Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Performance management

960 views

Published on

Performance Management in the Public Sector

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Performance management

  1. 1. Performance Management Introduction to Public Administration
  2. 2. Introduction • Approaches to Public Administration: • New Public Management – trend that surfaced in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand during the 1990s that had significant influence on the Clinton Administration’s market-based, customer-focused, quality-driven reinvention effort. • Notice how this matches with what we discussed before with regard to NPM • Values: • Concern with outcomes/outputs, not behavior • Outcomes success measured by policy analysis • Decision Making: • Very business like • Results oriented (GPRA) • Stakeholders • Customer focus • Outsourcing (non-profit) • Efficiency • Purpose: • Maximize the ability to act like firms. • Serve customers. • Borrows heavily from business practices. • National Performance Review (Al Gore) • Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector by David Osbourne and Ted Gaebler. • Organizational Structure: • More flat, less hierarchical • For example: Total Quality Management • View of the Individual: • Customer • Served not processed
  3. 3. GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY
  4. 4. The Results Oriented Approach • The focus would shift from inputs to outputs: • Results oriented – government programs that focus on performance in exchange for granting greater discretionary decision-making power to managers. • Scientific management: • Frederick Taylor - “the one best way” • Productivity – measureable relationship between results produced and the resources required for production; quantitative measure of the efficiency of the organization. • Shift to efficiency and effectiveness. • Difficulties: • Not all public programs and projects are not as easily quantifiable as in the private sector (profit/loss). • Easily quantifiable: • Remember “Don’t Mess with Texas?” • Difficult to quantify • Academic achievement • Credit hour production • Student retention • Graduation rates • GPA
  5. 5. The Results Oriented Approach • Improving Productivity • Improving efficiency of organizational and processing procedures • Streamlining • Paperwork reduction • Information communication technology • Information systems • Reducing costs of organizational and processing procedures • Technology has been particularly beneficial in reducing costs for government. • E-government • Computer and statistical packages • Geographic Information Systems – technological software tools that diagram special information visually. • Summary • The focus on productivity resulted in: • Focus on the quality of execution of programs • Less emphasis on the type of policy analysis previously discussed. • A movement called…
  6. 6. REINVENTING GOVERNMENT (OR THE PRODUCTIVITY MOVEMENT)
  7. 7. Reinventing Government: Introduction • Reinventing government – the Clinton-Gore administration initiative based on the 1992 book Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. • The main thrust of the book was to push for business standards to be applied in government: • Customers • Market forces • Customer service • Productivity • Al Gore was fascinated with these ideas and brought these ideas into the Clinton administration. • The appeal: • Politicians liked the idea of “reinventing government” as it served to pose as a motivation to improve government and make it more efficient and effective. • Administrators liked the idea because it replaced externally established goals, decision making, and program evaluation with more discretion to make these decisions internally.
  8. 8. Reinventing Government: GPRA • The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) • Requirements: • Define long-term goals • Setting annual targets derived from goals • Annual reporting of agency performance relative to goals • Creates: • More accountability for managers • Measureable results of performance • A new managerial objective: • Performance management – results-driven decision making that attempts to link goal achievement with budgetary allocations.
  9. 9. Reinventing Government: Customers and Customer Service • Executive Order 12862 (Clinton 1993) and “Customers” • Reinventing government as suggested by the New Public Management had a “customer” focus. • Focus on: • Customer-service standards – explicit standards of service quality published by federal agencies and part of the reinvention of government initiative. • Executive Order 12862 mandated that agencies: • Identify customers • Identify customers’ needs • Identify customers’ satisfaction levels (with services and post service) • Comparison of customer satisfaction with the private sector. • Benchmarking – quality and productivity improvement methodology that examines those organizations (in this case private sector) that are best at performing a certain process or set of processes and then transplanting the methods into one’s own organization. • Problem: • Cost control
  10. 10. Reinventing Government: Agency Improvement Officers • Executive Order 13450 (George W. Bush, 2007) • Sec. 5.Duties of Agency Performance Improvement Officers. • Subject to the direction of the head of the agency, each agency Performance Improvement Officer shall: • (a) supervise the performance management activities of the agency, including: • (i) development of the goals, specific plans, and estimates for which section 3 of this order provides; and • (ii) development of the agency’s strategic plans, annual performance plans, and annual performance reports as required by law; • (b) advise the head of the agency, with respect to a program administered in whole or in part by the agency, whether: • (i) goals proposed for the approval of the head of the agency under section 3(a)(i) of this order are: • (A) sufficiently aggressive toward full achievement of the purposes of the program; and • (B) realistic in light of authority and resources assigned to the specified agency personnel referred to in section 3(a)(ii)(A) of this order with respect to that program; and • (ii) means for measurement of progress toward achievement of the goals are sufficiently rigorous and accurate; • (c) convene the specified agency personnel referred to in section 3(a)(ii)(A) of this order, or appropriate subgroups thereof, regularly throughout each year to: • (i) assess performance of each program administered in whole or in part by the agency; and • (ii) consider means to improve the performance and efficiency of such program; • (d) assist the head of the agency in the development and use within the agency of performance measures in personnel performance appraisals, and, as appropriate, other agency personnel and planning processes; and • (e) report to the head of the agency on the implementation within the agency of the policy set forth in section 1 of this order.
  11. 11. Reinventing Government: GPRA 2: The Empire Strikes Back • Government Performance and Results Modernization Act of 2010 • “…better connecting plans, programs, and performance information.” • Agencies were required to develop five-year strategic plans that were directly related to agency mission statements. • Agency must report results quarterly, rather than annually, with respect to performance information. • Agencies must have annual plans that demonstrate the strategic plan for the fiscal year and how that plan relates to the five-year plan. • The OMB will produce a report on all agency performance that will be submitted with the president’s budget.
  12. 12. Reinventing Government: Evaluating Performance • National Performance Review (National Partnership for Reinventing Government) (1993 – 2001) – a national committee responsible for studying and monitoring strategies to reinvent government. • Focus: • Smaller government: • Reductions-in-force • Elimination of regulations • Customer-service focus • Greater citizen access • E-government • Social media • The Real Results: • Elimination roughly 250 government programs • Elimination of 16,000 pages of regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) • Budget cuts amounting to $137 billion dollars • Reduction of the federal government workforce by 317,000 employees (13%) • The “Results” • 2000 presidential election (Gore vs. Bush) • 60% believed the number of federal employees increased • ~50% were even familiar with reinventing • Gore, who supported NPR, lost.
  13. 13. Reinventing Government • Rewarding Entrepreneurial Spirit • Awards • Sharing of strategies for learning
  14. 14. The New Public Service: Public Administration Pushes Back • The New Public Service – government service based upon the view that democratic theory and definitions of public interest should result from a dialogue and deliberation about shared values. Public servants are motivated by a desire to contribute to society and to respect law, community values, political norms, professional standards, and citizen interests. • Denhardt and Denhardt, The New Public Service • Values: • Democracy • Citizenship • Pride • Administrators who are motivated by a value of public service. • The public interest • Devalues: • Market-driven • Competitive • Customer-focused • Administrators who are motivated by an “entrepreneurial spirit.”
  15. 15. Discussion • Which method, reinventing government or the new public service, do you think is the more advantageous approach to public administration and why? • What are the advantages and disadvantages of a customer-service based approach to public administration? • Is there any advantage or disadvantage to the adoption of business values in public administration?
  16. 16. Topics Not Covered • Politics of Performance Management • Comparing Alternative Performance Management Strategies • Citizen Relationship Management and Electronic Government

×