1.
Open cross-institutional academic CPD, expectations and value:
a recent example – UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL
19th Annual SEDA Conference 13-14 November 2014, Nottingham
Chrissi Nerantzi
Academic Developer
Manchester Metropolitan University
@chrissinerantzi
Sue Beckingham
Academic Developer
Sheffield Hallam University
@suebecks
artwork by Ellie Livermore

2.
Learning outcomes
• Explore the concept of open academic
Continuous Professional Development (CPD) for
personal and collective growth
• Gain an insight into an open cross-institutional
academic CPD initiative as normalised practice
based on collaborative pedagogies and
developed using social media.
• Invite opportunities for further development of
open cross-institutional CPD and wider
collaboration among institutions

3.
exploring open CPD

4.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
interested in course themes
interested in open course design used
new ideas
professional development for
application
research interest
sharing experiences, learning with and
from others, networking
frequency
frequency
WHY? Reasons for joining #BYOD4L, January 14

5.
Our findings are inline with Bennett (2012)
but...
• we had a wider
range of
practitioners, not
only early adopters,
digital and less-digital
practitioners
• we had participants
from different
institutions Digital Practitioner Framework (Bennett, 2012)
based on Beetham & Sharpe (2010)

6.
Voices
• ecological university (Barnett, 2011)
• personalisation, collaboration, informalisation
(Redecker et al, 2011) but also formalisation of informal
learning
• a new culture of learning and the power of the
collective (Douglas & Seely Brown, 2011)
• a need for a national initiative on cost-effective
teaching when resources are reduced (Gibbs, 2012)
• blending of formal & informal learning (Conole, 2013)
• call to open-up, join-up (European Commission, 2013)
• the danger of monocultures (Weller, 2014)
• lifewide curriculum (Jackson, 2014)

7.
a scalable model
for open cross-institutional CPD?

8.
Starting here?
Or...

9.
BYOD4L: an example from practice

10.
Bring Your Own Device for Learning

11.
What did we want to explore...
Can we create an open
learning ecology that
enables learners to learn
with and from each other
in a supportive
environment using
authentic and inquiry-based
pedagogical
models?
How can we support open
learners effectively to create
the foundations of a vibrant
learning community?
How can we scale
open CPD through
informal cross-institutional
collaboration?

12.
BYOD4L is... mobile
flexible
collaborative
authentic
practice-based
inquiry-based
autonomous
self-organised
self-determined
pick ‘n’ mix
bite-size learning
supported
registration-free
for teachers & students
rewarding achievement
volunteer facilitators
blended
BYOD4Learning
course
MELSIG Book
project
MELSIG Smart
Learning event #3
Nerantzi & Uhlin, 2012; Nerantzi, 2014: Nerantzi, submitted)

13.
5C Framework
(Nerantzi & Beckingham, 2014)
5C linear visualisation
5C non-linear visualisation

14.
some numbers
Jan 14 July 14
organisers 2 2
facilitators 11 16
student facilitators
facilitators home
institutions
9 8
course reviewer 1
institutions 5
open badges lead 1 1
badges reviewer 1 2
critical friend 1 1
artist 1 1

15.
January 2014

16.
extending BYOD4L
through F2F
local engagement

17.
BYOD4L answer garden
1 February 14 http://answergarden.ch/view/80135

18.
Who filled out the survey
voluntarily?
74
66
Outside of UK:
• Australia
• Canada
• Hong Kong
• Jordan
• USA
22 students
51 Professionals
(majority: Academics,
Academic Developers,
Learning Technologists)
Warning! Incomplete picture

19.
We got some ‘well
kitted’ learners who
use a variety of
devices but show
preference towards
smart devices (smart
phones and tablets).
6. How frequently do you use the following
devices for learning and/or teaching?
usage of devices for L & T
Smartphone Tablet Digital camera Camcorder Audio recorder
26%
28%
18%
11%
17%
Total never rarely sometimes regulary No Response
smartphone 75 10 8 12 45 2
tablet 72 3 7 18 44 5
digital camera 71 12 19 21 19 6
camcorder 67 22 20 20 5 10
audio recorder 72 11 24 23 14 5

