Skip to main content
Joshua Daniel Hanelin, MD
OVERVIEW
I.     Why Radiology
II.    Cost
III.   Radiation Dose
IV.    Imaging Modalities, Physics, and Contrast Reactions
V.     Organ Based Approach to Imaging
VI.    How to Order an Exam
WHY RADIOLOGY?
WHY RADIOLOGY?
Specific Question vs Fishing Expedition: Tailor your study to
  answer the question.

 Does my patient have gallstones?
 Does my patient have a kidney stone?
 Does my patient have a small bowel obstruction?
 Does my patient have fibroids?
Vs
 Why does my patient have this vague abdominal pain?
 Why does my patient have a fever?
 Why does my patient have knee pain?
COST
   Radiographs: $30 - $80
   Ultrasound: $120 - $160
   CT: $300 - $2000
   Nuclear scans: $120 - $240
   MRI: $670 - $1,250
   PET-CT: > $3,000

 Current expenditures on all medical imaging: $100
  billion per year
 Growth rate: doubling every decade
RADIATION DOSE
RADIATION DOSE
 Chest X-ray: 0.05 mSv
 Extremity X-ray: 0.1 mSv
 Abdomen X-ray: 1.0 mSv
 Head CT: 1 mSv
 Bone scan: 5 mSv
 Abd. Fluoro (e.g. barium enema): 5-15 mSv
 Abdomen CT: 10-20 mSv
RADIATION DOSE
 100 mSv to each of 100 adults yields about 1 extra
  malignancy
 Dose from a single abdomen CT minimally – but
  definitely – increases cancer risk
 Age at exposure is crucial
RADIATION DOSE
 Chest X-ray: 0.05 mSv
 Extremity X-ray: 0.1 mSv
 Abdomen X-ray: 1.0 mSv
 Head CT: 1 mSv
 Bone scan: 5 mSv
 Abd. Fluoro (e.g. barium enema): 5-15 mSv
 Abdomen CT: 10-20 mSv
RADIATION DOSE




 Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated Risks of Radiation-
 Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT. AJR 2001;176:289–296.
RADIATION DOSE
 Belly exams are the big-dose ones
 If you can avoid a few hundred per career, you’ll
  probably avoid causing a cancer
 Still - for any serious disease, failure to diagnose is still
  more dangerous than the radiation.
WHY RADIOLOGY?
Always ask yourself:
Will the results of this test change my management of
  the patient?

Is this cost effective?

Are the risks worth the benefit?
Conventional Radiography
Image Generation:
 X ray – Electromagnetic radiation
Conventional Radiography
EQUIPMENT
Conventional Radiography
FILM RADIOGRAPHY
Conventional Radiography
FILM RADIOGRAPHY
Conventional Radiography
FILM RADIOGRAPHY
Conventional Radiography
COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY
Conventional Radiography
DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY
Conventional Radiography
CONVENTIONAL TOMOGRAPHY
Conventional Radiography
CONVENTIONAL TOMOGRAPHY
Conventional Radiography
FLUOROSCOPY
Conventional Radiography
FLUOROSCOPY
CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY
FLUOROSCOPY

Contrast Agents:
Barium Sulfate – Well tolerated. Aspiration rarely causes
 a clinical problem. Major risk is barium peritonitis
 due to spill into peritoneal cavity through bowel
 perforations.
Water-soluble iodinated contrast media – No risk of
 peritonitis. Aspiration causes chemical pneumonitis.
 Large volumes in the GI tract draw water into the gut
 and may lead to hypovolemia, shock, and death.
Conventional Radiography
CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY
Conventional Radiography
RADIOGRAPHIC VIEWS
 Beam Direction:
 Posteroanterior (PA)
 Anteroposterior (AP)
 Craniocaudad(CC)

 Patient Position:
 Erect
 Supine
 Prone
 Lateral Decubitus
 Obliques
Conventional Radiography
PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION
 5 basic radiographic densities:
 Air – little attenuation
 Fat – intermediate attenuation
 Soft tissue – intermediate attenuation
 Bone – high attenuation
 Metal/Contrast agents – high attenuation
Conventional Radiography
PRINCIPLES OF IMAGE INTERPRETATION
 Structures are seen when outlined by tissues of
  different xray attenuation
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
IMAGING PLANES
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
 Computer reconstruction of cross section of body from
  measurements of x-ray transmission through thin
  slices of the patient
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

 Conventional CT
 Images obtained one slice at a time

 Helical/Spiral CT
 Patient table moves while xray tube rotates around patient

 Multidetector helical CT
 Multiple detectors allowing multiple slices per rotation of
  the xray tube
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Contrast:
 Intravenous – Enhance density differences between
  lesions and surrounding parenchyma, demonstrate
  vascular anatomy, and characterize lesions by patterns
  of contrast enhancement
 Oral – Required to opacify the bowel to help
  differentiate between from tumors, lymph nodes, and
  hematomas
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Contrast Reactions:
 Mild – nausea, vomiting, urticaria, injection site warmth, injection site
  pain
Tx: Observation 20 – 30 minutes

