SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Download to read offline
THE 2010 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT ON




REVIEW OF THE COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION'S FISCAL TARGETS




                COMMITTEE MEMBERS
                      Chair: James P. Howard, II, Long Reach
                 Vice-Chair: Alan Romack, Owen Brown
                             Ed Coleman, Long Reach
                             Roger Hultgren, Harper's Choice
                             Ryan McCarthy, Wilde Lake
                             Dan Woodruff, Dorsey's Search




                COLUMBIA, MARYLAND
                  FEBRUARY 22, 2010
The 2010 Financial Advisory Committee

Cynthia Coyle
Chair, Planning and Strategy Committee
Columbia Association, Inc.
10221 Wincopin Circle
Columbia, Maryland 21044

February 22, 2010

Dear Ms. Coyle:

Please accept the attached report from the 2010 Financial Advisory Committee on “Review of
the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets.”

As always, members of the Financial Advisory Committee are available for future consultation
regarding this report or other matters the Board of Directors or the Planning and Strategy
Committee require. The other committee members and I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to
have served the Columbia Association and residents as members of the Financial Advisory
Committee and on their behalf, I remain,

                                                  Respectfully,



                                                  James P. Howard, II
                                                  Chair, Financial Advisory Committee
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                 1



Charge
To develop a successor to the current Financial Management Program. The current Financial
Management Program is a ratio-based tool that is intended to analyze fiscal health. It has been
used for the past 5 years and is up for review. The PSC is asking that the FAC benchmark best
practices to create a successor program which may include these ratios, but which will not be
limited to them.

Recommendation
The Financial Advisory Committee recommends the Columbia Association adopt the Low Range
as specified as targets for financial health for the coming decade. These targets have been met
mostly under the current financial management plan and could be completely attainable with a
measure of fiscal discipline. Meeting these targets will help satisfy investor concern over the
long-term viability of CA's debt and encourage bond ratings agencies to continue classifying CA
debt at the upper range of investment grade.
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                  2



Introduction
The Financial Management Program (FMP) is a plan developed by the Columbia Association
(CA) to provide targets for financial health of the organization. The previous FMP will soon be
expiring and the charge asks the Financial Advisory Committee (FAC) to provide a new program
consisting of targets for several financial measurement ratios. These ratios are used to measure
the debt of the CA and provide insight into its long-term capacity to repay its obligations.

The CA uses debt financing to pay for new and existing programs and has done so since its
inception. In general, while the CA does separate its capital and operating expenditures for
budgetary purposes, the CA does not tie specific debts to specific programs nor physical plant.
The CA has pledged the income from its assessment lien income against the senior secured
bonds issued over the previous decades. The CA also maintains revolving credit which is
available to finance continuing activities. As a result, the CA's debt is similar to general
obligation debt in the parlance of municipal finance.

Much of the CA's debt is issued through the municipal bond market. The CA maintains a
revolving line of credit of $20 million and taps that credit line on an as-needed basis to fund
current activities. When that revolving line of credit is exhausted, the CA is able to issue
marketable securities and uses the proceeds of that sale to extinguish the line of credit and the
cycle begins anew. This can happen every two to four years depending upon the specific
financial needs of the CA. Additionally, market conditions, including prevailing interest rates,
may make it prudent to shorten or lengthen the cycle.

Using debt to fund CA operating and capital has both advantages and disadvantages. On the
positive side, the costs of facilities that are used for years or decades can be spread across the
entire time period for which the facility is in use, reducing the up front cost of a facility.
Negatives, however, are the increased cost due to interest payments and the questionable logic of
spreading the cost of operating expenses over a period of years. The core issue at hand, however,
is the inherent risk associated with debt management. By incurring long-term liabilities, the CA
and residents assume the risk that the CA might default and not meet its obligations.

Because the lien against homeowners is structurally similar to an ad valorem property tax and the
CA is a unique organization, the models of credit measurement available to cities and small
governments provide the best lens with which to view the CA. The FAC and its predecessors
have historically used the model of municipal debt when evaluating the CA's debt management
and believes this approach is also used by credit ratings agencies.

This model does have shortcomings, however, as it is predicated on the ability of a jurisdiction to
institute a tax on personal income. While many local governments engage in some enterprise
activities, unlike many cities, the CA receives approximately half of its income from enterprise
activities. As a result, the CA is subject to both cyclical and counter-cyclical market forces. If
the organization is fiscally prudent, under these circumstances, it can effectively hedge against
the broader market, providing significant protection to its credit standing, without regard to the
macroeconomic climate.
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                          3


The Financial Model of the Columbia Association
Because the CA is effectively modeled as a municipality, and there is evidence to suggest this is
the model used by the the credit ratings agencies, 1 this is the approach the Financial Advisory
Committee will take. Though this model suffers from drawbacks previously mentioned, it
effectively relates the ability of the CA to repay its obligations based on its assessment income
through the analogy to ad valorem taxes. In this regard, the CA is likened to a small city, with
approximately 100,000 residents, in a generally prosperous region. The FAC has historically
used this approach to understanding the CA's financial health.

The financial health ratios are important to the CA because some ratios are important for
maintaining the CA's debt rating, ensuring cost effective debt placements. Creditors look for
guidance from credit ratings agencies and if a ratings agency should consider the CA to be
higher risk than a similar sized city, the CA would be forced to pay a higher rate of interest for its
debt.

Additionally, some ratios, CA 2 and CA3, must be maintained at specified levels by the current
bond trust agreement. Failure to maintain those ratios can constitute technical default allowing
the bondholders to seize CA assets. The FAC has noted previously that a default by the CA is
not similar to a default by a local government given that a local government would likely survive
bankruptcy proceedings and bondholders would be disadvantaged in such a proceeding
compared to a private organization.

As CA income from both assessments and enterprise activities changes, along with expenses and
debt, the financial ratios can vary. For instance, an increase in expenses will cause the ratio of
income to expenses to decrease and may signal a potential problem. It is best to consider the set
of ratios holistically and not focus on individual measures.

The FAC recommends using the four ratios recommended for observation by the Municipal
Bond Association,2 according to their designations by the Budget Committee in 2007: 3

                                      R1=total debt /assessed value

                                        R2=total debt / population

                                 R3= per capita debt / per capita income

                                       CA1 =debt service / revenues

For reference, the Budget Committee also considered two other ratios, but because these are
required by the bond trust agreement, the FAC will not recommend targets for those ratios:

    1. Columbia Association Budget Committee, “Measuring the Financial Health of the Columbia Association,”
(Columbia, MD: Columbia Association: 2007).
    2. Judy Wesalow Temel, The Fundamentals of Municipal Bonds, (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001): 176.
    3. See note 1.
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                        4


                              CA2=debt service /annual charge revenue

                                   CA3 =operating expenses /revenues

The required target for CA2 is 67% and for CA3 is between 65% and 70%.4 The current FMP
also includes references to other ratios that the FAC believes should no longer be considered.

