Making the business case for step-
change
#theBIGshift
Webinar –24 September 2013
DavidBent,DirectorofSustainableBusiness d.bent@forumforthefuture.org
BenKellard,HeadofSustainableBusiness b.kellard@forumforthefuture.org
Webinar housekeeping
Please send your
questions in
throughout the
webinar from the
question box. We will
try to get through as
many of your
questions as possible
throughout the hour
**don’t raise your
hand, type a question
Any problems email Kester at k.byass@forumforthefuture.org
What we’ll cover today
• How can sustainability add to my bottom line?
• How can I make the business case for sustainability activities that
create real step-change?
• Forum for the Future’s cutting-edge research into how companies that
have successfully made the business case for step-change did it
• New tools to help you to use a logical step-by-step approach to build
your own business case
• Live examples of companies that firstly made the case and then went
on to make sustainability happen for their business
Let’s start with a story
4
This research was made possible by the
Sustainable Business Models Group
5
This group of our leading partners have come together to find practical
ways they can create step-change towards sustainable business models.
Why focus on ‘step-change’?
• There is a need in the world for step-change
• Other business case research tends to focus on incremental change
• What we mean by ‘step-change’:
• An activity which has an intended outcome that is a large, fast
contribution to trajectory we need towards a sustainable future.
• Could be:
• Shaping the context – an external initiative (eg Nike’s Road to Zero)
• Innovating to win - an internal investment in, for instance: big goals,
R&D, new fixed assets.
6
Where the research took us
7
Specific focus:
business case for step-change
Prototype tool that helps
you to create the common
features for your step-
change decision.
Results of WRI’s research
in the handout
The general
business case
A small-but-growing
databank of credible
examples
Difficult to make a ‘general
case’ because such
variety in companies,
industries and issues.
“Making the case”
What are the common
features of step-change
decisions?
“Making it happen”
Once a step-change
decision has been made,
how can you implement it?
Making the case
What was emphasised by decision-makers?
8
Making the case
What was emphasised by decision-makers?
Part of
journey
Senior
executive
leadership
Long-
term
view
Specific
business
rationale
Appropriate
decision
tools
Dupont
Forum A
Nissan
GSK Openness
Telefonica UK
Nike R2Z
B&Q Timber
B&Q Green Deal
WRI 1
WRI 5
WRI 6
9
Making the case
What was emphasised by decision-makers?
Part of
journey
Senior
executive
leadership
Long-
term
view
Specific
business
rationale
Addressed
status quo in
fin tools
Dupont
Forum A
Nissan
GSK Openness
Telefonica UK
Nike R2Z
B&Q Timber
B&Q Green Deal
WRI 1
WRI 5
WRI 6
10
Making the case
What was emphasised by decision-makers?
Part of
journey
Senior
executive
leadership
Long-
term
view
Specific
business
rationale
Addressed
status quo in
fin tools
Dupont
Forum A
Nissan
GSK Openness
Telefonica UK
Nike R2Z
B&Q Timber
B&Q Green Deal
WRI 1
WRI 5
WRI 6
11
getting better at ‘making the case’
12
1. Do you
have
a journey to
build on?
2. Do you
have the right
senior
executive
leadership?
Yes
3. Do you
have a
long-term
view of how
the company
creates value?
Yes
4. Do you
have a
specific
business
rationale?
Yes
5. Have you
addressed
status quo
bias in
financial
tools?
Yes
getting better at ‘making the case’
13
1. Do you
have
a journey to
build on?
1. do you have a journey to build on?
• Senior executives rarely make big commitments in new areas. Usually the first
decision will be low-risk and low-cost. Step-change decisions tend to be the latest
step in a longer journey. What favourable conditions do you already have?
14
Favourable condition Status Next steps
Successful track-record from past
sustainability initiatives
Acceptance of a general business case
across executives
Insights from stakeholder engagement
Public reporting for accountability &
transparency
Other conditions which help decisions
happen in your organisation:
getting better at ‘making the case’
15
1. Do you
have
a journey to
build on?
2. Do you
have the right
senior
executive
leadership?
Yes
2. do you have the right senior executive
leadership?
• Step-change decisions are risky, affect many parts of a company and have strategic
implications. So, they need board-level support - often from the CEO.
