Sourajit Aiyer - Dhaka Tribune - The Audacity of Hope - Aug 2014
Seeing the recent events across some of the Muslim countries during this holy month and imagining how these events might
impact their future, one is tempted to use the phrase of Barack Obama – “the audacity of hope” (made famous during his
Boston Convention speech in 2004).
It is said humans remember good things. But more humans remember the bad things, and recent events made this
Ramadan memorable for the wrong reasons. It might be opportune to see if one can hope for their future to be better than
their present and how so – ie hoping if the next Ramadan might be a better memory.
In the Israel-Palestine conflict, or rather the Israel-Hamas conflict, the common man in Gaza paid a price as Israel and
Hamas tossed the ping-pong on who started it – Hamas for firing rockets, or Israel for its Gaza blockade and not releasing
Israel justified with its right to defend itself. Hamas alleged that Israel’s exit from Gaza in 2005 under Ariel Sharon was a
practical sham, as Israel still maintained restrictions around Gaza’s borders.
To this Israel cited examples of weapon-smuggling tunnels, or IDF apprehending a Gaza-bound Iranian ship carrying
missiles as evidence of Hamas’s murkier objective. All is not well within Palestine either.
Internal bickering, with a violent confrontation between Fatah and Hamas in 2007, left them “divided” by Palestinians
themselves – Hamas in Gaza and Fatah (and Palestine Authority) in West Bank.
today's paper >> special >> published: 04:04 august 4, 2014>> updated : 16:15 august 9, 2014
The audacity of hope
Making the next Ramadan much more memorable for the Muslim world. This is the first part
which concentrates mainly on Palestine. The concluding part will be published tomorrow
In the Israel-Palestine conflict, or rather the Israel-Hamas conflict, the common man in Gaza paid a price as Israel and Hamas tossed the ping-pong
on who started it
Page 1 of 4The audacity of hope | Dhaka Tribune
Where does this leave Gaza’s common man? The lives of Palestinians in West Bank might not be perfect (be it in Area A, B
or C) due to limited jobs, education and movement difficulties. However, violence has been relatively lower in West Bank
Salman Fayyad as prime minister (though his appointment by Mahmoud Abbas was debatable) won kudos due to his focus
on economics, infrastructure and building institutions for governance.
While Israel is partly to blame for its offensive against Gaza’s innocents, somewhere Hamas’ way of working also seems a
reason aggravating violence which made basic survival for Gaza’s residents difficult.
At least the Palestinians in West Bank do not live in constant fear for daily survival. The Muslim world may not agree and
may defend Hamas, but the current conflict seems more to do with Hamas, rather than Palestine.
After Hamas fought Fatah and seized control of Gaza in 2007, it was not just Israel that upped its ante. Even Egypt closed its
Rafah-border at various times since 2007 as secret tunnels smuggling weapons were discovered, except during when
Hamas’ ally, the Muslim Brotherhood, ruled Egypt.
It is alleged that Hamas still does not see eye-to-eye on many aspects with Fatah (and Palestine Authority), and doubts
persist on who is Palestine’s legitimate leader.
How does one make the next Ramadan a better memory for Palestinians? I have no right or authority to opine on the
posturing of Hamas or IDF. Each side has its rationale for its actions. But it is high time the common-people of Gaza decide
what is good for their future.
They need to resolve their own internal politics first. Either they see a progressive future under Hamas which won the 2007
elections (the years from 2007 to 2014 should give some idea, especially after Israel eased its blockade for non-military
goods in 2010).
Otherwise, if they want to relocate to West Bank, then the authorities should facilitate it. However, allegations surfaced that
Hamas forbid residents from fleeing Gaza, effectively putting them in the path of death.
While images of corpses would be excellent public-relations for Hamas to defend its ideology and elicit sympathy, it would be
sheer injustice on the very people they are supposed to govern.
This does not paint a positive picture of Hamas – and Hamas might be as much to blame as Israel for the current suffering of
Gaza’s innocents. Such a comment on Hamas sounds controversial and the Muslim world may not agree.
However, incidents since 2007 do put question marks on Hamas’ intentions. Allegations that Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’
Palestinian Prime Minister, made a fortune taking 20% unofficial tax on goods coming through Rafah’s secret tunnels and
built palatial homes for himself and his thirteen children around Rimal area, tarnishing Hamas’s intentions to govern in a
proper, institutionalised manner.
Palestinians need to put their own house in order and stabilise Fatah-Hamas relations, or else its internal politics would be
disastrous. As the whole world rightly sympathises with Gaza, sympathisers need to decide if their sympathy is for Hamas, or
for Gaza’s common people or for Gaza’s identity within a united Palestine (which the Hamas-Fatah bickering is
Even amongst regional powers, Gaza seems just a pawn. As per media reports, Iran and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood are
alleged to support Hamas, while Saudi Arabia seems opposed as it remains watchful of its rival – Iran.
