Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Stewart Mercer: Evaluation of primary care integration and transformation in Scotland

83 views

Published on

Integration of health and social care – predicting the quality, costs and consequences 17.4.2018

Published in: Healthcare
  • ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐ This service will write as best as they can. So you do not need to waste the time on rewritings.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Stewart Mercer: Evaluation of primary care integration and transformation in Scotland

  1. 1. Evaluation of primary care integration and transformation in Scotland Stewart Mercer Director of the Scottish School of Primary care Professor of Primary care Research University of Glasgpw Scottish School of Primary Care
  2. 2. “My vision puts primary and community care at the heart of the healthcare system, with highly skilled multidisciplinary teams delivering care both in and out of hours, and a wide range of services that are tailored to each local area. That care will take place in locality clusters, and our primary care professionals will be involved in the strategic planning of our health services. The people who need healthcare will be more empowered and informed than ever, and will take control of their own health. They will be able to directly access the right professional care at the right time, and remain at or near home wherever possible.” Shona Robison, Scottish Parliament, 15 December 2015 Transforming Primary Care “We will transform primary care, delivering a new Community Health Service with a new GP contract, increased GP numbers and new multi-disciplinary community hubs.” SNP Manifesto, May 2016
  3. 3. performance time2016 20252018 transition “old world” “new world” Transforming primary care Transformation and integration of primary care
  4. 4. The need for evaluation and research in the ‘middle ground’…. “NHS professionals and academics all too often work in their individual silos with limited translation of research into practice, and limited evaluation of practice to maximise effectiveness. However, each group has complementary strengths and weaknesses, so collaboration on the right terms can be of great mutual benefit…..” Guthrie B, Gillies J, Calderwood C, Smith G, Mercer S. Developing middle-ground research to support primary care transformation. Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):498-499.
  5. 5. Frontline clinicians and managers Academics Creating interventions and new models of care Normal business for NHS innovators. Strong on feasibility but often don’t draw on strongest existing theory and evidence. Normal business for health services researchers. Strongly based on existing theory and evidence but often inadequate attention paid to feasibility. Evaluating interventions and new models of care Often not focused on from the start, tend to use weaker evaluation designs that have significant risks of bias. Emphasise pre-planned, ‘as strong as possible’ evaluation design to minimise bias. Translating new ideas into practice and ensuring spread and sustainability The experts in real-world implementation but often don’t draw on existing theory and evidence. Often under-estimate the complexity of real-world implementation and many perceive translation to be someone else’s responsibility. Evaluating widespread implementation Often not focused on from the start, tend to use weaker evaluation designs that have significant risk of bias. Have relevant methodological expertise but not commonly engaged in real-world evaluation. REF requirements to demonstrate impact.
  6. 6. Scottish School of Primary Care Evaluation of Primary Care Transformation • The Primary Care Transformation Fund (PCTF) invested £20 million on testing new models of primary care (part of a £60 million fund covering additional aspects of care such as mental health, community pharmacy, and out-of-hours care) starting April 2016 for 2 years • The Scottish School of primary Care (SSPC) is helping to evaluate these new models of primary care (2017 – 2018)
  7. 7. National and Local Levels • The national level evaluation will include the Scottish Governments own theories of change and expectations of impact and own indicators of impact – ongoing work • Detailed evidence of Impact, learning, spread and sustainability will be mainly gathered through a limited number of selected local case studies (‘deep dives’) carried out by SSPC members in different Health Boards or specific themes • Complemented with the available data and evidence from the other sites not selected for detailed case study. In this way, an integrated and detailed sharing of learning will be produced which will be of national as well as local relevance.