 Moderate – hives, vasovagal reactions, bronchospasm, mild laryngeal
  edema
Tx: Diphenhydramine, beta-agonists, epinephrine, leg elevation

 Severe – severe bronchospasm, severe laryngeal edema, loss of
  consciousness, seizures, cardiac arrest
Tx: Life support equipment and CPR
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Local adverse contrast effects: venous thrombosis,
 extravasation of contrast with associated pain, edema,
 skin slough, or deeper tissue necrosis
  Tx: elevate limb, warm compresses, consider plastic
 surgery consult
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Contrast-induced Nephropathy
 Acute renal failure within 48 hours of contrast
  administration
 Possibility of permanent renal damage
 Risk factors: diabetes and chronic renal insufficiency
 Prevention: Adequate hydration, administration of N-
  acetylcysteine, use of Visipaque
 Chronic dialysis patients at risk for adverse effect of
  osmotic load and direct toxicity on heart; recommend
  dialysis on day of contrast administration
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Metformin

 Oral antihyperglycemic used for type 2 DM
 May precipitate fatal lactic acidosis in presence of renal
  impairment
 FDA recommends withholding metformin for 48 hrs
  following administration of IV contrast and reinstated only
  after renal function has been reevaluated and found to be
  normal
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Patients at risk for adverse reactions:
 Reassess need for IV contrast and consider diagnostic alternatives
 Previous history of adverse reaction
 History of asthma or allergies: Iodine? Shellfish?
 Cardiac dysfunction: CHF, arrhythmias, unstable angina, recent MI,
  pulmonary HTN
 Renal insufficiency
 Diabetes
 Sickle cell disease
 Multiple Myeloma
 Age over 55 yrs
CROSS SECTIONAL IMAGING
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Premedication regimens:
 Prednisone 50 mg orally taken at 13, 7, and 1 hour prior
  to contrast administration. Diphenhydramine 50 mg
  orally, IV, or intramuscularly at 1 hour prior to contrast.
  Use nonionic low-osmolality agent.
 Methylprednisolone 32 mg orally at 12 and 2 hours
  prior to contrast administration. Use of
  diphenhydramine is optional. Nonionic low-osmolality
  agent should be used.
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

 Based on the ability of protons in the body to absorb and
  emit radio wave energy when the body is placed in a strong
  magnetic field
 Multiple different pulse sequences used to emphasize
  different tissue characteristics
 Advantages: excellent soft tissue contrast resolution,
  provides images in any plane, absence of ionizing radiation
 Limitations: Inability to demonstrate dense bone detail or
  calcifications, long imaging times, limited spatial
  resolution compared with CT, expensive
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Intravenous contrast: Enhance differences between lesions
  and surrounding parenchyma, demonstrate vascular
  anatomy, and characterize lesions by patterns of contrast
  enhancement
 Adverse reactions (rare): nausea, vomiting, headache,
  injection site warmth, paresthesias, dizziness, itching
 No nephrotoxicity

Oral contrast: Not used
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF)
 Rare disorder affecting patients with renal impairment
  after receiving intravenous MRI contrast agents
 Fibrosis of skin, joints, eyes, and internal organs
 Constant pain, muscle restlessness, and loss of skin
  flexibility
 No consistently effective therapy
 Avoid MRI contrast agents if GFR < 30
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF)
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
ULTRASONOGRAPHY

 Ultrasound transducer converts electrical energy to a
  pulse of high frequency sound energy, which reflects
  off of tissues, producing echoes which are used to
  generate images.
 Real time imaging of moving patient tissue
 Doppler ultrasound permits detection of blood
  velocity and direction
 Highly operator dependent
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
NUCLEAR MEDICINE

External detection and mapping of the biodistribution of
  radiotracers that have been administered to a patient.

Poor spatial resolution, but high functional resolution.

Examples: Ventilation perfusion scan, bone scan, biliary scan,
  white blood cell scan, renal scan, thyroid scan, brain scan,
  PET, liver spleen scan
CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
NEUROLOGIC IMAGING: BRAIN
General rule: CT for acute neurologic illness (< 48 hrs); MRI for
  chronic neurologic illness (> 3 days), never use plain films

If the CT or MRI suggests:
 Vascular lesion     MR or CT angiogram
 Tumor       Contrast
 No infarct, but Sx of infarct  Carotid doppler US or MRA or
   CTA

Acute Trauma      CT with no contrast
MR I inappropriate: multisystem trauma, assisted ventilation

Sedation for agitated adults and children
NEUROLOGIC IMAGING: BRAIN
SPECIFIC SITUATIONS

Acute Trauma: Noncontrast CT

Stroke: Noncontrast CT followed by MRI

Seizure: 1st Seizure, contrast-enhanced MR or CT
Postictal state or residual neurologic deficit, Noncontrast CT
         Chronic seizure disorder, detailed MRI

