sIFR Vs. Cufón

1,874 views

Published on

Create rich typography on the web with thai font.

Published in: Technology, Design
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,874
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
18
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

sIFR Vs. Cufón

  1. 1. “ Create rich typography on the web with thai font”
  2. 2. sIFR vs. Cufón
  3. 3. sIFR ( Scalable Inman Flash Replacement ) 1. Flash plug-ins required = Flash 2. Compatibility = Yes 3. Ease of use = Medium 4. Speed = Medium 5. Demo Preview = Need to load through a web server. Requirements
  4. 4. sIFR ( Scalable Inman Flash Replacement ) HTML + CSS + JavaScript + Font Source
  5. 5. Cufón 1. Flash plug-ins required = None 2. Compatibility = Yes 3. Ease of use = High 4. Speed = Fast 5. Demo Preview = Loaded from your computer and web server. Requirements
  6. 6. Cufón HTML + CSS + JavaScript + Font Source
  7. 7. “ sIFR Licensing” Under the GNU Free Documentation License. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt
  8. 8. “ Cufón Licensing” Under the MIT license. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License
  9. 9. The official : http://wiki.novemberborn.net/sifr3/ sIFR The official : http://wiki.github.com/sorccu/cufon Cufón
  10. 10. Sample site : sIFR
  11. 11. Cufón Sample site :
  12. 12. Thanks! Presented by DOCMan LaiThai (from LaiThai Team)

×