Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Second Screens - Blending TV and the web

4,257 views

Published on

Second screens bring rich TV interactivity finally into the mainstream. However, there are many pitfalls when implementing great second screen experiences. Foremost the mental and technological gap between program makers and (web) developers needs to be bridged.

Who should you design for? How can we hook into the traditional TV production chain? What works and truly augments the story told on the first screen. What’s a fad? Supported by data that was gathered from over 200 TV shows.

Presented at MOBX Berlin 16th of Movember 2012

Published in: Technology

Second Screens - Blending TV and the web

  1. 1. hendrik@smalltownheroes.be www.smalltownheroes.beHi I am Hendrik, I run a startup called Small Town Heroes
  2. 2. We’re making second screen apps for TV programs and visualize all the realtime data in the live TV show.
  3. 3. Second Screens - Blending TV and the web Hendrik DacquinBut I am here to talk about second screens. And how TV and the web might be blended to create a new visual language.
  4. 4. MY DADThis  is  a  picture  of  my  dad,  my  dad  used  to  be  an  old  school  journalist.  
  5. 5. Heavily  smoking  over  his  typewriter.  True  Mad  Men  style.  He  was  constantly  busy  calling  people,  asking  rough  ques=ons.  I  am  just  assuming  this.
  6. 6. The man was rough on me,
  7. 7.  I  assume  he  was  also  rough  on  poli=cians  and  demeaning  people.  
  8. 8. He  gathered  data  and  hard  evidence  in  order  to  tell  breaking  stories.  Every  week  his  work  was  published,  not  in  the  Huffington  Post  but  in  a  well  regarded  local  newspaper.  Why  I  am  telling  all  this?  Besides  my  fathers  preference  for  Belgian  beers  and  MILFS,  I  share  with  him  the  genes  
  9. 9. HIS GENESthat code for collecting data and telling great stories.
  10. 10. REALLY, HIS GENESI diverted from this genetically predetermined path when I enlisted at the University to study a Medicine and Biology.
  11. 11. Together with my Biology degree and a print-out of my first website I was able to secure a job at Alcatel, a high-tech multinational that marketeditself as "the internet company."
  12. 12. RESEARCHIt was fun time. It was the perfect playground, I worked really hard on new TV experiences and social TV prototypes.
  13. 13. One of the things we learned is that user interface is key.I also made horrible TV interfaces. Our wings of imagination were clipped by sluggish, energy absorbing, closed platforms, running on a80386 processor.
  14. 14. Aka the set-top-box.
  15. 15. True, not as ugly as today’s smart tv’s but still...ugly
  16. 16. BROADCASTERSwapped jobs and went working for a TV broadcaster. First couple of years
  17. 17. SAD PANDAI wasnt happy.
  18. 18. We were Internet geeks hired to reinvent television. Yet, the company housed us not only in a different building but also in a different city.The first two years I worked a new media guy, I never talked to a program maker.
  19. 19. BREAKTHROUGHIn 2010 I got my first meeting with a content guy. Just because we had a similar taste of music and were friends on Last.FM.
  20. 20. "The future of TV won’t be here until people who make TV are in these conversations!" Jacob ShwirtzBroadcasters dont talk to technology people and technology people are not really listening to broadcasters. Sure, theyre is a lot oftechnological innovations by second screen app makers. And there are beautiful designs too. But are they
  21. 21. ARE THEY MISSING THE POINT?not missing the point? Sure...
  22. 22. I can discover recommended content
  23. 23. I can "checkin" to media
  24. 24. I can tweet seamlessly about the show
  25. 25. can have live curated activity streams
  26. 26. can consult rich, related metadata
  27. 27. synced with the stream
  28. 28. over-the-top
  29. 29. integrated with my Xbox
  30. 30. receive auto-generated zee tags
  31. 31. voice controlling my TV. SURE. But.. what do the Broadcasters get?
  32. 32. They get demographic and sentiment information from Social interactions.
  33. 33. A whole technology hype cycle to generate better CRM, instead of better stories.
  34. 34. EYEBALLSSure, Eyeballs are the glue of the TV business but story always go first. You guys are Information architects, so you must know that.
  35. 35. I keep asking to myself. Did these ever have sit-down with the television makers?
  36. 36. Demo FIRST STEPS AND FALSE ALARMSOne of the first second screen projects I worked on was a companion app for TV programs, Zeebox style.
  37. 37. People could check-in, have aggregated activity streams,
  38. 38. FEATURITISconsult rich, related metadata. Usual second screen featuritis. It wasnt a success
  39. 39. SCHIZOPHRENICIt addressed two types of users but neither really well.
  40. 40. FAMILY TV VIEWER#1 The family TV viewers, who really wanted to participate with the show. They were asking questions to the guests, wanted to have an impact on the narrative.
  41. 41. TV CRITIC#2 The over served Social commentators who like to comment and discuss
  42. 42. IT’S NOT ABOUT THISIts not about building a better water-cooler, its about building new stories based on a fundamentally different relationship between viewers andcreators.
  43. 43. "TV isn’t about work, it isn’t about search, it isn’t about finding things and effort - it’s about escape." Jeremy ToemanThe user really is the TV viewer. Who knows this user best is not Nielsen. Its the program makers. So in order to succeed at making greatexperiences for TV well need to take them into the equation.
  44. 44. Thou shall not create secondscreen experiences as an afterthought.
  45. 45. LOOK, SOME TIPS
  46. 46. #1 SIMPLICITYThey need to be simple
  47. 47. TOO DIFFICULT 49
  48. 48. #2 ADD VALUEMust be valuable for all viewers.
  49. 49. CLOSE THE FEEBACK LOOPClose the feedback loop
  50. 50. TOO LOW
  51. 51. #3 SOCIAL IS A FEATURESocial is a feature, not the goal.
  52. 52. #4 EXPLORE EARLYSecond screen elements should be explored at the planning stage,Digital teams and creative teams should be put together.
  53. 53. #5 NO FAIL WHALESIt must be scalable, never fail, just like what wed expect from TV
  54. 54. call to action call to action trailer 1#6 TWIN PEAKS
  55. 55. #7 MAKE MORE MONEYThe business might not be that scalable. we must say NO to the generic poll. Like good TV, it should be tailor made. Who said secondscreen had to be cheap.
  56. 56. #8 BE CREATIVE
  57. 57. #9 must be creative
  58. 58. It must blend with the story told on the first screen
  59. 59. But foremost they must be crafted together with the storytellers, the dreamers. When technology reallyhelped storytellers forward, it was of symbiotic nature.
  60. 60. MY DADBecause  truly,  we  need  to  craM  new  narra=ves.  We  have  to  put  back  storytellers,  like  my  father,  in  front  of  the  viewer
  61. 61. THANK YOU
  62. 62. hendrik@smalltownheroes.be www.smalltownheroes.be @studiomuscle

×