Criteria for Policy Evaluation
In evaluating a potential change in ratio targets, this Committee will consider four questions:

    1. Bond Rating–How does this affect the bond rating? Will changing a given target alter
       how credit ratings organizations view the Columbia Association?

    2. Solvency–How does this affect the solvency of the corporation? This is closely related
       the first question, but is subtly different in extremity.

    3. Cash Flow–How does this affect the cash flow? Will a specified target impact cash flow
       positively or negatively?

    4. Assessment–How would this affect the assessment lien? Some changes may be best
       implemented by changing the assessment lien rate.

Policy Alternatives
The Committee will consider four potential targets for financial planning. The first option is to
maintain the current situation and keep the existing targets. The first alternative is an array of
low-range targets, exemplified by low debt and a push for expenses drawing from current
income. The second alternative is an array of mid-range targets, showing a middle-ground
approach. The third alternative is an array of high range targets, exemplified by higher debt.
There are infinite possibilities within the spectrum of options. However, the Committee believes
these four options present a simple but broad picture of the effects of the entire spectrum. The
target ranges are:

     Alternative              R1                    R2                     R3               CA1
    Current FMP              N/A                   N/A                    N/A              25.00%
     Low Range              1.00%                  $750                  1.00%              5.00%
   Middle Range             2.00%                 $1,300                 3.00%             10.00%
    High Range              3.00%                 $2,000                 5.00%             15.00%

The CA currently only has targets for the final metric, CA 1.


    4. Columbia Association Budget Committee, Report on the FY2006 Budget, (Columbia, Maryland: Columbia
Association, Inc., January 27, 2005).
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                     5



Comparison of Alternatives by Criteria
The comparison matrix for the effect of each alternative on each criterion the Financial Advisory
Committee deemed important is as follows:

    Alternative         Bond Rating            Solvency              Cash Flow       Assessment
    Current FMP           Neutral              Neutral                Neutral          Neutral
    Low Range             Positive             Positive               Positive        Negative
   Middle Range           Negative             Neutral                Neutral          Neutral
    High Range            Negative             Neutral               Negative         Positive

This analysis is subjective and can be interpreted in a variety of ways. It is the FAC's best guess
as to how altering the targets would affect the CA's financial condition. However, the FAC is
comfortable making this judgement due to its current and past analyses of the CA's and local
governments' financial conditions.
Recommendation
The Financial Advisory Committee recommends the Columbia Association adopt the Low Range
as specified as targets for financial health for the coming decade. These targets have been met
mostly under the current financial management plan and could be completely attainable with a
measure of fiscal discipline. Meeting these targets will help satisfy investor concern over the
long-term viability of CA's debt and encourage bond ratings agencies to continue classifying CA
debt at the upper range of investment grade.
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                                           6



Appendix 1: Ratio Comparison for Selected Cities Nationwide
                                          Beaverton, OR        Boulder, CO              Fargo, ND          Kenosha, WI        Las Cruces, NM
FY 2008 Figures
 Founded                                             1893                  1859                   1871              1835.00               1907
 General Obligation Debt                       $14,190,063           $60,120,000          $174,922,478           $8,236,434        $173,357,114
 Debt Service                                   $2,299,897           $12,883,000            $10,087,666          $7,499,567           $262,549
 Assessed Value                             $7,000,000,000        $2,416,542,000         $3,201,497,937      $6,341,813,300                   -
 Revenue                                       $60,605,037         $174,794,000           $108,246,514          $71,561,315         $84,539,359
 Property Tax                                  $28,131,042           $21,865,000            $17,269,481         $42,822,076          $7,777,195
 Operating Expenses                             58,252,893         $154,896,000             $97,307,824         $64,061,748         $70,995,143
 Population                                         85,560                94,171                 93,531              96,950              89,722
 Per Capita Income                                       -               $28,976                $37,553             $27,237              24293
Key Ratios
 CA1—debt service / revenues                        3.79%                  7.37%                  9.32%             10.48%               0.31%
 CA2—debt service / annual charge rev.              8.18%                 58.92%                 58.41%             17.51%               3.38%
 CA3—operating expenses / revenue                  96.12%                 88.62%                 89.89%             89.52%              83.98%
 R1—total debt / assessed value                     0.20%                  2.49%                    0.05             0.13%                    -
 R2—total debt / population                          $166                  $2,075                 $4,658              $302               $1,932
 R3—per capita debt / per capita income                  -                 7.16%                 12.40%              1.11%                 0.08
Source: Committee Compilation
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                                               7



Appendix 1: Ratio Comparison for Selected Cities Nationwide (continued)
                                          Livonia, MI         Macon, GA          Roanoke, VA           Sandy, UT        Waukegan, IL     Wilmington, NC
FY 2008 Figures
 Founded                                           1950                1823                1882                 1893             1859               1739
 General Obligation Debt                     $63,070,804         $67,452,000       $275,531,207            $2,425,000      $94,565,307        $29,655,000
 Debt Service                                 $2,818,271          $4,963,690         $31,165,398           $1,779,700       $8,306,966         $7,388,341
 Assessed Value                           $5,209,000,000      $1,895,364,925      $7,407,774,726       $8,834,376,909                -    $13,643,490,563
 Revenue                                   $127,400,000        $104,892,000        $287,996,553           $70,491,195      $89,250,643        $80,730,676
 Property Tax                                $58,381,619         $17,814,000         $98,714,420           $7,233,667      $17,356,638        $41,472,281
 Operating Expenses                        $123,100,000          $93,964,000       $306,874,197           $65,334,719      $87,873,000        $69,638,456
 Population                                       91,220              90623               93504                96660            89877             100192
 Per Capita Income                               $27,923           32619.00            33358.00             49151.60                 -          32800.91
Key Ratios
 CA1—debt service / revenues                      2.21%                4.73%              10.82%               2.52%            9.31%              9.15%
 CA2—debt service / annual charge rev.            4.83%               27.86%              31.57%              24.60%           47.86%             17.82%
 CA3—operating expenses / revenue                96.62%               89.58%             106.55%              92.68%           98.46%             86.26%
 R1—total debt / assessed value                   1.21%                3.56%               3.72%               0.03%                 -             0.22%
 R2—total debt / population                        $691                $2,068              $2,947                 $49           $1,052              $904
 R3—per capita debt / per capita income             0.02               6.34%               8.83%               0.10%                 -             2.76%
Source: Committee Compilation
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                                            8



