Introduction to
Arrangement and Description

          Amanda Hill
      Archeion Coordinator
Plan for the workshop
•   Introductions
•   First principles: arrangement
•   Practical arrangement exercise
•   Archival description
•   Practical description exercise
•   Descriptive standards
    – RAD
• Sharing descriptions through Archeion
Overview
• Why do we arrange and describe records?

  – To know what we’ve got and where it is

  – To make materials accessible to potential users

  – To explain the context of the creation and use of
    records
Arrangement is the intellectual and/or physical
processes of organizing documents in accordance
with accepted archival principles

Description is the creation of an accurate
representation of the archival material by the
process of capturing, collating, analyzing, and
organizing information that serves to identify
archival material and to explain the context and
records systems that produced it.



  Rules for Archival Description (Version 2) 2004
Arrangement

• Key archival principles
  – Provenance
  – Original order


• Another important consideration
  – Ease of use by researchers
Provenance
• Chain of custody is important for demonstrating the
  authenticity of archival material

• Need to maintain the coherence of a group of
  materials in order for them to have archival integrity

• Materials from one source should not be mixed with
  materials from another

• Respect des fonds (respect for the source)
Definition of a fonds

• All of the documents, regardless of form or
  medium, naturally generated and/or
  accumulated and used by a particular person,
  family or corporate body in the conduct of
  personal or corporate activity
Integrity of the fonds
• Context is crucial to understanding records

• Keep materials together to maintain the
  context of their creation and use

• N.B. Materials can be physically separated,
  if necessary, e.g. for specialist storage
Fonds can be big or small
• Records of a long-running business or other organization
  can be extensive

• A single fonds may arrive in more than one accession

• One or two items may be all that survive:

       “As one archivist has said, what is left of a fonds is a fonds.”1


   1 http://aabc.ca/msa/5_describing_archival_material.htm
Exercise: identifying fonds in
            accessioned material
Acc.   Records received                                 Nature of Receipt
No.
 A     The minute book of the Guelph Chapter of the Donated in May, 1980 by Georges Babineau,
       Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire,      who found it in the attic of the house he
       dating 1955-1960.                            purchased.

 B     2 m of minutes, correspondence and other         Donated in May, 1988 by Estelle Trethewey.
       textual records, dating 1966-1975, of the Galt   She was the last recording secretary of the
       Chapter of the Imperial Order Daughters of       chapter, which folded in 1975.
       the Empire.

 C     212 loose photographs taken by Estelle           Donated in June, 1996 by Johanna Trethewey,
       Trethewey, dating 1971-1982, showing events      the granddaughter of Estelle Trethewey.
       of the Galt Chapter of the IODE, and also
       other social and family occasions in the
       Galt/Cambridge Area.

 D     A second minute book of the Guelph Chapter       Donated in October, 1999 by Marlys Cabbalie,
       of the Imperial Order Daughters of the           daughter of the a member of the Guelph
       Empire, dating 1960-1966.                        Chapter of the Imperial Order Daughters of the
                                                        Empire.
Fonds

• Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire,
  Guelph Chapter fonds (Accessions A and D)

• Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire, Galt
  Chapter fonds (Accession B)

• Estelle Trethewey fonds (Accession C)
Original order
• Aim: to preserve or recreate the order and
  organization in which the documents were
  created and/or used by the creator or office of
  origin

  – Think about the functions of records
  – Keep related records together
Series

• A group of records within a fonds
  which are related to each other
  by function
• Series may be further divided into
  sub-series
• Series may contain files or items
STEPS IN ARRANGEMENT
1. Gather background information
• Find out as much as you can about the creator
  of the materials you are going to be
  processing
  – Accession records and correspondence
  – Internet searches


• Sometimes you may have very little
  information on the creator, which makes Step
  2 even more important…
2. Survey the material
• Look through the fonds/collection

• Get a sense of what it contains

• See if there is any obvious original order

• Identify materials which can be disposed of
  – Make a note of anything you do discard
3. Physically arrange the material
• Group related materials together

  – reflecting original order where possible

  – bearing the end user in mind

  – following any local conventions
Example of a
repository with an
arrangement and
numbering scheme
for certain types of
records
3. Physically arrange the material
• Package materials in acid-free containers
   – Less essential if your storage area is climate-controlled


• Remove rubber bands

• Remove metals fastenings, if this is your institution’s
  policy
   – This may not always be appropriate, depending on the
     bulk of material involved
Arrangement within a fonds
• Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire,
  Guelph Chapter fonds

  – Simple, chronological arrangement

    • Minute book 1955-1960
    • Minute book 1960-1966
More complex arrangement
• Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire, Galt
  Chapter fonds (Accession B)
  – 2 m of minutes, correspondence and other textual
    records, dating 1966-1975, of the Galt Chapter of
    the Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire.

