Improving socioeconomic equity in ITN access,
ownership and use in Rwanda from 2000-2010
Authors: Lia Florey1
, Cameron Taylor1
, Rebecca Winter1
, Ana Claudia Franca- Koh2
,
Samantha Herrera2
, Jui Shah2
, Yazoume Ye2
1
ICF International - The DHS Program, 2
ICF International - MEASURE Evaluation
29th
Annual ASTMH Meeting
New Orleans, LA USA
November 5, 2014
Background
• Huge investments have been made in malaria control
– > 280 million USD from 2008-2013 in Rwanda
• This has led to major scale-up in interventions and to
subsequent improvements in coverage
Coverage of ITN ownership and use
ITN Use in target populations
Children < 5 years Pregnant Women
Inequity in ITN ownership
Steketee RW, Eisele TP (2009) Is the Scale Up of Malaria Intervention Coverage Also Achieving Equity?. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8409.
Scale-up has not always been equitable
Objectives
Determine if:
•Interventions have reached those in the poorest
households
•ITN distribution has become more equitable over time
Lorenz Curves
• Graphical representation of the cumulative
distribution function of the empirical probability
distribution of wealth
• Developed in 1905 by Max O. Lorenz for
representing inequalities in wealth distributions
• Concentration Index (C-Index) values
range between -1 and 1 with a value
of 0 representing perfect equality.
Household ITN ownership
C-Index: 0.35, 0.07 and 0.03 in 2005, 2010 and 2013, respectively
ITN use in children less than 5
C-Index: 0.66, 0.33, 0.05 and 0.02 in 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013, respectively
ITN use by pregnant women
C-Index: 0.70, 0.25, 0.03 and 0.04 in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2013, respectively
Population access to ITNs
C-Index: 0.42, 0.12, 0.06, 0.04 in 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013, respectively
Households with Universal Coverage
C-Index: 0.56, 0.20, 0.10 and 0.08 in 2005, 2007/8, 2010 and 2013, respectively
Conclusions
• ITN distribution and use have become equitable
across household wealth quintiles between 2000 and
2013.
• Rwanda’s malaria control program has successfully
implemented ITN interventions to reach the poorest
households.
• Limited additional gains have been made between
2010 and 2013.
• Useful tool for identifying gaps in coverage and for
targeting high risk populations.
Next Steps
Spatial and temporal patterns in risk and interventions
Acknowledgments
• Yazoume Ye, MEASURE Evaluation
• Staff and participants of the Rwanda DHS and MIS
• President’s Malaria Initiative
www.measureevaluation.org

Improving Socioeconomic Equity in ITN Access, Ownership and Use in Rwanda from 2000-2010

  • 1.
    Improving socioeconomic equityin ITN access, ownership and use in Rwanda from 2000-2010 Authors: Lia Florey1 , Cameron Taylor1 , Rebecca Winter1 , Ana Claudia Franca- Koh2 , Samantha Herrera2 , Jui Shah2 , Yazoume Ye2 1 ICF International - The DHS Program, 2 ICF International - MEASURE Evaluation 29th Annual ASTMH Meeting New Orleans, LA USA November 5, 2014
  • 2.
    Background • Huge investmentshave been made in malaria control – > 280 million USD from 2008-2013 in Rwanda • This has led to major scale-up in interventions and to subsequent improvements in coverage
  • 3.
    Coverage of ITNownership and use
  • 4.
    ITN Use intarget populations Children < 5 years Pregnant Women
  • 5.
    Inequity in ITNownership Steketee RW, Eisele TP (2009) Is the Scale Up of Malaria Intervention Coverage Also Achieving Equity?. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8409. Scale-up has not always been equitable
  • 6.
    Objectives Determine if: •Interventions havereached those in the poorest households •ITN distribution has become more equitable over time
  • 7.
    Lorenz Curves • Graphicalrepresentation of the cumulative distribution function of the empirical probability distribution of wealth • Developed in 1905 by Max O. Lorenz for representing inequalities in wealth distributions • Concentration Index (C-Index) values range between -1 and 1 with a value of 0 representing perfect equality.
  • 8.
    Household ITN ownership C-Index:0.35, 0.07 and 0.03 in 2005, 2010 and 2013, respectively
  • 9.
    ITN use inchildren less than 5 C-Index: 0.66, 0.33, 0.05 and 0.02 in 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013, respectively
  • 10.
    ITN use bypregnant women C-Index: 0.70, 0.25, 0.03 and 0.04 in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2013, respectively
  • 11.
    Population access toITNs C-Index: 0.42, 0.12, 0.06, 0.04 in 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013, respectively
  • 12.
    Households with UniversalCoverage C-Index: 0.56, 0.20, 0.10 and 0.08 in 2005, 2007/8, 2010 and 2013, respectively
  • 13.
    Conclusions • ITN distributionand use have become equitable across household wealth quintiles between 2000 and 2013. • Rwanda’s malaria control program has successfully implemented ITN interventions to reach the poorest households. • Limited additional gains have been made between 2010 and 2013. • Useful tool for identifying gaps in coverage and for targeting high risk populations.
  • 14.
    Next Steps Spatial andtemporal patterns in risk and interventions
  • 15.
    Acknowledgments • Yazoume Ye,MEASURE Evaluation • Staff and participants of the Rwanda DHS and MIS • President’s Malaria Initiative
  • 16.

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Emphasize that this being an introductory session we may not be able to go in-depth on points 3 and 4.
  • #14 Mention the health insurance programs.