Even oil-rich Qatar finds itself in this tussle for influence over Hamas, as it tries to garner a bigger role in regional politics as a
key mediator. Hamas’ Khaled Mashaal is already in residence in Doha.
Next, an equally critical aspect is enhancing economic opportunities for Palestinian people so that their quality of life
improves. Most Palestinians are uneducated and unskilled, and capable only for blue-collar jobs.
Many are shop assistants in handicraft/garment/trinket/food stalls, as per Christian pilgrim tourists who visit the historical
towns of Bethlehem, Hebron and Jericho in southern West Bank.
The world should understand that, despite all their sympathies, till the time all Palestinians are able to access secondary,
university or vocational education, they will never progress. They will remain economically backward and may be susceptible
to radical groups due to the lack of adequate education and income opportunities.
The only way out is if they get access to education and better jobs. One solution is night schools for working adults, as it can
make them capable for higher paying work by developing skills related to communication, arithmetic and vocations.
Page 2 of 4The audacity of hope | Dhaka Tribune
College enrolment for the students through scholarships to universities abroad is another alternative. This would make them
capable for a higher level of work than their parents – albeit in other countries for now, until opportunities pick up in
Even then, remittance from foreign workers can be a key source of revenue – case in point being Bangladesh, India,
Philippines and Pakistan. Its neighbours can offer practical support. India itself has been a destination for university students
from many conflict-ridden Asian and African countries, including Palestinian students.
A criticism to these suggestions is that even if Palestinians become capable for better jobs or set up own businesses, Israeli
control over West Bank’s Area A, B and C means opportunities for Palestinian commerce to flow freely would be severely
However, a practical guess is that any effort towards economic development might be welcomed by all concerned, as this
would mean gainful employment for Palestinians and steady income for its government. This would make its establishment
more stable and less susceptible to internal disturbances and regional influences.
Such a situation might be encouraged by the world, including Israel, as it would make the region more peaceful. Economics
and commerce is often the best solution, and can achieve what politics and military cannot!
Moving to economic opportunities for the government itself, income opportunities for Palestine are few. Tax receipts from
Israel have been a key source – ie custom duties on Palestine-bound imports into Israel and taxes from Palestinians who
work in Israel.
But this is susceptible to sanctions, which depends on incidents of violence. Ismail Haniyeh had in the past ignored such
sanctions, which raises questions if Hamas had illegitimate income due to which the loss of tax income did not matter to him.
This again raises doubts on Hamas’ intentions to govern properly. Another vital source of income for Palestine is foreign aid.
According to Global Humanitarian Assistance, Palestine was amongst the top five recipients of global aid in 2011, along with
Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia and Ethiopia.
In fact, the Muslim world is partly to blame for Palestine’s plight here. Despite their sympathy due to the religion factor, actual
aid from Muslim countries has been far less than Western nations.
For instance, during the 2007 Donor Conference in Paris, Europe led with over 50% of the pledges, and USA-Canada about
11%. The Arab countries together made 20% of the pledges. Even if the West acted due to its own selfish interests, it is also
true that many Arab nations in the GCC are enormously prosperous on a “per capita basis” due to their oil spoils.
Higher commitments from them would show their solidarity for Palestine in more practical terms. Higher assistance to
development projects can win goodwill, in the same way US assistance to Egypt is believed to have helped normalise Israel-
Egypt relations in 1979.
Lastly, Israel needs to concentrate more on the Palestinians in Israel-Proper. The Palestinian cause has often centred
around those in the Occupied Territories and abroad, and the Palestinians in Israel remained neglected.
They make up 20% of Israel’s population, but still remain marginalised. It might be in Israel’s interests to assimilate them
even more inclusively within their society – be it in schools, colleges, markets, offices, etc.
This might help improve their standard of living and well-being, and “content people make peaceful nations!” Jews have a
paranoia that their community is reducing, while Palestinians have a higher reproduction rate (common in poverty-stricken
communities globally where families earn lower income with inadequate healthcare, hence an ill-placed perception that larger
families mean more working hands).
However, as families grow prosperous and expenses increase to maintain higher standard of living, education tuition,
medical care, etc, the family size reduces due to affordability concerns.
One hopes the experience of Palestinians in Israel might be the same if they do become prosperous, and this might help
quell the fear of population numbers that Jews have. It would also create an incentive for Palestinians and Jews to regard
each other with lesser hostility. In conclusion, one cannot say if the One-State or Two-State dilemma for Israel-Palestine will
ever be resolved. Tenders for Jewish housing development in West Bank settlements have increased in Benjamin
Netanyahu’s current term, as compared to his earlier term or those of Sharon and Olmert earlier.
