REAL TIME DATA GATHERING IN WIRELESS
SENSOR NETWORK BY MINIMIZING THE COST OF
NETWORK
PRESENTED BY:
AMIT KUSHWAHA(1307071)
RAKESH SHYORAN(1307055)
RITIKESH SINGH(1307070)
PROJECT GUIDE:
DR. DINESH DASH
Contents
• Introduction to WSN
• Objective
• Introduction to network cost
• Problem statement
• Introduction to experiment parameter
• Our approach
• Proposed algorithm
• Conclusion
• Advantages
• References
Introduction to WSN
• It consists of sensors which are small,with
limited processing and computing resources.
• These sensors work with each other to sense
some physical phenomenon and then the
information gathered is processed to get
relevant results.
• It consists of protocols and algorithms with self-
organizing capabilities.
Application of WSN
Introduction to network cost
If T is the total cost of the network then T will be-
T= (Total cost of data collectors) + (Total cost of base
stations)
T = N1*T1 + N2*T2
Where
N1= Total number of data collectors
N2= Total number of base stations
T1= Cost of a data collector
T2= Cost of a base station
Objective
• Gathering real time data in WSN.
• Finding the minimum number of data
collectors.
• Minimizing the toal cost of the WSN network.
Problem statement
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Fixed area with random distributed sensor nodes
Introduction to experiment parameter
• H: Height of the area
• W: Width of the area
• Cd : Communication distance
• V: Speed of the data collector
• T: Time
Our Approach Part 1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
In the part 1 of our approach we find the set of Polling Point
Our Approach Part 2
In the part 2 of our approach we take the result of
part 1 (set of polling point) and construct the
minimum spanning tree of the polling point by
using Prims Algorithm.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Minimum spanning tree on polling point
Our Approach Part 3
In the final part of our approach we break the
minimum spanning tree of polling point into the
minimum number of sub spanning tree by full
filling the condition that is the total weight of
every sub spanning tree should be less than
(V*T)/2 and assign them a set of data collector
and base station.
Where T is the time given to get data and V is the
speed of the data collector.
Result of part 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sensors nodes in the form of sub spanning tree
Proposed algorithm for part 1
Create an empty set Pcurr
Create a set Ucurr containing all sensors
Create a set L containing all candidate polling points
While Ucurr ≠NULL
Find a polling point l€L, which minimizes alpha= cost{nb(l)}/(nb(l) ∩Ucurr)
Cover sensors in nb(l)
Add the corresponding polling point of nb(l) into Pcurr
Remove the corresponding polling point of nb(l) from L
Remove sensors in nb(l) from Ucurr
End while
Proposed algorithm for part 3
If T is the spanning covering tree on all polling points in P
For each vertex v in T , calculate the weight value Weight(v)
While T≠NULL
Find the deepest leaf vertex u in T
Let the root of the subtreet,Root(t)=u
while Weight(Parent(Root(t)))≤(V*T/2)
Root(t)=Parent(Root(t))
End while
Add all child vertices of Root(t) and edges connecting them into t and remove t from
T
Update weight value of each remaining vertex in T
end While
Conclusion
• Proposed scheme will gather real time data.
• Number of sub spanning tree inversely proportional to the given
time.
• Number of data collectors inversely proportional to the given
time.
Advantages
• Less costly
• We can get update in real time
• Work efficiently for large area
References
[1] Ming Ma, Yunanyuan Yang and Miao Zhao.” Tour planning for
mobile data-gathering mechanisms in wireless sensor
networks.”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology on 2013.
[2] M. Ma and Y. Yang, “Data gathering in wireless sensor
networks with mobile collectors,” in Proc. 22nd IEEE Intern.
Parallel Distrib. Symp., Miami, FL, Apr. 2008.
References
[3] A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, and J.
Anderson, “Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring,” in
Proc. ACM Int. Workshop Wireless Sens. Netw. Appl., Atlanta,
GA, Sep. 2002.
[4] M. Zhao and Y. Yang, “Bounded relay hop mobile data
gathering in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol.
61, no. 2, pp. 265– 277, Feb. 2012.
