GARTNER DISCLOSURE: MQ CRITERIA •
Market Understanding : The ability of a vendor to understand buyers' needs and translate these needs into products and services. A vendor that shows the highest degree of vision listens and understands buyers' wants and needs , which it can shape or enhance with its vision. • Marketing Strategy: A clear, differentiated set of messages positioning statements. consistently communicated throughout the organization and publicized through the Web site, advertising, customer programs and • Sales Strategy: A strategy for selling products that uses the appropriate network of direct and indirect sales, marketing, service and communication affiliates to extend the scope and depth of a vendor's market reach services and customer base. , skills, expertise, technologies, • Offering (Product) Strategy: A vendor's approach to product development and delivery that emphasizes differentiation, functions, methodology and feature set in relation to current and future requirements. • vendor's underlying Business Model: The validity and logic of a business proposition . • Vertical/Industry Strategy: A vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the needs of including vertical industries. market segments , • Innovation: Marshaling of resources, expertise or capital for competitive advantage, investment, consolidation or defense against acquisition. • Geographic Strategy: A vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the needs of regions outside of the vendor's "home" or native area , directly or through partners, channels and subsidiaries, as appropriate for that region and market.
Lots of ideas online Personally,
though I’m not a lawyer or legal expert, I think it’s unlikely that ZL can win its case. In one recent case in which securities rating agencies’ opinions relating to the subprime mortgage crisis were found not to be protected by the First Amendment, there were some different circumstances, such as one judge’s opinion that plaintiffs had sufficiently proven ratings agencies did not sincerely believe their own statements had basis in fact. The lawsuit between ZL and Gartner, on the other hand, seems to come down to the weight given to sales and marketing strength over technical product specifications rather than Gartner’s sincerity. ZL’s complaint appears to be a little different than the usual pay-to-play complaint. ... The legal paperwork implies that ZL paid (although that is not clear), got to play, and didn’t like the way the game turned out. ZL supposedly got marked down because of poor sales and marketing. ... I would say Gartner got that right. The central problem with ZL Technologies and their placement in the Gartner Magic Quadrant is that ZL has, after 10 years, been unable to scale their business to match the competition. While the ZL Technologies products may have superior features and capabilities, and the market leaders may have all of the deficiencies cited in ZL’s legal filings, the fact remains ZL Technologies remains an extremely small player in a market dominated by huge technology companies.
Validating the Hypothesis • Methodology
– Quantitative-esque and Qualitative • Content Analysis – Reviewed Gartner MQ Criteria – Reviewed 6 Final Gartner MQ’s – Reviewed previous 11 MQ submissions and thought a little about the eventual placement or inclusion • 4 Products • 5 MQ Segments – Reviewed 4 hype cycles for market maturity and requirements coverage • Analyzed online brand and marketing of 2 samples from email archiving and Integration service providers
The Marketing & Brand MQ
Impact Scale Relative scale for determining placement of a organization in a given MQ via online content, social inputs, historical Gartner documents and seemingly magical Hubspot marketing tools. Marketing Value + Arbitrary Brand Value = MQ Impact Score
Arbitrary Brand Inputs • General
online brand image – Social presence, blog and delicious links • Web site usability • Messaging and positioning • Four participants in the arbitrary sample – varied levels of participation: – @emmyeg: Female, Age 31, Luddite-ish – Hadrian: Male, Age 2, Digs cool colors – Prescott: Male, Age 4, More flash is always better – @spatially: Male, Age 37, product guy, dad