     • Minutes
     • Correspondence
     • Other materials
Possible arrangement

                  Fonds                    IODE, Galt
                                         Chapter records




       Series                  Minutes              Correspondence             Other materials




Minute Book,           Minute Book,       Administrative
                                                                   Thank-you letters
 1966-1969              1969-1975        correspondence




               Items                                       Files
Very complex arrangement




Anti-Apartheid Movement papers, being sorted in Oxford, ca.1997
Mike Terry (1947-
2008), executive
secretary of the
Anti-Apartheid
Movement, 1975-
1994


A case of ‘original
disorder’!
•   (A) Boycott Movement papers, 1959-1961
•   (B) AAM Governing Bodies, 1960-1995
•   (C) AAM Committees, 1960-1995
•   (D) Local Anti-Apartheid Groups, [ca. 1960]-1995
•   (E) Professional and Special Interest Groups Against Apartheid, 1970-1994
•   (F) Local Authorities Against Apartheid, [ca. 1960]-1995
•   (G) Britain, 1959-1995
•   (H) South Africa, 1959-1995
•   (I) South Africa in Transition, 1986-1995
•   (J) Other African Countries, 1961-1995
•   (K) Europe, 1972-1995
•   (L) Commonwealth, 1960-1994
•   (M) Overseas anti-apartheid organisations, 1963-1995
•   (N) International Organisations, 1960-1995
•   (O) Campaigns, 1956-1995
•   (P) AAM Head Office, 1960-1995
•   (Q) Correspondence, 1960-1995
•   (R) Anti-Apartheid Enterprises (AAE), 1986-1990
•   (S) Clapham Common Productions Limited, 1987-1995
•   (T) Freedom Productions Limited, 1987-1995                             1,400 boxes of
•   (U) Action for Southern Africa (ACTSA), 1991-1998                      material, once
•   (V) Photographs and Audio-Visual Material, 1900-[ca. 1999]             catalogued!
•   (W) Posters, 1963-[ca. 1999]
•   (X) Exhibition Material, Artwork and Objects, [ca. 1960]-[ca. 1999]
•   (Y) Printed Material, 1960-1994
•   (Z) Miscellaneous Material, [ca. 1960]-[ca. 1999]

http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/rhl/aam/aam.html
Limited arrangement
Boxes in the Basement
• 89 boxes – materials had already been used by
  researchers: box numbers were known and
  records could not be re-arranged

• Had to sort items within each box
  – Original boxes were replaced
    with archival packaging
  – Each box filled around 3 archive boxes
Not part of the original order
Important!
• Bearing in mind the principles of original
  order, maintaining the integrity of archival
  materials and making life easier for users…

• …There is no ‘right way’ to arrange

• Common sense counts for much
Hotel sign
(lacking in common sense)
Collections
• Materials that were not generated as part of the
  activity of a person or organisation
• For example:
  – A group of postcards of a local town
  – Records relating to a particular subject, assembled by
    an individual

• These are not fonds, but collections
• Their provenance and original order may have
  been lost, but they can be described as a discrete
  group of records
Arrangement: Summary
• Group materials in a way that reflects the
  original creator’s order, if it is possible to
  determine what that was

• Keep in mind the requirements of end users

• Package materials in archival-quality
  wrappings
DESCRIPTION
Description
• A means of establishing intellectual control
  over materials held in archives
  – What we have
  – Where to find it


• A way of sharing information with potential
  users about what our records contain
Description
• No standard way to describe archives until late
  20th century

• Then: a flurry of descriptive standards
  – In Canada: Rules for Archival Description (RAD) –
    1990 (revised 2008)
  – Internationally: International Standard for Archival
    Description (General) (ISAD(G)) - 1994
Archival description

• Defined by the International Council on Archives as:

         “The creation of an accurate
         representation of each fonds and its
         component parts by the process of
         capturing, collating, analyzing and
         organizing any information that serves to
         identify archival material, and explain the
         context and records systems which
         produced it”
Key principles for archival description
• Describe from the general to the specific
• Contain information relevant to the unit of
  description
• Do not repeat information unnecessarily

• Arrangement defines description: once the
  material is arranged in a logical fashion, the
  description should be straightforward
  – Start with the fonds or collection level, then describe
    each series, with its associated files or items
Fonds                    IODE, Galt
                                         Chapter records




       Series                  Minutes              Correspondence         Other materials




Minute Book,           Minute Book,       Administrative
                                                               Thank-you letters
 1966-1969              1969-1975        correspondence




               Items                                       Files
Textual layout of finding aid
Level of description      Contents                           Possible number


Fonds-level description   Overview of entire fonds           2008.33
Series 1                  Description of minute books        2008.33/1
Item 1                    Description of minute book 1       2008.33/1/1
Item 2                    Description of minute book 2       2008.33/1/2
Series 2                  Description of correspondence      2008.33/2
File 1                    Description of admin. corresp.     2008.33/2/1
File 2                    Description of thank-you letters   2008.33/2/2
Series 3                  Overall description of ‘other      2008.33/3
                          materials’

                                                             In this example, the
                                                             numbering reflects
                                                             the hierarchy of the
                                                             description.
Alternative finding aid
Level of description      Contents                        Possible number


