Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Conservation Software: Is Data the Answer? - Part 1

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 10 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (13)

Similar to Conservation Software: Is Data the Answer? - Part 1 (20)

Advertisement

More from Texas Living Waters Project (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Conservation Software: Is Data the Answer? - Part 1

  1. 1. Austin Water’s Home Water Use Report Pilot Program Central Texas Water Efficiency Network Symposium February 2, 2016 Mark Jordan Conservation Program Coordinator
  2. 2. Incentive program trends •  Traditional “low hanging fruit” implemented •  Many programs phased out due to federal manufacturing standards, market saturation, and state/local requirements •  Shifting focus to high use areas, auxiliary water, higher standards for new development, and innovative technology and methods 2
  3. 3. Behavior modification •  Put more information into hands of customers •  Leverage social norms to change behavior by comparing customer’s water use with similar and efficient homes •  Give feedback to the customer on water and cost saving ideas and rebates •  Engage customer to set goals 3
  4. 4. Pilot study questions •  Will reports result in measurable and significant reductions in household water use? •  Will reports increase program participation? •  Can reports using monthly, rather than “real time”, water use still have a significant impact on reducing water use? •  Does providing water use against rate tiers affect water use? If so, by how much? •  What is the most effective application of home water use reports (selected by water usage, geographic area, at random, or self-selection; written, mobile app or internet)? 4
  5. 5. Platform selection criteria 5 •  Intuitive •  ‘Opt in’ approach •  Flexibility •  Cost •  Mobile phone application •  Custom home water use reports •  Analytics package Dropcountr App Mailed Home Water Report Dropcountr CLEAR Analytics Platform
  6. 6. Pilot scope •  One year pilot period: May 2015 – May 2016 •  10,000 participants – 8500 opt-in mobile app or internet reports – 3 control groups to receive mailed reports •  Top users city-wide •  High water use neighborhood •  City-wide at random 6
  7. 7. Program launch •  Staff training on all tools, anticipated questions, guidance on what to say and show customers •  Prepare for increased customer inquiries •  Coordination with Customer Service, Billing and IT •  Internal staff test group •  Public education and outreach; website info •  E-mail invitation sent to potential “opt-in” participants 7
  8. 8. Initial response •  7,105 of 8,500 interested customers have signed up •  Increased interest in having “smart meter” data •  Range of customer feedback, much of it positive: 8
  9. 9. Initial assessment •  Too early for precise water saving analysis •  Many external factors affected water use during initial six months •  Has increased customer engagement, initiation of the “Conservation Conversation” •  Cost-effective outreach – rebates and announcements 9
  10. 10. Mark Jordan Water Conservation Program Coordinator (512) 974-3901 mark.jordan@austintexas.gov www.waterwiseaustin.org

×