• Key question: Do you have a senior sponsor whose role and credibility matches the
risk, scope and strategic implications of the decision?
If no:
• Who are the key internal decision-makers?
• What do they want and how might your proposal help?
• Who or what influences the key decision-makers?
• e.g. their business school, their professional institute…
• What can you do to gain the right senior executive support?
Options include:
• Identifying who you need to work with to make change happen. Understand their
vision and use their language
• Framing sustainability issues as about delivering the current business strategy and
long-term value creation (see next slides)
• Identifying a burning platform
16
getting better at ‘making the case’
17
1. Do you
have
a journey to
build on?
2. Do you
have the right
senior
executive
leadership?
Yes
3. Do you
have a
long-term
view of how
the company
creates value?
Yes
3. do you have a long-term view of how the
company creates value?
• Step-change decisions answer: how will the company be successful in a future
affected by sustainability issues? This requires: an enduring purpose and long-
term view on how the company creates value
• Here are three key questions to work through:
• What is the company’s enduring purpose (especially for customers)?
• What is the organisation’s long-term view on how it creates value – the
matching of the company’s purpose and capabilities with its future context?
• How does your proposal align to the enduring purpose and long-term view?
18
getting better at ‘making the case’
19
1. Do you
have
a journey to
build on?
2. Do you
have the right
senior
executive
leadership?
Yes
3. Do you
have a
long-term
view of how
the company
creates value?
Yes
4. Do you
have a
specific
business
rationale?
Yes
4. do you have a specific business rationale?
• Step-change decisions have a clear, bespoke link from the particular action to value
creation for the shareholder.
• Try working through these steps
20
1. Develop specific
business rationale
Work through causal links from the proposed activity to shareholder value.
See next slide for a tool to help you do that.
2. Find evidence Look for compelling evidence for each link in the chain:
- Past experience
- Other examples
- Ask ‘what would need to be true for this to be a great decision?’
3. Quantify
magnitude
Put a financial range on the costs (upfront investment and on-going) and
benefits.
4. Track what
happens
Use 2. and 3. to put in place the information systems needed to measure
what happens
Shape
context
-Shared knowledge
-“More hands to the
pump”
-Encouraging greater
investment in green
chemistry
-Shape regulatory
context
Specific rational for
shaping the context
Nike: making the case for
Increase
Shareholder
value
Initiate
System
Innovation
Start
“Road to Zero”
Apply your
capabilities
-Innovation
-Turn sustainability
into performance
story that
reinforces brand
Pathways in:
-Revenue Growth
-Margin Growth
-Risk Management
Revenue:
-product innovation
Margin Growth
-reduce input costs
-share costs across industry
Risk management
-regulatory
-reputation
• In 2011 McKinsey published this
infographic of links from a
sustainability-related activity to
shareholder value.
• You could also use Forum’s
Pathways tool
• Consider each in turn in order to
identify the likely most important link
to financial value.
22
Putting into Practice, McKinsey, Oct 2011
Specific rational for
innovating to win
4. do you have a specific business rationale?
• Step-change decisions have a clear, bespoke link from the particular action to value
creation for the shareholder.
• Try working through these steps
23
1. Develop specific
business rationale
Work through causal links from the proposed activity to shareholder value.
See next slide for a tool to help you do that.
2. Find evidence Look for compelling evidence for each link in the chain:
- Past experience
- Other examples
- Ask ‘what would need to be true for this to be a great decision?’
3. Quantify
magnitude
Put a financial range on the costs (upfront investment and on-going) and
benefits.
4. Track what
happens
Use 2. and 3. to put in place the information systems needed to measure
what happens
getting better at ‘making the case’
24
1. Do you
have
a journey to
build on?
2. Do you
have the right
senior
executive
leadership?
Yes
3. Do you
have a
long-term
view of how
the company
creates value?
Yes
4. Do you
have a
specific
business
rationale?
Yes
5. Have you
addressed
status quo
bias in
financial
tools?
Yes
5. have you addressed the status quo bias in your
financial tools?
• Step-change decisions require financial tools that compare the proposed action with a realistic
base case; one that has the plausible consequences of not taking the action. Most financial tools
don’t take future resource constraints and thus higher energy bills, for example, into account.
