5. Our Preoccupation
with Design
Reasons
We are visual creatures. We
spend millions of dollars
annually on architecture, visual
arts, home furnishings and
fashion.
5
Web Content as Usability
1 2 3
6. Our Preoccupation
with Design
Reasons
Web development is so abstract
and difficult to communicate that
we latch onto design elements
as the closest things to tangible
objects we can understand and
control.
6
Web Content as Usability
1 2 3
7. Our Preoccupation
with Design
Reasons
The visual aspect of the web is
fun. It’s 16 million crayons and
an unlimited paper supply.
Content production — especially
writing content — is tedious. It’s
work, not play.
7
Web Content as Usability
1 2 3
8. So how do we stop design from
influencing our judgment?
8
Web Content as Usability
10. 30 Questions
In November 2013, Rutgers-Camden was planning for a redesign of its
main site — not for a specific purpose, but because it was “time to
redesign”.
Camden staff members involved in web and digital content were asked
for ideas about what should be accomplished and how to proceed.
10
Web Content as Usability
12. 30 Questions
The consensus was that it was one of the most beautiful and polished
sites ever created for Rutgers, yet nobody was truly happy with it. It
didn’t “feel” right.
To better understand the site and try to identify what needed work,
several staff members participated in the 30 Questions exercise.
12
Web Content as Usability
13. 30 Questions:
How it Works
For each question, start from the
site’s home page and try to find
the information using any search
or navigation tools it offers.
13
Web Content as Usability
14. 30 Questions: Can You Find …
1. The phone number for campus security.
2. A map or directions to the cashier’s office.
3. The login page for the university’s online learning system.
4. Additional admissions requirements for international students.
5. The bookstore (to buy required textbook for freshman English).
14
Web Content as Usability
15. 30 Questions: Can You Find …
6. Information on facilities rental.
7. Campus events for one week from today.
8. Graduate program tuition and fee information.
9. The next deadline for scholarship applications.
10. A list of student organizations, with descriptions, membership
requirements and contact information.
15
Web Content as Usability
16. 30 Questions: Can You Find …
11. The student handbook.
12. Contact information for the IT help desk.
13. The most recent issue of the student newspaper.
14. Child-care services on campus, with hours and rates.
15. The office location, phone number and email address of a biology
professor (pick one before starting).
16
Web Content as Usability
17. 30 Questions: Can You Find …
16. Campus parking guidelines.
17. Information on where to order a transcript.
18. The current continuing education course offerings.
19. Contact information and guidelines for accessibility services.
20. The score from the most recent football/basketball/baseball game.
17
Web Content as Usability
18. 30 Questions: Can You Find …
21. The login page for university email.
22. Information on where to take the SAT.
23. A list, with descriptions, of athletics/PE facilities.
24. The catalog of current courses for the history program.
25. A list of job opportunities on campus for students, with application
instructions.
18
Web Content as Usability
19. 30 Questions: Can You Find …
26. Current library hours.
27. This week’s menu for the dining hall.
28. Current (non-student) job openings on campus.
29. The catalog of current courses for the history program.
30. The university’s online application, with admissions requirements.
19
Web Content as Usability
20. 30 Questions: Record Your Results
First, record your ability to find the information.
✦ Did you discover what you were looking for? How long did it take?
If not, how long did you look before giving up?
✦ How many clicks/searches did it take to get there?
✦ Once you reached your destination, were you able to return easily
to the home page?
20
Web Content as Usability
21. 30 Questions: Record Your Results
Next, record the quality of the information you found.
✦ Was the information complete?
✦ Did it appear to be current and accurate?
✦ Was it easy to understand?
21
Web Content as Usability
22. 30 Questions: Record Your Results
Jot down any incidental details such as obvious accessibility issues,
broken links, content errors or related content that would have been
useful.
22
Web Content as Usability
23. 30 Questions: Get Outside Help
For fresh viewpoints I invited Facebook friends to help with the project.
Each volunteer got five of the questions.
The volunteers ranged in age from mid-20s to nearly 70, and their
experience with the web was equally diverse. None was associated
with Rutgers or familiar with the Camden site.
23
Web Content as Usability
29. 30 Questions: the Findings
Finding for: information on where to take the SAT (3:23)
The participant finally gave up. She reached the admissions site, which
stated only that scores are needed for admission. It provided no
information about taking these tests or links to college testing services.
Finding for: campus parking guidelines (1:41)
It took four clicks to reach this information. The participant wasn’t clear
as to which lots were approved for which drivers. The map was too
small to read.
