June 13-14, 2015, at Hotel Holiday Inn Mayur Vihar, Delhi
Discuss Agile Conference Delhi-2015
www.discussagile.com ThoughtWorks
Kshitij Agrawal
Implementing Agile in Non-Agile World
Discuss Agile Conference
DELHI 2015
Photo by will_cyclist - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License https://www.flickr.com/photos/88379351@N00 Created with Haiku Deck
Agenda
Agile Implementation Challenges
Case Study Context
Next Steps
Agile Journey
Summary
Project Context
Multiple Brands
24 x 7
Multiple ChannelsCustomers
Multiple
Geographies
Retail
Corporate
Private / Wealth
Java Front End MF Legacy Backend Other Systems
Tightly coupled system. Slow Development
Multiple Stakeholders
Distributed Team
Type of work
High
Work Stack
Constituents
Strategic
Enhancement
Support
Initiated
Prod Issues
Regulatory
Campaigns
& Offers
New Product
Launches or
Customizations
All this was being delivered in the form of multiple waterfall
projects with serious issues about quality and timelines.
Agile Challenges
Agile Challenges – Matrix Organization
 Business Technology Misalignment
 Support Functions Misalignment
 Lack of synergy between departments Pic from: http://www.illustrationsource.com/
Agile Challenges – Hierarchical Organization
Hierarchical Org Growth = Climbing the ladder
Pic from: http://johngerber.world.edu/2012/08/10/hierarchy/
Pic from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/alanhall/2013/04/11/get-noticed-four-easy-steps-to-climbing-the-corporate-ladder/
In hierarchical organizations bringing change is difficult. Also, team members see
growth as getting bigger job title rather than adding more value.
Agile Challenges - Command & Control Culture
Improvement = More controls
Pic from: http://www.slideshare.net/apanitsch/the-management-rowing-race
Failures indicates complexity and complexity is best tacked by adaptive approach but often
reverse is done and more controls are added to prevent failures.
Agile Challenges - Heavy Processes
High Governance
Multiple Approval Board
Rigid Processes
Focus on compliance
Pic from: http://globe-views.com/dreams/lawyer.html
Agile Challenges- Rigid Processes
More than amount of processes, the issue is with one Size fits all approach
Pic from: http://hudsonvalleynewsnetwork.com/2014/12/17/one-size-not-fit/
Agile Challenges – Lack of Technical Agility
Is business agility feasible without technical agility?
Legacy Systems
Slow development
Tight coupling
Complex dependencies
Pic from: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jeroeneijkhof/4533163799
Agile Challenges – Tools & Infrastructure
Lack of tools & technical infrastructure
First attempt towards agile
There is serious problem of
scope creep and you are
suggesting we do development
without covering all
requirements.
We think there is need of more
controls to handle this chaos
and what made you think that
we should remove processes
Solving the right problem …
Finding out the most important problems and their causes is the key.
Pic from: http://dilbert.com/strip/2013-02-15
Solving the right problem
• Too Many
Stakeholders
• Demand Supply
mismatch
Causes
• Interdependencies
Leading to Deadlock
• Wastage in building
consensus
• Flow Jams
• Quality Issues
Effects
• Poor Time to
Market
• Production
Disruptions
Outcome
Solving the business problem
Stakeholders
Development Team
 Dedicated product Owner Team.
Product Owner
Business Analysts
Lead / Release Manager
 Building Consensus
 Breaking down requirements
 Prioritization (focus on MVP)
 Managing dependencies
 Guide development
 User acceptance testing  Facilitate
 Guide team and PO
 Remove blockers
Solving the business problem
 Combining work requests and doing quarterly releases
This proposal was accepted as it gives management more control
& more visibility along with improved time to market and less
production disruption.
Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Release 1
Release 2
Release 3
 Smaller work requests, focus on ‘must haves’ and match demand
to supply
Challenges post new model
Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Release 1
Release 2
Release 3
 Scope creep, Adhoc work requests still causing issues
 Changes costly and discouraged
 Six months is still long period to see outcome
 Slow development, Quality issues, release overheads
This was just iterative waterfall but sometimes a working waterfall is better
place to start agile journey. Also, one major win was to have a single product
owner.
