MECHANISMS OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
1
Antagonism
❖ Mechanisms by which an organism suppresses the normal growth and activity of a
pathogen or the diseases they cause.
❖ Effect of antagonism depends upon the interspecies contact.
2
3
❖ Parasitism is the direct competitive interaction between two organisms in which one organism
is gaining nutrients from the other.
❖ Trichoderma spp parasitize fungal plant pathogens.
❖ The parasite extends hyphal branches towards target host, coils around and attaches to it with
appressorium-like bodies, and punctures its mycelium.
❖ These events require specific interactions between the parasite and fungal host, including the
detection of chemical gradients and mycelial surface features.
Contdâ€Ļâ€Ļ.
4
Parasitism
❖ Specificity: Trichoderma coils around Pythium ultimum hyphae but not plastic threads of
a similar diameter.
❖ Digestion of host cell walls - enzyme - proteases, chitinases, and glucanases
Antifungal
Synergistic with antibiotics
❖ Pseudomonads - antibiotic 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG) – induce host defences
❖ Trait of Colonizing root - Suppress pathogen activity in the rhizosphere of wheat through
competition for organic nutrients (Raaijmakers and Weller 2001).
5
Hyperparasitism
❖ If the host is also a parasite (a plant pathogen), the interaction is defined as hyperparasitism.
Eg: 1. Coniothyrium minitans - attacks sclerotia
2. Pythium oligandrum - attacks living hyphae
3. Acremonium alternatum, Acrodontium crateriforme, Ampelomyces quisqualis,
Cladosporium oxysporum, and Gliocladium virens - parasitize powdery mildew pathogens.
Four major classes of hyperparasites
❖ Obligate bacterial pathogens,
❖ Hypoviruses,
❖ Facultative parasites, and
❖ Predators.
6
Obligate bacterial pathogens
❖ Pasteuria penetrans is an obligate bacterial pathogen of root-knot nematodes.
Hypoviruses
❖ Virus infects Cryphonectria parasitica, a fungus causing chestnut blight, which causes
hypovirulence, a reduction in disease-producing capacity of the pathogen.
❖ Controlled the chestnut blight in many places (Milgroom and Cortesi 2004).
❖ The interaction of virus, fungus, tree, and environment success or failure
of hypovirulence.
7
❖
❖ Generalized feeders
❖ Non- specific
❖ Less predictable in the level of disease control.
❖ Eg: Trichoderma
1. Fresh bark used in composts - not directly attack the plant pathogen,(Rhizoctonia solani)
2. Decomposing bark- concentration of cellulose decreases activates the chitinase
genes - parasitize R. solani (Benhamou and Chet, 1997).
8
Predators
❖ Antibiotics are microbial toxins that can, at low concentrations, poison or kill other
microorganisms.
❖ Effective at suppressing plant pathogens and the diseases they cause.
❖ Antibiotics must be produced in sufficient quantities near the pathogen to result in a
biocontrol effect.
❖ Bacillus cereus strain (UW85) produce both zwittermycin (Silo-Suh et al. 1994) and
kanosamine (Milner et al. 1996).
❖ Pseudomonas putida (WCS358r) strains genetically engineered to produce phenazine and
DAPG - suppress plant diseases in field-grown wheat (Bakker et al. 2002).
9
Antibiotic-mediated suppression
10
Some of antibiotics produced by BCAs
11
❖ Many microorganisms produce and release lytic enzymes - hydrolyze a wide variety of
polymeric compounds, including chitin, proteins, cellulose, hemicellulose, and DNA.
❖ Eg: Control of Sclerotium rolfsii by Serratia marcescens appeared to be mediated by
chitinase expression.
12
Lytic enzymes
❖ P. fluorescens CHA0 produces antibiotics, siderophores and HCN.
❖ Eg: P. fluorescens - HCN production – suppress black rot of tobacco (Thielaviopsis
basicola) by blocking cytochrome oxidase pathway.
❖ Enterobacter cloacae – ammonia – suppress Pythium ultimum-induced damping-off of
cotton (Howell et al., 1988)
13
Un-regulated waste products
14

Mechanisms of Biological Control

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Antagonism ❖ Mechanisms bywhich an organism suppresses the normal growth and activity of a pathogen or the diseases they cause. ❖ Effect of antagonism depends upon the interspecies contact. 2
  • 3.