Fonds-level description   Overview of entire fonds        2008.33
Series 1                  Description of minute books     2008.33/1
Series 2                  Description of correspondence   2008.33/2
Series 3                  Overall description of ‘other   2008.33/3
                          materials’
Alternative finding aid
Level of description      Contents                   Reference number


Fonds-level description   Overview of entire fonds   2008.33
Some core elements of description
Fonds/Collection level              Series/File/Item level
Repository
Title                               Title
Name of creator
Dates                               Dates
Size                                Size
Information about creator
Description of materials            Description of materials
Restrictions on access
Reference number                    Reference number
Custodial history of the material
                                                         These elements are
                                                         common to most
                                                         archival descriptive
                                                         standards.
Descriptive standards
• RAD and other archival description standards
  break down descriptions into a set of key
  elements

• This helps archivists describe materials in a
  consistent way

• …and helps users know what to expect from
  an archival description
RAD concentrates on describing
             fonds

              Information
                 about
Archival       creator(s)
description

               Information
                  about
                 records
The Series System
• For certain types of records, particularly those
  of governments, it is easier to describe
  records at the level of series, rather than as a
  fonds

• The creating body may change frequently (e.g.
  with government reorganizations), while the
  records continue to be created according to
  their original purpose
Series System entities

          Second
          creator
  First              Third
creator             creator
          Record
          series
Series System
• Developed in Australia in 1960s and widely
  used by archives of all kinds there

• In Canada it is mainly used to describe
  government records such as those held by the
  Archives of Ontario
Rules for Archival Description
• First edition published in 1990
• Last updated in 2008
• Based on the Anglo-American Cataloguing
  Rules (AACR2, a library standard)
• Maintained by the Canadian Committee on
  Archival Description, a committee of the
  Canadian Council of Archives
RAD Principles
• P1.0 Archival description should be
  undertaken with attention to requirements for
  use

• P2.0 The description of all archival material
  (e.g. fonds, series, collections and discrete
  items) should be integrated and proceed from
  a common set of rules
RAD Principles
• P3.0 Respect des fonds is the basis of archival
  arrangement and description

• P4.0 Creators of archival material must be
  described

• P5.0 Description reflects arrangement
RAD Principles
• P5.1 Levels of arrangement and description
  constitute a hierarchical system
• P5.2 Descriptions should proceed from
  general to specific
• P5.3 Information provided at each level of
  description must be appropriate to that level
• P5.4 Relationships between levels of
  description must be clearly indicated
RAD areas
1.   Title
2.   Edition
3.   Class of material specific details
4.   Dates of creation
5.   Physical description
6.   Series area
7.   Archival description
8.   Notes
9.   Standard number
Important RAD areas
1.   Title
2.   Edition
3.   Class of material specific details
4.   Dates of creation
5.   Physical description
6.   Series area
7.   Archival description
8.   Notes
9.   Standard number
Title Area
• 1.1B3 Title proper

• Enter the name of the person, family, or
  corporate body responsible for the creation of
  the records, followed by the word fonds. If the
  unit being described is an artificially
  accumulated collection, use the word
  collection instead of fonds
Examples
• Anthony Adamson and Marion MacRae fonds
• Frederick Hagan fonds
• Kingston General Hospital photograph
  collection
• Proctor family fonds
Dates of creation
• 1.4B Date

• Give the date(s) of creation of the unit being
  described either as a single date, or range of
  dates (for inclusive dates and/or predominant
  dates). Always give the inclusive dates. When
  providing predominant dates, specify them as
  such, preceded by the word predominant.
• If there is no date, provide an estimated date in
  square brackets. Do not use ‘n.d.’ or ‘undated’
Examples
•   1890
•   1934-1955
•   [ca. 1875]-1954
•   1812-1903, predominant 1845-1867
Uncertain/probable dates
[1867?]               probable date
[ca. 1867]            approximate date
[before 1867]         terminal date
[after 5 Jan. 1867]   terminal date
[1892 or 1893]        one year or the other
[between 1915 and     use only for dates fewer
1918]                 than 20 years apart
[197-]                decade certain
[186-?]               probable decade
[17–]                 century certain
[17–?]                probable century
Physical description area
• 1.5B

• At all levels of description, record the extent of
  the unit being described by giving the number of
  physical units and their nature

• Record all the different types of materials found,
  starting each on a new line

• Use metric measurements
Examples
•   ca. 200 photographs
•   50 maps
•   21cm of textual records
•   102 posters : silkscreen ; 60 x 90 cm, 40 x 60
    cm and smaller
Archival description area
• 1.7

• This area contains the core of your archival
  description, including information on the
  creator(s) of the material and the nature of
  the material itself
Administrative history/Biographical
              sketch
• 1.7B