29
Web Content as Usability
30. 30 Questions: the Findings
Finding for: a map or directions to the cashier’s office (1:04)
It took three clicks to reach the cashier’s page. The participant found
the address but no map or directions.
Finding for: current continuing education course offerings (2:24)
Nothing useful was found on the main site. A search on "Camden
continuing education" led to the Continuing Education site in New
Brunswick. It contained no listings for Camden. The participant
pursued several dead ends.
30
Web Content as Usability
31. 30 Questions: the Findings
Finding for: graduate program tuition and fee information (:51)
Nothing useful was found on the Graduate Admissions page. From the
main menu she found a Net Price Calculator tool, but it takes 10-15
minutes to complete and requires access to various financial
documents she did not have in hand.
Finding for: information on facilities rental or reservations (2:32)
It took five clicks to reach this information on the Events Office page.
To get to this page, the participant passed through the Conference
Services page, described as “useless”.
31
Web Content as Usability
32. 30 Questions: the Findings
Finding for: additional admissions requirements for international
students (1:34)
It took five clicks to reach this information on an Application Process
page. At one point the participant fell into a loop sending her back to
the Apply Now page.
Finding for: the next deadline for scholarship applications (:50)
The information was found in two clicks, but it provided information for
first-year and transfer students only. There was no comprehensive list
and description of scholarships.
32
Web Content as Usability
33. 30 Questions: the Findings
Finding for: the most recent issue of the student newspaper (1:02)
Nothing was found on the main site or under student organizations. A
search on “Camden student newspaper” turned up the Gleaner as the
first result, but it was a dead site. She learned later that the newspaper
had moved to Tumblr and didn’t notify anyone.
Finding for: a list, with descriptions, of athletics/PE facilities (:25)
The participant found the page in four clicks, but it contained no list or
descriptions. The page had an image rotation and a story on the facility
opening dated four years previously.
33
Web Content as Usability
34. 30 Questions: the Findings
Finding for: the catalog of current courses for the history
program (2:13)
It took nine clicks to reach this information. The participant described
the entire Brochures & Catalogs section as “a mess”.
Finding for: this week’s menu for the dining hall (:59)
The page containing menus was three clicks from the home page. The
menus themselves were PDF files buried on the page. No nutrition
information was available.
34
Web Content as Usability
35. 30 Questions: the Findings
Finding for: the login page for university email (2:34)
Nothing of use was found on the main site. A search on "email" turned
up six possibilities in the top seven results with no clear indicator which
system was which. None were ScarletMail.
Finding for: the student handbook (1:37)
Nothing was found on the main site. A search of "Camden student
handbook" turned up only a nursing handbook. Is there no
university/campus general student handbook?
35
Web Content as Usability
36. Dysfunction in your organization
will manifest itself as dysfunction
on your website.
36
Web Content as Usability
37. 30 Questions: Surprise Findings!
Wasted space: an enormous amount of the Camden site’s prime
screen real estate was dedicated to content irrelevant to the tasks:
✦ Civic Engagement
✦ Our Vision
✦ Global Rutgers-Camden
✦ Faculty & Research
✦ Office of the Chancellor
✦ Custom Services for You
37
Web Content as Usability
38. 30 Questions: Surprise Findings!
We discovered two major problems related to the search function:
1. It defaulted to a people search. A visitor had to manually switch the
search type to web search — which took several tries to figure out.
2. The search results page disabled the browser’s Back button. The
only way to get back to the Camden home page was to retype the
URL.
38
Web Content as Usability
40. Adapting 30
Questions
Start with Journalism 101
questions: the 5 W’s and the H:
✦ Who
✦ What
✦ When
✦ Where
✦ Why
✦ How
40
Web Content as Usability
41. Adapting 30 Questions
As you formulate questions, make them task-oriented. Instead of
asking, “Are the operating hours on the site?” try, “How late are you
open tonight?”
41
Web Content as Usability
42. Adapting 30 Questions
Look at comparable sites for ideas. Don’t get hung up focusing solely
on competitors in the immediate area. If the site is for a bakery in
Flagstaff, Arizona, see what the bakeries are doing in Springfield,
Oregon, or Sarasota, Florida.
42
Web Content as Usability
43. Adapting 30 Questions
Ask the people in the know: receptionists, administrative assistants,
interns, problem solvers.
What do they get the most calls, emails, complaints, inquiries about?
43
Web Content as Usability
44. Adapting 30 Questions
If you can interview front-line employees, pull them together in informal
small groups for feedback, away from managers.
Follow up with an alternative research method such as an online
survey.
