1.
European Regional Sessions- SWG <br />IFMSA in relation to EMSA<br />Updates and further concrete steps to be followed up on till the August Meeting<br />March9th2011<br /><ul><li>DespinaPolidou (IFMSA Regional Coordinator for Europe) - Facilitator

2.
Agostinho Sousa (PorMSIC)

3.
Anna Potzi (EMSA)

4.
IoanaGoganau (SCOME – D)

5.
Naomi Begemann (IFMSA – The Netherlands)

6.
Sebastian Schmidt (BVMD)

7.
SüleymanYildiz (EMSA)</li></li></ul><li>INTRODUCTION<br /><ul><li>The European Partnership Agreement

8.
Started: April 1st 2007

9.
Expires: March 31st 2012

10.
Main Points

11.
Communication

12.
Professional Partners

13.
Joint Projects and Publications

14.
Meetings</li></li></ul><li>STRENGTHS<br /><ul><li>The two organizations have the similar aims and vision

15.
The document creates a platform to work together

16.
Creation of opportunities of discussion

17.
Work with more organizations (For IFMSA in the Europe and for EMSA in the World)

18.
Different background creates the share of experiences</li></li></ul><li>STRENGTHS<br /><ul><li>Synergies at a local, national and European level to create projects, policy statements and thereby solve problems

19.
Can analyze problems of Europe in detail

20.
Can work together about one problem to create more impact

21.
The participation in the meetings of the officials of the both organizations is important to create new bonds, strengthening of relationships and create new projects </li></li></ul><li>WEAKNESSES<br /><ul><li>Serious problems with the communication between the two organizations

22.
The officials in the agreement don’t work together

23.
Problems in on-line platforms

24.
www.teddybearhospital.org don’t work

25.
The site with the agreement don’t exist</li></li></ul><li>WEAKNESSES<br /><ul><li>The tackling of the same issues and problems creates parallel work

26.
“Conflict” in the calendar between activities like EMS Council and EuRegMe</li></li></ul><li>SOLUTIONS<br /><ul><li>Need to motivate the membersof the both organization to be more active, work more together and communicate efficiently

27.
Need to unite positions in some opinions like medical education, especially in policy towards the European Commission</li></li></ul><li>SOLUTIONS<br /><ul><li>The agreement need to be more specific in some points

28.
Organize logistics and calendar together to don’t create any overlap in the activities

29.
Organize events together

30.
Inviting and motivating to attend each other events</li></li></ul><li>SUGESTIONS<br /><ul><li>The Agreement should last for 5 years and reevaluated every year leaving space for modifications, after the evaluation

31.
To have a functional communication platform between SOLO and RC Europe and other officials and member of the boards of both organizations</li></li></ul><li>SUGESTIONS<br /><ul><li>Delete the points that concern websites

32.
IFMSA and EMSA should communicate the decisions of WHO and CPME to each other

33.
To have more joint projects</li></li></ul><li>European Regional Sessions- SWG <br />IFMSA in relation to EMSA<br />Updates and further concrete steps to be followed up on till the August Meeting<br />March9th2011<br /><ul><li>DespinaPolidou (IFMSA Regional Coordinator for Europe) - Facilitator

34.
Agostinho Sousa (PorMSIC)

35.
Anna Potzi (EMSA)

36.
IoanaGoganau (SCOME – D)

37.
Naomi Begemann (IFMSA – The Netherlands)

38.
Sebastian Schmidt (BVMD)

39.
SüleymanYildiz (EMSA)</li>