• What to do about it:
• Rigorously improve the ‘do-nothing’ base case
> Check the base case for optimistic assumptions
• In times of disruption, compare the total cashflows of status quo and proposal
> Normally, Net Present Value calculations look at the extra costs and benefits. This
assumes fixed and sunk costs will continue to perform.
> Avoid an incumbency bias by comparing the total costs and benefits of different options.
• Use ‘discovery-driven planning’
> Start with the ‘reverse income statement’ – list the costs and benefits that would need to
be true for this decision to be worth doing in order of importance
> Test these assumptions, starting with the most important
25
The problem with standard financial decision-
making tools
26
DCF and NPV
methodologies
implicitly make this
comparison
Companies should
be making this
comparison
Adapted from Innovation Killers, Christensen et al, HBR Jan 2008
A. Assumed cash
stream from doing
nothing
A
C. Projected cash
stream from
investing in step-
change C
B. More likely cash
stream from doing
nothing
B
5. have you addressed the status quo bias in your
financial tools?
• Step-change decisions require financial tools that compare the proposed action with a realistic
base case; one that has the plausible consequences of not taking the action. Most financial tools
don’t take future resource constraints and thus higher energy bills, for example, into account.
• What to do about it:
• Rigorously improve the ‘do-nothing’ base case
 Check the base case for optimistic assumptions
• In times of disruption, compare the total cashflows of status quo and proposal
 Normally, Net Present Value calculations look at the extra costs and benefits. This
assumes fixed and sunk costs will continue to perform.
 Avoid an incumbency bias by comparing the total costs and benefits of different
options.
• Use ‘discovery-driven planning’
 Start with the ‘reverse income statement’ – list the costs and benefits that would need
to be true for this decision to be worth doing in order of importance
 Test these assumptions, starting with the most important
27
getting better at ‘making the case’
28
1. Do you
have
a journey to
build on?
2. Do you
have the right
senior
executive
leadership?
Yes
3. Do you
have a
long-term
view of how
the company
creates value?
Yes
4. Do you
have a
specific
business
rationale?
Yes
5. Have you
addressed
status quo
bias in
financial
tools?
Yes
making it happen: strategies to deploy
Recommendation In practice this means Who is doing
this?
Set goals that integrate
environmental considerations
into core business decision
making
- Selecting suppliers based on their
economic, social and environmental
performance
- Developing products and services that
help customers reduce their
environmental impact
- Natura
- AkzoNobel;
Alcoa; Greif;
Siemens
Implement internal mechanisms
that ensure environmental
sustainability is valued
- Allowing funds saved in operational costs
on environmental projects to be allocated
to capital budget needs
- Bundle high financial return/low GHG
reduction projects with low return/high
GHG reduction projects to diversify risk
and deliver overall corporate value.
- Johnson &
Johnson
- Diversey
(Sealed Air)
29
• Based on our research, five recommendations emerged that can help companies
implement sustainability strategies:
making it happen: strategies to deploy
Recommendation In practice this means Who is doing
this?
Vest the CSO with greater
authority over capital budget
decisions and engage the
sustainability team early in
project planning
- Giving the CSO authority to ensure all
capital budget requests integrate
sustainability considerations
- Ensuring the company’s sustainability
specialists are engaged early in project
planning
- AkzoNobel;
Alcoa
- AkzoNobel
Establish and manage metrics
that comprehensively indicate
risks and opportunities across
corporate value chain
- Instituting supplier programs that put a
price on externalities like CO2 emissions,
water use, and waste generation
- Natura
Support public policies that put
a stable price on externalities
- Consistently supporting public policies
that benefit the environment and
companies’ financial performance
Identified as a
need, but no
companies active
30
getting better at ‘making the case’
31
1. Do you
have
a journey to
build on?
2. Do you
have the right
senior
executive
leadership?
Yes
3. Do you
have a
long-term
view of how
the company
creates value?
Yes
4. Do you
have a
specific
business
rationale?
Yes
5. Have you
addressed
status quo
bias in
financial
tools?
Yes
Questions?
