Skip to main content
PURPOSES
1.To measure competence of teachers.
2.To foster professional growth and
development.
3. To improve student teacher
relationship.
4. Utilize technological development.
5. Find out own limitations and
deficiency.
EVALUATOR??
WHO WILL EVALUATE??
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION
-Evaluative tool/instrument should be measurable.
-Should relate to important teaching skill.
-Be as objective as possible.
-Should be clearly communicated to the teacher
before the evaluation.
-Should be linked to the teacher’s professional
growth.
-A pre conference and post conference
should be held.
-All observations should be documented,
reviewed and signed by the evaluator and
the teacher.
-Teacher should be provide opportunity to
place written comments on the evaluation
form.
TEACHING EVALUATION
MODEL
Polifroni Ec(2008) suggested this model.Teaching and teaching strategy
is done by:
STUDENTS 2-3 TIMES /COURSE
PEERS 2 TIMES BY 2 PEERS PER COURSE
SELF CREATED PORTFOLIO EACH TIME CLASS
TAUGHT
ADMINISTRATORS-END OF SEMESTER OR YEAR
AND MORE OFTEN AS NEEDED
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
PROCESS
The process of performance appraisal include
ASSES INSTITUTIONAL AND PERSONAL NEEDS AND SET
GOALS
DEVELOP POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS,OBJECTIVES AND
TIME FRAME
COMMUNICATE THESE STANDARDS TO THE EMPLOYEES
ASSES THE PERFORMANCE
Contd…
COMPARE THE ACTUAL WITH THE
STANDARDS
DISCUSS THE RESULTS PERIODICALLY
INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WHEN
NECESSARY
EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE
TOOLS FOR PERFORMANCE
APPRAIASAL
FREE RESPONSE REPORTS
RANKING
PERFORMANCE CHECK LIST
RATING SCALE
NUMERICAL RATING SCALE
LETTERED RATING SCALE
GRAPHIC RATING SCALE
DESCRIPTIVE RATING RATING SCALE
FORCED CHOICE WRITING
BEHAVIOURALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALE
EVALUATION METHODS
1.OBSERVATION OF CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES.
2.REVIEW OF LESSON PLANS AND CLASS ROOM RECORDS
3.SELF MONITERING
ADVANTAGES:
DISADVANTAGES
4. AUDIO TAPE AND VIDEO TAPE RECORDING:
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
5.INFORMATION FROM STUDENTS:
QUESTIONNAIRES
INTERVIEW
3.STUDENT’S TEST RESULTS
4.OUTSIDE OBSERVERS
3. SELF EVALUATION:
OBJECTIVES
1.SKILL NECESSARY TO TEACH EFFECTIVELY
2.ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE THE WEAK POINTS IN TEACHING.
3.ABILITY TO EXAMINE ONES OWN TECHNIQUE OF
TEACHING CRITICALLY.
4.SKILL NECESSARY FOR ADEQUATE EMOTIONAL
PREPARATION TO EVALUATE SELF TEACHING WITHOUT
HURTING PERSONAL FEELINGS.
5.CAPACITY TO ADJUST IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE PERSON
DOING SELF EVALUATION WOULD BE ABLE TO SOLVE
HIS/HER OWN PROBLEMS THAT ARE THE OBSTACLES IN THE
WAY OF HIS/HER TEACHING.
6.CAPACITY TO ANALYZE RELATIVELY COMPLEX
PROBLEMS IN TEACHING TECHNIQUES WITH THE
ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE AND INITIATE SOLUTION TO
THE PROBLEM.
7.ABILITY TO EVALUATE SELF AND COMPARE IT
WITH THE OTHER PERSONS EVALUATION DONE ON
HIM/HER AT THE SAME TIME.
TECHNIQUE OF SELF EVALUATION
FIRST METHOD
1.THE TEACHER IS ASKED TO GIVE A LECTURE ON A GIVEN
SUBJECT
2.A SUPERVISOR SITS IN THE CLASS AND LISTEN TO THE
LECTURE AND MAKES RUNNING NOTES ON WHAT IS
HAPPENING IN THE CLASS AND THEN REPORTS HIS/HER
OBSERVATIONS.
3.AFTER THE LECTURE IS OVER THE TEACHER IS ASKED TO
WRITE NOTES ON HIS/HER LECTURE.
4.THEN THE SUPERVISOR AND THE TEACHER COMPARE
THEIR OBSERVATION AND DISCUSS ON GOOD AND BAD
POINT.
SECOND METHOD
1.THE EVALUATION FORM IS GIVEN TO BOTH THE
TEACHER AND SUPERVISOR.
2.THE TEACHER IS ASKED TO GIVE LECTURE ON A GIVEN
SUBJECT
3.THE SUPERVISOR SITS IN THE CLASS DURING LECTURE
AND COMPLETES EVALUATION FORMS ACCORDING TO
INSTRUCTIONS
4.THE TEACHER FILLS HIS/HER EVALUATION FORM
AFTER FINISHING THE LECTURE.
5.BOTH THE EVALUATION FORMS AFTER COMPLETIONS
ARE COMPARED AND POINTS DISCUSSED.
6.THE TEACHER TRIES TO UNDERSTAND HIS/HER
MISTAKES AND CORRECT THEM AND IMPROVE HIS/HER
TEACHING TECHNIQUES
PEER REVIEW
ā—¦ ADVANTAGES
ā—¦ DISADVANTAGES
GOALS OF PEER EVALUATION
1.ACCOUNTABILITY
2.ASSESMENT
GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF PEER
EVALUATION
1-THERE MUST BE ACCEPTANCE OF TEACHER EVALUATION
WITHIN THE COLLEGE AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF
EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
2-IN THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION,TEACHER
DEVELOPMENT WILL OCCUR ONLY IF A CONSTRUCTIVE
APPROACH IS FOLLOWED
3-COLLABORATION AND MUTUAL RESPECT BETWEEN
TEACHER AND EVALUATOR ARE ESSENTIAL
4-GENERAL AGREEMENT AMONG CONCERNED PARTIES
ABOUT THE COLLEGE MISSION AND JOB ASSIGNMENTS
MUST PRECEDE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PLAN OF TEACHER
EVALUATION
5-TEACHER SELF APPRAISAL MUST BECOME A SIGNIFICANT
PART OF THE PROCESS
REPORTING THE RESULT OF
EVALUATION
-DELIVER FEEDBACK IN APPOSITIVE AND CONSIDERATE WAY.
- OFFER IDEAS AND SUGGEST CHANGE THAT IS
BENEFICIAL TO THE TEACHER.
- BE FORMAL WHILE GIVING FEEDBACK.
- MAINTAIN BALANCE BETWEEN PRAISE AND
CRITICISM.
- GIVE ENOUGH FEEDBACK TO BE USEFUL BUT NOT
TOO MUCH TO BE OVER WHELMED.