Appendix 2: Historical Ratio Comparison for Selected Counties in Maryland
                                          Anne Arundel        Baltimore Co.              Howard           Montgomery         Columbia Assn.
FY 2006 Figures
 Founded                                             1650                 1659                   1851                1776                1965
 General Obligation Debt                     $875,982,000         $752,245,000           $541,323,315       $1,493,888,054         $63,035,000
 Debt Service                                $104,580,589           $68,084,000            $67,132,766       $215,372,072          $12,703,000
 Assessed Value                            $43,802,722,000      $48,292,908,000        $29,852,994,080    $110,529,249,116      $8,034,858,000
 Revenue                                    $1,047,237,963       $1,389,453,000          $996,345,521       $3,410,462,595         $52,923,000
 Property Tax                                 $411,488,309        $588,640,000           $353,894,412       $1,073,936,688         $26,060,000
 Operating Expenses                            924,028,630       $1,325,854,000          $931,195,501       $3,273,734,293         $30,775,000
 Population                                        511,549              786,650                276,287             953,000              98,383
 Per Capita Income                                 $44,927              $39,478                $54,924             $61,805             $54,924
Key Ratios
 CA1—debt service / revenues                        9.99%                 4.90%                  6.74%              6.32%              24.00%
 CA2—debt service / annual charge rev.             25.42%                11.57%                 18.97%             20.05%              48.75%
 CA3—operating expenses / revenue                  88.23%                95.42%                 93.46%             95.99%              58.15%
 R1—total debt / assessed value                     2.00%                 1.56%                  1.81%              1.35%               0.78%
 R2—total debt / population                         $1,712                 $956                  $1,959             $1,568               $641
 R3—per capita debt / per capita income             3.81%                 2.42%                  3.57%              2.54%               1.17%
Source: Committee Compilation
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets                9



Addendum 1
Per the request of the Columbia Association's Planning and Strategy Committee, the FAC
provides a time table for reduction of CA 1:

                                  Fiscal Year                     CA1
                                      2011                        16%
                                      2012                        18%
                                      2013                        15%
                                      2014                        12%
                                      2015                        11%
                                      2016                         6%
                                      2017                         5%
                                      2018                         5%
                                      2019                         5%
                                      2020                         5%

The values for fiscal year 2011 through 2016 are based upon the existing and proposed debt as of
April 30, 20125 and assumes a 3.0% increase in income from all sources for each year.




    5. Columbia Association, Operating and Capital Budget (Draft), (Columbia, Maryland: Columbia,
Association, Inc., December 17, 2009).
Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets              10



Addendum 2
The Columbia Association's Planning and Strategy Committee asked the FAC to consider the
impact of a proposed new headquarters building on the targets recommended in this review. The
FAC recognizes that a proposed building project will be expensive and impossible to fund from
current revenues. Borrowing will be necessary. However, these recommendations are based on
best practices and it is incumbent upon the Columbia Association's Board of Directors to balance
the value of a new facility with the costs of building it.

More Related Content

What's hot

JPMorgan Chase First Quarter 2008 Financial Results Conference Call
JPMorgan Chase First Quarter 2008 Financial Results Conference Call JPMorgan Chase First Quarter 2008 Financial Results Conference Call
JPMorgan Chase First Quarter 2008 Financial Results Conference Call
finance2
 
Mem-Shelby Sports Auth-Fitch (2002)
Mem-Shelby Sports Auth-Fitch (2002)Mem-Shelby Sports Auth-Fitch (2002)
Mem-Shelby Sports Auth-Fitch (2002)
Jim Gilliland
 
sovereignbank Q1_2004
sovereignbank Q1_2004sovereignbank Q1_2004
sovereignbank Q1_2004
finance47
 
My Community Mortgage & Flexible Mortgage Ppt
My Community Mortgage & Flexible Mortgage PptMy Community Mortgage & Flexible Mortgage Ppt
My Community Mortgage & Flexible Mortgage Ppt
AffinityCalvin
 

What's hot (18)

Main Street Lending Program (MSLP) Demysitified
Main Street Lending Program (MSLP) DemysitifiedMain Street Lending Program (MSLP) Demysitified
Main Street Lending Program (MSLP) Demysitified
 
BancABC Botswana Pillar III disclosures risk input June 2017 with table
BancABC Botswana Pillar III disclosures risk input June 2017 with tableBancABC Botswana Pillar III disclosures risk input June 2017 with table
BancABC Botswana Pillar III disclosures risk input June 2017 with table
 
FIS Research - High Performance Community Banking
FIS Research - High Performance Community BankingFIS Research - High Performance Community Banking
FIS Research - High Performance Community Banking
 
FASB Update - presented by McGladrey at June 2011 NYSSCPA Private Company Acc...
FASB Update - presented by McGladrey at June 2011 NYSSCPA Private Company Acc...FASB Update - presented by McGladrey at June 2011 NYSSCPA Private Company Acc...
FASB Update - presented by McGladrey at June 2011 NYSSCPA Private Company Acc...
 
JPMorgan Chase First Quarter 2008 Financial Results Conference Call
JPMorgan Chase First Quarter 2008 Financial Results Conference Call JPMorgan Chase First Quarter 2008 Financial Results Conference Call
JPMorgan Chase First Quarter 2008 Financial Results Conference Call
 
Harcourt Brown & Carey NGA State Clean Energy Financing Presentation
Harcourt Brown & Carey NGA State Clean Energy Financing PresentationHarcourt Brown & Carey NGA State Clean Energy Financing Presentation
Harcourt Brown & Carey NGA State Clean Energy Financing Presentation
 
The Case for High Yield Muni Bonds
The Case for High Yield Muni BondsThe Case for High Yield Muni Bonds
The Case for High Yield Muni Bonds
 
Hw01 fin. mgmt.
Hw01 fin. mgmt.Hw01 fin. mgmt.
Hw01 fin. mgmt.
 