Upcoming Network activities
- The World We Made | October | London, New York, Atlanta & San Francisco
- The Future is here: workshop & tour at the Design Museum | 22 Oct | London
- Informal Cities Dialogue | 24 Oct | webinar
- Energy drinks: #theBIGshift & the Energy System | 11 Nov | London
- Blue Skies, Sustainable Thinking: the new innovation frontier | 21 Nov | London
- #theBIGshift: how to be a system innovator | 5 Dec | New York
- #theBIGshift: in conversation with Paul Polman and Jonathon Porritt | 9 Dec |
London
- End-of-year network event & drinks| 16 Dec | London

Network webinar | Making the Business Case for Step-Change

  • 1.
    Making the businesscase for step- change #theBIGshift Webinar –24 September 2013 DavidBent,DirectorofSustainableBusiness d.bent@forumforthefuture.org BenKellard,HeadofSustainableBusiness b.kellard@forumforthefuture.org
  • 2.
    Webinar housekeeping Please sendyour questions in throughout the webinar from the question box. We will try to get through as many of your questions as possible throughout the hour **don’t raise your hand, type a question Any problems email Kester at k.byass@forumforthefuture.org
  • 3.
    What we’ll covertoday • How can sustainability add to my bottom line? • How can I make the business case for sustainability activities that create real step-change? • Forum for the Future’s cutting-edge research into how companies that have successfully made the business case for step-change did it • New tools to help you to use a logical step-by-step approach to build your own business case • Live examples of companies that firstly made the case and then went on to make sustainability happen for their business
  • 4.
  • 5.
    This research wasmade possible by the Sustainable Business Models Group 5 This group of our leading partners have come together to find practical ways they can create step-change towards sustainable business models.
  • 6.
    Why focus on‘step-change’? • There is a need in the world for step-change • Other business case research tends to focus on incremental change • What we mean by ‘step-change’: • An activity which has an intended outcome that is a large, fast contribution to trajectory we need towards a sustainable future. • Could be: • Shaping the context – an external initiative (eg Nike’s Road to Zero) • Innovating to win - an internal investment in, for instance: big goals, R&D, new fixed assets. 6
  • 7.
    Where the researchtook us 7 Specific focus: business case for step-change Prototype tool that helps you to create the common features for your step- change decision. Results of WRI’s research in the handout The general business case A small-but-growing databank of credible examples Difficult to make a ‘general case’ because such variety in companies, industries and issues. “Making the case” What are the common features of step-change decisions? “Making it happen” Once a step-change decision has been made, how can you implement it?
  • 8.
    Making the case Whatwas emphasised by decision-makers? 8
  • 9.
    Making the case Whatwas emphasised by decision-makers? Part of journey Senior executive leadership Long- term view Specific business rationale Appropriate decision tools Dupont Forum A Nissan GSK Openness Telefonica UK Nike R2Z B&Q Timber B&Q Green Deal WRI 1 WRI 5 WRI 6 9
  • 10.
    Making the case Whatwas emphasised by decision-makers? Part of journey Senior executive leadership Long- term view Specific business rationale Addressed status quo in fin tools Dupont Forum A Nissan GSK Openness Telefonica UK Nike R2Z B&Q Timber B&Q Green Deal WRI 1 WRI 5 WRI 6 10
  • 11.
    Making the case Whatwas emphasised by decision-makers? Part of journey Senior executive leadership Long- term view Specific business rationale Addressed status quo in fin tools Dupont Forum A Nissan GSK Openness Telefonica UK Nike R2Z B&Q Timber B&Q Green Deal WRI 1 WRI 5 WRI 6 11
  • 12.
    getting better at‘making the case’ 12 1. Do you have a journey to build on? 2. Do you have the right senior executive leadership? Yes 3. Do you have a long-term view of how the company creates value? Yes 4. Do you have a specific business rationale? Yes 5. Have you addressed status quo bias in financial tools? Yes
  • 13.
    getting better at‘making the case’ 13 1. Do you have a journey to build on?
  • 14.
    1. do youhave a journey to build on? • Senior executives rarely make big commitments in new areas. Usually the first decision will be low-risk and low-cost. Step-change decisions tend to be the latest step in a longer journey. What favourable conditions do you already have? 14 Favourable condition Status Next steps Successful track-record from past sustainability initiatives Acceptance of a general business case across executives Insights from stakeholder engagement Public reporting for accountability & transparency Other conditions which help decisions happen in your organisation:
  • 15.
    getting better at‘making the case’ 15 1. Do you have a journey to build on? 2. Do you have the right senior executive leadership? Yes
  • 16.
