Sourajit Aiyer - Financial Express Bangladesh - How India handled the slowdown, Mar 2014
VOL 21 NO 125 REGD NO DA 1589 | Dhaka, Tuesday, March 18 2014
New Search Old Search Google Search
VIEWS & REVIEWS
How Corporate India handled the economic slowdown
The current economic slowdown in India is not just an aftereffect of the financial crisis of 2007. A lot
is written of how China and India received only minor bruises from that crisis due to certain structural
patterns in which they had opened up their economies in the last two decades. Conversely, many
advanced economies caught a cold when America sneezed. But the Indian growth chart does not show
minor bruises. It shows deeper cuts. The financial crisis had actually coincided with another severe
crisis in India - an utter failure of governance implementation. The combined effects of the two crises
are visible, and the global community is debating whether the India story is over.
But there is always something to learn from every adversity. The slowdown shook up the way India
Inc. managed its businesses. It made companies develop better strategies to attract clients, bring in
best practices, cut the flab, be adaptable and enhance their business models from the earlier golden
days. Not everyone succeeded, but many have. It is easy for companies to capture volume during good
times, but only the better-managed ones could capture market share during tough times. In short, the
economic slowdown brought to forth the better-managed, quality companies - sorted the pearls from
the froth. So how did Corporate India navigate the slowdown? Some attributes emerge from the way
the better-managed ones conducted their business in these recent years:
Delivering a specific value: If every firm offers the exact same thing, then there is nothing to
remember one specific company by. Creating a value proposition gives clients a reason. It addresses a
specific area for clients, something extra over and above the normal. "What is it we bring to the table
that others do not?" is the question the better-run companies addressed. This created a branding, and
branding created recall. That is a significant intangible asset the successful firms enjoy. It increased
the chances of clients sticking with that company in the long-run. It is also believed that such sticky
relationships continue even after the crisis is over, and that stickiest relationships typically contribute
to the maximum proportion of sales. When volumes shrank as during the slowdown, the value
proposition helped gain market share. Delivering a value proposition holds for B2B (business to
business) businesses, but is even more critical in B2C (business to consumer) where the client base is
generally more fragmented and less bound by long-term sales contracts.
Balancing cost rationalization: Cost-cutting was one way to remain afloat, done with an intention to
increase productivity by cutting unrequired flab. Process-mapping of various operations was essential
to ensure that the basic and optimal resource level was not compromised upon, since that would
negatively impact productivity. That helped ensure the companies did not give up those resources that
would actually help it gain business. But companies also had to invest into creating growth, since doing
Posted : 18 Mar, 2014 00:00:00 A A- A+
Sourajit Aiyer from Mumbai
Page 1 of 4How Corporate India handled the economic slowdown | VIEWS & REVIEWS | Finan...
things in the earlier status quo would not take them anywhere. Investing into sales-creating avenues
was inevitable. Better-managed companies invested into areas that helped them gain visibility and top-
of-mind recall from clients, reduced turnaround times for service delivery and enhanced the delivery
experience, reduced overheads in operations and hired experienced talent to guide the company. In
short, create operating efficiencies and a launch-pad to grow from as recovery occurred.
Adaptable to address purchasing power capabilities: Companies earned sales ahead of others by being
adaptable to address the changes in the purchasing power of clients. Tough economic times impacted
the client's propensity to spend, since incomes are often stagnant together with a climate of inflation.
Clients still wanted the product or service, but perceived the earlier price on the higher end now. This
impacted their willingness to purchase. Companies reduced the quantum (and packaging) to make the
price-point more affordable to clients, and hence still win sales in a tough climate. In services segment,
it would necessitate unbundling of services into smaller components and assign separate pricing.
Profitability, ahead of profits: During tough times, there is only that much the industry can do to
increase the depressed volumes. Capturing market share within depressed volumes can often take
time, and time meant possible bleeding every quarter-end. Absolute profits can be impacted by lower
business volumes and proportion of irreplaceable fixed costs. Also, accumulated losses and continued
capital calls hampered the growth plans of some companies, especially where the ability to raise that
capital in-house was limited. This included over-leveraged companies, many of whom struggled to
meet obligations leading to asset quality concerns in certain banks. Hence, maintaining profitability was
a way to navigate the rough seas by serving as a yardstick to ensure results were still within some
acceptable limits. Maintaining profitability was a fine balance and a tough task, but many better-
performers companies were those who delivered consistent profit margins across the cycle.
Investing into new markets for both sales and production: The financial crisis gripped the USA and
west Europe, traditional export destinations for India. The recent years necessitated Indian companies
(in both manufacturing and services segments) to send out prospect teams and invest into road-shows
into new markets. It meant going where the 'new money' was, and 'new money' was growing in China,
Middle East, South East Asia and larger Latin American countries in recent years. But they came with
their own cultural challenges. Companies had to understand the nuances in which they did business.
Many Indian companies still made significant inroads into new geographies - intention being both to
gain export markets and to set up production facilities for global sourcing. It meant hiring foreign
managers and training domestic managers who could then take over those operations. These
expansions have not been restricted in terms of sectors, but have been visible across sectors.
Staying focused, instead of going beyond core competencies: A hallmark of successful players has been
to focus on few segments where it could build specialisation, rather than too many segments where it
might not be able to build competency. It was better to be Master of few, rather than Jack of all. Being
big might help enjoy economies of scale and spread common costs. But it may not always turn out to
be the best strategy, since size often created failure to ensure every segment is run in the best
manner. Every company could not always be best in everything, and clients had become increasingly
demanding post-2007. They wanted the best service and would switch their loyalty rather than
compromise if service-level fell. Companies which focused in few areas and went into them in depth to
ensure the best proposition for clients often ended up more successful.
Corporate governance to enhance capital-raising sources: Corporate governance became table-stay, be
it when foreign partners are looking to source or invest and moreover during capital infusion. With the
ability of some banks to lend impacted due to asset quality stress combined with a depressed IPO
(initial public offering) market, private equity emerged as an alternate source of growth capital. But PE
(private equity) funds had strict standards of corporate governance, be it in financial reporting,
Page 2 of 4How Corporate India handled the economic slowdown | VIEWS & REVIEWS | Finan...
external directors, etc. Corporate governance came at a cost. But it also brought reputation and
dependability of those companies as far as raising capital was concerned, and capital was needed by
many companies to achieve their next level of growth.
In conclusion, these are few attributes of the better-managed Indian companies that emerge from the
observations of the current economic slowdown. For global players looking to source, invest or partner
with Corporate India, these attributes might help identify the quality ones.
The writer works with a leading capital markets company in India. Views expressed are entirely
personal and do not represent those of any entity.
MORE FROM THIS SECTION
■ Electricity tariff increase: Impact on residential use
■ How Corporate India handled the economic slowdown
■ Parliament session resumes in the afternoon
■ BNP to besiege DC offices Thursday
■ 13 die in Afghan suicide bomb attack
■ 1 dies in Dhaka road crash
■ Peaceful hartal in Chuadanga's Damurhuda
■ 3 killed in 'shootout' with Rab
■ Cops' rubber bullets hurt 10 in Sirajganj
■ Asian shares up after Wall Street rally
Home About Us Contact Us Editor's Panel Web Mail Feedback
Print Version Ad Price
0 0 0 0 0 New
Page 3 of 4How Corporate India handled the economic slowdown | VIEWS & REVIEWS | Finan...