Agile Journey
Transition Backlog
Collaboration
Feedback Loops
Technical Agility
Key elements of agile transition backlog : -
Technical Agility
Technical Backlog
Testing Improvements &
Automation Backlog
Reusable Tools
Improving Infrastructure
Continuous Integration
Technical Agility
Business Agility
Leads To
Supports
Pair Programming &
Test Driven Development
Strategic verses tactical
Business
Functionality
Technical
Enhancements
Technical
Backlog
Infrastructure
Testing
Automation
Enhancements
Mandatory
Prod Fixes
Team Collaboration
Daily Stand-up with task board
Brainstorming
Collaboration Tools
Pair Programming
Stand-up Photo by Acarlos1000 - Creative Commons Attribution License https://www.flickr.com/photos/73694110@N00 Created with Haiku Deck
Pic from: https://www.airpair.com/
Pic From: www.friendshipcircle.org
Team Distribution
Distributed across locations based on speciality
Throw over the wall attitude
Collaboration
Tools
To reduce cross location dependencies, rebalanced team to have independent team with
specialities at each location.
Feedback Loops
Customer Showcases
Retrospectives
Photo by justin - Creative Commons Attribution License https://www.flickr.com/photos/35034345586@N01 Created with Haiku Deck
Pic From: https://hakanforss.wordpress.com
Agile Training and Coaching
Collaboration with authorities
Customizations of processes
User
Stories
Features
Work
Requests
WR 1
Feature 11
User Story
11-01
User Story
11-02
Feature 12
User Story
12-01
Isn’t this same as what you call as traceability Matrix?
Customization of processes for agile - To fulfill the same purpose
but in a different way.
Current Model
Current Model
Weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Release1
Release2
Release3
Scoping, Release plannning, Story Writing, Estimation, high level architecture discussion
Development and Testing
Deployment to test environment and skim test
Hardening - UAT, NFT, End to End testing
Implementation Preparations, Audit, Approvals
Production Deployment
 Three releases running in parallel but only one development/execution phase at a time.
 Execution phase means design, coding, testing by self organized team in any sequence
but based on priorities set by product owner. Frequent delivery of working software and
frequent customer showcases.
 Backlog grooming also happens during development cycle.
 Due to test environment constraints, governance requirements and other constraints,
need to have a hardening phase.
Current Model - Kanban
Iterative Frameworks
No work in progress limit
within iteration
WIPLimit=2
Work in progress limit but
no iteration boundary
KANBAN
During execution phase, Kanban is followed instead of Scrum. The reasons are:
 Due to legacy code issues, some stories take more than 2 weeks to develop. Don’t
want to break these as these would loose relevance and become tasks.
 Due to hardening defects, prod fixes, high priority work requests, backlog is more
fluid than ideal for iterative development.
Current Model
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8
Retrospectives (4w)
Planning Cadence (2w)
Showcase cadence (2w)
Backlog grooming discussions multiple times a week (on demand)
High level planning & estimation
Size Estimate
Small 1
Medium 2
Large 3
Extra Large 5
Velocity = 10
High Level Planning & funding approval happens when there are no user stories.
How to confirm doability at that level?
 A custom model is to divide the work requests into size categories.
 The normal velocity driven planning model has been extended for high level
planning. Velocity is known based on historic data and refined constantly.
 Also factor in risks and external dependencies.
Backlog Management & Estimation
 Divide the work requests into features and
prioritize.
 Use Fibonacci series for estimation.
 Focus on ‘Must Have’ features
 Maintain 20-40% ‘Good to have’ features as
planning buffer.
Reference: http://www.expertprogrammanagement.com/
Next Steps
 Further automation to reduce hardening period.
 Resolving test environment constraints to have better ‘DONE
DONE’ definition.
 Continue with technical enhancements to speed up development.
Summary
 Focus on business problems first
 Don’t sell agile, just show the value
 Avoid jargons, use the language which people understand
 Engage performing organization
 Collaborate and build relationships with PMOs & support
functions
 Focus on technical agility
 Focus on being agile rather than doing agile
 Remember AGILE is a journey rather than destination
Questions ?
