course material

1. Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Essay.
Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Essay. The needs of the pediatric
patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected
assessment findings for each stage. In a 500-750-word paper, examine the needs of a
school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the
following:Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Essay.ORDER A
PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERECompare the physical assessments among school-aged
children. Describe how you would modify assessment techniques to match the age and
developmental stage of the child.Choose a child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old.
Identify the age of the child and describe the typical developmental stages of children that
age.Applying developmental theory based on Erickson, Piaget, or Kohlberg, explain how you
would developmentally assess the child. Include how you would offer explanations during
the assessment, strategies you would use to gain cooperation, and potential findings from
the assessment.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style
Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment
uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar
with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment
to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for
assistance.Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Essay.Developmental
Assessment and the School-Aged Child1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less than
Satisfactory75.00%3Satisfactory79.00%4Good89.00%5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content
25.0 %Comparison of Physical Assessment Among School-Aged ChildrenA comparison of
physical assessments among different school-aged children is omitted.An incomplete
comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized.
How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental
stage of the child is omitted or contains significant inaccuracies.A general comparison of
physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How
assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of
the child is generally described. More information or support is needed for clarity or
accuracy.Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Essay.A comparison of
physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment
techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is
described. Some information is needed for clarity.A detailed comparison of physical
assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment

2. techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is
thoroughly described. Insight is demonstrated into the physical assessment of school age
children.25.0 %Typical Assessment for a Child of a Specific AgeThe typical developmental
stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is not described. The typical developmental stage
of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is summarized. The summary contains significant
inaccuracies for the age of the child. The typical developmental stage of a child between the
ages 5 and 12 is generally described. The description contains some inaccuracies for the age
of the child.The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is
described. The overall description is accurate. Some information is needed for clarity.The
typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is accurately and
thoroughly described. 30.0 %Developmental Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental
Theory (Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg)A child assessment based on a developmental theory is
omitted.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is partially summarized.
Partial strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the
assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are omitted
or are incorrect. There are significant inaccuracies.A child assessment based on a
developmental theory is generally described. General strategies to gain cooperation and for
how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential
findings expected from the assessment are summarized. There are minor inaccuracies.A
child assessment based on a developmental theory is described. Appropriate strategies to
gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are
presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are described. Some
information is needed for clarity.A child assessment based on a developmental theory is
thoroughly described. Well-developed strategies to gain cooperation and for how
explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings
expected from the assessment are all accurate and described in detail.15.0 %Organization
and Effectiveness 5.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall
purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the
development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper.
Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.15.0 %Organization and
Effectiveness 5.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified
by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent
and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable
credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. Developmental
Assessment And The School-Aged Child Essay.The argument presents minimal justification
of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are
credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical
progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing
argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All

3. sources are authoritative.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are
present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is
largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence
structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of
standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format 2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate
style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation
format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is
correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are
virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Format 3.0
%Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of
sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly
documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total
WeightageDevelopmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child Essay.