THANK YOU

Real_time_data_gathering_in_wireless_sensor_network.pptx

  • 1.
    REAL TIME DATAGATHERING IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK BY MINIMIZING THE COST OF NETWORK PRESENTED BY: AMIT KUSHWAHA(1307071) RAKESH SHYORAN(1307055) RITIKESH SINGH(1307070) PROJECT GUIDE: DR. DINESH DASH
  • 2.
    Contents • Introduction toWSN • Objective • Introduction to network cost • Problem statement • Introduction to experiment parameter • Our approach • Proposed algorithm • Conclusion • Advantages • References
  • 3.
    Introduction to WSN •It consists of sensors which are small,with limited processing and computing resources. • These sensors work with each other to sense some physical phenomenon and then the information gathered is processed to get relevant results. • It consists of protocols and algorithms with self- organizing capabilities.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Introduction to networkcost If T is the total cost of the network then T will be- T= (Total cost of data collectors) + (Total cost of base stations) T = N1*T1 + N2*T2 Where N1= Total number of data collectors N2= Total number of base stations T1= Cost of a data collector T2= Cost of a base station
  • 6.
    Objective • Gathering realtime data in WSN. • Finding the minimum number of data collectors. • Minimizing the toal cost of the WSN network.
  • 7.
    Problem statement 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Fixed area with random distributed sensor nodes
  • 8.
    Introduction to experimentparameter • H: Height of the area • W: Width of the area • Cd : Communication distance • V: Speed of the data collector • T: Time
  • 9.
    Our Approach Part1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In the part 1 of our approach we find the set of Polling Point
  • 10.
    Our Approach Part2 In the part 2 of our approach we take the result of part 1 (set of polling point) and construct the minimum spanning tree of the polling point by using Prims Algorithm.
  • 11.
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Minimum spanning tree on polling point
  • 12.
    Our Approach Part3 In the final part of our approach we break the minimum spanning tree of polling point into the minimum number of sub spanning tree by full filling the condition that is the total weight of every sub spanning tree should be less than (V*T)/2 and assign them a set of data collector and base station. Where T is the time given to get data and V is the speed of the data collector.
  • 13.
    Result of part3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sensors nodes in the form of sub spanning tree
  • 14.
    Proposed algorithm forpart 1 Create an empty set Pcurr Create a set Ucurr containing all sensors Create a set L containing all candidate polling points While Ucurr ≠NULL Find a polling point l€L, which minimizes alpha= cost{nb(l)}/(nb(l) ∩Ucurr) Cover sensors in nb(l) Add the corresponding polling point of nb(l) into Pcurr Remove the corresponding polling point of nb(l) from L Remove sensors in nb(l) from Ucurr End while
  • 15.
    Proposed algorithm forpart 3 If T is the spanning covering tree on all polling points in P For each vertex v in T , calculate the weight value Weight(v) While T≠NULL Find the deepest leaf vertex u in T Let the root of the subtreet,Root(t)=u while Weight(Parent(Root(t)))≤(V*T/2) Root(t)=Parent(Root(t)) End while Add all child vertices of Root(t) and edges connecting them into t and remove t from T Update weight value of each remaining vertex in T end While
  • 16.
    Conclusion • Proposed schemewill gather real time data. • Number of sub spanning tree inversely proportional to the given time. • Number of data collectors inversely proportional to the given time.
  • 17.
    Advantages • Less costly •We can get update in real time • Work efficiently for large area
  • 18.
    References [1] Ming Ma,Yunanyuan Yang and Miao Zhao.” Tour planning for mobile data-gathering mechanisms in wireless sensor networks.”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology on 2013. [2] M. Ma and Y. Yang, “Data gathering in wireless sensor networks with mobile collectors,” in Proc. 22nd IEEE Intern. Parallel Distrib. Symp., Miami, FL, Apr. 2008.
  • 19.
    References [3] A. Mainwaring,J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, and J. Anderson, “Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring,” in Proc. ACM Int. Workshop Wireless Sens. Netw. Appl., Atlanta, GA, Sep. 2002. [4] M. Zhao and Y. Yang, “Bounded relay hop mobile data gathering in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 265– 277, Feb. 2012.
  • 20.