Skip to main content
50 June 2012 District Administration
But can they do it all? And at what cost?
Principal Brian Matney
The Virginia Beach Landstown High School and Technology Academy administration confers with lead teachers on the five dozen
professional development opportunities offered to its faculty this past February. Principal Brian Matney, above, is holding the binder.
Leaders
Principals as
Instructional
By Ed Finkel
Principles_DA0612.indd 50 5/15/12 11:22 AM
www.DistrictAdministration.com June 2012 51
Principal Rob Monson
photo c
photo c
photo c
photo c
photo c
photo c
A
t some level, principals always have
been instructional leaders—but
never before has their role been
more prominent.
First, the accountability movement—
No Child Left Behind in particular—
thrust principals into the spotlight on
academic achievement. Then budget cuts
peeled away capacity at both the district
and school levels, thinning the ranks of
assistant superintendents, curriculum
specialists and assistant principals, who
shouldered some or most of the load.
For Beverly Jarrett, principal at Far
West High School in the Oakland (Calif.)
Unified School District, that has meant
an upward creep from 10 hours per day,
five days a week when she started five years
ago, to 12 to 14 hours per day and one
Saturday a month.
“You’re never in this place where you
can relax. You’re always thinking about
the next thing that needs to be done,” she
says, recalling an early evening when she
ran into a student on the street who said
to Jarrett, “I’ve never seen you outside of
school.” Says Jarrett with a wry chuckle,
“They think I live there.”
Traditionally, principals have been
more engaged in management functions,
like making sure every student has a desk,
the buses are on time and cafeterias are
supervised, says Dan Domenech, execu-
tive director of the American Association
of School Administrators. “Often in the
larger schools, an assistant principal was
clearly designated as an instruction per-
son, or a systemwide curriculum director,
or a director of instruction. In the smaller
districts, it was the assistant superinten-
dent of instruction.”
But now, he adds, if a school doesn’t
make adequate yearly progress under
NCLB, the principal is held responsible.
“With that focus of accountability directly
on the principals, they have to step up and
assume that [academic leadership] role,”
Domenech says.
“The reality in most schools was that
curriculum was what happened when the
teacher went into the class and closed the
door,” adds Dick Flannery, senior director
of leadership programs and services at the
National Association of Secondary School
Principals. “There’s no question that prin-
cipals’ substantive involvement in instruc-
tional leadership is a positive for schools.”
Principals who define themselves as
instructional leaders typically have the
most success, particularly in high-poverty
areas, says Karin Chenoweth, writer-
in-residence at the Education Trust and
co-author of Getting It Done: Leading Aca-
demic Success in Unexpected Schools.
“Traditionally, principals were really
not instructional leaders,” she says. “They
tended to be building problem-solvers—
putting out the little fires. Many aren’t
prepared to do that [instructional leader-
ship] job. They were gym teachers, and
they had a good relationship with the
superintendent. That’s not a good recipe
for instructional leadership.”
In addition to greater accountabil-
ity, principals have been thrust into the
instructional leadership role due to budget
cuts. “At one time, they had a curriculum
director who was the go-to person when
looking to implement the new math series
or the new reading series,” says Rob Mon-
son, president of the National Associa-
tion of Elementary School Principals and
principal of Parkston (S.D.) Elementary
School. “Now, the principal has become
Principal Rob Monson,
of Parkston Elementary
School in South
Dakota, gets a big hug
from “begindergarten”
students, who may
not be ready for
kindergarten just yet,
but are ready after they
attend the program.
Principles_DA0612.indd 51 5/15/12 11:22 AM
52 June 2012 District Administration
the beacon that people look to when they
say, ‘What do we do next?’ … We all wish
we had assistants, we all wish we had spe-
cialists, but we don’t.”
Jarrett in Oakland says she doesn’t
mind. “The instructional role is the most
important role, and it’s the one I enjoy the
most—more than all the other roles you
have to play, from facilities manager, to
social worker, to mental health therapist,”
the sixth-year principal says.
Katherine Konopasek, principal at
Adlai E. Stevenson Elementary School
in the Chicago Public Schools, says she’s
always considered herself an instructional
leader. “If you become a principal to get
out of the classroom, you’ve made a serious
mistake,” she says.
Training Helps Shift
Domenech feels that superintendents need
to ensure principals have the proper train-
ing to take on that instructional leader-
ship role. For example, if principals are
not experts in reading but their schools
are having problems with reading perfor-
mance, he says they must “beef up” their
knowledge of reading methodology, and
techniques and programs.
