Published on


Published in: Education
1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide


  1. 1. Chapter 2 Pulse Propagation in Fibers For an understanding of the nonlinear phenomena in optical fibers, it is neces- sary to consider the theory of electromagnetic wave propagation in dispersive nonlinear media. The objective of this chapter is to obtain a basic equation that governs propagation of optical pulses in single-mode fibers. Section 2.1 intro- duces Maxwell’s equations and important concepts such as the linear and non- linear parts of the induced polarization and the frequency-dependent dielectric constant. The concept of fiber modes is introduced in Section 2.2 where the single-mode condition is also discussed. Section 2.3 considers the theory of pulse propagation in nonlinear dispersive media in the slowly varying envelope approximation with the assumption that the spectral width of the pulse is much smaller than the frequency of the incident radiation. The numerical methods used to solve the resulting propagation equation are discussed in Section 2.4. 2.1 Maxwell’s Equations Like all electromagnetic phenomena, the propagation of optical fields in fibers is governed by Maxwell’s equations. In the International System of Units (Syst`eme international d’unit´es or SI), these equations are [1] For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  2. 2. 32 Pulse Propagation in Fibers (2.1.4) where E and H are electric and magnetic field vectors, respectively, and D and B are corresponding electric and magnetic flux densities. The current density vector J and the charge density ρf represent the sources for the electromagnetic field. In the absence of free charges in a medium such as optical fibers, J 0 and ρf 0. The flux densities D and B arise in response to the electric and magnetic fields E and H propagating inside the medium and are related to them through the constitutive relations given by [1] (2.1.5) (2.1.6) where ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, µ0 is the vacuum permeability, and P and M are the induced electric and magnetic polarizations. For a nonmagnetic medium such as optical fibers, M 0. Maxwell’s equations can be used to obtain the wave equation that describes light propagation in optical fibers. By taking the curl of Eq. (2.1.1) and using Eqs. (2.1.2), (2.1.5), and (2.1.6), one can eliminate B and D in favor of E and P and obtain (2.1.7) where c is the speed of light in vacuum and the relation µ0ε0 1 c2 was used. To complete the description, a relation between the induced polarization P and the electric field E is needed. In general, the evaluation of P requires a quantum-mechanical approach. Although such an approach is often necessary when the optical frequency is near a medium resonance, a phenomenological relation of the form (1.3.1) can be used to relate P and E far from medium resonances. This is the case for optical fibers in the wavelength range 0.5– 2 µm that is of interest for the study of nonlinear effects. If we include only the third-order nonlinear effects governed by χ´3µ , the induced polarization consists of two parts such that (2.1.8) where the linear part PL and the nonlinear part PNL are related to the electric field by the general relations [2]–[4] (2.1.9) For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  3. 3. Maxwell’s Equations 33 These relations are valid in the electric-dipole approximation and assume that the medium response is local. Equations (2.1.7)–(2.1.10) provide a general formalism for studying the third-order nonlinear effects in optical fibers. Because of their complexity, it is necessary to make several simplifying approximations. In a major simplifica- tion, the nonlinear polarization PNL in Eq. (2.1.8) is treated as a small pertur- bation to the total induced polarization. This is justified because the nonlinear effects are relatively weak in silica fibers. The first step therefore consists of solving Eq. (2.1.7) with PNL 0. Because Eq. (2.1.7) is then linear in E, it is useful to write in the frequency domain as where ˜E´r ωµ is the Fourier transform of E´r tµ defined as The frequency-dependent dielectric constant appearing in Eq. (2.1.12) is defined as where ˜χ´1µ ´ωµ is the Fourier transform of χ´1µ ´tµ. As ˜χ´1µ ´ωµ is in general complex, so is ε´ωµ. Its real and imaginary parts can be related to the refractive index n´ωµ and the absorption coefficient α´ωµ by using the definition From Eqs. (2.1.13) and (2.1.14), n and α are related to χ´1µ by the relations where Re and Im stand for the real and imaginary parts, respectively. The frequency dependence of n and α has been discussed in Section 1.2. For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  4. 4. 