Anderson and Bow...
Shipping – lots of low carbon options
Existing: Operational change, radically reduce speed
(cube relationship with energy ...
Shipping
… yet planning for a 1000% (A2) to 2000% (A1B) increase
on their high-level mitigation commitments
… with the IMO...
Shipping is in good company …
Overall there is very clear weakening of the global and UK government’s commitment to climat...
2013 UK Context
 Tax breaks for shale gas development
 Osborne’s (Chancellor) 37GW of unabated CCGTS
 Highest investmen...
Σ China & India…
(making our computers & running our call centres)
Emission in 2020 15-20GtCO2 (~⅔ global 2010)
Peak ~20...
We must escape the shackles of a twentieth century mind-
set if we are ever to resolve twenty-first century challenges
Thi...
Tyndall Centre
Radical Emission Reduction conference
Royal Society Dec. 2013
Kevin Anderson
Website: http:// kevinanderson...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Tyndall Centre Update Presentation 2013

815 views

Published on

Tyndall Centre Update: Mitigation … potted account of some recent research

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
815
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Tyndall Centre Update Presentation 2013

  1. 1. Tyndall Centre Update: Mitigation … potted account of some recent research Kevin Anderson Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
  2. 2. Finally, “… this is not a message of futility, but a wake-up call of where our rose-tinted spectacles have brought us. Real hope, if it is to arise at all, will do so from a bare assessment of the scale of the challenge we now face.” Anderson & Bows Beyond ‘dangerous climate change Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Jan 2011
  3. 3. “When I look at this [CO2] data, the trend is perfectly in line with a temperature increase of 6 degrees Celsius, which would have devastating consequences for the planet.” Fatih Birol - IEA chief economist … and according to the World Bank, at just 4°C "There will be water and food fights everywhere,” Jim Yong Kim – WB president
  4. 4. My headline conclusion: Stabilisation at 2°C remains a feasible goal just … with economic (oikonimia), but not financial (chrematisitc) benefits
  5. 5. Research Areas  District heating (esp. CHP)  CCS/Renewables –planning, stakeholder/public perceptions,  Bio energy (lead UK’s research with strong industry link)  Smart grids (technical and how used)  Food in a changing climate  Growth, green growth, equity (economics, steady state)  High-emitters (UK & China) – tailoring policies  Carbon budgets (revisiting UK budgets)
  6. 6. Shale gas - Environmental/Social issues can be mitigated - Climate change implications cannot  Shale gas & natural gas are identical  They are both high carbon energy sources (75% carbon)  For electricity, gas is ~50% of coal emissions per kWh  But only lower CO2 if substituted coal is not burnt elsewhere  In absence of explicit policies, shale only adds to the carbon burden (see US data). As DECC note: “it is difficult to envisage a situation other than shale gas largely being used in addition to other fossil fuel reserves and adding a further carbon burden.”
  7. 7. Shale gas and UK carbon budgets Emissions from combusting ~10% of British Geological Survey’s central estimate of the Bowland shale resource equates to the total 2013-2050 UK carbon budget In brief; if the UK is to pursue shale gas for use in UK power stations it must renege on its own carbon budgets (shale gas will not be a major energy source before ~2025, & the CCC state by 2030 the UK requires almost carbon-free electricity)
  8. 8. Nuclear New Tyndall Report into nuclear power within the UK http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/tyndall_evidence.pdf The mitigation conclusion is that the case for or against nuclear energy within the UK is contextual; i.e. the objectives, in terms of carbon reduction levels, rates of mitigation and timeframe all need to be well specified
  9. 9. Shipping International Maritime Organisation (IMO) tasked by UNFCCC to develop Climate Change response (emblematic of most sectors)
  10. 10. “Mankind is on the horns of a dilemma. … our collective way of life [is] eating away at the very support system that enables us to live and breathe. This cannot go on. We need to make some tough decisions, we need to make them now ... Faced with facts we cannot argue against we need to consider our priorities … to make sacrifices; we need to start putting "life" ahead of "lifestyle". Efthimios E. Mitropoulos The IMO General Secretary’s view on climate change
  11. 11. Shipping Two flagship mitigation policies of the IMO are:  The ‘energy efficiency design index’ (EEDI)  The ‘ship energy efficient management plan’ (SEEMP) How do these fair against the IMO and ICS’s high-level commitments?
  12. 12. Anderson and Bows, 2012, Carbon Management (2012) 3(6), 615–628 Superimposing IMO/ICS plans/projections on their high-level commitments
  13. 13. 90-140MtCO2 Superimposing IMO/ICS plans/projections on their high-level commitments Anderson and Bows, 2012, Carbon Management (2012) 3(6), 615–628
  14. 14. 90-140MtCO2 ~1300MtCO2 ~1900MtCO2 Superimposing IMO/ICS plans/projections on their high-level commitments Anderson and Bows, 2012, Carbon Management (2012) 3(6), 615–628
  15. 15. Shipping – lots of low carbon options Existing: Operational change, radically reduce speed (cube relationship with energy consumption) Retrofit: Kites & possibly nuclear New: Wind (kites, flettnor rotors, sails, nuclear, bio) Demand: ~50% of UK shipping is transporting fossil fuels Ports: Cold ironing, renewable onsight (Sulphur & LNG)
  16. 16. Shipping … yet planning for a 1000% (A2) to 2000% (A1B) increase on their high-level mitigation commitments … with the IMO referring repeatedly to such increases as reductions
  17. 17. Shipping is in good company … Overall there is very clear weakening of the global and UK government’s commitment to climate change Virtually every nation & sector is failing to meet its own commitments, or claiming ‘savings’ that are known to be false (except Swansea?) … as for 2°C, no nation or sector (including the UK & Wales) is even contemplating such emission reductions (e.g. UK 3-4% p.a., whilst 50:50 chance of 2°C demands ~10% p.a. for UK)
  18. 18. 2013 UK Context  Tax breaks for shale gas development  Osborne’s (Chancellor) 37GW of unabated CCGTS  Highest investment ever in North Sea oil  (possible reopening of Scottish coal mines)  Expanding aviation & more ports  EU Car legislation watered down to be little more that BAU  Rejected 2030 decarbonisation target  Shell – Arctic exploration  Myth of CCS – 50-80gCO2/kWh
  19. 19. Σ China & India… (making our computers & running our call centres) Emission in 2020 15-20GtCO2 (~⅔ global 2010) Peak ~2025-30 Population ~40% of global figure GDP/capita < 5% OECD in 2010 Energy growth ~5-8% p.a.
  20. 20. We must escape the shackles of a twentieth century mind- set if we are ever to resolve twenty-first century challenges This will demand leadership, courage, innovative thinking, engaged teams, difficult choices & ‘pain’ for high emitters Cybil exemplified what this may look like for Swansea
  21. 21. Tyndall Centre Radical Emission Reduction conference Royal Society Dec. 2013 Kevin Anderson Website: http:// kevinanderson.info Twitter: kevinclimate

×