Thank You 
Implementing Agile In Non-Agile World : Presented By Kshitij Agrawal

Implementing Agile In Non-Agile World : Presented By Kshitij Agrawal

  • 1.
    June 13-14, 2015,at Hotel Holiday Inn Mayur Vihar, Delhi Discuss Agile Conference Delhi-2015 www.discussagile.com ThoughtWorks Kshitij Agrawal Implementing Agile in Non-Agile World
  • 2.
    Discuss Agile Conference DELHI2015 Photo by will_cyclist - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License https://www.flickr.com/photos/88379351@N00 Created with Haiku Deck
  • 3.
    Agenda Agile Implementation Challenges CaseStudy Context Next Steps Agile Journey Summary
  • 4.
    Project Context Multiple Brands 24x 7 Multiple ChannelsCustomers Multiple Geographies Retail Corporate Private / Wealth Java Front End MF Legacy Backend Other Systems Tightly coupled system. Slow Development Multiple Stakeholders Distributed Team
  • 5.
    Type of work High WorkStack Constituents Strategic Enhancement Support Initiated Prod Issues Regulatory Campaigns & Offers New Product Launches or Customizations All this was being delivered in the form of multiple waterfall projects with serious issues about quality and timelines.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Agile Challenges –Matrix Organization  Business Technology Misalignment  Support Functions Misalignment  Lack of synergy between departments Pic from: http://www.illustrationsource.com/
  • 8.
    Agile Challenges –Hierarchical Organization Hierarchical Org Growth = Climbing the ladder Pic from: http://johngerber.world.edu/2012/08/10/hierarchy/ Pic from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/alanhall/2013/04/11/get-noticed-four-easy-steps-to-climbing-the-corporate-ladder/ In hierarchical organizations bringing change is difficult. Also, team members see growth as getting bigger job title rather than adding more value.
  • 9.
    Agile Challenges -Command & Control Culture Improvement = More controls Pic from: http://www.slideshare.net/apanitsch/the-management-rowing-race Failures indicates complexity and complexity is best tacked by adaptive approach but often reverse is done and more controls are added to prevent failures.
  • 10.
    Agile Challenges -Heavy Processes High Governance Multiple Approval Board Rigid Processes Focus on compliance Pic from: http://globe-views.com/dreams/lawyer.html
  • 11.
    Agile Challenges- RigidProcesses More than amount of processes, the issue is with one Size fits all approach Pic from: http://hudsonvalleynewsnetwork.com/2014/12/17/one-size-not-fit/
  • 12.
    Agile Challenges –Lack of Technical Agility Is business agility feasible without technical agility? Legacy Systems Slow development Tight coupling Complex dependencies Pic from: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jeroeneijkhof/4533163799
  • 13.
    Agile Challenges –Tools & Infrastructure Lack of tools & technical infrastructure
  • 14.
    First attempt towardsagile There is serious problem of scope creep and you are suggesting we do development without covering all requirements. We think there is need of more controls to handle this chaos and what made you think that we should remove processes
  • 15.
    Solving the rightproblem … Finding out the most important problems and their causes is the key. Pic from: http://dilbert.com/strip/2013-02-15
  • 16.
    Solving the rightproblem • Too Many Stakeholders • Demand Supply mismatch Causes • Interdependencies Leading to Deadlock • Wastage in building consensus • Flow Jams • Quality Issues Effects • Poor Time to Market • Production Disruptions Outcome
  • 17.
    Solving the businessproblem Stakeholders Development Team  Dedicated product Owner Team. Product Owner Business Analysts Lead / Release Manager  Building Consensus  Breaking down requirements  Prioritization (focus on MVP)  Managing dependencies  Guide development  User acceptance testing  Facilitate  Guide team and PO  Remove blockers
  • 18.
    Solving the businessproblem  Combining work requests and doing quarterly releases This proposal was accepted as it gives management more control & more visibility along with improved time to market and less production disruption. Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Release 1 Release 2 Release 3  Smaller work requests, focus on ‘must haves’ and match demand to supply
  • 19.
