Download as PDF, PPTX
![userneeds! @anous
The 4 basics of a 1 on 1
usability check
3. Actively observe
Watch how they use (and misuse!) what you have given
them. Don’t immediately “correct” what your user tester is
doing.
4. Follow up with questions
This is important; often this is the most valuable part of
testing. “Show me why this would [not] work for you.”
“Can you tell me more about how this made you feel?”
“Why?”
Answer questions with questions (i.e “well, what do you
think that button does”)](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/conveyuxuserchecks-160210014936/75/Userchecks-Method-for-agile-usability-testing-49-2048.jpg)
![userneeds! @anous
Prepare to retest
Improve the design
Set up the hypothesis (or more than one, focus for the retest)
We believe that
[this statement is true (e.g adding social proof, better
labeling, visual cues… will…)]
We will know we are right/wrong when we have the
following result
[quantitative feedback; qualitative feedback; KPI;…}](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/conveyuxuserchecks-160210014936/75/Userchecks-Method-for-agile-usability-testing-65-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byAnouschka Scholten
Userchecks - Method for agile usability testing
The document outlines a workshop on 'user checks,' a method for agile usability testing that emphasizes observing user behavior to improve design. It details the process of conducting user checks, including planning, executing, and evaluating testing sessions with real users to gather insights for enhancing usability efficiently. The author highlights key aspects such as the importance of empathy in usability testing and the advantages of user checks over traditional methods.
More Related Content
![Conducting Usability Research with a Team of One [Revised: October 2009]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/kowalskiheweb2009aps7-091002163651-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
Similar to Userchecks - Method for agile usability testing
Userchecks - Method for agile usability testing
- 1. userneeds! @anous User Checks! Methodfor agile usability testing February 9, 2016 3,5 hour workshop Anouschka Scholten userneeds
- 2.
- 3. userneeds! @anous What youwill learn You get to know User Checks – A method for agile usability testing You experience important facets of the User Checks method – learning by doing
- 4.
- 5. userneeds! @anous Quantitative methods Whathappens Where How often WHY How better ?
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9. userneeds! @anous Focus group Enquête Verify test Remote tracking Usability testing User driven Marketing driven
- 10. userneeds! @anous People donot always do what ! you think ! you tell them ! they think ! they say ! they do! ! ! Observing and asking why makes you find out what people really ! do and need!
- 11. userneeds! @anous Usability testing isabout observing behaviour Watch the user do what comes naturally, while performing a task (thinking aloud). Don't help. Not asking about opinion.
- 12. userneeds! @anous empathy! a keyfunction of usability testing to really see, hear and find out what moves your users the ability to see an experience through another person’s eyes Getting to
- 13. userneeds! @anous Usability ROI • Increased conversion rates • Increased productivity • Reduced need for help desk intervention • Reduced fall off rate at checkout
- 14. userneeds! @anous No usabilitytesting • Customer dissatisfaction • Lose of potential income • Losing money on marketing • Higher development costs • Bad reputation • Staying behind the competition
- 15. userneeds! @anous user checks! &traditional usability testing!
- 16.
- 17.
- 18. userneeds! @anous Usability Testtraditional 1 round of testing" In a lab environment, eye tracking Moderator is a UX researcher Process based
- 19. userneeds! @anous Traditional Usablitytest drawbacks • 1 time, at end design process • An extensive report, little or no redesign • No retest • Not in user context • High costs: lab, eye tracking, special UX researcher • Product team indirectly involved • Schedule well in advance (at least 1 month)
- 20.
- 21. userneeds! @anous Test andretest within 1-3 weeks Preferably in the users context, quick and easy set up Team member (Designer, PO,…) conducts the test, team directly involved Output is a better design/ better MVP" Value based User Checks Agile Usability Test
- 22. userneeds! @anous User ChecksAgile Usability Testing 6. Evaluate Priortize Improvements 2. User Checks round 1 3. Evaluate Priortize Improvements 5. User Checks round 2 1. Design / MVP 4. Improved Design / MVP 7. Improved Design / MVP Repeat or develop Based on the RITE-model: https://uxmag.com/articles/the-rite-way-to-prototype
- 23.
- 24. userneeds! @anous Focus thetest, informed by data and user feedback. Make a testplan What is the goal, what do you want to improve for whom, where do you want to find out the WHY Recruit real users!! User Checks elements 0. Prepare
- 25. userneeds! @anous 1. MVPor Prototype
- 26. userneeds! @anous The testsubject, live or prototyped in design phase. With focus on problem area. User Checks elements 1. The MVP or Prototype
- 27.