But seeing the Israel-Hamas events, it must be understood that improvement in education and income opportunities as well
as resolution of internal politics is absolutely imperative for Palestine to avoid unrest and make their future brighter.
Just sympathies will not do. Otherwise, they continue to stare at a bleak future, and some might become easy poaching for
radical groups in case such groups are the only avenue offering them a source of income.
Page 3 of 4The audacity of hope | Dhaka Tribune
Continued from Part 1
Amongst other Arab-Muslim nations, Egypt, Iraq, Libya and Syria continue to struggle in the post-Arab Spring world. It is a
tragedy tearing the legacies of historical cities like Damascus, Aleppo, Cairo and Baghdad to tatters.
In Syria, Bashar Assad starting his third term means the conflict would continue until a ceasefire is announced or till the
rebels (and their foreign backers) drop their guns. Foreign aid is the only way for any normalcy ahead, given the abject
destruction to homes, basic facilities and normal economic life.
In Libya, opposing forces across Tripoli, Sirte and Benghazi continue to battle. Weapons have found their way to the hands
of civilians, creating continued lawlessness. Some years back, Lebanon addressed its issue of civilian weapons with a
scheme to replace them with free mobile phones.
But mobiles were a novelty then, not so much now. Libya needs to take weapons out of civilian hands and take the people
out of its cities’ battlefields by employing them, maybe in oil or infrastructure projects. Till then, Libya would burn.
In Iraq, while Shia-Sunni sectarianism was always a thorn for Nouri Maliki, recent weeks saw it worsen. ISIS, the Salafi/Sunni
today's paper >> special >> published: 00:04 august 5, 2014>> updated : 21:06 august 5, 2014
The audacity of hope
Making the next Ramadan much more memorable for the Muslim world. This is the
concluding part focusing on the other unstable Muslim majority countries
Areas in the Middle East and North Africa that are facing severe instability
Page 1 of 4The audacity of hope | Dhaka Tribune
group, increased its hold across areas of Nineveh and Anbar, including key towns like Mosul and Fallujah.
Anbar has strategic importance, as the province borders Jordan and a vital access route. The future holds a long-drawn-out
offensive. But with western armies weakened by years of fighting, mediation by regional Middle East biggies might hold some
weight instead for Iraq’s future – especially those who have sway over Salafi/Wahabbi entities.
Egypt might be the only one out of these four which can hope for a better Ramadan next time. After tumultuous years of civil
disturbance as Hosni Mubarak’s regime and Muslim Brotherhood’s Islamist government were ousted, Abdel Fattah might
provide some stability.
Tensions remain, given the depth of Muslim Brotherhood’s penetration into villages through its network of social services
built over a few decades. With an over-80-million population, Egypt is a sizable middle-income consumer market.
A stable government would put Egypt back on the road to development (albeit with some foreign assistance into projects). It
was seeing economic and income opportunities for its youth, if commercial developments like Smart Village near October 6
City/Giza are any indication. Economic revival from here on should spell a better Ramadan for Egypt next time.
Amongst non-Arab Muslim nations, Pakistan, Iran, Indonesia and Malaysia need a mention. Malaysia’s case is truly
saddening. Many of its citizens lost their lives in two plane crashes, for no fault of their own.
The first crash remains a mystery. In the second, Malaysians still ask why they got caught in the Ukraine situation. Given the
nature of the incidents, its citizens did not even get a dignified death.
While the memories of the lost ones would plague its next Ramadan, one hopes a swift conclusion to the investigations and
apprehending of the actual culprits might offer some justice. Iran and Indonesia can look forward to some positivity.
A furniture exporter turned city-mayor, Joko Widodo just became Indonesia’s President. It is the first time that someone
outside the military or elite won the top office. His grassroots style of functioning by going within the people endeared him to
The result remains a debate due to the legal challenge filed by the opposing contender, former army-man Subianto, on the
election commission. Nevertheless, the world’s largest Muslim nation, and world’s fourth most populous at about 250 million,
can look at its future with optimism after a lackluster second term under President Susilo.
Indonesia’s economic potential is enormous, given its young population and vast natural resources. It has to play a bigger
role among emerging economies, and in ASEAN and G-20. Countries seeking to invest in projects in Indonesia or market
their products to its growing workforce will keep a watch now on Widodo’s upcoming policies and reforms.