34 Pulse Propagation in Fibers Two further simplifications can be made before solving Eq. (2.1.11). First, because of low optical losses in fibers in the wavelength region of interest, the imaginary part of ε´ωµ is small in comparison to the real part. Thus, we can replace ε´ωµ by n2´ωµ in the following discussion of fiber modes and include fiber loss later in a perturbative manner. Second, as n´ωµ is often independent of the spatial coordinates in both the core and the cladding of step-index fibers, one can use where the relation ∇ ¡D ε∇ ¡E 0 was used from Eq. (2.1.3). With these simplifications, Eq. (2.1.11) takes the form This equation is solved in the next section on fiber modes. 2.2 Fiber Modes At any frequency ω, optical fibers can support a finite number of guided modes whose spatial distribution ˜E´r ωµ is a solution of the wave equation (2.1.18) and satisfies all appropriate boundary conditions. In addition, the fiber can support a continuum of unguided radiation modes. Although the inclusion of radiation modes is crucial in problems involving transfer of power between bounded and radiation modes [5], they do not play an important role in the discussion of nonlinear effects. As fiber modes are covered in many text- books [5]–[7], they are discussed only briefly in this section. 2.2.1 Eigenvalue Equation Because of the cylindrical symmetry of fibers, it is useful to express the wave equation (2.1.18) in cylindrical coordinates ρ φ and z: where k0 ω c 2π λ and ˜E is the Fourier transform of the electric field E, i.e., For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  5. 5. Fiber Modes 35 Similar relations exist for the magnetic field H´r tµ. As E and H satisfy Maxwell’s equations (2.1.1)–(2.1.4), only two components out of six are inde- pendent. It is customary to choose ˜Ez and ˜Hz as the independent components and express ˜Eρ ˜Eφ ˜Hρ, and ˜Hφ in terms of ˜Ez and ˜Hz. Both ˜Ez and ˜Hz satisfy Eq. (2.2.1). The wave equation for ˜Ez is easily solved by using the method of separation of variables, resulting in the following general form: where A is a normalization constant, β is the propagation constant, m is an integer, and F´ρµ is the solution of where the refractive index n n1 for ρ a for a fiber of core radius a but takes the value n2 outside the core (ρ a). Equation (2.2.4) is the well-known differential equation for Bessel func- tions. Its general solution inside the core can be written as where Jm is the Bessel function, Nm is the Neumann function, and The constants C1 and C2 are determined using the boundary conditions. As Nm´κρµ has a singularity at ρ 0, C2 0 for a physically meaningful solution. The constant C1 can be absorbed in A appearing in Eq. (2.2.3). Thus, In the cladding region (ρ a), the solution F´ρµ should be such that it decays exponentially for large ρ. The modified Bessel function Km represents such a solution. Therefore, where For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  6. 6. 36 Pulse Propagation in Fibers The same procedure can be followed to obtain the magnetic field compo- nent ˜Hz. The boundary condition that the tangential components of ˜E and ˜H be continuous across the core-cladding interface requires that ˜Ez, ˜Hz, ˜Eφ , and ˜Hφ be the same when ρ a is approached from inside or outside the core. The equality of these field components at ρ a leads to an eigenvalue equation whose solutions determine the propagation constant β for the fiber modes. Since the whole procedure is well known [5]–[7], we write the eigenvalue equation directly: where a prime denotes differentiation with respect to the argument and we used the important relation The eigenvalue equation (2.2.10) in general has several solutions for β for each integer value of m. It is customary to express these solutions by βmn, where both m and n take integer values. Each eigenvalue βmn corresponds to one specific mode supported by the fiber. The corresponding modal field distribution is obtained from Eq. (2.2.3). It turns out [5]–[7] that there are two types of fiber modes, designated as HEmn and EHmn. For m 0, these modes are analogous to the transverse-electric (TE) and transverse-magnetic (TM) modes of a planar waveguide because the axial component of the electric field, or the magnetic field, vanishes. However, for m 0, fiber modes become hybrid, i.e., all six components of the electromagnetic field are nonzero. 2.2.2 Single-Mode Condition The number of modes supported by a specific fiber at a given wavelength de- pends on its design parameters, namely the core radius a and the core-cladding index difference n1  n2. An important parameter for each mode is its cut-off frequency. This frequency is determined by the condition γ 0. The value of κ when γ 0 for a given mode determines the cut-off frequency from Eq. (2.2.11). It is useful to define a normalized frequency V by the relation where κc is obtained from Eq. (2.2.11) by setting γ 0. For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  7. 