20.
We got about 50%
digital learners who
were
confident with
social media and
networked learning
and wanted to
learn more about
mobile learning
8. Tick the degree of experience you have in
the following areas.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Total
Open
learning
not experienced
at all
experience
Open
course
organiser
Using social
media for
learning
Networked
learning
Series1
not very experienced experienced
very
experienced
Mobile
learning
No Response
open learning 75 9 20 34 12 2
open course organiser 75 32 27 12 4 2
using social media for learning 75 4 24 34 13 2
networked learning 75 6 17 38 14 2
mobile learning 74 7 28 29 10 3

21.
Individuals were confident,
comfortable and experienced in such
spaces and joined us for CPD
(according to the initial survey).
Question
How can we attract individuals who are
less confident and experienced?

22.
Facilitators as co-learners in a collaborative
open course for teachers and students in
Higher Education
A study of the facilitator experience using qualitative data from survey 100%
January 2014
• The social glue: creating a community of facilitators
using social media
• Facilitators as co-learners
• Tweetchats, more than just chats
• Global offer and time zones challenges
• Making time a challenge for facilitators
(Nerantzi, Middleton & Beckingham, 2014)

23.
positive relationships/social interdependence (Deutsch, 1949)
promotive interaction
trusting
caring
sharing
supporting
community
achieve common goals
Veletsianos (2014, online) talks about “social media as places where some academics express
and experience care.”

24.
July 2014

25.
Design for learning
Nerantzi & Beckingham (2014) based on Nerantzi, Uhlin & Kvarnström (2013)

26.
open to all
5 institutions supporting BYOD4L

27.
the BYOD4L team (July 2014)
16 facilitators
5 institutions
2 peer reviewers
1 artist
Ellie
Livermore, artist

28.
on air hangout
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6nEimzL
ZY4

29.
The collaborative #byod4l poem
In the digital jungle
Reaching out into the chaotic, swirling abyss
Feeling that e-learning can be so hit and miss
I want to avoid device apathy and neglect
But what does it mean to really connect?
So onwards we go
But where, do we know?
Wouldn’t it be great?
If we all started to communicate
Curating a task, can be quite unfamiliar,
belonging in museums, art galleries and similar.
With mobile devices we curate a different way
Sharing resources with scoop it and mendeley
Five brief days, so short and sweet
In Twitter and Google we gathered to meet
Inspired to explore, discuss and create
Minds now expanded; an enlightened state
Knowledge isn’t just facts
Or historical acts
Its cerebral energy we state
When we start to create
But this isn’t the end!
We now each have a valuable PLN to tend
Our #BYOD4L community will continue to grow
Help us reach out to let others know
contributors
1 Sam Illingworth
2 Neil Withnell
3 Ian Guest
4 Peter Reed
5 Carol Haigh
6 Sue Beckingham
The Digital Jungle
by BYOD4Learning is
licensed under aCreative
Commons Attribution-
ShareAlike 4.0
International License.
•Learning about collaborative
learning through collaborating.
•Learning about open educational
resources through making.
•Learning about creative commons
licences through choosing one.

30.
#BYOD4Lchat
code by Martin Hawskey visualisation for BYOD4L by Peter Reed
1 2 3
4 5
1-5

31.
open cross-institutional CPD: further opportunities

32.
January 2015

33.
cross-institutional
#BYOD4L
12 – 16 Jan 15
Is your institution
joining us?