Mem-Shelby Sports Auth-Fitch (2002)
Mem-Shelby Sports Auth-Fitch (2002)Mem-Shelby Sports Auth-Fitch (2002)
Mem-Shelby Sports Auth-Fitch (2002)
 
Fair Lending Data Analysis Adi Consulting
Fair Lending Data Analysis Adi ConsultingFair Lending Data Analysis Adi Consulting
Fair Lending Data Analysis Adi Consulting
 
Blx webcast presentation 2 q19
Blx webcast presentation 2 q19Blx webcast presentation 2 q19
Blx webcast presentation 2 q19
 
The New Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage Rule
The New Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage RuleThe New Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage Rule
The New Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage Rule
 
sovereignbank Q1_2004
sovereignbank Q1_2004sovereignbank Q1_2004
sovereignbank Q1_2004
 
The gradual phasing out of libor
The gradual phasing out of liborThe gradual phasing out of libor
The gradual phasing out of libor
 
THE PHASE-OUT OF LIBOR: Timeline, State of Play and the Path Forward
THE PHASE-OUT OF LIBOR: Timeline, State of Play and the Path ForwardTHE PHASE-OUT OF LIBOR: Timeline, State of Play and the Path Forward
THE PHASE-OUT OF LIBOR: Timeline, State of Play and the Path Forward
 
Bladex's Investor Presentation 2 Q16 from Bladex
Bladex's Investor Presentation 2 Q16 from BladexBladex's Investor Presentation 2 Q16 from Bladex
Bladex's Investor Presentation 2 Q16 from Bladex
 
My Community Mortgage & Flexible Mortgage Ppt
My Community Mortgage & Flexible Mortgage PptMy Community Mortgage & Flexible Mortgage Ppt
My Community Mortgage & Flexible Mortgage Ppt
 
2009 No 13 Federal Reserve Assets Understanding The Pieces Of The Pie
2009   No 13 Federal Reserve Assets   Understanding The Pieces Of The Pie2009   No 13 Federal Reserve Assets   Understanding The Pieces Of The Pie
2009 No 13 Federal Reserve Assets Understanding The Pieces Of The Pie
 

Viewers also liked (7)

My Country Colombia
My Country ColombiaMy Country Colombia
My Country Colombia
 
Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries
Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing CountriesMunicipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries
Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries
 
James Howard - The Culture of Affluence Looks at the Cold War
James Howard - The Culture of Affluence Looks at the Cold WarJames Howard - The Culture of Affluence Looks at the Cold War
James Howard - The Culture of Affluence Looks at the Cold War
 
James Howard - The Little Red Menace
James Howard - The Little Red MenaceJames Howard - The Little Red Menace
James Howard - The Little Red Menace
 
Colombia Presentation - 2014
Colombia Presentation - 2014Colombia Presentation - 2014
Colombia Presentation - 2014
 
Colombia: Basic Facts
Colombia: Basic FactsColombia: Basic Facts
Colombia: Basic Facts
 
My Country Colombia
My Country ColombiaMy Country Colombia
My Country Colombia
 

Similar to Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets

204 206 E.N. Roussa.docx
204       206 E.N. Roussa.docx204       206 E.N. Roussa.docx
204 206 E.N. Roussa.docx
tarifarmarie
 
Chapter 21Capital FormationLearning Objectives.docx
Chapter 21Capital FormationLearning Objectives.docxChapter 21Capital FormationLearning Objectives.docx
Chapter 21Capital FormationLearning Objectives.docx
keturahhazelhurst
 
A_New_Model_For_Dealing_with_Personal_Debt
A_New_Model_For_Dealing_with_Personal_DebtA_New_Model_For_Dealing_with_Personal_Debt
A_New_Model_For_Dealing_with_Personal_Debt
Karl Meekings
 
Manual on loan policy procedure for ccs microfinance
Manual on loan policy procedure for ccs microfinanceManual on loan policy procedure for ccs microfinance
Manual on loan policy procedure for ccs microfinance
Abdalla Hersi
 
Leverging Public and Private Investment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevent...
Leverging Public and Private Investment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevent...Leverging Public and Private Investment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevent...
Leverging Public and Private Investment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevent...
Tony Uhl
 
Non-performing Loans in China
Non-performing Loans in ChinaNon-performing Loans in China
Non-performing Loans in China
Karl Kerksiek
 
Effect of Debt Recovery Techniques on Performance of Selected Financial Insti...
Effect of Debt Recovery Techniques on Performance of Selected Financial Insti...Effect of Debt Recovery Techniques on Performance of Selected Financial Insti...
Effect of Debt Recovery Techniques on Performance of Selected Financial Insti...
inventionjournals
 

Similar to Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets (20)

Corporate Debt Restructuring
Corporate Debt RestructuringCorporate Debt Restructuring
Corporate Debt Restructuring
 
204 206 E.N. Roussa.docx
204       206 E.N. Roussa.docx204       206 E.N. Roussa.docx
204 206 E.N. Roussa.docx
 
CRA Regulations Hearings
CRA Regulations HearingsCRA Regulations Hearings
CRA Regulations Hearings
 
Public Borrowing and Debt Management
Public Borrowing and Debt ManagementPublic Borrowing and Debt Management
Public Borrowing and Debt Management
 
Chapter 21Capital FormationLearning Objectives.docx
Chapter 21Capital FormationLearning Objectives.docxChapter 21Capital FormationLearning Objectives.docx
Chapter 21Capital FormationLearning Objectives.docx
 
Mercer Capital's Bank Watch | July 2015 | Small Bank Holding Companies Regula...
Mercer Capital's Bank Watch | July 2015 | Small Bank Holding Companies Regula...Mercer Capital's Bank Watch | July 2015 | Small Bank Holding Companies Regula...
Mercer Capital's Bank Watch | July 2015 | Small Bank Holding Companies Regula...
 
UKMBA_QAs
UKMBA_QAsUKMBA_QAs
UKMBA_QAs
 
A_New_Model_For_Dealing_with_Personal_Debt
A_New_Model_For_Dealing_with_Personal_DebtA_New_Model_For_Dealing_with_Personal_Debt
A_New_Model_For_Dealing_with_Personal_Debt
 
DFA Federal Deposit Insurance Reform - Dr. Scott Hein
DFA Federal Deposit Insurance Reform - Dr. Scott HeinDFA Federal Deposit Insurance Reform - Dr. Scott Hein
DFA Federal Deposit Insurance Reform - Dr. Scott Hein
 
Manual on loan policy procedure for ccs microfinance
Manual on loan policy procedure for ccs microfinanceManual on loan policy procedure for ccs microfinance
Manual on loan policy procedure for ccs microfinance
 
Model.risk.management2015
Model.risk.management2015Model.risk.management2015
Model.risk.management2015
 
205_MPA.pptx
205_MPA.pptx205_MPA.pptx
205_MPA.pptx
 
Compliance implications of crossing the $10 billion asset threshold
Compliance implications of crossing the $10 billion asset thresholdCompliance implications of crossing the $10 billion asset threshold
Compliance implications of crossing the $10 billion asset threshold
 
Aspens Capital Management
Aspens Capital ManagementAspens Capital Management
Aspens Capital Management
 
Effect of credit risk management practices on lending portfolio among savings...
Effect of credit risk management practices on lending portfolio among savings...Effect of credit risk management practices on lending portfolio among savings...
Effect of credit risk management practices on lending portfolio among savings...
 
Leverging Public and Private Investment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevent...
Leverging Public and Private Investment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevent...Leverging Public and Private Investment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevent...
Leverging Public and Private Investment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevent...
 