7. Fiber Modes 37 The eigenvalue equation (2.2.10) can be used to determine the values of V at which different modes reach cut-off. The procedure is complicated, but has been described in many texts [5]–[7]. Since we are interested mainly in single-mode fibers, we limit the discussion to the cut-off condition that allows the fiber to support only one mode. A single-mode fiber supports only the HE11 mode, also referred to as the fundamental mode. All other modes are beyond cut-off if the parameter V Vc, where Vc is the smallest solution of J0´Vcµ 0 or Vc 2 405. The actual value of V is a critical design parameter. Typically, microbending losses increase as V Vc becomes small. In practice, therefore, fibers are designed such that V is close to Vc. The cut-off wavelength λc for single-mode fibers can be obtained by using k0 2π λc and V 2 405 in Eq. (2.2.12). For a typical value n1  n2 0 005 for the index difference, λc 1 2 µm for a 4 µm, indicating that such a fiber supports a single mode only for λ 1 2 µm. In practice, core radius should be below 2 µm for a fiber to support a single mode in the visible region. 2.2.3 Characteristics of the Fundamental Mode The field distribution E´r tµ corresponding to the HE11 mode has three non- zero components Eρ, Eφ , and Ez, or in Cartesian coordinates Ex, Ey, and Ez. Among these, either Ex or Ey dominates. Thus, to a good degree of approxima- tion, the fundamental fiber mode is linearly polarized in either x or y direction depending on whether Ex or Ey dominates. In this respect, even a single-mode fiber is not truly single mode because it can support two modes of orthogo- nal polarizations. The notation LPmn is sometimes used to denote the linearly polarized modes, which are approximate solutions of Eq. (2.2.1). The funda- mental mode HE11 corresponds to LP01 in this notation [6]. The two orthogonally polarized modes of a single-mode fiber are degen- erate (i.e., they have the same propagation constant) under ideal conditions. In practice, irregularities such as random variations in the core shape and size along the fiber length break this degeneracy slightly, mix the two polariza- tion components randomly, and scramble the polarization of the incident light as it propagates down the fiber. As discussed in Section 1.2.4, polarization- preserving fibers can maintain the linear polarization if the light is launched with its polarization along one of the principal axes of the fiber. Assuming that the incident light is polarized along a principal axis (chosen to coincide with the x axis), the electric field for the fundamental fiber mode HE11 is approxi- For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  8. 8. 38 Pulse Propagation in Fibers mately given by where A´ωµ is a normalization constant. The transverse distribution inside the core is found to be where ρ ´x2 · y2µ1 2 is the radial distance. Outside the fiber core, the field decays exponentially as [5] where Km´γρµ in Eq. (2.2.8) was approximated by the leading term in its asymptotic expansion and a constant factor was added to ensure the equality of F´x yµ at ρ a. The propagation constant β´ωµ in Eq. (2.2.13) is ob- tained by solving the eigenvalue equation (2.2.10). Its frequency dependence results not only from the frequency dependence of n1 and n2 but also from the frequency dependence of κ. The former is referred to as material dispersion while the latter is called waveguide dispersion. As discussed in Section 1.3, material dispersion generally dominates unless the light wavelength is close to the zero-dispersion wavelength. The evaluation of β´ωµ generally requires a numerical solution of Eq. (2.2.10) although approximate analytic expressions can be obtained in specific cases [5]. The effective mode index is related to β by neff β k0. As the use of modal distribution F´x yµ given by Eqs. (2.2.14) and (2.2.15) is cumbersome in practice, the fundamental fiber mode is often approximated by a Gaussian distribution of the form where the width parameter w is determined by fitting the exact distribution to a Gaussian form or by following a variational procedure. Figure 2.1 shows the dependence of w a on the fiber parameter V defined by Eq. (2.2.12). The com- parison of the actual field distribution with the fitted Gaussian is also shown for a specific value V 2 4. The quality of fit is generally quite good [8], par- ticularly for V values in the neighborhood of 2. Figure 2.1 shows that w a for V 2, indicating that the core radius provides a good estimate of w for telecommunication fibers for which V 2. Note that w can be significantly larger than a for V 1 8. The use of Gaussian approximation is of consider- able practical value because of its relative simplicity. For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  9. 