• Record in narrative form or as a chronology the
  main life events, activities, achievements and/or
  roles of the entity being described. This may
  include information on gender, nationality, family
  and religious or political affiliations. Wherever
  possible, supply dates as an integral component
  of the narrative description.
For organizations include:
•   Dates of founding and/or dissolution
•   Mandate/sphere of responsibility
•   Predecessor and successor bodies
•   Administrative relationships with other bodies
•   Administrative structure
•   Names of the chief officers
•   Other significant information
For individuals, include:
•   Place and dates of birth and death
•   Place(s) of residence
•   Occupation, education and activities
•   Names of family members
Custodial history
• 1.7C

• Use this field to record the changes of
  ownership of the archival materials, if known,
  since their creation

• If the records were received directly from their
  creator, record this information under
  ‘Immediate source of acquisition’ (1.8B12)
Scope and content
• 1.7D

• Give information about the functions and/or
  kinds of activities generating the records, the
  period of time, the subject matter, and the
  geographical area to which they relate

• Summarize the arrangement and structure of
  the records and the form that they take
Examples
• Fonds consists of Anthony Richmond's records pertaining
  to his career as a scholar and includes his research files,
  professional files, manuscripts, as well as his personal
  files.

• The collection consists of records of various private
  businesses which operated in Hastings County, Ontario,
  which were gathered as a unit by the Hastings County
  Historical Society. Various kinds of activities and
  occupations are represented: collection of duties; public
  utilities; loan; general merchants; grocery; temperance;
  insurance; engineering; surveying; railway…
Notes area
Physical condition
• 1.8B9a

• Note anything about the physical condition of the
  material being described that affects the clarity
  or legibility of the records

• Also consider noting if the material has suffered
  mould damage, even if it does not affect the
  legibility of the records, as a warning to potential
  users.
Immediate source of acquisition
• 1.8B12

• Enter information about the donor from
  whom you obtained the records

• Only information about the holder of the
  record immediately prior to their transfer to
  the archives should be recorded in this field
Restrictions on access
• 1.8B16a

• Enter information about any applicable
  restrictions on researchers' ability to view the
  material
Examples
• Open

• Access restrictions apply to Series 5,
  Restricted Originals.

• Several files and photographs within the
  collection have restricted access due to the
  information they contain. Access to brittle
  documents may be restricted.
Access points
• Act as index terms for your description
• Usually in a standardized form (e.g. names)
  – Or taken from a predetermined list of terms (e.g.
    places, subjects)
Forming names in RAD (Section 22)
• Surname comes first
  – Fisher, John
• Names used by person form the heading,
  other names explained in brackets
  – Macdonald, H. Ian (Hugh Ian)
• RAD goes into detail about how to form name
  headings for more complex examples
MANAGERIAL CONSIDERATIONS
RELATING TO ARCHIVAL DESCRIPTION
Need to think about…

• User demand

• Time available

• Overall control of several groups vs. detailed
  description of one group of records

• Recording your actions

• MPLP: More Product Less Process
MPLP
“There is sometimes an unfortunate tendency
on the part of processing archivists to use the
preparation of [finding aids] as an excuse to
demonstrate their own knowledge (of both
collection and historical context) and writing
ability.”

• Greene, Mark A. & Dennis Meissner (2005) ‘More Product, Less Process:
  Revamping Traditional Archival Processing’ American Archivist 68: 208–
  263
MPLP
“The archivist’s job is simply to represent the
materials sufficient to affording acceptable
access. Let’s not waste either our own valuable
time researching and writing lengthy
narratives, or our researchers’ time in forcing
them to read more verbiage than necessary.”
• Greene, Mark A. & Dennis Meissner (2005) ‘More Product, Less Process:
  Revamping Traditional Archival Processing’ American Archivist 68: 208–
  263
ARCHEION
Archeion
• Ontario’s archive information network
• Established in 1999
• Major upgrade in 2011 with a move of all
  existing information to ICA-AtoM software
• Holds over 8,000 fonds- and collection-level
  descriptions from more than 70 institutions
  across Ontario
• One of a network of provincial systems
  feeding in to ArchivesCanada
Archeion’s structure

                 Archival institutions



                  Online display


Archival descriptions          Record creators
Standards-based records
• ISDIAH – International
  Standard for Describing       Archival institutions
  Institutions with Archival
  Holdings
• RAD – Rules for Archival      Archival descriptions
  Description
• ISAAR-CPF – International
  Standard for Archival
  Authority Records -           Record creators
  Corporate, Personal, Family
Some tips for Archeion
             descriptions
• Be concise
• Put key information at the start of longer text
  fields, particularly:
  – Biographical/administrative history
  – Scope and content
• Remember you are writing for a global
  audience (context!)
  – The reader is (probably) not in your reading room
Remember
         In your first sentence…                  world-wide
                                                  context…

• Include the name, birth and death dates, major
  occupation, and geographical area of the
  creator(s) in the biographical sketch/
  administrative history.
  – Adam Lindsay Webb (b. 1879) was a physician who
    practised in Brighton, Ontario.