  8. 8. Summative Slide from Sanjeev Sridharam with permission Developmental Formative 9
  9. 9. Phase 1: Programme Theory and Expectations of Impact Phase 2: Impacts, Learning, Spread and Sustainability
  10. 10. Phase 1: Intervention Theory and Expectations of Impact: The key questions include: • What are the planned interventions/projects/service developments and how do they build on previous work? • What are the key components of the intervention/project? • Are these likely to change over the life of the intervention? • What are the expected impacts in the short, medium, and long-term? • How do the stakeholders think these impacts are going to be achieved? • What is the evidence to support this? • Who are the key stakeholders in terms of future sustainability and spread and what evaluation information do they require?
  11. 11. Phase 2: Impacts, Learning, Spread and Sustainability The key questions include: • What impact(s) has the intervention/project/programme had, in relation to the expected impacts to date? • Has the intervention, and the expected impacts changed over time? • Have there been any unintended negative consequences? • What is the key learning that needs to be shared? • Which interventions seem worth scaling up and spreading? • How easily can these be implemented? • How sustainable are these likely to be in the long-term?
  12. 12. Evaluation of New Models of Primary Care Inverclyde Case Study January 2018
  13. 13. Inverclyde was selected in September 2015 to pilot new models of care, including GP Clusters, ahead of the release of funding to other Scottish NHS Health Board areas in April 2016. The evaluation by SSPC was carried out between 1 October 2016 and 31 March 2017. http://www.sspc.ac.uk/media/media_573766_en.pdf
  14. 14. Findings • The functioning of the GP Clusters (12-18 months later) remains at an early stage. Their intrinsic work in quality improvement is likely to emerge relatively quickly, but their extrinsic role, especially in engagement with the Integrated Joint Boards, may take much longer. • The 6 tests of change conducted to date have generally involved a few GP Practices within or across GP Clusters. There has been limited engagement of the wider primary healthcare team or the public in the choice and design of the tests of change. The potential effects of new models of primary care on health inequalities is unclear.
  15. 15. Key Learning • Healthcare staff require substantial support for data collection, extraction and analysis • The internal role of GP Clusters in relation to improving the quality of care for their combined patient populations requires time to develop new trusting relationships. • Their external role in relation to reorienting the NHS in Scotland towards integrated new models of primary care requires close collaborative working with IJBs. • Early and comprehensive engagement with the wider healthcare team and with service users is of paramount importance in moving forward. It is also important to ensure that the most deprived communities benefit as much as the more affluent.
  16. 16. This type of evaluation is necessary but not sufficient…….
  17. 17. Delivering the Evidence-Base Primary Care Transformation • There is a compelling ongoing need to fill the many ‘evidence-gaps’ in integrated primary care. • There is an important innovative ‘middle-ground’ that sits between the current remit of national research funding bodies and service evaluations. • A focus on this ‘research middle-ground’ – working closely with the NHS and social care partners – could provide evidence within a relatively short time frame to inform primary care transformation and to help realise Realistic Medicine.
  18. 18. Primary Care Evidence SSPC NHSHS HIS ALLIANCENES NSS HSCA (SG) Collaborative members Primary Care Division (SG) Practice Primary Care Evidence Collaborative Primary Care Evidence Framewor k Research Evaluation Improvement Voice of lived experience Workforce Data Comms. and Engagement plan
  19. 19. Primary Care Evidence Collaborative Primary Care Evidence Policy Practice Primary Care Evidence Collaborative Members HSCA Health and Social Care Analysis, Scottish Government SSPC Scottish School of Primary Care NHSHS NHS Health Scotland HIS Healthcare Improvement Scotland (including Scottish Health Council) ALLIANCE Alliance for Health and Social Care Scotland NES NHS Education for Scotland NSS National Services Scotland Primary Care Evidence Triangle
  20. 20. performance time2018 20282023 transition “old world” “new world” Transforming primary care 10 year long-term evaluation SSPC research programme
  21. 21. SSPC Annual Conference 17 May Edinburgh Primary Care Research in an Era of Realistic Medicine • Keynote speaker: Dr Catherine Calderwood, Chief Medical Officer for Scotland.
  22. 22. Thank you

×