Skip to main content
By,
Garima Tandon
B.SC., B.Ed., M.Ed.
Banaras Hindu University
Preparing Teachers for different Contexts of school
education: Structural and Substantive Arrangements in
Teacher Education Programme
The Changing School Context and its Demands-
A teacher functions within the broad framework of the school education system
– its goals, curricula, materials, methods and expectations from the teacher. A
teacher education curriculum framework needs to be in consonance with the
curriculum framework for school education. A teacher needs to be prepared in
relation to the needs and demands arising in the school context, to engage with
questions of school knowledge, the learner and the learning process. The
expectations of the school system from a teacher change from time to time,
responding to the broader social, economic and political changes taking place in
the society.
Regional, social, and gender disparities continue to pose new challenges.
This reality increases the challenge of implementing the Right of Children to Free
and Compulsory Education Act and, in particular, the role and place of the school
teacher. Teacher should be empathetic and sensitized for that and it should be
inculcated by curriculum of Teacher Education Programme.
The teacher must be equipped not only to teach but also to understand the
students and the community of parents so that children are regular in schools and
learn. The Act mandates that the teacher should refrain from inflicting corporal
punishment, complete the entire curriculum within the given time, assess
students, hold parent’s meetings and apprise them and as part of the school
management committee, organize the overall running of the school.
Is B.Ed. Curriculum do this?
The Act, vide section 29 (2), emphasizes the following areas while laying down
the curriculum and evaluation procedures:
 Conformity with the values enshrined in the Constitution.
 All round development of the child.
 Building up child’s knowledge, potentiality and talent.
 Development of physical and mental abilities to the fullest extent.
 Learning through activities, discovery and exploration in a child friendly
and child-centered manner.
 Medium of instruction shall, as far as practicable, be in child’s mother
tongue.
 Making the child free of fear, trauma and anxiety and helping the child to
express views freely.
 Comprehensive and continuous evaluation of child’s understanding of
knowledge and his or her ability to apply the same.
NCF requires a teacher to be a facilitator of children’s learning
in a manner that helps children to construct knowledge and meaning. It also opens
out possibilities for the teacher to participate in the construction of syllabi,
textbooks and teaching-learning materials.
The launch of the massive Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in 2002
and the financial commitment and education cess to augment the UEE mission
have underscored the need to prepare the teachers adequately to address the
growing demand for quality education. A similar demand may arise in the context
of the impending universalization of secondary education in the coming years.
The continued decline in quality of the state school system and the proliferation
of sub-standard unregulated private schools pose several challenges to the
national declaration of catering to the basic learning needs.
Present Teacher Education Scenario
The training of teachers is a major area of concern at present as both pre-service
and in-service training of school teachers are extremely inadequate and poorly
managed in most states. Pre-service training needs to be improved and differently
regulated both in public and private institutions, while systems for in-service
training require expansion and major reform that allow for greater flexibility. In
terms of alternative schools, government and private schools places its own
demands and will also need to be addressed. Diversity also exists in terms of the
set of agencies that conduct teacher education programmes. These include state
institutions, university-based institutions and private institutions that have grown
enormously in number in the recent past, contributing to the commercialization
of the process of teacher education.
Teacher Education Reform Perspectives: Past and Present
At the heart of teacher education is the question ‘What value does teacher
education add to the prospective teacher’s ability to face challenges of facilitating
the development of critical and creative students and subsequently adults?’
Reform of teacher education has been one of the abiding concerns in the reports
of major Education Commissions and Committees on education. The Education
Commission (1964-66) discussed at length various issues related to teacher
education. It recommended professionalization of teacher education,
development of integrated programmes, comprehensive colleges of education
and internship. The National Commission on Teachers (1983-85) recommended
five-year integrated courses and internship. The National Policy on Education
(NPE) (1986) recommended the overhaul of teacher education to impart it a
professional orientation and referred to the same concerns voiced by the earlier
Committees. Its recommendations led to the launch of the Centrally Sponsored
Scheme of Teacher Education incorporating the establishment of DIETs, CTEs
and IASEs. The NPE Review Committee (1990) and the National Advisory
Committee on Learning without Burden (1993) have also drawn attention to the
need for qualitative reform of teacher education and suggested various measures.
The Review Committee recommended adoption of the internship model for
teacher education involving a brief theoretical orientation followed by a 3 to 5
year period of supervised teaching in a school under mentor teachers. The
Advisory Committee in its report Learning without Burden drew attention to the
need for the involvement of teachers in curriculum and textbook preparation and
training teachers in fostering learning through activity, discovery, observation
and understanding. These policy recommendations have been taken cognisanze
of while preparing the present draft of the National Curriculum Framework for
Teacher Education.
Urgency of Reforming Teacher Education
Teacher education as a whole needs urgent and comprehensive
reform. There is need to bring greater convergence between professional
preparation and continuing professional development of teachers at all stages of
schooling in terms of level, duration and structure.
1. Elementary Teacher Education-
Initial training of elementary teachers continues to suffer from
isolation, low profile and poor visibility in view of it being a non-degree
programme.
There is a grave need to upgrade initial teacher education by
enhancing the entry qualification and duration of training making it equivalent to
a degree programme and locating the management and control of elementary
teacher education within Universities.
Upgrading elementary teacher education calls for participatory
curriculum planning involving all stakeholders, modular organization of
curriculum in terms of critically engaging with theory and bringing practice
within its perspective and a professional approach to teacher education processes.
Another instance of neglect of elementary teacher education is the
non-recognition of the need for specially qualified teacher educators in
elementary education. The difficulty is exacerbated by the absence of degree and
post-degree programmes in primary/elementary teacher education.
2. Secondary Teacher Education-
There is also a dire need to critically review the secondary teacher
education system. Secondary teacher education institutes continue to exist as
insular organizations even within the university system where many are located.
This precludes the larger academic debates on equity, gender and community to
enter the day-to-day discourse of teacher educators. Institutes of teacher
education have become breeding grounds of academic stagnation and resistance
to change. The training of teachers happens in insular, intellectually impoverished
environments that are severed from ground realities as well as the aims of
education they espouse. Such an intellectual isolation actively discourages
educational theorization and the growth of disciplinary and interdisciplinary
enquiry.