• Give a single sentence overview in the scope and
  content note.
  – Fonds consists of photocopies of records created and
    received by A.L. Webb, primarily relating to his
    medical practice.
If in doubt…
a) Check the Archeion manual

b) See how other archivists have described similar
   materials on Archeion already and use their
   descriptions and access points as a model

c) Consult RAD

d) Contact the Archeion Coordinator if you get
   completely stuck!
Coordinator contact details
• Amanda Hill
• archeion@aao-archivists.ca
• 416-929-4447

Introduction to arrangement and description (feb 4&5, 2012)

  • 1.
    Introduction to Arrangement andDescription Amanda Hill Archeion Coordinator
  • 2.
    Plan for theworkshop • Introductions • First principles: arrangement • Practical arrangement exercise • Archival description • Practical description exercise • Descriptive standards – RAD • Sharing descriptions through Archeion
  • 3.
    Overview • Why dowe arrange and describe records? – To know what we’ve got and where it is – To make materials accessible to potential users – To explain the context of the creation and use of records
  • 4.
    Arrangement is theintellectual and/or physical processes of organizing documents in accordance with accepted archival principles Description is the creation of an accurate representation of the archival material by the process of capturing, collating, analyzing, and organizing information that serves to identify archival material and to explain the context and records systems that produced it. Rules for Archival Description (Version 2) 2004
  • 5.
    Arrangement • Key archivalprinciples – Provenance – Original order • Another important consideration – Ease of use by researchers
  • 6.
    Provenance • Chain ofcustody is important for demonstrating the authenticity of archival material • Need to maintain the coherence of a group of materials in order for them to have archival integrity • Materials from one source should not be mixed with materials from another • Respect des fonds (respect for the source)
  • 7.
    Definition of afonds • All of the documents, regardless of form or medium, naturally generated and/or accumulated and used by a particular person, family or corporate body in the conduct of personal or corporate activity
  • 8.
    Integrity of thefonds • Context is crucial to understanding records • Keep materials together to maintain the context of their creation and use • N.B. Materials can be physically separated, if necessary, e.g. for specialist storage
  • 9.
    Fonds can bebig or small • Records of a long-running business or other organization can be extensive • A single fonds may arrive in more than one accession • One or two items may be all that survive: “As one archivist has said, what is left of a fonds is a fonds.”1 1 http://aabc.ca/msa/5_describing_archival_material.htm
  • 10.
    Exercise: identifying fondsin accessioned material Acc. Records received Nature of Receipt No. A The minute book of the Guelph Chapter of the Donated in May, 1980 by Georges Babineau, Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire, who found it in the attic of the house he dating 1955-1960. purchased. B 2 m of minutes, correspondence and other Donated in May, 1988 by Estelle Trethewey. textual records, dating 1966-1975, of the Galt She was the last recording secretary of the Chapter of the Imperial Order Daughters of chapter, which folded in 1975. the Empire. C 212 loose photographs taken by Estelle Donated in June, 1996 by Johanna Trethewey, Trethewey, dating 1971-1982, showing events the granddaughter of Estelle Trethewey. of the Galt Chapter of the IODE, and also other social and family occasions in the Galt/Cambridge Area. D A second minute book of the Guelph Chapter Donated in October, 1999 by Marlys Cabbalie, of the Imperial Order Daughters of the daughter of the a member of the Guelph Empire, dating 1960-1966. Chapter of the Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire.
  • 11.
    Fonds • Imperial OrderDaughters of the Empire, Guelph Chapter fonds (Accessions A and D) • Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire, Galt Chapter fonds (Accession B) • Estelle Trethewey fonds (Accession C)
  • 12.
    Original order • Aim:to preserve or recreate the order and organization in which the documents were created and/or used by the creator or office of origin – Think about the functions of records – Keep related records together
  • 13.
    Series • A groupof records within a fonds which are related to each other by function • Series may be further divided into sub-series • Series may contain files or items
  • 14.
  • 15.
    1. Gather backgroundinformation • Find out as much as you can about the creator of the materials you are going to be processing – Accession records and correspondence – Internet searches • Sometimes you may have very little information on the creator, which makes Step 2 even more important…
  • 16.
    2. Survey thematerial • Look through the fonds/collection • Get a sense of what it contains • See if there is any obvious original order • Identify materials which can be disposed of – Make a note of anything you do discard
  • 17.
    3. Physically arrangethe material • Group related materials together – reflecting original order where possible – bearing the end user in mind – following any local conventions
  • 18.
    Example of a repositorywith an arrangement and numbering scheme for certain types of records
  • 19.
    3. Physically arrangethe material • Package materials in acid-free containers – Less essential if your storage area is climate-controlled • Remove rubber bands • Remove metals fastenings, if this is your institution’s policy – This may not always be appropriate, depending on the bulk of material involved
  • 20.