    Challenges post newmodel Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Release 1 Release 2 Release 3  Scope creep, Adhoc work requests still causing issues  Changes costly and discouraged  Six months is still long period to see outcome  Slow development, Quality issues, release overheads This was just iterative waterfall but sometimes a working waterfall is better place to start agile journey. Also, one major win was to have a single product owner.
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Transition Backlog Collaboration Feedback Loops TechnicalAgility Key elements of agile transition backlog : -
  • 22.
    Technical Agility Technical Backlog TestingImprovements & Automation Backlog Reusable Tools Improving Infrastructure Continuous Integration Technical Agility Business Agility Leads To Supports Pair Programming & Test Driven Development
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Team Collaboration Daily Stand-upwith task board Brainstorming Collaboration Tools Pair Programming Stand-up Photo by Acarlos1000 - Creative Commons Attribution License https://www.flickr.com/photos/73694110@N00 Created with Haiku Deck Pic from: https://www.airpair.com/ Pic From: www.friendshipcircle.org
  • 25.
    Team Distribution Distributed acrosslocations based on speciality Throw over the wall attitude Collaboration Tools To reduce cross location dependencies, rebalanced team to have independent team with specialities at each location.
  • 26.
    Feedback Loops Customer Showcases Retrospectives Photoby justin - Creative Commons Attribution License https://www.flickr.com/photos/35034345586@N01 Created with Haiku Deck Pic From: https://hakanforss.wordpress.com
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Customizations of processes User Stories Features Work Requests WR1 Feature 11 User Story 11-01 User Story 11-02 Feature 12 User Story 12-01 Isn’t this same as what you call as traceability Matrix? Customization of processes for agile - To fulfill the same purpose but in a different way.
  • 30.
  • 31.
    Current Model Weeks 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Release1 Release2 Release3 Scoping, Release plannning, Story Writing, Estimation, high level architecture discussion Development and Testing Deployment to test environment and skim test Hardening - UAT, NFT, End to End testing Implementation Preparations, Audit, Approvals Production Deployment  Three releases running in parallel but only one development/execution phase at a time.  Execution phase means design, coding, testing by self organized team in any sequence but based on priorities set by product owner. Frequent delivery of working software and frequent customer showcases.  Backlog grooming also happens during development cycle.  Due to test environment constraints, governance requirements and other constraints, need to have a hardening phase.
  • 32.
    Current Model -Kanban Iterative Frameworks No work in progress limit within iteration WIPLimit=2 Work in progress limit but no iteration boundary KANBAN During execution phase, Kanban is followed instead of Scrum. The reasons are:  Due to legacy code issues, some stories take more than 2 weeks to develop. Don’t want to break these as these would loose relevance and become tasks.  Due to hardening defects, prod fixes, high priority work requests, backlog is more fluid than ideal for iterative development.
  • 33.
    Current Model Week 1Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Retrospectives (4w) Planning Cadence (2w) Showcase cadence (2w) Backlog grooming discussions multiple times a week (on demand)
  • 34.
    High level planning& estimation Size Estimate Small 1 Medium 2 Large 3 Extra Large 5 Velocity = 10 High Level Planning & funding approval happens when there are no user stories. How to confirm doability at that level?  A custom model is to divide the work requests into size categories.  The normal velocity driven planning model has been extended for high level planning. Velocity is known based on historic data and refined constantly.  Also factor in risks and external dependencies.
  • 35.
    Backlog Management &Estimation  Divide the work requests into features and prioritize.  Use Fibonacci series for estimation.  Focus on ‘Must Have’ features  Maintain 20-40% ‘Good to have’ features as planning buffer. Reference: http://www.expertprogrammanagement.com/
  • 36.
    Next Steps  Furtherautomation to reduce hardening period.  Resolving test environment constraints to have better ‘DONE DONE’ definition.  Continue with technical enhancements to speed up development.
  • 37.
    Summary  Focus onbusiness problems first  Don’t sell agile, just show the value  Avoid jargons, use the language which people understand  Engage performing organization  Collaborate and build relationships with PMOs & support functions  Focus on technical agility  Focus on being agile rather than doing agile  Remember AGILE is a journey rather than destination
  • 38.
  • 39.