Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Low Voltage Power MOSFET_Final

807 views

Published on

  • Settling for less on valentine's? Then you need VigRX pLUS!  https://bit.ly/30G1ZO1
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Low Voltage Power MOSFET_Final

  1. 1. - Jinrong Liu - Somsubhra Ghosh - Ramya Hemant - Yukui Luo Low Voltage Power MOSFET
  2. 2. Overview 1 Trench MOSFET 2 NexFET 3 “Rad-Hard” MOSFET 4 LV Super-Junction 5 Refrences 2
  3. 3. Trench MOSFET 3 -Yukui Luo
  4. 4. History of Trench-MOSFET development • Timeline of Trench-MOSFET 4 … ... 1993 First Trench-MOSFET Siliconix introduces industry-first POWER MOSFETs Base on Trench Technology 2000 Trench-MOSFET version II 2009 TrenchFET Gen III Vishay Develop the TrenchFET Gen III 2015 TrenchFET Gen IV2005 Siliconix becomes a wholly owned subsidiary of Vishay Developing TrenchFET TrenchFET version II 2015 TI NexFET
  5. 5. FOM(Figure of Merit) FOM factors to benchmark MOSFET products FOM = Rds(on) *Qgd 5 [13]
  6. 6. The structure of VDMOS and Trench-MOSFET 6 Fig. VDMOS structure[13] Fig.Trench-MOSFET structure[13]
  7. 7. 7 Pitching current (JFET effect) Thicker N epitaxial layer Higher Breakdown voltage Large Cgd Fig. VDMOS structure[13]
  8. 8. VDMOS-vertical double diffused MOSFET • Improve the current capability of the power MOSFET • Advantage • High breakdown voltage. • Large Current Density. • Disadvantage • JFET effect • Large Cgd 8
  9. 9. Trench-MOSFET • Advantage: • Low Rds(on) As for VDMOS, Rds(on) = R(Source diffusion resistance) + R(Channel resistance) + R(Accumulation resistance) + R(JFET component-resistance) + R(drift region resistance) + R(substrate resistance) + R(wire resistance) Removed JFET implies no R(JFET component-resistance). And it is easy to make cell pitch smaller. • Disadvantage: • Large value of built-in capacitors • Large capacitance from gate-to- drain (Cgd). 9
  10. 10. 10 Cbuild-in Cgd No JFET structure Generate the advantage of VDMOS High Breakdown Voltage Large value of built- in capacitors Large capacitance from gate-to-drain Fig.Trench-MOSFET structure[13]
  11. 11. Trench-MOSFET – Versions 11 Thick oxide[15]Shielding Effect[15]
  12. 12. The latest trench technology - TRENCHFET® GEN IV 12 Latest Trench-MOSFET Vishay TrenchFET Gen IV Package (small to large) Configuration VDS (V) RDS(on) @ 4.5 V (mΩ) Qgd (nC) ID Max. (A) PowerPAIR 3 x 3 N-type DUAL 30 Min 7-Max 13.8 Max 1.8-Min 0.7 30 ThinPower PAK1212-8 N-type SINGLE 30 12 1.6 38.3 PowerPAK1212-8 N-type SINGLE 30 Min 3.1-Max 12.5 Max 4-Min 1.6 20-40 So-8 N-type SINGLE 30 4.4 4 31.3 PowerPaKSo-8 N-type SINGLE 30, 40,60 Min 1.35-Max 13.5 Max 8.6-Min 1.6 20-100 PowerPAIR 6 x 5 skyFET N-type DUAL PLUS INTEGRATED SCHOTTKY 30 Min 1.75-Max 10 Max 5-Min 0.75 16-60 D2PAK(TO-263) N-type SINGLE 60 2.6 7.1 120 TO-220 N-type SINGLE 60 2.8 7.1 120
  13. 13. NexFET 13 -Jinrong Liu
  14. 14. Lateral Double Diffused MOSFET (LDMOS) 14 Fig. Lateral MOSFET structure representing the channel region under very small drain bias voltages[9]
  15. 15. 15 Fig. Lateral MOSFET structure representing the channel region under channel pinch-off conditions and above channel pinch-off conditions[9]
  16. 16. NexFET • Cons • The Trench-FET channel density is very high, leading to low channel resistance. But the direct overlap of gate to drain results in large Cgd, slowing down the switching speed, leading to high switching loss. • Pros • NexFET can reduce parasitic capacitances Cgd and Cgs, while achieving similar specific RDS(ON), like in the Trench-FET technology. 16
  17. 17. The improvement from NexFET • The gate has the minimum overlap with source and drain regions and effectively shielded by the source metal. • Low resistivity polycide gate material – reduced gate resistance. • Thick top reduces the metal resistance and prevents electro-migration effects. • The gate portions are minimized which reduce Cgs and Cgd values. • The field plate introduces a shielding effect which reduces Cgd • Shield effect helps to push the electric field distribution towards the drain sinker. 17 Fig. Schematic cross-section of the first generation NexFET[10]