High regulatory costs for small and mid sized banks
High regulatory costs for small and mid sized banksHigh regulatory costs for small and mid sized banks
High regulatory costs for small and mid sized banks
 
Non-performing Loans in China
Non-performing Loans in ChinaNon-performing Loans in China
Non-performing Loans in China
 
Effect of Debt Recovery Techniques on Performance of Selected Financial Insti...
Effect of Debt Recovery Techniques on Performance of Selected Financial Insti...Effect of Debt Recovery Techniques on Performance of Selected Financial Insti...
Effect of Debt Recovery Techniques on Performance of Selected Financial Insti...
 
Local Bank Financial Constraints and Firm Access To E-Fin.pptx
Local Bank Financial Constraints and Firm Access To E-Fin.pptxLocal Bank Financial Constraints and Firm Access To E-Fin.pptx
Local Bank Financial Constraints and Firm Access To E-Fin.pptx
 

More from James Howard

Private Applications of Local Government Risk Metrics
Private Applications of Local Government Risk MetricsPrivate Applications of Local Government Risk Metrics
Private Applications of Local Government Risk Metrics
James Howard
 
Galaxies and cosmology certificate
Galaxies and cosmology certificateGalaxies and cosmology certificate
Galaxies and cosmology certificate
James Howard
 
Astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life
Astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial LifeAstrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life
Astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life
James Howard
 
An Introduction to the U.S. Food System: Perspectives from Public Health
An Introduction to the U.S. Food System: Perspectives from Public HealthAn Introduction to the U.S. Food System: Perspectives from Public Health
An Introduction to the U.S. Food System: Perspectives from Public Health
James Howard
 

More from James Howard (18)

Big Data in the Online Classroom
Big Data in the Online ClassroomBig Data in the Online Classroom
Big Data in the Online Classroom
 
NFIP Dissertation Proposal Defense
NFIP Dissertation Proposal DefenseNFIP Dissertation Proposal Defense
NFIP Dissertation Proposal Defense
 
NFIP Dissertation Defense
NFIP Dissertation DefenseNFIP Dissertation Defense
NFIP Dissertation Defense
 
Numerical Analysis in R
Numerical Analysis in RNumerical Analysis in R
Numerical Analysis in R
 
Planning for Martian Polity
Planning for Martian PolityPlanning for Martian Polity
Planning for Martian Polity
 
Virtual Bumblebees
Virtual BumblebeesVirtual Bumblebees
Virtual Bumblebees
 
James Howard - Public Financial Management - Tax Incremental Financing
James Howard - Public Financial Management - Tax Incremental FinancingJames Howard - Public Financial Management - Tax Incremental Financing
James Howard - Public Financial Management - Tax Incremental Financing
 
Using Agile Methods for Course Management and Delivery
Using Agile Methods for Course Management and DeliveryUsing Agile Methods for Course Management and Delivery
Using Agile Methods for Course Management and Delivery
 
Private Applications of Local Government Risk Metrics
Private Applications of Local Government Risk MetricsPrivate Applications of Local Government Risk Metrics
Private Applications of Local Government Risk Metrics
 
Galaxies and cosmology certificate
Galaxies and cosmology certificateGalaxies and cosmology certificate
Galaxies and cosmology certificate
 
Astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life
Astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial LifeAstrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life
Astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life
 
An Introduction to the U.S. Food System: Perspectives from Public Health
An Introduction to the U.S. Food System: Perspectives from Public HealthAn Introduction to the U.S. Food System: Perspectives from Public Health
An Introduction to the U.S. Food System: Perspectives from Public Health
 
Estimating the Net Social Benefits of the National Flood Insurance Program
Estimating the Net Social Benefits of the National Flood Insurance ProgramEstimating the Net Social Benefits of the National Flood Insurance Program
Estimating the Net Social Benefits of the National Flood Insurance Program
 
Maryland ASPA Awards Nomination 2013
Maryland ASPA Awards Nomination 2013Maryland ASPA Awards Nomination 2013
Maryland ASPA Awards Nomination 2013
 
Measuring the Impacts of the National Flood Insurance Program
Measuring the Impacts of the National Flood Insurance ProgramMeasuring the Impacts of the National Flood Insurance Program
Measuring the Impacts of the National Flood Insurance Program
 
Working with Mediawiki
Working with MediawikiWorking with Mediawiki
Working with Mediawiki
 
Policy Entrepreneurship at the Dorr Foundation
Policy Entrepreneurship at the Dorr FoundationPolicy Entrepreneurship at the Dorr Foundation
Policy Entrepreneurship at the Dorr Foundation
 
Municipal Creditworthiness
Municipal CreditworthinessMunicipal Creditworthiness
Municipal Creditworthiness
 

Recently uploaded

一比一原版(UCSD毕业证书)加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UCSD毕业证书)加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(UCSD毕业证书)加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UCSD毕业证书)加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
atedyxc
 
wiley-cpa-review-focus-notes revieww.pdf
wiley-cpa-review-focus-notes revieww.pdfwiley-cpa-review-focus-notes revieww.pdf
wiley-cpa-review-focus-notes revieww.pdf
allysaamping
 
一比一原版(UMich毕业证书)密歇根大学安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UMich毕业证书)密歇根大学安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(UMich毕业证书)密歇根大学安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UMich毕业证书)密歇根大学安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
atedyxc
 
一比一原版(Concordia毕业证书)康卡迪亚大学毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(Concordia毕业证书)康卡迪亚大学毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(Concordia毕业证书)康卡迪亚大学毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(Concordia毕业证书)康卡迪亚大学毕业证成绩单学位证书
atedyxc
 
Rapport annuel de Encevo Group pour l'année 2023
Rapport annuel de Encevo Group pour l'année 2023Rapport annuel de Encevo Group pour l'année 2023
Rapport annuel de Encevo Group pour l'année 2023
Paperjam_redaction
 
一比一原版(Caltech毕业证书)加利福尼亚理工学院毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(Caltech毕业证书)加利福尼亚理工学院毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(Caltech毕业证书)加利福尼亚理工学院毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(Caltech毕业证书)加利福尼亚理工学院毕业证成绩单学位证书
atedyxc
 
一比一原版(UIUC毕业证书)UIUC毕业证香槟分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UIUC毕业证书)UIUC毕业证香槟分校毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(UIUC毕业证书)UIUC毕业证香槟分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UIUC毕业证书)UIUC毕业证香槟分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
atedyxc
 
ASSESSING HRM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT MEASURES IN THE BANKI...
ASSESSING HRM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT MEASURES IN THE BANKI...ASSESSING HRM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT MEASURES IN THE BANKI...
ASSESSING HRM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT MEASURES IN THE BANKI...
indexPub
 