    Arrangement within afonds • Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire, Guelph Chapter fonds – Simple, chronological arrangement • Minute book 1955-1960 • Minute book 1960-1966
  • 21.
    More complex arrangement •Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire, Galt Chapter fonds (Accession B) – 2 m of minutes, correspondence and other textual records, dating 1966-1975, of the Galt Chapter of the Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire. • Minutes • Correspondence • Other materials
  • 22.
    Possible arrangement Fonds IODE, Galt Chapter records Series Minutes Correspondence Other materials Minute Book, Minute Book, Administrative Thank-you letters 1966-1969 1969-1975 correspondence Items Files
  • 23.
    Very complex arrangement Anti-ApartheidMovement papers, being sorted in Oxford, ca.1997
  • 24.
    Mike Terry (1947- 2008),executive secretary of the Anti-Apartheid Movement, 1975- 1994 A case of ‘original disorder’!
  • 25.
    (A) Boycott Movement papers, 1959-1961 • (B) AAM Governing Bodies, 1960-1995 • (C) AAM Committees, 1960-1995 • (D) Local Anti-Apartheid Groups, [ca. 1960]-1995 • (E) Professional and Special Interest Groups Against Apartheid, 1970-1994 • (F) Local Authorities Against Apartheid, [ca. 1960]-1995 • (G) Britain, 1959-1995 • (H) South Africa, 1959-1995 • (I) South Africa in Transition, 1986-1995 • (J) Other African Countries, 1961-1995 • (K) Europe, 1972-1995 • (L) Commonwealth, 1960-1994 • (M) Overseas anti-apartheid organisations, 1963-1995 • (N) International Organisations, 1960-1995 • (O) Campaigns, 1956-1995 • (P) AAM Head Office, 1960-1995 • (Q) Correspondence, 1960-1995 • (R) Anti-Apartheid Enterprises (AAE), 1986-1990 • (S) Clapham Common Productions Limited, 1987-1995 • (T) Freedom Productions Limited, 1987-1995 1,400 boxes of • (U) Action for Southern Africa (ACTSA), 1991-1998 material, once • (V) Photographs and Audio-Visual Material, 1900-[ca. 1999] catalogued! • (W) Posters, 1963-[ca. 1999] • (X) Exhibition Material, Artwork and Objects, [ca. 1960]-[ca. 1999] • (Y) Printed Material, 1960-1994 • (Z) Miscellaneous Material, [ca. 1960]-[ca. 1999] http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/rhl/aam/aam.html
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Boxes in theBasement • 89 boxes – materials had already been used by researchers: box numbers were known and records could not be re-arranged • Had to sort items within each box – Original boxes were replaced with archival packaging – Each box filled around 3 archive boxes
  • 28.
    Not part ofthe original order
  • 29.
    Important! • Bearing inmind the principles of original order, maintaining the integrity of archival materials and making life easier for users… • …There is no ‘right way’ to arrange • Common sense counts for much
  • 30.
  • 31.
    Collections • Materials thatwere not generated as part of the activity of a person or organisation • For example: – A group of postcards of a local town – Records relating to a particular subject, assembled by an individual • These are not fonds, but collections • Their provenance and original order may have been lost, but they can be described as a discrete group of records
  • 32.
    Arrangement: Summary • Groupmaterials in a way that reflects the original creator’s order, if it is possible to determine what that was • Keep in mind the requirements of end users • Package materials in archival-quality wrappings
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Description • A meansof establishing intellectual control over materials held in archives – What we have – Where to find it • A way of sharing information with potential users about what our records contain
  • 35.
    Description • No standardway to describe archives until late 20th century • Then: a flurry of descriptive standards – In Canada: Rules for Archival Description (RAD) – 1990 (revised 2008) – Internationally: International Standard for Archival Description (General) (ISAD(G)) - 1994
  • 36.
    Archival description • Definedby the International Council on Archives as: “The creation of an accurate representation of each fonds and its component parts by the process of capturing, collating, analyzing and organizing any information that serves to identify archival material, and explain the context and records systems which produced it”
  • 37.
    Key principles forarchival description • Describe from the general to the specific • Contain information relevant to the unit of description • Do not repeat information unnecessarily • Arrangement defines description: once the material is arranged in a logical fashion, the description should be straightforward – Start with the fonds or collection level, then describe each series, with its associated files or items
  • 38.
    Fonds IODE, Galt Chapter records Series Minutes Correspondence Other materials Minute Book, Minute Book, Administrative Thank-you letters 1966-1969 1969-1975 correspondence Items Files
  • 39.
    Textual layout offinding aid Level of description Contents Possible number Fonds-level description Overview of entire fonds 2008.33 Series 1 Description of minute books 2008.33/1 Item 1 Description of minute book 1 2008.33/1/1 Item 2 Description of minute book 2 2008.33/1/2 Series 2 Description of correspondence 2008.33/2 File 1 Description of admin. corresp. 2008.33/2/1 File 2 Description of thank-you letters 2008.33/2/2 Series 3 Overall description of ‘other 2008.33/3 materials’ In this example, the numbering reflects the hierarchy of the description.
  • 40.
    Alternative finding aid Levelof description Contents Possible number Fonds-level description Overview of entire fonds 2008.33 Series 1 Description of minute books 2008.33/1 Series 2 Description of correspondence 2008.33/2 Series 3 Overall description of ‘other 2008.33/3 materials’
  • 41.