  18. 18. • The current flow pass through the lateral channel into the substrate. • A heavily-doped drain sinker helps to direct the current flow reach drain. • Vertical current flow makes this device suitable for carrying high current density. • The heavily doped drain sinker region is very helpful to achieve smaller resistance in chip scale parts than conventional VDMOSFET. 18 Fig. Drain Down (right) NexFET Power MOSFETs[11] The Current Flow Of NexFET
  19. 19. Regions to support breakdown • The one is the underneath of the source contact • Another one is along the LDD, N- epitaxial layer and sinker region. 19 Fig. Schematic cross-section of the new low voltage NexFET[12]
  20. 20. • Current flows through the following path, • Source Terminal on the substrate • Vertical Sinker • Metallization layer • N+ Source Region • Forwarded to drain terminal by the LDD region. 20 Fig. Source Down (right) NexFET Power MOSFETs[11]
  21. 21. Stack-Die Technique • Stack-die Power Module Package technique reduces the parasitic inductance and resistance • Structure of Stack-Die: • Integration of high-side (HS) and low- side (LS) transistors. • Thick copper clips • high-current connections such as input and switching node terminals • Substantially reduces the RDS(ON) of the power block. 21 Fig. SEM image of NexFET Power Block[11]
  22. 22. Comparative Simulation – Switch On 22 Trench FET NexFET
  23. 23. 23 Comparative Simulation – Switch Off Trench FET NexFET
  24. 24. “Rad-Hard” MOSFET 24 -Somsubhra Ghosh
  25. 25. Rad-Hard MOSFET Radiation hardened or “Rad-Hard” MOSFETs are enhanced Field Effective Transistors to withstand the effects of Radiation. 25 ©Infinion, 100 Krad TID
  26. 26. Radiation • Terrestrial • Emissions from Nuclear Reactors. • Emissions from Nuclear Core Enrichment process • Fusion reactors. • Extra Terrestrial • Solar radiation. • Primarily Solar Heavy Ion emissions in Van Allen Belts. (~7 MeV - GeV)[1][2]. • Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) • Primarily heavy bursts of protons (~10s of TeV)[2] 26 ©K. Endo, Prof. Yohsuke Kamide
  27. 27. Radiation Effects - Failures • Total Ionizing Dose (TID) • Total amount of radiation energy imparted to the electronic device. • TID CMOS structure vulnerability effects • Change in Threshold Voltage (ΔVth ∝ tox 2) • Sub threshold leakage current. • Single Event Effects (SEE) – device status altering events. • Single Event Upsets (SEU) - Heavy ion induced leakage current turning on the self sustaining parasitic BJT • Single Event Transients (SET) – Reversible transient glitch in combinational logic caused by excessive charge formation • Single Event Gate Rupture (SEGR) – Electrically overstressed gate. 27
  28. 28. Effects of Radiation-on VDMOSFET • Semiconductor Material (Lattice Displacement) • Penetrating heavy ions create ehps in the semiconductor through transfer of energy or Coulomb Scattering[4] and Compton scattering[4]. • Redistribution of Electric field - ‘Funneling Effect’ to maintain charge neutrality easier with higher electron mobility (1350 cm2/V-s)[3]. • Gate MO (Ionization) • Lower hole mobility (~10-4-10-11)[3] • Trapped charges at various energy levels moving towards SiO2-Si interface. • MOSFET Drain is shorted to the base – parasitic transistor is turned on. 28 N- Epi Poly Gate N+ N+P+ N+ P+ P-P-
  29. 29. Effects of Radiation-on P-LDMOSFET • Advantage over VDMOS • Benefits from the same layer position of the Gate, Base and Drain. • Lower gate charge – higher switching frequency (up to 1-2 GHz)[5] • Compatible with TID hardened CMOS fabrication process. 29 P-Epi P+ SiO2 Poly Si LDD N+P+ N+ P-Body Source Gate Drain
  30. 30. TID Effects 30 © A J Womac, “The Characterization of a CMOS Radiation Hardened-by-Design Circuit Technique”
  31. 31. SEB Simulation 31 © M Landowski “Design and modeling of radiation hardened lateral power mosfets”
  32. 32. Radiation Hardening • Hardening process • Hardened by Design (HBD) – provides better cost to performance. -Combines current CMOS intrinsic hardness along with special transistor design technology • Layout Level enhancement Technologies • Circuit Level enhancement Technologies • Hardening by Process (HBP) • Hard reset by watchdog timer • Redundant circuits 32