- 28. userneeds! @anous Observe 2or 3 real users, attempt real task(s); Conduct a simple usability test per user, preferably in context: user check 1 moderator + 1 observer (UX) designer, PO or other team member as moderator and a a team member as observer User Checks elements 2. User Checks round 1
- 29. userneeds! @anous 3. Findings& improvements
- 30. userneeds! @anous What haveyou learned? Prioritize. What are improvements? Brainstorm and prioritize. With the team, together Via KJ-method and Impact/effort matrix http://www.uie.com/articles/kj_technique/ http://www.innovationgames.com/impact- effort-matrix/ User Checks elements 3. Findings & Improvements
- 31. userneeds! @anous 4. Improveddesign > 5. User Checks Round 2
- 32. userneeds! @anous Improve theprototype or MVP Do a 2nd round of user checks With the next 2 or 3 real users (not the same users as round 1!) User Checks elements 4. Improved design > 5. User Checks Round 2
- 33. userneeds! @anous 6. Findingsand improvements > 7. Improved design
- 34. userneeds! @anous Again withthe team: Collect and group findings, prioritize. Think of design improvements, prioritize and implement in better design Use a backlog for improvements that take more time Repeat the process or implement design User Checks elements 6. Findings & improvements > 7. Improved design/MVP
- 35.
- 36. userneeds! @anous Design newsite ggdhaaglanden.nl User check with a doctor in his office GGD Haaglanden project Angi Studio:" http://angistudio.com/cases/ggd-haaglanden.html
- 37. userneeds! @anous GGD Haaglandenproject Angi Studio: http://angistudio.com/cases/ggd-haaglanden.html User Checks during completely new design I do not know what OCGZ stands for… Is this for me? Off course SOA and child abuse, very important indeed!
- 38. userneeds! @anous “LINDA.Girls.. I expectthis is for 14 till 21 year old… but oh, reading this subscription I think it actually does fit me?” Pop-up information about LINDA.meiden Project Angi Studio: http://angistudio.com Redesign LINDA subscription
- 39.
- 40. userneeds! @anous “Very clearand easy to walk through this way, underneath each other” Sub home Subscription with incentive - mobile Scrolling was no problem at all on mobile Footer with next step was used Navigating via main menu on top wasn’t used, it was ignored, even with a sticky menu… dead end alert! Project van Angi Studio: http://angistudio.com/ 2e round
- 41. userneeds! @anous User Checksduring redesign Greenchoice.nl, project Angi Studio:" http://angistudio.com/cases/greenchoice.html
- 42. userneeds! @anous Subsidie aanvraagsysteemGemeente Den Haag, project Angi Studio: http://angistudio.com/cases/gemeentelijk-subsidie-loket.html User Checks during completely new design
- 43. userneeds! @anous Compared Cost +/-10.000 EUR +/- 5.000 EUR Test participants 6-8 once 2 rounds with 3 participants Who performs UX researchers/specialists only Product team (designers, product owner, developers) Where Lab In context user or meeting room How often Once Twice or more With 1 MVP/design 2 or more variations of MVP/ design Equipment Laptop/mobile, Eytracking, video Laptop/mobile, audio- and screen capture Plan At least 1 month upfront Recruit (target) users and conduct You get Report, 1-2 weeks later A better design and retest in 1-3 weeks Engaged team Tradit. usability tests User checks
- 44. userneeds! @anous Outsourcing youruser research work is like outsourcing your vacation. It gets the job done, but probably won’t have the effects you were seeking. Jared Spool http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/08/02/outsourcing-your-user-research-is-like-outsourcing-your-vacation/ “
- 45. userneeds! @anous “Elaborate testsare a waste of resources” Source: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/ 75% of the problems found with 3 or 4 user tests
- 46. userneeds! @anous User checksdrawbacks • Too unexperienced biased designer or team member as moderator • Heavy pressure on improving the design within agile process (keeping in pace with development) • With ‘high fidelity’ testing it demands velocity for retest with high multidisciplinary efforts: product owners, IxD, visual design and content And with a live site: front end, back end…
- 47.
- 48. userneeds! @anous The 4basics of a 1 on 1 usability check 1. Let your user experience the prototype/ MVP/site Observe don’t tell. Put your prototype in the user’s hands (or your user in the prototype) and give just the minimum context so they understand what to do. Give them a task. 2. Have them talk through their experience (talk aloud) For example, when appropriate, as the host, ask “Tell me what you are thinking as you are doing this.”
