Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Group 13 06.11.2009

1,142 views

Published on

các Slide môn Law thuộc chương trình tiên tiến K49, NEU. Nhóm 13 gồm có các thành viên: Phạm Duy Thanh, Đặng Phương Tâm, Nguyễn Tiến Thịnh, Nguyễn Văn Sơn. Giảng viên : Trần Văn Nam.

Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Group 13 06.11.2009

  1. 1. Acceptances<br />Case 8 – 209<br />GROUP 13<br />Dang Phuong Tam<br /> Nguyen Van Son<br />Pham Duy Thanh<br />Nguyen Tien Thinh<br />
  2. 2. Pearsall and Alexander <br /> friends forover 20 years<br />
  3. 3. “Package”<br /><ul><li>A half-pint of vodka
  4. 4. Orange juice
  5. 5. Two cups
  6. 6. Lottery tickets</li></li></ul><li>Lottery tickets<br />They won<br />Bought more<br />
  7. 7. 16/12/1982The first package bought by Pearsall <br />Yes<br />Are you in on it ?<br />Pearsall<br />Alexander<br />A half of price?<br />I has no money<br />Then, Alexander snatched and scratched boths tickets<br />
  8. 8. Pearsall snatched the tickets, scratched one and <br /> left another one for Alexander<br />16/12/1982 The second “package” bought by Alexander<br />
  9. 9. Alexander<br />Won$20.000<br />Refused to split<br />
  10. 10. DoesPearsallhave a right to<br />half the winnings ? <br />Yes<br />
  11. 11. Analyse<br />Offer + Acceptance = Agreement<br /> - Intent<br /> - Definiteness<br /> - Communication <br />- Intent<br />- Exactiveness<br />- Communication <br /> meeting of mind <br />valid<br />valid<br />Share fortunes of ticket<br />
  12. 12. Precedent<br />Plantiff: Richard Zientara<br />Defendant: Bernice Kaszuba <br />(506 NE2d 1 (IN. 1987) <br />(Sources: www.lotterypost.com )<br />
  13. 13. Richard Zientara offered Kaszuba <br /> to buy tickets for him<br />She accepted and used money<br />he gave to buy tickets regularly<br />
  14. 14. <ul><li>However, when it was a $1,696,800 winner she refused to give it to him and claimed the winnings for herself
  15. 15. He successfully sued her</li></li></ul><li> Judgment in favor of Pearsall was appropriate on this breach of agreement<br />Verdict<br />
  16. 16. Implication in Vietnam<br />Plantiff: Mr. N. T. T<br />Defendant: Mr. T. T. L<br />(Ba Ria, Ben Tre Province) (Sources: http://www.phapluattp.vn)<br />
  17. 17. 10/2006<br />L. bought 4 tickets T. bought 3 tickets<br />I have to work, hold tickets for me, please<br />Mr.L<br />Mr.T<br />
  18. 18. L scratches 7 tickets without T’s permission<br />One of 3 T’s tickets won speacial prize<br />
  19. 19. <ul><li> L received 100 millions VND, gave 50 millions for T
  20. 20. T did not know which ticket the prize came from and received 50 millions
  21. 21. 2 months later, T realized then sued L on Ba Tri court and claimed that L had to pay him 50 millions</li></ul>No. Give back to me my money !<br />Mr.T<br />Mr.L<br />
  22. 22. Decision<br />Is there any acceptance from T?<br />NO<br /> There is no agreement between T and L.<br />Judgment in favor of N. T .T was appropriate<br />
  23. 23. Group 13<br />Acceptances<br />Case 8 – Page 209<br />Thank for listening !<br />

×