  33. 33. Layout Level Enhancement – Removal of Edge Leakage Current • Annular gate/Enclosed Gate Transistor • Thin gate MO removes threshold voltage shifts. But due to Ionizing radiation, the positive charge trapping gives rise to various leakage current from drain source. • Also, the presence of gate MO between transistors provides path for intertransistional current that can be eliminated by enclosing the gate with drain or source.[6][7] • Enclosed Source Transistor • Removal of leakage current by removing the edge. • H Gate Transistor • Dog Bone Transistor 33 [8] [6]
  34. 34. Circuit level Enhancement • Redundant circuits • P1 and N1 works as a typical inverter when Vi is ‘high’. And when Vi is ‘low’ the additional circuit output is high, and N1 has a negative VGS. This ensures the transistor is fully turned-off reducing leakage current. 34 [1]
  35. 35. Low Voltage Super-Junction 35 -Ramya Hemant
  36. 36. Super-Junction Technology 36 • Super-Junction • Long P Type Pillars. • Charge balancing mechanism • High Breakdown Voltage
  37. 37. Benefits of Super-Junction • Low RDS(on) and switching loss. • Higher Breakdown Voltage for the same die size due to more distributed electric field. • Faster Switching due to smaller lightly doped region. 37
  38. 38. Low Voltage Super-Junction - Challenges • Resistance of lightly doped region is very small for low voltages. • So, low voltage super junction is not very effective for reducing RDS(ON). 38
  39. 39. Low Voltage Super-Junction – nextPower MOSFET 39 • Combines the benefits of a LMOS with that of a Trench MOS. • Less cell density unlike Trench MOSFET • Low Qg and low QGD, Cout • Better Safe Operating Area. • Low RDS(on). [16]
  40. 40. Low Voltage Super-Junction – nextPower MOSFET • Higher Efficiency 40 [16]
  41. 41. Overall Performance 41 [16]
  42. 42. Application • DC-DC Conversion • Low Voltage isolated power supply topologies 42
  43. 43. References 1. A. J. Womac “The Characterization of a CMOS Radiation Hardened by Design Circuit Technique”, Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2013 2. M. M. Landowski “Design and Modeling of Radiation Hardened lateral Power MosFETs”, Master’s Thesis, University of Central Florida, 2008 3. D. A. Neamen, “Semiconductor Physics and Devices: Basic Principles”, 4th ed., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2012. 4. R. Lacoe, "CMOS Scaling, Design Principles and Hardening-by-Design Methodologies”, in IEEE NSREC, Monterey, 2003. 5. A. A. Tanany “A Study of Switched Mode Power Amplifiers using LDMOS”, Master’s Thesis, University of Gavle, 2007. 6. L. Zhi, N. Hongying, Y. Hongbo, L. Youbao “Design of a total-dose radiation hardened monolithic CMOS DC– DC boost converter”, Journal of Semiconductors, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 075006-1 – 075006-6, Jul 2011. 7. L. J. Bissey, K. G. Duesman, W. M. Farnworth “Annular gate and technique for fabricating an annular gate”, United States Patent, No. US 6,794,699 B2, Sept. 2004. 8. J. D. Cressier, H. A. Mantooth, “Extreme Environment Electronics”, CRC Press 43
  44. 44. References 9. B. J Baliga “Fundamentals of Power Semiconductor Devices”, Power Semiconductor Research Center North Carolina State University, USA 10. J. Wang, J. Korec, S. Xu, “Low Voltage NexFET with Record Low Figure of Merit”, Texas Instruments Incorporated, Power Stage BU Bethlehem, PA, USA 11. B. Yang, et.al, “NexFET Generation 2, New Way to Power”, Texas Instruments Incorporated 12. J. Wang, J. Korec, S. Xu, ”Low Voltage NexFET with Record Low Figure of Merit”, Texas Instruments Incorporated, Power Stage BU, Bethlehem, PA, USA 13. J. Korec “Low Voltage Power MOSFETs – Design, Performance and Applications”, Vol. 7, Springer, ISBN: 978-1-4419-9319-9, 2011 14. J. Korec, C. Bull “History of FET technology and the Move to NexFETTM”, Bodo’s Power system, May 2009, pp. 44-46. 15. S. Sapp, R. Sodhi, S. Sekhawat, “New Power Semiconductors Cut Data Center Energy”, Fairchild Semiconductors, Oct. 2009. 16. P. Rutter, S. T. Peake “Low Voltage Superjunction Power MOSFET: An Application Optimized Technology ”, 26th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), 2011, pp. 491 – 497. 44
  45. 45. Thank You 45

×