  • 4.
    ❖ Parasitism isthe direct competitive interaction between two organisms in which one organism is gaining nutrients from the other. ❖ Trichoderma spp parasitize fungal plant pathogens. ❖ The parasite extends hyphal branches towards target host, coils around and attaches to it with appressorium-like bodies, and punctures its mycelium. ❖ These events require specific interactions between the parasite and fungal host, including the detection of chemical gradients and mycelial surface features. Contdâ€Ļâ€Ļ. 4 Parasitism
  • 5.
    ❖ Specificity: Trichodermacoils around Pythium ultimum hyphae but not plastic threads of a similar diameter. ❖ Digestion of host cell walls - enzyme - proteases, chitinases, and glucanases Antifungal Synergistic with antibiotics ❖ Pseudomonads - antibiotic 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG) – induce host defences ❖ Trait of Colonizing root - Suppress pathogen activity in the rhizosphere of wheat through competition for organic nutrients (Raaijmakers and Weller 2001). 5
  • 6.
    Hyperparasitism ❖ If thehost is also a parasite (a plant pathogen), the interaction is defined as hyperparasitism. Eg: 1. Coniothyrium minitans - attacks sclerotia 2. Pythium oligandrum - attacks living hyphae 3. Acremonium alternatum, Acrodontium crateriforme, Ampelomyces quisqualis, Cladosporium oxysporum, and Gliocladium virens - parasitize powdery mildew pathogens. Four major classes of hyperparasites ❖ Obligate bacterial pathogens, ❖ Hypoviruses, ❖ Facultative parasites, and ❖ Predators. 6
  • 7.
    Obligate bacterial pathogens ❖Pasteuria penetrans is an obligate bacterial pathogen of root-knot nematodes. Hypoviruses ❖ Virus infects Cryphonectria parasitica, a fungus causing chestnut blight, which causes hypovirulence, a reduction in disease-producing capacity of the pathogen. ❖ Controlled the chestnut blight in many places (Milgroom and Cortesi 2004). ❖ The interaction of virus, fungus, tree, and environment success or failure of hypovirulence. 7
  • 8.
    ❖ ❖ Generalized feeders ❖Non- specific ❖ Less predictable in the level of disease control. ❖ Eg: Trichoderma 1. Fresh bark used in composts - not directly attack the plant pathogen,(Rhizoctonia solani) 2. Decomposing bark- concentration of cellulose decreases activates the chitinase genes - parasitize R. solani (Benhamou and Chet, 1997). 8 Predators
  • 9.
    ❖ Antibiotics aremicrobial toxins that can, at low concentrations, poison or kill other microorganisms. ❖ Effective at suppressing plant pathogens and the diseases they cause. ❖ Antibiotics must be produced in sufficient quantities near the pathogen to result in a biocontrol effect. ❖ Bacillus cereus strain (UW85) produce both zwittermycin (Silo-Suh et al. 1994) and kanosamine (Milner et al. 1996). ❖ Pseudomonas putida (WCS358r) strains genetically engineered to produce phenazine and DAPG - suppress plant diseases in field-grown wheat (Bakker et al. 2002). 9 Antibiotic-mediated suppression
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Some of antibioticsproduced by BCAs 11
  • 12.
    ❖ Many microorganismsproduce and release lytic enzymes - hydrolyze a wide variety of polymeric compounds, including chitin, proteins, cellulose, hemicellulose, and DNA. ❖ Eg: Control of Sclerotium rolfsii by Serratia marcescens appeared to be mediated by chitinase expression. 12 Lytic enzymes
  • 13.
    ❖ P. fluorescensCHA0 produces antibiotics, siderophores and HCN. ❖ Eg: P. fluorescens - HCN production – suppress black rot of tobacco (Thielaviopsis basicola) by blocking cytochrome oxidase pathway. ❖ Enterobacter cloacae – ammonia – suppress Pythium ultimum-induced damping-off of cotton (Howell et al., 1988) 13 Un-regulated waste products
  • 14.