34.
NEW!!!
including student facilitators/mentors

35.
Are you interested in joining us? Still time!

36.
What next?
• Further research linked to the open scalable
cross-institutional CPD model, open badges,
Tweetchats
• Open facilitators’ experiences project (work-in-progress)
• Getting ready for BYOD4L in January 15!!!
• …

37.
special thank yous...
... to all our collaborators, institutions, participants as well
as our very own artist Ellie Livermore.
We thank them all for embracing this project, their
commitment and energy.
BYOD4L would not have been possible without them!!!
... the journey continues...

38.
References
Beetham and Sharpe, (2010), ‘Developing Digital Literacies Framework’, available
fromhttp://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/file/40474958/Literacies%20development%20framework.doc, date accessed 11th April 2014
Bennett, L. (2012) Learning from the early adopters: Web2.0 tools, pedagogic patters and the development of the digital practitioner, Doctoral thesis, University of
Huddersfield.
Cormier, D. (2008) Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum, Innovate. Journal of Online Education, V 4 No 5, Jun-Jul 2008, available at
http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ840362
Deutsch, M. (1949) A theory of cooperation and competition, in: Human Relations, 2, pp. 129-152.
Dougkas, T. & Seely Brown, J. (2011) A new culture of learning. Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change,
Galley, R., Conole, G, Dalziel, J and Ghiglione, E. (2010). Cloudworks as a ‘pedagogical wrapper’ for LAMS sequences: supporting the sharing of ideas across professional
boundaries and facilitating collaborative design, evaluation and critical reflection. LAMS and Learning Design. A. Alexander, J. Dalziel, J. Krajka and R. Kiely. Nicosia,
University of Nicosia Press. 2: pp. 37-50.
Gibbs, G. (2012) Implications of ‘Dimensions of quality’ in a market environment, York: HEA.
Jackson, N. J. (2013) The Concept of Learning Ecologies in N Jackson and G B Cooper (Eds) Lifewide Learning, Education and Personal Development E-Book. Chapter A5
available at http://www.lifewideebook.co.uk/uploads/1/0/8/4/10842717/chapter_a5.pdf [accessed 9 February 2014]
Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., Whitworth, A., Akass, J., Cook, J., Day, P., Ecclesfield, N., Hamilton, T. and Robertson, J. (2010) Learner Generated Contexts: a framework to
support the effective use of technology to support learning, in: Lee, M. J. W. & McLoughlin, C. (eds) Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary
Teaching, IGI Global, pp. 70-84., available at http://knowledgeillusion.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/bookchapterluckin2009learnergeneratedcontexts.pdf [accessed
25 January 2014]
Nerantzi, C. & Uhlin, L. (2012) FISh, available at http://fdol.wordpress.com/design/
Nerantzi, C. (submitted) Conceptions of open learners using FISh, a Problem-Based Learning design, used in a professional development course for teachers in higher
education
Nerantzi, C (2014) A personal journey of discoveries through a DIY open course development for professional development of teachers in Higher Education (invited
paper),Journal of Pedagogic Development, University of Bedfordshire, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp. 42-58 http://www.beds.ac.uk/jpd
Nerantzi, C., Middleton, A. & Beckingham, S. (i2014) Facilitators as co-learners in a collaborative open course for teachers and students in Higher Education, in: Learning in
cyberphysical worlds, eLearning paper, issue No. 39.
Nerantzi, C & Beckingham, S (2014) BYOD4L – Our Magical Open Box to Enhance Individuals’ Learning Ecologies, in: Jackson, N. & Willis, J. (eds.) Lifewide Learning and
Education in Universities and Colleges E-Book, avaialable athttp://www.learninglives.co.uk/e-book.html.
Siemens, G. (2002) "Elearning Course," elearnspace, August 27, 2002, available at http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/elearningcourse.htm [accessed 8 February 2014].
Veletsianos, G. (2013). Learner Experiences with MOOCs and Open Online Learning. Hybrid Pedagogy. Available at http://learnerexperiences.hybridpedagogy.com [accessed6
May 2014]
Wenger, E., White, N. & Smith J. D. (2009) Digital Habitats. Stewarding technology for communities, Portland: CPsquare.