9. Pulse-Propagation Equation 39 Figure 2.1 Variation of mode-width parameter w with V obtained by fitting the fun- damental fiber mode to a Gaussian distribution. Traces on the right show the quality of fit for V 2 4. (After Ref. [8].) 2.3 Pulse-Propagation Equation The study of most nonlinear effects in optical fibers involves the use of short pulses with widths ranging from 10 ns to 10 fs. When such optical pulses propagate inside a fiber, both dispersive and nonlinear effects influence their shape and spectrum. In this section we derive a basic equation that governs propagation of optical pulses in nonlinear dispersive fibers. The starting point is the wave equation (2.1.7). By using Eqs. (2.1.8) and (2.1.17), it can be written in the form where the linear and nonlinear parts of the induced polarization are related to the electric field E´r tµ through Eqs. (2.1.9) and (2.1.10), respectively. 2.3.1 Nonlinear Pulse Propagation It is necessary to make several simplifying assumptions before solving Eq. (2.3.1). First, PNL is treated as a small perturbation to PL. This is justified because nonlinear changes in the refractive index are 10 6 in practice. Sec- ond, the optical field is assumed to maintain its polarization along the fiber length so that a scalar approach is valid. This is not really the case, unless For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  10. 10. 40 Pulse Propagation in Fibers polarization-maintaining fibers are used, but the approximation works quite well in practice; it will be relaxed later in Chapter 6. Third, the optical field is assumed to be quasi-monochromatic, i.e., the pulse spectrum, centered at ω 0, is assumed to have a spectral width ∆ω such that ∆ω ω0 1. Since ω 0 1015 s 1, the last assumption is valid for pulses as short as 0.1 ps. In the slowly varying envelope approximation adopted here, it is useful to separate the rapidly varying part of the electric field by writing it in the form where ˆx is the polarization unit vector, and E´r tµ is a slowly varying function of time (relative to the optical period). The polarization components PL and PNL can also be expressed in a similar way by writing The linear component PL can be obtained by substituting Eq. (2.3.3) in Eq. (2.1.9) and is given by where ˜E´r ωµ is the Fourier transform of E´r tµ and is defined similarly to Eq. (2.1.12). The nonlinear component PNL´r tµ is obtained by substituting Eq. (2.3.4) in Eq. (2.1.10). Considerable simplification occurs if the nonlinear response is assumed to be instantaneous so that the time dependence of χ´3µ in Eq. (2.1.10) is given by the product of three delta functions of the form δ´t  t1µ. Equation (2.1.10) then reduces to The assumption of instantaneous nonlinear response amounts to neglecting the contribution of molecular vibrations to χ´3µ (the Raman effect). In gen- eral, both electrons and nuclei respond to the optical field in a nonlinear man- ner. The nuclei response is inherently slower compared with the electronic For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  11. 11. Pulse-Propagation Equation 41 response. For silica fibers the vibrational or Raman response occurs over a time scale 60–70 fs. Thus, Eq. (2.3.6) is approximately valid for pulse widths 1 ps. The Raman contribution is included later in this section. When Eq. (2.3.2) is substituted in Eq. (2.3.6), PNL´r tµ is found to have a term oscillating at ω0 and another term oscillating at the third-harmonic frequency 3ω 0. The latter term requires phase matching and is generally neg- ligible in optical fibers. By making use of Eq. (2.3.4), PNL´r tµ is given by where the nonlinear contribution to the dielectric constant is defined as To obtain the wave equation for the slowly varying amplitude E´r tµ, it is more convenient to work in the Fourier domain. This is generally not possible as Eq. (2.3.1) is nonlinear because of the intensity dependence of εNL. In one approach, ε NL is treated as a constant during the derivation of the propagation equation [9], [10]. The approach is justified in view of the slowly varying envelope approximation and the perturbative nature of PNL. Substituting Eqs. (2.3.2)–(2.3.4) in Eq. (2.3.1), the Fourier transform ˜E´r ω  ω0µ, defined as is found to satisfy the Helmholtz equation where k0 ω c and is the dielectric constant whose nonlinear part εNL is given by Eq. (2.3.8). Similar to Eq. (2.1.14), the dielectric constant can be used to define the refrac- tive index ˜n and the absorption coefficient ˜α. However, both ˜n and ˜α become intensity dependent because of εNL. It is customary to introduce Using ε ´ ˜n · i ˜α 2k0µ2 and Eqs. (2.3.8) and (2.3.11), the nonlinear-index coefficient n2 and the two-photon absorption coefficient α2 are given by For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  12. 