Flannery believes that principal-prepa-
rationprogramsdon’tdoenoughtoground
principals in day-to-day realities and that
their impact is dimmed by the time gap
that sometimes occurs between training
and practice. “The other issue is, if you
look at the reality of today’s accountability
in schools, how many people [teaching] in
universities have worked in [K12] schools
with accountability?” he says, adding that
university programs recently have been
trying to upgrade their relevance.
Budget cuts have also impacted train-
ing that involves out of state travel in
many districts. “Budgets have been cut so
much in so many states, we don’t have that
opportunity,” Monson says.
Konopasek doesn’t believe Chicago
Public Schools does enough to give prin-
cipals such training, having shut down a
professional development center and mak-
ing plans to deliver training directly to
schools. The district is in transition, she
says. “But what to do this year?”
In the Oakland district, data coaches
have helped principals get up to speed
on and analyze the benchmark tests that
students take three times during the year
to measure their progress. “You find out
exactly where students are, rather than
making the assumption that if it’s been
taught, they know it,” Jarrett says. “It’s a
better way than looking at [state tests] at
the end of the year.”
Principals in Oakland also have had
the benefit of results-based budgeting for
at least nine years, Jarrett says, giving them
the ability to decide how to spend all mon-
ies outside of Title I and other categorical
grants. These remaining state and local
Leaders
Principals as Instructional
Principal Beverly Jarrett, background, at Far West High School in the Oakland(Calif.) Unified School District, meets in April with her leadership
team to discuss the district’s budget needs.
Principal Beverly Jarrett
Principles_DA0612.indd 52 5/15/12 11:23 AM
54 June 2012 District Administration
funds are given to principals as a lump sum
that’s calculated based on the current year’s
enrollment. This allows them to attend to
their particular schools’ needs, which has
led some principals (although not Jarrett
herself) to bring in the data coaches.
Teaching the Teachers
Chenoweth believes that principals need
to guide teachers away from thinking of
themselves as “masters of their classroom”
and toward a more collaborative style to
work together on the common goals laid
out through accountability measures. “It’s
impossible for every teacher to provide
everything—to have all content knowl-
edge and pedagogical knowledge,” she
says. “Only by collaborating and pooling
expertise is there even a chance of [provid-
ing everything students need].” To start
that process, teachers look at test scores
and other data and compare how well their
kids performed—but not for the purposes
of competition. “Your kids learned frac-
tions a lot better than mine. What are you
doing?” one teacher might ask another.
Adds Chenoweth, “For teachers to have
those conversations in a professional and
not defensive way—that takes leadership.”
It also takes leadership for a principal
to question a teacher whose methods of
teaching don’t result in the students under-
standing and knowing the subject. The
principal has to ask, “Did you think about
doing it this way? Maybe that would help,”
Chenoweth says, adding: “That [requires]
a principal steeped in what it looks like to
be a classroom leader.”
In many cases, a teacher may be reach-
ing some students but not others. Teach-
ers should think, “It’s worked with Johnny
but not Fred. Now what am I going to do
about Fred?” Principals play a valuable role
in pushing teachers to ask this question
and in either providing answers or point-
ing them to colleagues who can help them.
About a decade ago, administrators at
Marshall High School in Falls Church,
Va., outside of Washington, D.C., made
a decision to develop itself as a profes-
sional learning community, which involves
empowering teachers to become instruc-
tional leaders, says Principal Jay Pearson.
“Singlehandedly, the principal cannot pos-
sibly know all those [subject-matter] stan-
dards, all those benchmarks,” he says. “My
job is to establish a culture whereby you’ve
got teacher-leaders stepping up.”
Pearson explains that the professional
learning community is not so much a
formal structure as the establishment of
a culture. Teachers collaborate around
questions like, “What do we want kids to
know? How do we get there? And what
are we going to do if they don’t?” he says.
“It’s shared ownership of student results.”
For example, all of the algebra 2 teachers
in a school look at how all 200 students
performed, then at their own 50 students.
“It’s going away from what was once a
Katherine Konopasek,
principal of Adlai E.
Stevenson Elementary
School in Chicago,
works every Saturday
{alone in the
building} to keep up
with the increasing
demands of the job.
Leaders
Principals as Instructional
very isolated existence,” he adds. When
one teacher’s students haven’t done as
well, the other teachers ask, ‘What can we
do collectively to help teacher A?’” That
requires the principal to establish trust so
that he or she can “lay data on the table
and not be defensive.” It also requires that
time be set aside during the contractual
school day, he says.
