- The document discusses using small "Chihuahua-sized" load tests versus large "Big Ass Load Tests (BALT)" and argues that smaller load tests are better for continuous integration pipelines.
- Chihuahua-sized load tests are described as small, lightweight, manageable, and easy to include in pipelines without disrupting environments or requiring many resources.
- In contrast, BALTs are characterized as heavy, disruptive, resource-intensive, and only suitable when needed outside of pipelines. The document recommends focusing on small, lean, and friendly load tests that can be run continuously.