12. 42 Pulse Propagation in Fibers The linear index n and the absorption coefficient α are related to the real and imaginary parts of ˜χ´1µ xx as in Eqs. (2.1.15) and (2.1.16). As α2 is relatively small for silica fibers, it is often ignored. The parameter n2 should not be confused with the cladding index of Section 2.2 even though the same notation has been used. From here onward, n2 is a measure of the fiber nonlinearity. Equation (2.3.10) can be solved by using the method of separation of vari- ables. If we assume a solution of the form where ˜A´z ωµ is a slowly varying function of z and β0 is the wave number to be determined later, Eq. (2.3.10) leads to the following two equations for F´x yµ and ˜A´z ωµ: In obtaining Eq. (2.3.16), the second derivative ∂2 ˜A ∂z2 was neglected since ˜A´z ωµ is assumed to be a slowly varying function of z. The wave number ˜β is determined by solving the eigenvalue equation (2.3.15) for the fiber modes using a procedure similar to that used in Section 2.2. The dielectric constant ε´ωµ in Eq. (2.3.15) can be approximated by where ∆n is a small perturbation given by Equation (2.3.15) can be solved using first-order perturbation theory [11]. We first replace ε with n2 and obtain the modal distribution F´x yµ, and the corresponding wave number β´ωµ. For a single-mode fiber, F´x yµ corre- sponds to the modal distribution of the fundamental fiber mode HE11 given by Eqs. (2.2.14) and (2.2.15), or by the Gaussian approximation (2.2.16). We then include the effect of ∆n in Eq. (2.3.15). In the first-order perturbation theory, ∆n does not affect the modal distribution F´x yµ. However, the eigenvalue ˜β becomes For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  13. 13. Pulse-Propagation Equation 43 where This step completes the formal solution of Eq. (2.3.1) to the first order in perturbation PNL. Using Eqs. (2.3.2) and (2.3.12), the electric field E´r tµ can be written as where A´z tµ is the slowly varying pulse envelope. The Fourier transform ˜A´z ω  ω0µ of A´z tµ satisfies Eq. (2.3.16), which can be written as where we used Eq. (2.3.19) and approximated ˜β2  β2 0 by 2β0´ ˜β  β0µ. The physical meaning of this equation is clear. Each spectral component within the pulse envelope acquires, as it propagates down the fiber, a phase shift whose magnitude is both frequency and intensity dependent. At this point, one can go back to the time domain by taking the inverse Fourier transform of Eq. (2.3.22), and obtain the propagation equation for A´z tµ. However, as an exact functional form of β´ωµ is rarely known, it is useful to expand β´ωµ in a Taylor series about the carrier frequency ω0 as The cubic and higher-order terms in this expansion are generally negligible if the spectral width ∆ω ω0. Their neglect is consistent with the quasi- monochromatic assumption used in the derivation of Eq. (2.3.22). If β2 0 for some specific values of ω0 (in the vicinity of the zero-dispersion wavelength of the fiber, as discussed in Section 1.3.3), it may be necessary to include the cubic term. We substitute Eq. (2.3.23) in Eq. (2.3.22) and take the inverse Fourier transform by using For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  14. 14. 44 Pulse Propagation in Fibers During the Fourier-transform operation, ω  ω0 is replaced by the differential operator i´∂ ∂tµ. The resulting equation for A´z tµ becomes The term with ∆β includes the effect of fiber loss and nonlinearity. By using Eqs. (2.3.18) and (2.3.20), ∆β can be evaluated and substituted in (2.3.26). The result is where the nonlinear parameter γ is defined as In obtaining Eq. (2.3.27) the pulse amplitude A is assumed to be normal- ized such that A 2 represents the optical power. The quantity γ A 2 is then measured in units of m 1 if n2 is expressed in units of m2/W (see Appendix B). The parameter Aeff is known as the effective core area and is defined as Its evaluation requires the use of modal distribution F´x yµ for the fundamen- tal fiber mode. Clearly Aeff depends on fiber parameters such as the core ra- dius and the core-cladding index difference. If F´x yµ is approximated by a Gaussian distribution as in Eq. (2.2.16), Aeff πw2. The width parameter w depends on the fiber parameters and can be obtained using Fig. 2.1 and Eq. (2.2.12). Typically, Aeff can vary in the range 20–100 µm2 in the 1.5-µm re- gion depending on the fiber design. As a result, γ takes values in the range 1–10 W 1/km if n2 2 6¢10 20 m2/W is used (see Appendix B). In a large- effective-area fiber (LEAF), Aeff is increased intentionally to reduce the impact of fiber nonlinearity. Equation (2.3.27) describes propagation of picosecond optical pulse in single-mode fibers. It is often referred to as the nonlinear Schr¨odinger (NLS) equation because it can be reduced to that form under certain conditions. It includes the effects of fiber losses through α, of chromatic dispersion through β1 and β2, and of fiber nonlinearity through γ. The physical significance of For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  15. 