Chapter Three Interest rates in the Financial System.ppt
Chapter Three Interest rates in the Financial System.pptChapter Three Interest rates in the Financial System.ppt
Chapter Three Interest rates in the Financial System.ppt
Kalkaye
 
NO1 Best kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale baba kal...
NO1 Best kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale baba kal...NO1 Best kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale baba kal...
NO1 Best kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale baba kal...
Amil baba
 

Recently uploaded (20)

一比一原版(UCSD毕业证书)加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UCSD毕业证书)加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(UCSD毕业证书)加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UCSD毕业证书)加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
 
wiley-cpa-review-focus-notes revieww.pdf
wiley-cpa-review-focus-notes revieww.pdfwiley-cpa-review-focus-notes revieww.pdf
wiley-cpa-review-focus-notes revieww.pdf
 
Managing personal finances wisely for financial stability and
Managing personal finances wisely for financial stability  andManaging personal finances wisely for financial stability  and
Managing personal finances wisely for financial stability and
 
Bond Bazaar Powerpoint Presentation in Details
Bond Bazaar Powerpoint Presentation in DetailsBond Bazaar Powerpoint Presentation in Details
Bond Bazaar Powerpoint Presentation in Details
 
Class XII Business Studies-Mind Maps.pdf
Class XII Business Studies-Mind Maps.pdfClass XII Business Studies-Mind Maps.pdf
Class XII Business Studies-Mind Maps.pdf
 
一比一原版(UMich毕业证书)密歇根大学安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UMich毕业证书)密歇根大学安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(UMich毕业证书)密歇根大学安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UMich毕业证书)密歇根大学安娜堡分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
 
International economics – 2 classical theories of IT
International economics – 2 classical theories of ITInternational economics – 2 classical theories of IT
International economics – 2 classical theories of IT
 
How can I withdraw my pi coins to real money in India.
How can I withdraw my pi coins to real money in India.How can I withdraw my pi coins to real money in India.
How can I withdraw my pi coins to real money in India.
 
一比一原版(Concordia毕业证书)康卡迪亚大学毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(Concordia毕业证书)康卡迪亚大学毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(Concordia毕业证书)康卡迪亚大学毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(Concordia毕业证书)康卡迪亚大学毕业证成绩单学位证书
 
Rapport annuel de Encevo Group pour l'année 2023
Rapport annuel de Encevo Group pour l'année 2023Rapport annuel de Encevo Group pour l'année 2023
Rapport annuel de Encevo Group pour l'année 2023
 
一比一原版(Caltech毕业证书)加利福尼亚理工学院毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(Caltech毕业证书)加利福尼亚理工学院毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(Caltech毕业证书)加利福尼亚理工学院毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(Caltech毕业证书)加利福尼亚理工学院毕业证成绩单学位证书
 
New Stratus Corporate Presentation May 2024
New Stratus Corporate Presentation May 2024New Stratus Corporate Presentation May 2024
New Stratus Corporate Presentation May 2024
 
Goldamn report on India's economy in 2024
Goldamn report on India's economy in 2024Goldamn report on India's economy in 2024
Goldamn report on India's economy in 2024
 
一比一原版(UIUC毕业证书)UIUC毕业证香槟分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UIUC毕业证书)UIUC毕业证香槟分校毕业证成绩单学位证书一比一原版(UIUC毕业证书)UIUC毕业证香槟分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
一比一原版(UIUC毕业证书)UIUC毕业证香槟分校毕业证成绩单学位证书
 
NO1 Best Black Magic Removal in Uk kala jadu Specialist kala jadu for Love Ba...
NO1 Best Black Magic Removal in Uk kala jadu Specialist kala jadu for Love Ba...NO1 Best Black Magic Removal in Uk kala jadu Specialist kala jadu for Love Ba...
NO1 Best Black Magic Removal in Uk kala jadu Specialist kala jadu for Love Ba...
 
ASSESSING HRM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT MEASURES IN THE BANKI...
ASSESSING HRM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT MEASURES IN THE BANKI...ASSESSING HRM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT MEASURES IN THE BANKI...
ASSESSING HRM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT MEASURES IN THE BANKI...
 
Chapter Three Interest rates in the Financial System.ppt
Chapter Three Interest rates in the Financial System.pptChapter Three Interest rates in the Financial System.ppt
Chapter Three Interest rates in the Financial System.ppt
 
The Pfandbrief Roundtable 2024 - Covered Bonds
The Pfandbrief Roundtable 2024 - Covered BondsThe Pfandbrief Roundtable 2024 - Covered Bonds
The Pfandbrief Roundtable 2024 - Covered Bonds
 
NO1 Best kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale baba kal...
NO1 Best kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale baba kal...NO1 Best kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale baba kal...
NO1 Best kala jadu karne wale ka contact number kala jadu karne wale baba kal...
 
How to exchange my pi coins on HTX in 2024
How to exchange my pi coins on HTX in 2024How to exchange my pi coins on HTX in 2024
How to exchange my pi coins on HTX in 2024
 

Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets

  • 1. THE 2010 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT ON REVIEW OF THE COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION'S FISCAL TARGETS COMMITTEE MEMBERS Chair: James P. Howard, II, Long Reach Vice-Chair: Alan Romack, Owen Brown Ed Coleman, Long Reach Roger Hultgren, Harper's Choice Ryan McCarthy, Wilde Lake Dan Woodruff, Dorsey's Search COLUMBIA, MARYLAND FEBRUARY 22, 2010
  • 2. The 2010 Financial Advisory Committee Cynthia Coyle Chair, Planning and Strategy Committee Columbia Association, Inc. 10221 Wincopin Circle Columbia, Maryland 21044 February 22, 2010 Dear Ms. Coyle: Please accept the attached report from the 2010 Financial Advisory Committee on “Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets.” As always, members of the Financial Advisory Committee are available for future consultation regarding this report or other matters the Board of Directors or the Planning and Strategy Committee require. The other committee members and I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to have served the Columbia Association and residents as members of the Financial Advisory Committee and on their behalf, I remain, Respectfully, James P. Howard, II Chair, Financial Advisory Committee
  • 3. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 1 Charge To develop a successor to the current Financial Management Program. The current Financial Management Program is a ratio-based tool that is intended to analyze fiscal health. It has been used for the past 5 years and is up for review. The PSC is asking that the FAC benchmark best practices to create a successor program which may include these ratios, but which will not be limited to them. Recommendation The Financial Advisory Committee recommends the Columbia Association adopt the Low Range as specified as targets for financial health for the coming decade. These targets have been met mostly under the current financial management plan and could be completely attainable with a measure of fiscal discipline. Meeting these targets will help satisfy investor concern over the long-term viability of CA's debt and encourage bond ratings agencies to continue classifying CA debt at the upper range of investment grade.
  • 4. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 2 Introduction The Financial Management Program (FMP) is a plan developed by the Columbia Association (CA) to provide targets for financial health of the organization. The previous FMP will soon be expiring and the charge asks the Financial Advisory Committee (FAC) to provide a new program consisting of targets for several financial measurement ratios. These ratios are used to measure the debt of the CA and provide insight into its long-term capacity to repay its obligations. The CA uses debt financing to pay for new and existing programs and has done so since its inception. In general, while the CA does separate its capital and operating expenditures for budgetary purposes, the CA does not tie specific debts to specific programs nor physical plant. The CA has pledged the income from its assessment lien income against the senior secured bonds issued over the previous decades. The CA also maintains revolving credit which is available to finance continuing activities. As a result, the CA's debt is similar to general obligation debt in the parlance of municipal finance. Much of the CA's debt is issued through the municipal bond market. The CA maintains a revolving line of credit of $20 million and taps that credit line on an as-needed basis to fund current activities. When that revolving line of credit is exhausted, the CA is able to issue marketable securities and uses the proceeds of that sale to extinguish the line of credit and the cycle begins anew. This can happen every two to four years depending upon the specific financial needs of the CA. Additionally, market conditions, including prevailing interest rates, may make it prudent to shorten or lengthen the cycle. Using debt to fund CA operating and capital has both advantages and disadvantages. On the positive side, the costs of facilities that are used for years or decades can be spread across the entire time period for which the facility is in use, reducing the up front cost of a facility. Negatives, however, are the increased cost due to interest payments and the questionable logic of spreading the cost of operating expenses over a period of years. The core issue at hand, however, is the inherent risk associated with debt management. By incurring long-term liabilities, the CA and residents assume the risk that the CA might default and not meet its obligations. Because the lien against homeowners is structurally similar to an ad valorem property tax and the CA is a unique organization, the models of credit measurement available to cities and small governments provide the best lens with which to view the CA. The FAC and its predecessors have historically used the model of municipal debt when evaluating the CA's debt management and believes this approach is also used by credit ratings agencies. This model does have shortcomings, however, as it is predicated on the ability of a jurisdiction to institute a tax on personal income. While many local governments engage in some enterprise activities, unlike many cities, the CA receives approximately half of its income from enterprise activities. As a result, the CA is subject to both cyclical and counter-cyclical market forces. If the organization is fiscally prudent, under these circumstances, it can effectively hedge against the broader market, providing significant protection to its credit standing, without regard to the macroeconomic climate.
  • 5. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 3 The Financial Model of the Columbia Association Because the CA is effectively modeled as a municipality, and there is evidence to suggest this is the model used by the the credit ratings agencies, 1 this is the approach the Financial Advisory Committee will take. Though this model suffers from drawbacks previously mentioned, it effectively relates the ability of the CA to repay its obligations based on its assessment income through the analogy to ad valorem taxes. In this regard, the CA is likened to a small city, with approximately 100,000 residents, in a generally prosperous region. The FAC has historically used this approach to understanding the CA's financial health. The financial health ratios are important to the CA because some ratios are important for maintaining the CA's debt rating, ensuring cost effective debt placements. Creditors look for guidance from credit ratings agencies and if a ratings agency should consider the CA to be higher risk than a similar sized city, the CA would be forced to pay a higher rate of interest for its debt. Additionally, some ratios, CA 2 and CA3, must be maintained at specified levels by the current bond trust agreement. Failure to maintain those ratios can constitute technical default allowing the bondholders to seize CA assets. The FAC has noted previously that a default by the CA is not similar to a default by a local government given that a local government would likely survive bankruptcy proceedings and bondholders would be disadvantaged in such a proceeding compared to a private organization. As CA income from both assessments and enterprise activities changes, along with expenses and debt, the financial ratios can vary. For instance, an increase in expenses will cause the ratio of income to expenses to decrease and may signal a potential problem. It is best to consider the set of ratios holistically and not focus on individual measures. The FAC recommends using the four ratios recommended for observation by the Municipal Bond Association,2 according to their designations by the Budget Committee in 2007: 3 R1=total debt /assessed value R2=total debt / population R3= per capita debt / per capita income CA1 =debt service / revenues For reference, the Budget Committee also considered two other ratios, but because these are required by the bond trust agreement, the FAC will not recommend targets for those ratios: 1. Columbia Association Budget Committee, “Measuring the Financial Health of the Columbia Association,” (Columbia, MD: Columbia Association: 2007). 2. Judy Wesalow Temel, The Fundamentals of Municipal Bonds, (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001): 176. 3. See note 1.