Extroverts will talk first and dominate groups. Introverts will want to
think first and answer privately in their own time.
44
Web Content as Usability
45. Adapting 30
Questions
If there’s a support email or a
help desk, can you get a
summary of the requests they’ve
fielded in the past month? Six
months?
45
Web Content as Usability
46. Adapting 30 Questions
If you’re working with an existing site, dig deep into Google Analytics
for a clearer idea of who the visitors are and how they behave. A high
bounce rate at an unexpected point may indicate they’re having trouble
with the site.
46
Web Content as Usability
47. Adapting 30
Questions
If you’re working with an existing
WordPress site, the Relevanssi
plugin is helpful because it logs
the search terms used on the
site.
47
Web Content as Usability
48. Adapting 30 Questions
If you want to strengthen your skills in these areas, try auditing an Intro
to News Writing course, which will help you organize facts and identify
holes in information.
An Interviewing course will help you in almost any field where you need
to interact with clients and obtain useful information.
48
Web Content as Usability
50. Adapting 30 Questions
A related presentation from Content Strategy Philly: How to Be Leslie
Knope for Content in a Website Redesign.
Slides
https://www.slideshare.net/nchess/be-the-leslie-knope-for-content-in-a-
website-redesign
Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUUy4zg5b5I
50
Web Content as Usability
If we’re seeing a site for the first time and say this, what we mean is that it’s visually appealing to us. There’s no way in five or 10 seconds of looking at a site that you can make an informed judgment about whether a site is useful, if it has good content and it functions well. What we’re doing is the definition of judging a book by its cover. And we continue to be influenced by visual elements of a site when we’re trying to assess it.
The site’s long-term success depends on whether visitors find it useful, which is driven by the content, not the design. We need to focus on what’s essential to success.
If we had evolved without vision as we know it, would we have fashion? Would it be about how clothing feels, smells and sounds? Would we wear clothing at all? And if we assembled a development team of people who had been blind since birth and told them to create the best site possible, what would they come up with?
We tend to focus on elements such as fonts, colors, image placement, maybe the number of columns, as things we understand and communicate. This is particularly true of our clients.
How many people, given the choice between drawing a picture and writing an essay, would elect to write? The adult coloring book craze suggests that we find a particular pleasure in visuals.
In order to assess a site effectively, we need a way to remove the CSS, images from the equation without physically removing them, which would change the overall experience of the site.
I won’t go into the origin of 30 Questions in this presentation. It evolved from a previous job. I compiled the questions into a single assessment tool for Rutgers in 2013.
When the university decided to redesign, the administrator responsible for the site sought input as to what we should do.
This is what the site looked like at the time.
We agreed that we liked the look, but we didn’t really like the site beyond that and that it didn’t seem useful. Several of us said we never really used the site ourselves.
You can use menus, the search feature, any content on the page that looks promising – whatever the home page has to offer.
The questions cover most of the functions common to most colleges and universities.
When I did this exercise, I used the stopwatch on my phone to keep track of my time and put the information I gathered into a spreadsheet. It took more than 5 1/2 hours to complete.
Is it complete? Is it correct? Is it timely? Is it relevant? Is it easy to understand?
I also kept track of the path I took to get to my destination (assuming I found the information I was looking for).
If you do this, tell them up front this isn’t your work and if they find something to criticize, they should share it freely. Make sure they’re not afraid of hurting your feelings.
The people who completed these tasks didn’t compile the results into a single report because it was never meant to be a formal study, just an assessment tool. But when we met again to compare notes, we found our results were very much alike. I kept my documentation, and the findings presented here are based on that.
We’ll start with how long it took to find things. For myself it ranged from just under six seconds to more than 2 ½ minutes. The longest time recorded was 8 ¼ minutes looking for something before the volunteer gave up.
It’s hard to find guidelines for how long it takes to find information on a site. One resource suggested 15 seconds, another 30 seconds. They all seem to agree that more than a minute is a failure. By that standard we were failing on more than half of the tasks.
This is the tasks measured in clicks or steps to the destination. About 10 percent of the information could be found on or near the home page.
If more than three clicks is considered unacceptable, then the distance to one-third of the content is too far, and another 30 percent of the tasks could not be accomplished at all.
I’ve included a little about 14 tasks that raised the biggest red flags, though I’ll be talking about only one.
The one I’ll talk about is the login page for university email. Back in fall 2013, the university was running many different email systems, of which at least five or six were being used widely enough in Camden that we had to provide links and information. This made linking to a single login impossible. Even the OIT-Camden site had a webmail page that didn’t go directly to a login; it contained an essay describing who should use which system and listed links to each of them.