Overall, Indonesia spells good news. Iran saw some good news under Hassan Rouhani’s leadership. After undergoing years
of harsh sanctions, 2013-end saw Iran reach an interim deal with six super powers to reduce some of those sanctions in
return for a short-term freeze on some of its nuclear programmes.
The deal unlocked a few billions of relief from sanctions for Iran, an economy that was in dire straits indeed. Though the six-
month deadline for the final deal had to be extended by another four months since the two sides could not agree on certain
aspects despite negotiations ongoing through Ramadan, one hopes that some concessions would be agreed upon
eventually before the November deadline. That may bode better news for Iran in the months ahead.
For Pakistan, its armed operation in North Waziristan could not have come at a worse time. There was criticism that the
government delayed the offensive, but giving peace talks a chance first was also needed.
While it aims to put legislations in place to address the Internally Displaced People (IDP) issue, it should look to build formal
settlement colonies for them. Informal refugee camps are prone to crime and health risks.
Formal colonies might be a durable long-term solution. Such colonies would ensure basic standards of living, housing and
essential services to the IDPs. Of course, it presupposes that they may not want to return to the conflict areas in the near
future, as only then would the government’s investment be worth it.
If the government’s resources are inadequate to fund such colony projects, it may use external assistance. Apart from the
$6bn IMF loan, $12bn World Bank funding, $2bn of Eurobonds, China has also agreed to invest $32bn over the next five
years in energy, transport and infrastructure through its EXIM Bank.
This additional $52bn is estimated to double its existing level of external debt – a worry for repayment. A portion of China’s
infrastructure assistance could be utilised to develop settlement colony projects.
South Asian political expert Christine Fair suggested in an interview related to her book “Fighting to the End, Pakistan Army’s
Way of War” that this offensive was done simply for the country to make a case to continue receiving military assistance and
support cheques from the US.
Page 2 of 4The audacity of hope | Dhaka Tribune
This was based on US Senator Carl Levin’s proviso in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2015 that suggested
making further assistance contingent to an operation in TTP areas.
Pakistan might try allocating some of these US cheques to fund IDP settlement projects. In any case, the time period of
displacement that the IDPs are staring at is questionable.
There is criticism that many insurgents might already have crossed into the Afghan province of Khost before the offensive
started, given the governments’ prior warnings. Those extremists might return to haunt Waziristan.
Or else they might head for other restive regions like Xinjiang, Kashmir, Nuristan or Paktika, in which case Pakistan’s
neighbours should beware. Another aspect is easing IDPs’ movements between provinces.
There were allegations of Sindh restricting entry for IDPs, although it maintained its objective was to scrutinise militants
passing off as IDPs. Another is of assistance to the host communities.
These are the families who play host to the displaced people. They have to share their resources, often meagre, with many
more mouths. At such times, the government should subsidise some essential resources for the hosts.
A challenge is to track the households as they are scattered, unlike in refugee camps. Another is checking if they are
genuine IDPs. Full coverage of IDP registration cards would help, as well as centres in towns where IDPs are headed.
Subsidising resources for host communities might help settle the lives of the IDPs and hosts, and minimise the added
burden. It is essential that Pakistan settles its conflicts in FATA. Much-needed foreign/private investment will flow in only
when its issue of internal security is adequately addressed.
The country has a sizable workforce, intelligent graduates and natural resources, and can achieve much more than its
current track record. Its local industries will have to compete with cheap Chinese imports, as China might want access to
Pakistan’s consumer base in return for its generous assistance.
This might limit opportunities for local Pakistani industries and job creation. Nevertheless, even some addition to economic
activity would be useful, given the gap between its supply of graduates and demand from companies.
Currently, some Pakistani youth seem to find employment in aid agencies or as self-employed contractors. As the US exits
Afghanistan, some aid agencies might opt to shift base to worse hit regions like Ukraine, Syria, etc, thus impacting local jobs.
In short, Pakistan has no choice but to create more jobs, entrepreneurship and revitalise its local industries. Dependence on
US support cheques might keep the government solvent, but it will not create adequate economic opportunities for all its
educated youth, who will continue to struggle to find enough well paying jobs unless economic activity picks up. For this,
achieving sustained internal security would give a definite hope for the future.
In conclusion, the recent experiences of these nine Muslim countries discussed have been a mixed bag during this recent
holy month. Some seem to be on the road for a better tomorrow, while some seem quite far from it.
How the next few months actually turn out is anybody’s guess. The attempt in this article was to list some of those guesses.
Irrespective, the hope remains that the next holy month would be memorable for all the right reasons, and would spell a
better future for “all” the nations even though such a hope might seem audacious now for “some” of these countries.
Sourajit Aiyer is a finance professional based in India.
Page 3 of 4The audacity of hope | Dhaka Tribune