  • 6. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 4 CA2=debt service /annual charge revenue CA3 =operating expenses /revenues The required target for CA2 is 67% and for CA3 is between 65% and 70%.4 The current FMP also includes references to other ratios that the FAC believes should no longer be considered. Criteria for Policy Evaluation In evaluating a potential change in ratio targets, this Committee will consider four questions: 1. Bond Rating–How does this affect the bond rating? Will changing a given target alter how credit ratings organizations view the Columbia Association? 2. Solvency–How does this affect the solvency of the corporation? This is closely related the first question, but is subtly different in extremity. 3. Cash Flow–How does this affect the cash flow? Will a specified target impact cash flow positively or negatively? 4. Assessment–How would this affect the assessment lien? Some changes may be best implemented by changing the assessment lien rate. Policy Alternatives The Committee will consider four potential targets for financial planning. The first option is to maintain the current situation and keep the existing targets. The first alternative is an array of low-range targets, exemplified by low debt and a push for expenses drawing from current income. The second alternative is an array of mid-range targets, showing a middle-ground approach. The third alternative is an array of high range targets, exemplified by higher debt. There are infinite possibilities within the spectrum of options. However, the Committee believes these four options present a simple but broad picture of the effects of the entire spectrum. The target ranges are: Alternative R1 R2 R3 CA1 Current FMP N/A N/A N/A 25.00% Low Range 1.00% $750 1.00% 5.00% Middle Range 2.00% $1,300 3.00% 10.00% High Range 3.00% $2,000 5.00% 15.00% The CA currently only has targets for the final metric, CA 1. 4. Columbia Association Budget Committee, Report on the FY2006 Budget, (Columbia, Maryland: Columbia Association, Inc., January 27, 2005).
  • 7. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 5 Comparison of Alternatives by Criteria The comparison matrix for the effect of each alternative on each criterion the Financial Advisory Committee deemed important is as follows: Alternative Bond Rating Solvency Cash Flow Assessment Current FMP Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Low Range Positive Positive Positive Negative Middle Range Negative Neutral Neutral Neutral High Range Negative Neutral Negative Positive This analysis is subjective and can be interpreted in a variety of ways. It is the FAC's best guess as to how altering the targets would affect the CA's financial condition. However, the FAC is comfortable making this judgement due to its current and past analyses of the CA's and local governments' financial conditions. Recommendation The Financial Advisory Committee recommends the Columbia Association adopt the Low Range as specified as targets for financial health for the coming decade. These targets have been met mostly under the current financial management plan and could be completely attainable with a measure of fiscal discipline. Meeting these targets will help satisfy investor concern over the long-term viability of CA's debt and encourage bond ratings agencies to continue classifying CA debt at the upper range of investment grade.
  • 8. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 6 Appendix 1: Ratio Comparison for Selected Cities Nationwide Beaverton, OR Boulder, CO Fargo, ND Kenosha, WI Las Cruces, NM FY 2008 Figures Founded 1893 1859 1871 1835.00 1907 General Obligation Debt $14,190,063 $60,120,000 $174,922,478 $8,236,434 $173,357,114 Debt Service $2,299,897 $12,883,000 $10,087,666 $7,499,567 $262,549 Assessed Value $7,000,000,000 $2,416,542,000 $3,201,497,937 $6,341,813,300 - Revenue $60,605,037 $174,794,000 $108,246,514 $71,561,315 $84,539,359 Property Tax $28,131,042 $21,865,000 $17,269,481 $42,822,076 $7,777,195 Operating Expenses 58,252,893 $154,896,000 $97,307,824 $64,061,748 $70,995,143 Population 85,560 94,171 93,531 96,950 89,722 Per Capita Income - $28,976 $37,553 $27,237 24293 Key Ratios CA1—debt service / revenues 3.79% 7.37% 9.32% 10.48% 0.31% CA2—debt service / annual charge rev. 8.18% 58.92% 58.41% 17.51% 3.38% CA3—operating expenses / revenue 96.12% 88.62% 89.89% 89.52% 83.98% R1—total debt / assessed value 0.20% 2.49% 0.05 0.13% - R2—total debt / population $166 $2,075 $4,658 $302 $1,932 R3—per capita debt / per capita income - 7.16% 12.40% 1.11% 0.08 Source: Committee Compilation
  • 9. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 7 Appendix 1: Ratio Comparison for Selected Cities Nationwide (continued) Livonia, MI Macon, GA Roanoke, VA Sandy, UT Waukegan, IL Wilmington, NC FY 2008 Figures Founded 1950 1823 1882 1893 1859 1739 General Obligation Debt $63,070,804 $67,452,000 $275,531,207 $2,425,000 $94,565,307 $29,655,000 Debt Service $2,818,271 $4,963,690 $31,165,398 $1,779,700 $8,306,966 $7,388,341 Assessed Value $5,209,000,000 $1,895,364,925 $7,407,774,726 $8,834,376,909 - $13,643,490,563 Revenue $127,400,000 $104,892,000 $287,996,553 $70,491,195 $89,250,643 $80,730,676 Property Tax $58,381,619 $17,814,000 $98,714,420 $7,233,667 $17,356,638 $41,472,281 Operating Expenses $123,100,000 $93,964,000 $306,874,197 $65,334,719 $87,873,000 $69,638,456 Population 91,220 90623 93504 96660 89877 100192 Per Capita Income $27,923 32619.00 33358.00 49151.60 - 32800.91 Key Ratios CA1—debt service / revenues 2.21% 4.73% 10.82% 2.52% 9.31% 9.15% CA2—debt service / annual charge rev. 4.83% 27.86% 31.57% 24.60% 47.86% 17.82% CA3—operating expenses / revenue 96.62% 89.58% 106.55% 92.68% 98.46% 86.26% R1—total debt / assessed value 1.21% 3.56% 3.72% 0.03% - 0.22% R2—total debt / population $691 $2,068 $2,947 $49 $1,052 $904 R3—per capita debt / per capita income 0.02 6.34% 8.83% 0.10% - 2.76% Source: Committee Compilation
  • 10. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 8 Appendix 2: Historical Ratio Comparison for Selected Counties in Maryland Anne Arundel Baltimore Co. Howard Montgomery Columbia Assn. FY 2006 Figures Founded 1650 1659 1851 1776 1965 General Obligation Debt $875,982,000 $752,245,000 $541,323,315 $1,493,888,054 $63,035,000 Debt Service $104,580,589 $68,084,000 $67,132,766 $215,372,072 $12,703,000 Assessed Value $43,802,722,000 $48,292,908,000 $29,852,994,080 $110,529,249,116 $8,034,858,000 Revenue $1,047,237,963 $1,389,453,000 $996,345,521 $3,410,462,595 $52,923,000 Property Tax $411,488,309 $588,640,000 $353,894,412 $1,073,936,688 $26,060,000 Operating Expenses 924,028,630 $1,325,854,000 $931,195,501 $3,273,734,293 $30,775,000 Population 511,549 786,650 276,287 953,000 98,383 Per Capita Income $44,927 $39,478 $54,924 $61,805 $54,924 Key Ratios CA1—debt service / revenues 9.99% 4.90% 6.74% 6.32% 24.00% CA2—debt service / annual charge rev. 25.42% 11.57% 18.97% 20.05% 48.75% CA3—operating expenses / revenue 88.23% 95.42% 93.46% 95.99% 58.15% R1—total debt / assessed value 2.00% 1.56% 1.81% 1.35% 0.78% R2—total debt / population $1,712 $956 $1,959 $1,568 $641 R3—per capita debt / per capita income 3.81% 2.42% 3.57% 2.54% 1.17% Source: Committee Compilation
  • 11. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 9 Addendum 1 Per the request of the Columbia Association's Planning and Strategy Committee, the FAC provides a time table for reduction of CA 1: Fiscal Year CA1 2011 16% 2012 18% 2013 15% 2014 12% 2015 11% 2016 6% 2017 5% 2018 5% 2019 5% 2020 5% The values for fiscal year 2011 through 2016 are based upon the existing and proposed debt as of April 30, 20125 and assumes a 3.0% increase in income from all sources for each year. 5. Columbia Association, Operating and Capital Budget (Draft), (Columbia, Maryland: Columbia, Association, Inc., December 17, 2009).
  • 12. Review of the Columbia Association's Fiscal Targets 10 Addendum 2 The Columbia Association's Planning and Strategy Committee asked the FAC to consider the impact of a proposed new headquarters building on the targets recommended in this review. The FAC recognizes that a proposed building project will be expensive and impossible to fund from current revenues. Borrowing will be necessary. However, these recommendations are based on best practices and it is incumbent upon the Columbia Association's Board of Directors to balance the value of a new facility with the costs of building it.