    Alternative finding aid Levelof description Contents Reference number Fonds-level description Overview of entire fonds 2008.33
  • 42.
    Some core elementsof description Fonds/Collection level Series/File/Item level Repository Title Title Name of creator Dates Dates Size Size Information about creator Description of materials Description of materials Restrictions on access Reference number Reference number Custodial history of the material These elements are common to most archival descriptive standards.
  • 43.
    Descriptive standards • RADand other archival description standards break down descriptions into a set of key elements • This helps archivists describe materials in a consistent way • …and helps users know what to expect from an archival description
  • 44.
    RAD concentrates ondescribing fonds Information about Archival creator(s) description Information about records
  • 45.
    The Series System •For certain types of records, particularly those of governments, it is easier to describe records at the level of series, rather than as a fonds • The creating body may change frequently (e.g. with government reorganizations), while the records continue to be created according to their original purpose
  • 46.
    Series System entities Second creator First Third creator creator Record series
  • 47.
    Series System • Developedin Australia in 1960s and widely used by archives of all kinds there • In Canada it is mainly used to describe government records such as those held by the Archives of Ontario
  • 48.
    Rules for ArchivalDescription • First edition published in 1990 • Last updated in 2008 • Based on the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2, a library standard) • Maintained by the Canadian Committee on Archival Description, a committee of the Canadian Council of Archives
  • 49.
    RAD Principles • P1.0Archival description should be undertaken with attention to requirements for use • P2.0 The description of all archival material (e.g. fonds, series, collections and discrete items) should be integrated and proceed from a common set of rules
  • 50.
    RAD Principles • P3.0Respect des fonds is the basis of archival arrangement and description • P4.0 Creators of archival material must be described • P5.0 Description reflects arrangement
  • 51.
    RAD Principles • P5.1Levels of arrangement and description constitute a hierarchical system • P5.2 Descriptions should proceed from general to specific • P5.3 Information provided at each level of description must be appropriate to that level • P5.4 Relationships between levels of description must be clearly indicated
  • 52.
    RAD areas 1. Title 2. Edition 3. Class of material specific details 4. Dates of creation 5. Physical description 6. Series area 7. Archival description 8. Notes 9. Standard number
  • 53.
    Important RAD areas 1. Title 2. Edition 3. Class of material specific details 4. Dates of creation 5. Physical description 6. Series area 7. Archival description 8. Notes 9. Standard number
  • 54.
    Title Area • 1.1B3Title proper • Enter the name of the person, family, or corporate body responsible for the creation of the records, followed by the word fonds. If the unit being described is an artificially accumulated collection, use the word collection instead of fonds
  • 55.
    Examples • Anthony Adamsonand Marion MacRae fonds • Frederick Hagan fonds • Kingston General Hospital photograph collection • Proctor family fonds
  • 56.
    Dates of creation •1.4B Date • Give the date(s) of creation of the unit being described either as a single date, or range of dates (for inclusive dates and/or predominant dates). Always give the inclusive dates. When providing predominant dates, specify them as such, preceded by the word predominant. • If there is no date, provide an estimated date in square brackets. Do not use ‘n.d.’ or ‘undated’
  • 57.
    Examples • 1890 • 1934-1955 • [ca. 1875]-1954 • 1812-1903, predominant 1845-1867
  • 58.
    Uncertain/probable dates [1867?] probable date [ca. 1867] approximate date [before 1867] terminal date [after 5 Jan. 1867] terminal date [1892 or 1893] one year or the other [between 1915 and use only for dates fewer 1918] than 20 years apart [197-] decade certain [186-?] probable decade [17–] century certain [17–?] probable century
  • 59.
    Physical description area •1.5B • At all levels of description, record the extent of the unit being described by giving the number of physical units and their nature • Record all the different types of materials found, starting each on a new line • Use metric measurements
  • 60.
    Examples • ca. 200 photographs • 50 maps • 21cm of textual records • 102 posters : silkscreen ; 60 x 90 cm, 40 x 60 cm and smaller
  • 61.
    Archival description area •1.7 • This area contains the core of your archival description, including information on the creator(s) of the material and the nature of the material itself
  • 62.
    Administrative history/Biographical sketch • 1.7B • Record in narrative form or as a chronology the main life events, activities, achievements and/or roles of the entity being described. This may include information on gender, nationality, family and religious or political affiliations. Wherever possible, supply dates as an integral component of the narrative description.
  • 63.
    For organizations include: • Dates of founding and/or dissolution • Mandate/sphere of responsibility • Predecessor and successor bodies • Administrative relationships with other bodies • Administrative structure • Names of the chief officers • Other significant information
  • 64.
    For individuals, include: • Place and dates of birth and death • Place(s) of residence • Occupation, education and activities • Names of family members
  • 65.