15. Pulse-Propagation Equation 45 the parameters β1 and β2 has been discussed in Section 1.2.3. Briefly, the pulse envelope moves at the group velocity vg 1 β1 while the effects of group-velocity dispersion (GVD) are governed by β2. The GVD parameter β2 can be positive or negative depending on whether the wavelength λ is be- low or above the zero-dispersion wavelength λD of the fiber (see Fig. 1.5). In the anomalous-dispersion regime (λ λD), β2 is negative, and the fiber can support optical solitons. In standard silica fibers, β2 50 ps2/km in the visi- ble region but becomes close to  20 ps2/km near wavelengths 1 5 µm, the change in sign occurring in the vicinity of 1.3 µm. 2.3.2 Higher-Order Nonlinear Effects Although the propagation equation (2.3.27) has been successful in explaining a large number of nonlinear effects, it may need modification depending on the experimental conditions. For example, Eq. (2.3.27) does not include the effects of stimulated inelastic scattering such as SRS and SBS (see Section 1.3.2). If peak power of the incident pulse is above a threshold level, both SRS and SBS can transfer energy from the pulse to a new pulse, which may propagate in the same or the opposite direction. The two pulses interact with each other through the Raman or Brillouin gain and XPM. A similar situation occurs when two or more pulses at different wavelengths (separated by more than individual spectral widths) are incident on the fiber. Simultaneous propagation of multi- ple pulses is governed by a set of equations similar to Eq. (2.3.27), modified suitably to include the contributions of XPM and the Raman or Brillouin gain. Equation (2.3.27) should also be modified for ultrashort optical pulses whose width is close to or 1 ps [12]–[22]. The spectral width of such pulses becomes large enough that several approximations made in the deriva- tion of Eq. (2.3.27) become questionable. The most important limitation turns out to be the neglect of the Raman effect. For pulses with a wide spectrum ( 0 1 THz), the Raman gain can amplify the low-frequency components of a pulse by transferring energy from the high-frequency components of the same pulse. This phenomenon is called intrapulse Raman scattering. As a result of it, the pulse spectrum shifts toward the low-frequency (red) side as the pulse propagates inside the fiber, a phenomenon referred to as the self-frequency shift [12]. The physical origin of this effect is related to the delayed nature of the Raman (vibrational) response [13]. Mathematically, Eq. (2.3.6) cannot be used in the derivation of Eq. (2.3.27); one must use the general form of the nonlinear polarization given in Eq. (2.1.10). For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor
  16. 16. 46 Pulse Propagation in Fibers The starting point is again the wave equation (2.3.1). Equation (2.1.10) de- scribes a wide variety of third-order nonlinear effects, and not all of them are relevant to our discussion. For example, nonlinear phenomena such as third- harmonic generation and four-wave mixing are unlikely to occur unless an appropriate phase-matching condition is satisfied (see Chapter 10). Nonres- onant, incoherent (intensity-dependent) nonlinear effects can be included by assuming the following functional form for the third-order susceptibility [17]: where R´tµ is the nonlinear response function normalized in a manner similar to the delta function, i.e., Ê ∞  ∞ R´tµdt 1. By substituting Eq. (2.3.30) in Eq. (2.1.10) the nonlinear polarization is given by where it is assumed that the electric field and the induced polarization vectors point along the same direction. The upper limit of integration in Eq. (2.3.31) extends only up to t because the response function R´t  t1µ must be zero for t1 t to ensure causality. The analysis of Section 2.3.1 can still be used by working in the frequency domain. Using Eqs. (2.3.2)–(2.3.4), ˜E is found to satisfy [18] where ˜R´ωµ is the Fourier transform of R´tµ. As before, one can treat the terms on the right-hand side as a small perturbation and first obtain the modal distri- bution by neglecting them. The effect of perturbation terms is to change the propagation constant for the fundamental mode by ∆β as in Eq. (2.3.19) but with a different expression for ∆β. One can then define the slowly varying am- plitude A´z tµ as in Eq. (2.3.21) and obtain, after some algebra, the following equation for pulse evolution inside a single-mode fiber [18]: For Evaluation Only. Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 - 2007 Edited by Foxit PDF Editor