Skip to main content
Reply to below posting in a paragraph of at least five sentences
by asking questions, reflecting on your own experience,
challenging assumptions, pointing out something new you
learned, offering suggestions.
1)
Edward Snowden is a hero or a criminal
Edward Snowden, a low-level private contractor to the US-
based National Security Agency (NSA), breached moral
confidentiality and secrecy obligations by engaging in
unauthorized accessing, retrieving and/or releasing of a large
volume of confidential data from NSA to the press and,
possibly, to foreign powers. Edward Snowden (born June 21,
1983) is a computer programmer who worked as a subcontractor
for the National Security Agency (NSA). Snowden collected
top-secret documents regarding NSA domestic surveillance
practices that he found disturbing and leaked them. During his
years of IT work, Snowden had noticed the far reach of the
NSA's everyday surveillance.
“While working for Booz Allen, Snowden began copying top-
secret NSA documents.”
(Biography.com, 2019) After he had compiled a large store of
documents, Snowden told his NSA supervisor that he needed a
leave of absence for medical reasons, stating he had been
diagnosed with epilepsy. On May 20, 2013, Snowden took a
flight to Hong Kong, China. (Biography.com, 2019)
As mentioned by author Rouse in her article referring, he leaked
and also raised questions about data sovereignty and how secure
a company's data really is if it's stored by a cloud provider
based in the United States. In 2014, almost 90% of respondents
to a survey commissioned by security consultancy NTT
Communications said they were changing their cloud-buying
behavior as a result of Snowden’s revelations. Just over half
said they are carrying out greater due diligence on cloud
providers than ever before, and more than four-fifths responded
that they would seek out more training on data protection laws.
(Rouse, 2015)
Snowden has also been accused of irregularities under the
Espionage Law for knowingly discovering mysterious national
security data. When these charges were opened, newspapers
quickly guaranteed that he was accused of undercover work.
Such cases are not exactly accurate. Undercover work is
commonly characterized as
"the act of spying ... to acquire data on plans and exercises,
particularly from an external government."
(Richa, (2015) Although there have been hypotheses as to
whether the nations to which Snowden fled (Russia and China)
have kept their records, there is still no evidence that he has
continued to his advantage or helped them easily as would be
the case. The situation with great recognition. (Richa, (2015)
Contrary to Snowden’s claim about wanting to stand up for his
fellow Americans, the information he leaked actually created
more harm than good.
“The majority of the information that he shared is about the
U.S. spying on foreign nations and not its domestic operations.”
(Rachel Segal, 2019) As such, he risked damaging America’s
relationship with foreign countries. By doing so, Snowden not
only undermined U.S. alliances around the world but also U.S.
efforts to undermine enemies that operate in countries where
citizens have less ability to protect themselves from tyranny.
(Rachel Segal, 2019)
Finally, Edward Joseph Snowden certainly has done a heroic act
by exposing the global surveillance programmer of NSA. His
act obviously fumes a global debate over surveillance
techniques and protecting citizens’ privacy which was very
much required in the age of present technological scenario. This
also resulted in the US government passing the laws for the first
time in decades restricting government surveillance. In his
word:
"He's obviously violated the laws of America, for which he's
responsible, but I think the invasion of human rights and
American privacy has gone too far and the secrecy that has been
surrounding this invasion of privacy has been excessive, so I
think that the bringing of it to the public notice has probably
been, in the long term, beneficial"
(Newton, 2013).
2)
Edward Snowden, a former government employee and
contractor, disclosed to newspaper reporters information about
US intelligence activities that he obtained during the course of
his work. Specifically, he revealed that the NSA engaged in
widespread, warrantless surveillance of domestic and
international telephone and Internet communications and also
engaged in cyber spying on other governments, including allies.
The revelations caused a public stir, especially given the
questionable constitutionality of the NSA’s domestic
surveillance. But far more press, much of it hyperbolic, has
focused on Snowden himself. Many officials and observers have
called him a traitor while others labeled him a hero and a
whistleblower who exposed massive government wrongdoing.
Although officials have referred to Snowden as a traitor, he was
not charged with treason. Nor should he be. The crime of
treason requires that a person actually levy war against the US
or act to aid enemies with whom the US is at war while showing
allegiance to those enemies. Snowden’s disclosure of
confidential information does not rise to the level of treason,
especially given that his apparent motive was to inform the
general public about a surveillance scheme he viewed as “an
existential threat to democracy.” In fact, the crime of treason is
purposefully difficult to prove against defendants like Snowden
precisely because it was historically abused, often used to
punish those who did nothing more than criticize the
government.
Snowden has also been charged with crimes under the
Espionage Act for intentionally revealing secret national
security information. Once these charges became public,
newspapers immediately claimed that he was charged with
espionage. Such claims are not quite accurate. Espionage is
generally defined as “the practice of spying to obtain
information about the plans and activities especially of a
foreign government.” Although there has been speculation
regarding whether the countries to which Snowden has fled have
seized his files, there is not yet any evidence that he acted on
their behalf or willingly cooperated with them as would be the
case with classic espionage. Which brings us back to the First
Amendment. As with those early and often abused-treason
prosecutions, the broad provisions of the Espionage Act raise
significant First Amendment concerns. The laws give officials
nearly unfettered discretion to determine when a release of
confidential information may cause damage to US interests.
Thus, officials can retaliate against certain leakers by charging
them with crimes while ignoring other leaks. And leaks occur,
often purposefully and at the behestand likely always will. Prior
to the last decade, the federal government did not aggressively
pursue criminal charges against government employees who
leaked information to the press; rather, it punished such leaks if
at all, via internal disciplinary actions.
Reply to below  posting in a paragraph of at least five sentences by.docx