    Custodial history • 1.7C •Use this field to record the changes of ownership of the archival materials, if known, since their creation • If the records were received directly from their creator, record this information under ‘Immediate source of acquisition’ (1.8B12)
  • 66.
    Scope and content •1.7D • Give information about the functions and/or kinds of activities generating the records, the period of time, the subject matter, and the geographical area to which they relate • Summarize the arrangement and structure of the records and the form that they take
  • 67.
    Examples • Fonds consistsof Anthony Richmond's records pertaining to his career as a scholar and includes his research files, professional files, manuscripts, as well as his personal files. • The collection consists of records of various private businesses which operated in Hastings County, Ontario, which were gathered as a unit by the Hastings County Historical Society. Various kinds of activities and occupations are represented: collection of duties; public utilities; loan; general merchants; grocery; temperance; insurance; engineering; surveying; railway…
  • 68.
  • 69.
    Physical condition • 1.8B9a •Note anything about the physical condition of the material being described that affects the clarity or legibility of the records • Also consider noting if the material has suffered mould damage, even if it does not affect the legibility of the records, as a warning to potential users.
  • 70.
    Immediate source ofacquisition • 1.8B12 • Enter information about the donor from whom you obtained the records • Only information about the holder of the record immediately prior to their transfer to the archives should be recorded in this field
  • 71.
    Restrictions on access •1.8B16a • Enter information about any applicable restrictions on researchers' ability to view the material
  • 72.
    Examples • Open • Accessrestrictions apply to Series 5, Restricted Originals. • Several files and photographs within the collection have restricted access due to the information they contain. Access to brittle documents may be restricted.
  • 73.
    Access points • Actas index terms for your description • Usually in a standardized form (e.g. names) – Or taken from a predetermined list of terms (e.g. places, subjects)
  • 74.
    Forming names inRAD (Section 22) • Surname comes first – Fisher, John • Names used by person form the heading, other names explained in brackets – Macdonald, H. Ian (Hugh Ian) • RAD goes into detail about how to form name headings for more complex examples
  • 75.
  • 76.
    Need to thinkabout… • User demand • Time available • Overall control of several groups vs. detailed description of one group of records • Recording your actions • MPLP: More Product Less Process
  • 77.
    MPLP “There is sometimesan unfortunate tendency on the part of processing archivists to use the preparation of [finding aids] as an excuse to demonstrate their own knowledge (of both collection and historical context) and writing ability.” • Greene, Mark A. & Dennis Meissner (2005) ‘More Product, Less Process: Revamping Traditional Archival Processing’ American Archivist 68: 208– 263
  • 78.
    MPLP “The archivist’s jobis simply to represent the materials sufficient to affording acceptable access. Let’s not waste either our own valuable time researching and writing lengthy narratives, or our researchers’ time in forcing them to read more verbiage than necessary.” • Greene, Mark A. & Dennis Meissner (2005) ‘More Product, Less Process: Revamping Traditional Archival Processing’ American Archivist 68: 208– 263
  • 79.
  • 80.
    Archeion • Ontario’s archiveinformation network • Established in 1999 • Major upgrade in 2011 with a move of all existing information to ICA-AtoM software • Holds over 8,000 fonds- and collection-level descriptions from more than 70 institutions across Ontario • One of a network of provincial systems feeding in to ArchivesCanada
  • 81.
    Archeion’s structure Archival institutions Online display Archival descriptions Record creators
  • 82.
    Standards-based records • ISDIAH– International Standard for Describing Archival institutions Institutions with Archival Holdings • RAD – Rules for Archival Archival descriptions Description • ISAAR-CPF – International Standard for Archival Authority Records - Record creators Corporate, Personal, Family
  • 87.
    Some tips forArcheion descriptions • Be concise • Put key information at the start of longer text fields, particularly: – Biographical/administrative history – Scope and content • Remember you are writing for a global audience (context!) – The reader is (probably) not in your reading room
  • 88.
    Remember In your first sentence… world-wide context… • Include the name, birth and death dates, major occupation, and geographical area of the creator(s) in the biographical sketch/ administrative history. – Adam Lindsay Webb (b. 1879) was a physician who practised in Brighton, Ontario. • Give a single sentence overview in the scope and content note. – Fonds consists of photocopies of records created and received by A.L. Webb, primarily relating to his medical practice.
  • 89.
    If in doubt… a)Check the Archeion manual b) See how other archivists have described similar materials on Archeion already and use their descriptions and access points as a model c) Consult RAD d) Contact the Archeion Coordinator if you get completely stuck!
  • 90.
    Coordinator contact details •Amanda Hill • archeion@aao-archivists.ca • 416-929-4447

Editor's Notes

  • #17 e.g. duplicates, materials which do not meet your collecting policies
  • #19 Example of listing scheme for parish records – also Rhodes House categories for records of colonial administrators
  • #22 Then chronologically within those sections. There is no right and wrong way to arrange things!
  • #24 A six-year task to organize and describe!
  • #26 51 boxes of miscellaneous material!