Rutgers has since phased out the redundant systems. It has now has two: one for students and another for employees.
If this sounds exceptionally dysfunctional, it’s actually pretty typical for higher education. The larger and more decentralized a university is, the more likely it is to have these sorts of problems.
The reason I touched on the email situation is because it illustrates what I call Walker’s Principle, which is: Dysfunction in your organization will manifest itself as dysfunction on your website. It may happen in any number of ways. For instance, if an organization has morale problems leading to high turnover, this will affect its ability to keep web content up to date.
The exercise yielded a number of unexpected discoveries. As you do this exercise, you find the visual elements become almost invisible to you except as they help accomplish a task. Certain areas will “light up” as you visit them over and over again, and others will become dark spots of content of no great relevance. That’s not to say the content is unimportant or should be removed from the site, only that it takes up an amount of screen real estate and prominence that’s not proportional to their overall usefulness.
These may have been the biggest findings of all because they profoundly impacted how all of us interacted with the site and created a frustration level bordering on fury. I implemented workarounds for both these issues on the WordPress sites. The main Camden site (which is in Drupal) adopted them later.
I’d like to say that all of the issues have long since been resolved, but since many of them are problems with a central site in New Brunswick, and not the Camden site, we haven’t been able to fix everything. But we’ve made progress, and the exercise has affected how we think about all our sites.
So, how do you create your own 30 questions? And does it have to be 30? No, it doesn’t, but if you have fewer than about 15 and the site doesn’t have an exceptionally narrow focus, you’re probably shortchanging yourself.
Who are you? What do you offer? When are you open? Where are you located? Why would people be interested in what you have to offer? How do we contact you? These are all examples of basic questions.
Approach the formulation from the user’s point of view.
One of the mistakes universities make regularly is modeling themselves on their neighbors/competitors. Instead of recycling each other’s bad ideas, we need ask, “Who is doing this well and how can we emulate them?”
You want to track down the people who are dealing with customers directly, either face-to-face or by phone or online. Find out from them what the customers have to say, both negative and positive.
If you let management tell you this information, you won’t get the data. You’ll get their assumptions about the data. If they’re the source of the dysfunction, they may also be motivated to keep problems hidden.
I relied heavily on the messages that came in through the OIT-Camden help desk to rebuild its home page around the most common support requests. The most common requests for help were variations on “I lost my password; what do I do?”, so I made sure that information was directly available from the home page.
We found out the school of Arts and Sciences fields many questions about the nursing program. The school set up a page whose sole purpose was to to redirect to the School of Nursing so visitors will have found something useful, even though they’re looking in the wrong place.
These courses aren’t as much about writing as they are about gathering information, finding holes, organizing it and presenting it in a clear and concise way.
Content strategy groups don’t always focus on this topic, but they frequently have useful presentations that can expand your expertise.
If you’re looking for more steps to take beyond the 30 Questions, I highly recommend this talk from Content Strategy Philly. It begins with many of the ideas I’ve presented here and takes them a couple of stages beyond that.
Photo credits:
Eiffel Tower by mrdanielweir, https://www.flickr.com/photos/15134271@N03/8303848410/
License: (CC BY-NC 2.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/
Bird of Paradise by origami_madness, https://www.flickr.com/photos/ahudson/4192149430/in/photolist-7orRYs-dDj2mw-Su6h4v-rgSy83-5RsiAa-fEAKhU-QraomN-7EyuRp-pcswit-parjPw
License: (CC BY-NC 2.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/
Crayola Study by Dion, https://www.flickr.com/photos/noodlenoodle/4759710622/in/photolist-8fAL9f-7Ht1Uk-8fxtMK-7JrXQe-7D6p3R-7D6s98-5qM3te-7YWzsq-7Da5km-55pRrT-7JrX38-2o1qWa-AKGyw-c7Sd49-awq6Fi-obyQgB-6mXtgm-AHjN8S-cUWzqd-nRmLgs-BJwNG-cUXrAs-42KPv-ot1Ziw-c7Ryaw-obxGdC-c7Ro4E-7JrYu2-2HgHzm-2HgH5Q-8mAigP-or1B8A-osLeLt-2Hcopn-osQqQN-ot21JN-2HgJ7h-2HcoPk-zQNnSD-7h285q-rQJj9t-7ztVKm-6JzHui-6mXsAb-c7RrEG-9kTsyQ-c7SFy9-bEuh3v-8mDqnd-akgr8H
License: (CC BY-SA 2.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/