    2. do youhave the right senior executive leadership? • Step-change decisions are risky, affect many parts of a company and have strategic implications. So, they need board-level support - often from the CEO. • Key question: Do you have a senior sponsor whose role and credibility matches the risk, scope and strategic implications of the decision? If no: • Who are the key internal decision-makers? • What do they want and how might your proposal help? • Who or what influences the key decision-makers? • e.g. their business school, their professional institute… • What can you do to gain the right senior executive support? Options include: • Identifying who you need to work with to make change happen. Understand their vision and use their language • Framing sustainability issues as about delivering the current business strategy and long-term value creation (see next slides) • Identifying a burning platform 16
  • 17.
    getting better at‘making the case’ 17 1. Do you have a journey to build on? 2. Do you have the right senior executive leadership? Yes 3. Do you have a long-term view of how the company creates value? Yes
  • 18.
    3. do youhave a long-term view of how the company creates value? • Step-change decisions answer: how will the company be successful in a future affected by sustainability issues? This requires: an enduring purpose and long- term view on how the company creates value • Here are three key questions to work through: • What is the company’s enduring purpose (especially for customers)? • What is the organisation’s long-term view on how it creates value – the matching of the company’s purpose and capabilities with its future context? • How does your proposal align to the enduring purpose and long-term view? 18
  • 19.
    getting better at‘making the case’ 19 1. Do you have a journey to build on? 2. Do you have the right senior executive leadership? Yes 3. Do you have a long-term view of how the company creates value? Yes 4. Do you have a specific business rationale? Yes
  • 20.
    4. do youhave a specific business rationale? • Step-change decisions have a clear, bespoke link from the particular action to value creation for the shareholder. • Try working through these steps 20 1. Develop specific business rationale Work through causal links from the proposed activity to shareholder value. See next slide for a tool to help you do that. 2. Find evidence Look for compelling evidence for each link in the chain: - Past experience - Other examples - Ask ‘what would need to be true for this to be a great decision?’ 3. Quantify magnitude Put a financial range on the costs (upfront investment and on-going) and benefits. 4. Track what happens Use 2. and 3. to put in place the information systems needed to measure what happens
  • 21.
    Shape context -Shared knowledge -“More handsto the pump” -Encouraging greater investment in green chemistry -Shape regulatory context Specific rational for shaping the context Nike: making the case for Increase Shareholder value Initiate System Innovation Start “Road to Zero” Apply your capabilities -Innovation -Turn sustainability into performance story that reinforces brand Pathways in: -Revenue Growth -Margin Growth -Risk Management Revenue: -product innovation Margin Growth -reduce input costs -share costs across industry Risk management -regulatory -reputation
  • 22.
    • In 2011McKinsey published this infographic of links from a sustainability-related activity to shareholder value. • You could also use Forum’s Pathways tool • Consider each in turn in order to identify the likely most important link to financial value. 22 Putting into Practice, McKinsey, Oct 2011 Specific rational for innovating to win
  • 23.
    4. do youhave a specific business rationale? • Step-change decisions have a clear, bespoke link from the particular action to value creation for the shareholder. • Try working through these steps 23 1. Develop specific business rationale Work through causal links from the proposed activity to shareholder value. See next slide for a tool to help you do that. 2. Find evidence Look for compelling evidence for each link in the chain: - Past experience - Other examples - Ask ‘what would need to be true for this to be a great decision?’ 3. Quantify magnitude Put a financial range on the costs (upfront investment and on-going) and benefits. 4. Track what happens Use 2. and 3. to put in place the information systems needed to measure what happens
  • 24.
    getting better at‘making the case’ 24 1. Do you have a journey to build on? 2. Do you have the right senior executive leadership? Yes 3. Do you have a long-term view of how the company creates value? Yes 4. Do you have a specific business rationale? Yes 5. Have you addressed status quo bias in financial tools? Yes
  • 25.