- 49. userneeds! @anous The 4basics of a 1 on 1 usability check 3. Actively observe Watch how they use (and misuse!) what you have given them. Don’t immediately “correct” what your user tester is doing. 4. Follow up with questions This is important; often this is the most valuable part of testing. “Show me why this would [not] work for you.” “Can you tell me more about how this made you feel?” “Why?” Answer questions with questions (i.e “well, what do you think that button does”)
- 50. userneeds! @anous Key: moderatingthe test If they… Say… Are not talking “What are you thinking?” Ask you a question (e.g. “Is that what I should do here?”) Rephrase the question (e.g “ What do you think you should do?”) Get a task right or wrong “Thank you , that is very helpful” “Thanks for the feedback” Mess up “Remember, you can’t make any mistakes. You’re doing a great job.” Are unsure if they have completed a task and ask you “Is this what you would do if you were doing X at home?” Criticize the design “Thanks for the feedback”
- 51. userneeds! @anous Observe theuser’s behaviour The observer(s) note every occasion the user: • hesitates, worries, or is forced to think • misunderstands something • gets frustrated or annoyed • gives up • is surprised
- 52. userneeds! @anous User Checksset up • Test script with real tasks • Real target users as participants • Ideally conducted in context user on their own device • Record audio and screen capture • 1 test moderator, 1 observer (more observers are possible, but not too much and really on the background)
- 53. userneeds! @anous Test script-agenda 1. Introduction and questions up front 2. Situation sketch + think aloud instruction 3. Think aloud session 4. Evaluate session, open questions 5. End session - thank participant
- 54. userneeds! @anous 1. ExampleIntroduction Thank you for participating, we really appreciate it! I’m <name> and there is one person besides me <name> is also here. We’re helping a company to develop a new service / to optimize a website This company cares about their customers and thinks it’s very important to involve potential customers when developing new services. They want the new service to be valuable for you. That’s why we want to ask you some questions and along the way we’d like show you the service/site. You can walk through it. The interview takes about a 20 minutes. If you do not understand something, or you want to add something, do not hesitate to interrupt me! Do you mind if we record the session for future reference within our organisation? Everything we discuss and record is confidential; we will not share things without your permission! Any questions?
- 55. userneeds! @anous Task-think aloudinstruction You are going to see: a draft proposal of the service, which has not yet been developed/ the site now. <if a proptotype> The proposal is only images. It looks finished and you can click through it, but most of it is not working yet. It’s also not as fast as a normal app and you can’t do anything wrong. <Situation sketch and task> Please open the link on your mobile phone and walk through the app. Can you please say things aloud? Not to me, but for yourself? Everything you do or say is fine, eg. Also "what the hell is this ?! “. You can start now by clicking the link
- 56. userneeds! @anous Evaluation questions Afterthe think aloud session, zoom in to what you observed, like: • You mentioned… what did you mean with that? • I saw you doing… why? What did you expect? How would you call it? • You didn’t go to … why not? What do you expect to find? Also ask service, product or content specific questions, e.g.: • You read this text thoroughly, why? • You were going back and fourth between product X and Y, why? • You choose X and said something about .., what did you mean with that ?
- 57.
- 58. userneeds! @anous Volunteers • 2moderators • 2 users
- 59. userneeds! @anous Tell us • The main goal(s) of the site/application • Target users • Main tasks, main questions of the users • Context of use Do not tell us how you think the site works now!!!
- 60. userneeds! @anous Observe theuser’s behaviour Note every occasion the user: • hesitates, worries, or is forced to think • misunderstands something • gets frustrated or annoyed • gives up • is surprised
- 61. userneeds! @anous 1st usercheck session! 20 min ! 2nd user check session! 20 min ! Findings & improvements! 20 min !
- 62. userneeds! @anous The findings,issues • Collect Findings • Prioritize issues to be solved: prioritize from the business/user goals perspective, rate them Do this with thewhole team
- 63. userneeds! @anous Improvements • Improvementson every level, note down Labeling, content, categorization, visual assets, interaction, concept, flow, persuasion > but keep the business/user goals perspective in mind (focus)! • Prioritize by Impact & Effort (matrix) or dot- vote Choose improvement(s) to be re-tested Do this with thewhole team
- 64. userneeds! @anous Impact &Effort matrix Impact: creates high/low value for users effort: high/low effort in terms of time, knowledge, tools, people… Source: http://www.innovationgames.com/impact-effort-matrix/ Do this with the whole team incl. decision makers!
- 65. userneeds! @anous Prepare toretest Improve the design Set up the hypothesis (or more than one, focus for the retest) We believe that [this statement is true (e.g adding social proof, better labeling, visual cues… will…)] We will know we are right/wrong when we have the following result [quantitative feedback; qualitative feedback; KPI;…}
- 66. userneeds! @anous A betterdesign fast!
- 67. userneeds! @anous With UserChecks • Checking with users on a regular bases Effective problem detection • Ensures that users can successfully reach their goals and shows where their satisfaction can be improved Boosts optimalization • Offers insights about the proposition or concept weaknesses and unknown opportunities Enables innovation • Ensures the whole team understands how users use their product Empathy and commitment • Emphasizes where a design change is needed, reduces waste Brings focus, avoids feature creep
- 68. userneeds! @anous A holisticfocus on a good UX! Understand! Find out!Build!
- 69. userneeds! @anous Be outrageous efficaciousand ! make people’s lives better! ! Just do it!!
- 70. userneeds! @anous Thank you! anouschka.scholten@userneeds.nl www.userneeds.nl Twitter:@anous LinkedIn: https://nl.linkedin.com/in/anouschkascholten