Infection and Cancer: contrast-enhanced MRI

Headache: Acute headache, noncontrast CT
          Chronic headache with no neurologic Sx, noncontrast MRI
           Chronic headache with neurologic Sx, contrast-enhanced MRI

Dementia: noncontrast MRI
NEUROLOGIC IMAGING: BRAIN




 XX, best study; X acceptable study (depending on situation)
NEUROLOGIC IMAGING: SPINE
Acute Trauma: Plain film, CT if plain film findings
 equivocal

Everything else: MRI
HEAD AND NECK IMAGING
CT vs MRI

CT: Patient cannot hold still, obstructed salivary ducts,
 fractures

MRI: Discrimination of soft tissue pathology
THORACIC IMAGING
Mainstay: Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest
          radiographs

Special views:
 Lateral decubitus: Small effusions or small
  pneumothorax
 Expiratory radiograph: Focal or diffuse air trapping
 Apical lordotic view: Visualization of lung apices
 Chest fluoroscopy: Diaphragmatic paralysis
THORACIC IMAGING
THORACIC IMAGING
THORACIC IMAGING
THORACIC IMAGING
PET: Oncologic diagnosis and staging

Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scan: Diagnosis of PE   `
LIVER
 Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT):
  Primary imaging method
 MRI with contrast: Inability to give iodinated contrast
  or need for multiple repeat examinations
 US: Screening method for patients with abdominal
  symptoms and suspected diffuse or focal liver disease,
  assessment of hepatic vessels
BILIARY TREE
 US: Screening for biliary obstruction
 MRCP: High resolution imaging of biliary tree
GALLBLADDER

US: Method of choice

Cholescintigraphy: Equivocal ultrasound for detection of
                   acute cholecystitis
PANCREAS AND SPLEEN
PANCREAS: Contrast enhanced multidetector CT vs
              contrast enhanced MRI

         US poor visualization of pancreas

SPLEEN: Contrast enhanced CT and US
PHARYNX AND ESOPHAGUS
Barium Swallow/Esophagram: Swallowing disorders and
                           mucosal lesions

CT: Cancer staging, extent of disease

MR: Cancer staging, extent of disease, preferred for
     evaluation of nasopharynx
STOMACH AND DUODENUM
Upper GI Series (UGI): Evaluation of mucosal surface,
                       largely being replaced by
                       endoscopy

CT: Extraluminal component of disease
SMALL BOWEL
Small Bowel Follow Through (SBFT): Insensitive, bowel
                                   lumen and mucosa
                                   details



Enteroclysis: Improved anatomic detail, shorter imaging
              time

CT: Extraluminal disease
ADRENAL GLANDS AND KIDNEYS
ADRENAL GLANDS

CT: Modality of choice

MRI: High quality images with ability to differentiate
 benign adrenal adenomas
ADRENAL GLANDS AND KIDNEYS
KIDNEYS

Contrast enhanced MDCT: Modality of choice

MRI: Patients who cannot tolerate iodinated IV contrast

US: Screening study to detect hydronephrosis and
 demonstrate kidney size
PELVICALYCEAL SYSTEM AND
URETERS

Contrast enhanced MDCT: Modality of choice

MRI with or without contrast: Patients who cannot
 tolerate iodinated IV contrast or with poor renal
 function
BLADDER

Cystogram: Detailed examination of bladder mucosa

CT or MRI: Cancer staging
URETHRA

Retrograde urethrogram: Anterior male urethra

Voiding cystourethrogram: Anterior and posterior
 urethra
GENITAL TRACT
FEMALE GENITAL TRACT

US: Primary imaging modality; Transvaginal vs
 Transabdominal

CT/MRI: Staging and follow up of pelvic malignancies

Hysterosalpingography (HSG): Congenital anomalies
 and causes of infertility
GENITAL TRACT
TESTES AND SCROTUM

Color US: Primary imaging method

CT/MRI: Tumor staging and locating undescended
 testes
GENITAL TRACT
PROSTATE AND SEMINAL VESICLES

MR with endorectal coil: Local disease staging

CT/MRI: Nodal disease and distant spread
MUSCULOSKELETAL
Plain Radiograph: Minimum of two films at 90 degrees
  to each other

CT: Examination of fine bony details or high suspicion of
 fracture not seen on plain radiograph

MRI: Extent of tumor, characterization of soft tissues,
 radiographically occult fractures
ORDERING AN EXAM
 Ask for exams sequentially rather than all at once
 Use your radiologists
 Train your radiologists
 Help your radiologists
ORDERING AN EXAM
WHEN IN DOUBT
ASK YOUR LOCAL RADIOLOGIST
THAT’S IT AND THAT’S ALL

                      G’BYE
                      Y’ALL!
Questions, Comments, Concerns…



Joshua D Hanelin, MD
jdhnyc14@yahoo.com
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2
Radiology Np Students2