Assistant superintendents in Fairfax
County Public Schools do a nice job
training principals to know what to del-
egate, Pearson says. “My bosses built the
knowledge within me,” he says. “In many
ways, it’s a significant paradigm shift in
how schools operate.”
Denise Garison, principal at Jack Britt
High School in the Fayetteville (N.C.)
Public Schools, agrees there’s a balance to
be struck and says that her departmental
chairs still play a major role in instruc-
tion. “It’s not all about one person’s opin-
ion,” she says. “With standardized tests,
we share [with colleagues]: ‘This is what
works for me. Do you want to try it?’”
Managing Time
Principals can’t just decide to offload their
other responsibilities. Chenoweth recom-
mends a combination of delegating and
careful time management. “Don’t do
administrative things when kids are in
the building,” she says. “[District leaders]
need to stop doing stupid stuff, like [ask-
ing principals to] turn in the same report
in three different formats. It drives them
nuts.” But she says, “be very careful to
hire and supervise the building and office
staff so they’re not solving every problem.
They devolve a lot of responsibility onto
other people who are expected to solve
problems and not come to them and say,
‘Now what do we do?’”
Principal Konopasek in Chicago says
she’s faced a tough time crunch in the
past couple of years. She has seen a new
mayor (Rahm Emanuel), a new schools’
CEO (Jean-Claude Brizard), implemen-
tation of the Common Core State Stan-
dards in K8 all at once (which prompted
Konopasek to send 35 teachers to a K-12
Alliance workshop), implementation
Principal Katherine Konopasek
Principles_DA0612.indd 54 5/16/12 10:51 AM
www.DistrictAdministration.com June 2012 55
of response-to-intervention (which the
school is paying for out of “poverty funds,”
says Konopasek), and upcoming negotia-
tions on a teachers contract resulting in a
new compensation system (with details yet
to come) and a longer school day. On top
of all that, she said she has been without a
licensed building engineer for six months.
All of that combined has resulted in
many 11-hour days plus Saturdays and
some Sundays in the office. “I’m doing it
just to keep up,” Konopasek says. She sup-
ports many of the changes taking place,
but admits, “You can get to the point
where there are too many changes. … You
can’t suffer a hurricane every day. You get
soaking wet to the bone.”
To keep the time crunch manageable,
Brian Matney, principal at Landstown
High School and Technology Academy in
the Virginia Beach City Public Schools,
recommends “not falling prey to the tyr-
anny of the urgent.” As much as he tries
to stay focused on instruction, he believes
time is his greatest challenge. “It’s a matter
of, I have to walk into the building, I have
to keep my eye on the main thing,” he says.
“The biggest challenge we have is not let-
ting the time we commit to [instruction]
be taken up by other things that, while
important, are not as important.”
Matney sees his role as making sure
he’s aware of what’s happening in the
classrooms and what methodologies teach-
ers are using. “I want to know where the
best teaching is occurring and to showcase
those prototypes to their peers,” he says.
Matney sees himself and his peers as
being most comfortable in a foundational
role. “Principals are architects, not plumb-
ers,” Matney concludes. “There are going
to be some plumbing duties, and I’m
happy to do them. … But we thrive on
being the architect.” DA
Ed Finkel is a contributing writer to
District Administration.
Principal Rob Monson, of Parkston
Elementary School, speaks with the head
custodian about trees that the school received
thanks to the student council and service
groups in town. Students dug holes and
planted 10 trees around the playground.
A look at innovative products from leading vendors
In Solution Showcase, District Administration spotlights innovative solutions from leading K12
vendors with 20-minute product videos. Featured this month:
ST Math: Neuroscience-based math instruction, and a cute penguin to make it lovable.
ST Math, from MIND Research Institute, is backed by neuroscience research and has been proven
effective in large-scale studies. Plus, it is largely language independent, so it works with all
students, including English learners.
Introducing the LightRaise 40wi interactive projector from SMART—interactivity
on almost any surface.
Backed by over 20 years of innovation in educational technology, the LightRaise allows you to create
more dynamic learning spaces. As the only interactive projector that includes SMART Notebook
collaborative learning software, the LightRaise brings learning to life with engaging content.
To watch, go to www.districtadministration.com/showcase
Solution Showcase
Principles_DA0612.indd 55 5/15/12 11:24 AM
Copyright of District Administration is the property of Professional Media Group, LLC and its content may not
be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.