Chapter 3: Performance
Planning
Lecture
Outline
 Performance planning process
 Contents of performance agreements
 Focus of performance measure
 Defining work to be done
 Drawing up the plans
 Evaluating the Performance Planning Process
Performance
Planning
The Planning
Process
 Future-oriented joint discussion between individuals and
managers.
 Explores:
1. What individuals are expected to do.
2. How they are expected to behave to meet role requirements
3. How to develop skills and capabilities
4. How mangers will provide support and guidance
 An agreement plan will be made on performance will be measured
and what. Evidence that will be used to establish levels of
competence.
Periodical
review
meetings.
 Performance agreements and plans are prepared
 Compare past performance with objectives and make new plans in
light of previous outcomes.
 Initial meeting is largely about defining goals, roles and standards.
 Recording the plans and discussions for reference is helpful. Forms
as basis for progress and revision.
The Planning
Process
 Personal Development Plan:
 A learning action plan for individuals within an organization.
 Can include formal training
 Incorporates a wider set of development activities such as
 self-managed learning,
 coaching,
 mentoring,
 project work,
 job enlargement, and
 job enrichment.
Performance
Agreements:
Content
Corporate core values or requirements
Performance measures and indicators
Knowledge, skills and capabilities
Objectives and standards of performance
Role requirements
Focus for
performance
measure
Defining the
work to be
done
 Overall purpose of the work
 Defining what the role exists for
 How it contributes to the achievement of the objectives of the team or
department, and organization.
 Key result areas
 What role holders are expected to achieve in clear terms and goals.
 Can be quantified as targets or according to completion of project.
 Non-quantifiable areas can also be measured in terms of outcomes or
levels of performance.
 For higher-level jobs
 Accountable for achieving objectives in demanding & changing
conditions
 Main tasks
 In some organizations, key result areas and main tasks are considered
the same.
 Defined in the same way as key result area.
 Lower-level jobs
 carrying out work activities to a certain standard.
Key result area
format
 The definition of a key result area starts with an active verb and
expresses specifically and succinctly (in one sentence) what has to
be achieved.
 It does not try to explain how the work is carried out.
 Good examples are:
 Prepare marketing plans that support the achievement of corporate
targets for profit and sales revenue.
 Control manufacturing operations to achieve output targets, quality
specifications and delivery to time requirements within cost
budgets.
 Maintain a stock control system that optimizes inventory levels.
 Plan and provide training programmes that meet defined needs.
Drawing up
the Plans
Performance and
development plans
Workplans
Drawing up
the Plans
 Each performance and development plan should provide
answers to the following questions, which can be discussed with
job holders:
 What areas of your performance do you feel are in need of
development?
 What do you think you need to do to develop your performance in
any particular areas?
 Do you think you need further training in any aspect of your work?
 What help or support can I (a manager) give to improve your
performance?
 What development and training actions should we agree (on the
basis of the answers to the earlier questions)?
Drawing up
the Plans
 The aim of work plans is to ensure that the meaning of the
objectives and performance standards as they apply to everyday
work is understood.
 They define:
 programmes of work for achieving targets,
 improving performance or
 Completion of projects.
Evaluating the
Performance
Planning
Process
 Checking the whether or not tasks are performed correctly. And
what improvements can be made in the future.
 To evaluate effectiveness of performance planning, check if:
Plans are based on past performance and future demands
Managers encourage individuals to make own personal
development plan.
Plans are jointly made between manager and individual
Clear objectives without too much detail (so that more scope is
given to individuals)
Success criteria defined
Individuals are empowered
Methods for monitoring of progress is defined without disturbance
Managers are prepared to provide any support if required.
The End.