    5. have youaddressed the status quo bias in your financial tools? • Step-change decisions require financial tools that compare the proposed action with a realistic base case; one that has the plausible consequences of not taking the action. Most financial tools don’t take future resource constraints and thus higher energy bills, for example, into account. • What to do about it: • Rigorously improve the ‘do-nothing’ base case > Check the base case for optimistic assumptions • In times of disruption, compare the total cashflows of status quo and proposal > Normally, Net Present Value calculations look at the extra costs and benefits. This assumes fixed and sunk costs will continue to perform. > Avoid an incumbency bias by comparing the total costs and benefits of different options. • Use ‘discovery-driven planning’ > Start with the ‘reverse income statement’ – list the costs and benefits that would need to be true for this decision to be worth doing in order of importance > Test these assumptions, starting with the most important 25
  • 26.
    The problem withstandard financial decision- making tools 26 DCF and NPV methodologies implicitly make this comparison Companies should be making this comparison Adapted from Innovation Killers, Christensen et al, HBR Jan 2008 A. Assumed cash stream from doing nothing A C. Projected cash stream from investing in step- change C B. More likely cash stream from doing nothing B
  • 27.
    5. have youaddressed the status quo bias in your financial tools? • Step-change decisions require financial tools that compare the proposed action with a realistic base case; one that has the plausible consequences of not taking the action. Most financial tools don’t take future resource constraints and thus higher energy bills, for example, into account. • What to do about it: • Rigorously improve the ‘do-nothing’ base case  Check the base case for optimistic assumptions • In times of disruption, compare the total cashflows of status quo and proposal  Normally, Net Present Value calculations look at the extra costs and benefits. This assumes fixed and sunk costs will continue to perform.  Avoid an incumbency bias by comparing the total costs and benefits of different options. • Use ‘discovery-driven planning’  Start with the ‘reverse income statement’ – list the costs and benefits that would need to be true for this decision to be worth doing in order of importance  Test these assumptions, starting with the most important 27
  • 28.
    getting better at‘making the case’ 28 1. Do you have a journey to build on? 2. Do you have the right senior executive leadership? Yes 3. Do you have a long-term view of how the company creates value? Yes 4. Do you have a specific business rationale? Yes 5. Have you addressed status quo bias in financial tools? Yes
  • 29.
    making it happen:strategies to deploy Recommendation In practice this means Who is doing this? Set goals that integrate environmental considerations into core business decision making - Selecting suppliers based on their economic, social and environmental performance - Developing products and services that help customers reduce their environmental impact - Natura - AkzoNobel; Alcoa; Greif; Siemens Implement internal mechanisms that ensure environmental sustainability is valued - Allowing funds saved in operational costs on environmental projects to be allocated to capital budget needs - Bundle high financial return/low GHG reduction projects with low return/high GHG reduction projects to diversify risk and deliver overall corporate value. - Johnson & Johnson - Diversey (Sealed Air) 29 • Based on our research, five recommendations emerged that can help companies implement sustainability strategies:
  • 30.
    making it happen:strategies to deploy Recommendation In practice this means Who is doing this? Vest the CSO with greater authority over capital budget decisions and engage the sustainability team early in project planning - Giving the CSO authority to ensure all capital budget requests integrate sustainability considerations - Ensuring the company’s sustainability specialists are engaged early in project planning - AkzoNobel; Alcoa - AkzoNobel Establish and manage metrics that comprehensively indicate risks and opportunities across corporate value chain - Instituting supplier programs that put a price on externalities like CO2 emissions, water use, and waste generation - Natura Support public policies that put a stable price on externalities - Consistently supporting public policies that benefit the environment and companies’ financial performance Identified as a need, but no companies active 30
  • 31.
    getting better at‘making the case’ 31 1. Do you have a journey to build on? 2. Do you have the right senior executive leadership? Yes 3. Do you have a long-term view of how the company creates value? Yes 4. Do you have a specific business rationale? Yes 5. Have you addressed status quo bias in financial tools? Yes Questions?
  • 32.
    Upcoming Network activities -The World We Made | October | London, New York, Atlanta & San Francisco - The Future is here: workshop & tour at the Design Museum | 22 Oct | London - Informal Cities Dialogue | 24 Oct | webinar - Energy drinks: #theBIGshift & the Energy System | 11 Nov | London - Blue Skies, Sustainable Thinking: the new innovation frontier | 21 Nov | London - #theBIGshift: how to be a system innovator | 5 Dec | New York - #theBIGshift: in conversation with Paul Polman and Jonathon Porritt | 9 Dec | London - End-of-year network event & drinks| 16 Dec | London