Performance Management Performance Planning

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Lecture Outline  Performance planningprocess  Contents of performance agreements  Focus of performance measure  Defining work to be done  Drawing up the plans  Evaluating the Performance Planning Process
  • 3.
  • 4.
    The Planning Process  Future-orientedjoint discussion between individuals and managers.  Explores: 1. What individuals are expected to do. 2. How they are expected to behave to meet role requirements 3. How to develop skills and capabilities 4. How mangers will provide support and guidance  An agreement plan will be made on performance will be measured and what. Evidence that will be used to establish levels of competence.
  • 5.
    Periodical review meetings.  Performance agreementsand plans are prepared  Compare past performance with objectives and make new plans in light of previous outcomes.  Initial meeting is largely about defining goals, roles and standards.  Recording the plans and discussions for reference is helpful. Forms as basis for progress and revision.
  • 6.
    The Planning Process  PersonalDevelopment Plan:  A learning action plan for individuals within an organization.  Can include formal training  Incorporates a wider set of development activities such as  self-managed learning,  coaching,  mentoring,  project work,  job enlargement, and  job enrichment.
  • 7.
    Performance Agreements: Content Corporate core valuesor requirements Performance measures and indicators Knowledge, skills and capabilities Objectives and standards of performance Role requirements
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Defining the work tobe done  Overall purpose of the work  Defining what the role exists for  How it contributes to the achievement of the objectives of the team or department, and organization.  Key result areas  What role holders are expected to achieve in clear terms and goals.  Can be quantified as targets or according to completion of project.  Non-quantifiable areas can also be measured in terms of outcomes or levels of performance.  For higher-level jobs  Accountable for achieving objectives in demanding & changing conditions  Main tasks  In some organizations, key result areas and main tasks are considered the same.  Defined in the same way as key result area.  Lower-level jobs  carrying out work activities to a certain standard.
  • 10.
    Key result area format The definition of a key result area starts with an active verb and expresses specifically and succinctly (in one sentence) what has to be achieved.  It does not try to explain how the work is carried out.  Good examples are:  Prepare marketing plans that support the achievement of corporate targets for profit and sales revenue.  Control manufacturing operations to achieve output targets, quality specifications and delivery to time requirements within cost budgets.  Maintain a stock control system that optimizes inventory levels.  Plan and provide training programmes that meet defined needs.
  • 11.
    Drawing up the Plans Performanceand development plans Workplans
  • 12.
    Drawing up the Plans Each performance and development plan should provide answers to the following questions, which can be discussed with job holders:  What areas of your performance do you feel are in need of development?  What do you think you need to do to develop your performance in any particular areas?  Do you think you need further training in any aspect of your work?  What help or support can I (a manager) give to improve your performance?  What development and training actions should we agree (on the basis of the answers to the earlier questions)?
  • 13.
    Drawing up the Plans The aim of work plans is to ensure that the meaning of the objectives and performance standards as they apply to everyday work is understood.  They define:  programmes of work for achieving targets,  improving performance or  Completion of projects.
  • 14.
    Evaluating the Performance Planning Process  Checkingthe whether or not tasks are performed correctly. And what improvements can be made in the future.  To evaluate effectiveness of performance planning, check if: Plans are based on past performance and future demands Managers encourage individuals to make own personal development plan. Plans are jointly made between manager and individual Clear objectives without too much detail (so that more scope is given to individuals) Success criteria defined Individuals are empowered Methods for monitoring of progress is defined without disturbance Managers are prepared to provide any support if required.
  • 15.

Editor's Notes

  • #4 The framework for performance management is provided by the performance and development plan (or agreement), which is the outcome of performance planning.
  • #5 1. Analysis of performance in the immediate past may provide guidance on areas for improvement or development 2. The performance aspect of the plan obtains agreement on what has to be done to achieve objectives, raise standards and improve performance. It also establishes priorities the key aspects of the job to which attention has to be given. This could be described as a work plan.
  • #7 This plan therefore contributes to the achievement of a policy of continuous development that is predicated on the belief that everyone is capable of learning more and doing better in their jobs. But the plan will also contribute to enhancing the potential of individuals to carry out higher-level jobs.
  • #9 1. Their performance will be measured by what they do to get results; how they do it will be less important, so long as they avoid upsetting shareholders 2.