Human Flourishing in
Science and Technology
Technology as a Mode of
Revealing
By: Prof. Liwayway Memije-Cruz
Flourishing
 a state where people
experience positive
emotions, positive
psychological functioning
and positive social
functioning, most of the
time," living "within an
optimal range of human
functioning."
POSITIVITY
Human Flourishing
 an effort to achieve
self-actualization and
fulfillment within the
context of a larger
community of
individuals, each with
the right to pursue his
or her own such
efforts.
Human flourishing
 involves the rational
use of one's
individual human
potentialities,
including talents,
abilities, and virtues
in the pursuit of his
freely and rationally
chosen values and
goals.
Human civilizations and the development of
science and technology.
 Human person as
both the bearer and
beneficiary of
science and
technology.
bearer – a
person or
thing that
carries or
holds
something.
beneficiary-
 Human flourishes and finds meaning
in the world that he/she builds.
 Human may unconsciously acquire,
consume or destroy what the world
has to offer.
Science and Technology
 must be treated as part of human life
that needs reflective and meditative
thinking.
Reflective Thinking
Meditative thinking
 kind of thinking
that thinks the
truth of being,
that belongs to
being and listens
to it.
Science and Technology
 must be
examined for
their greater
impact on
humanity as a
whole.
TECHNOLOGY AS A MODE OF
REVEALING
MARTIN HEIDEGGER
 a German philosopher
and a seminal thinker in
the Continental tradition
of philosophy.
 widely acknowledged to
be one of the most
original and important
philosophers of the 20th
century.
HEIDEGGER’S VIEW ON
TECHNOLOGY.
 He strongly opposes the view that
technology is “a means to an end” or
“a human activity.”
 These two approaches, which he calls,
respectively, the “instrumental” and
“anthropological” definitions, are indeed
“correct”, but do not go deep enough; as
he says, they are not yet “true.”
 Heidegger points out, technological
objects are means for ends, and are built
and operated by human beings, but the
essence of technology is something else
entirely.
 Since the essence of a tree is not
itself a tree, he points out, so the
essence of technology is not anything
technological.
What, then, is technology, if it is
neither a means to an end nor a
human activity?
 Technology, according to Heidegger
must be understood as “a way of
revealing” (Heidegger 1977, 12).
 Revealing is his translation of the
Greek word alètheuein, which means
‘to discover’ – to uncover what was
covered over. Related to this verb is
the independent noun alètheia, which
is usually translated as “truth,” though
Heidegger insists that a more
adequate translation would be “un-
concealment.”
What is reality?
 according to Heidegger, it is not given the same
way in all times and all cultures (Seubold 1986,
35-6).
 not something absolute that human beings can
ever know once and for all
 is relative in the most literal sense of the word – it
exists only in relations.
 inaccessible for human beings. As soon as we
perceive or try to understand it, it is not ‘in itself’
anymore, but ‘reality for us.’
How can technology be ‘a way
of revealing’?
1. What does this have to do
with technology?
2. What does Heidegger mean
when he says that technology
is “a way of revealing”?
 everything we perceive or think of or
interact with “emerges out of concealment
into unconcealment,
 by entering into a particular relation with
reality, reality is ‘revealed’ in a specific
way.
 technology is the way of revealing
that characterizes our time.
 technology embodies a specific way
of revealing the world, a revealing in
which humans take power over
reality.
 While the ancient Greeks experienced the
‘making’ of something as ‘helping
something to come into being’ – as
Heidegger explains that modern
technology is rather a ‘forcing into being’.
 Technology reveals the world as raw
material, available for production and
manipulation.
WHY IS TECHNOLOGY NOT A
HUMAN ACTIVITY?
 According to Heidegger, there is
something wrong with the modern,
technological culture we live in today. In
our ‘age of technology’ reality can only be
present as a raw material (as a ‘standing
reserve’). This state of affairs has not
been brought about by humans; the
technological way of revealing was not
chosen by humans.
 Rather, our understanding of the world -
our understanding of ‘being’, of what it
means ‘to be’ - develops through the ages.
In our time ‘being’ has the character of a
technological ‘framework’, from which
humans approach the world in a
controlling and dominating way.
 Every attempt to climb out of
technology throws us back in. The
only way out for Heidegger is “the will
not to will”.
 We need to open up the possibility of
relying on technologies while not
becoming enslaved to them and
seeing them as manifestations of an
understanding of being.
References:
 https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/philosophy-
of-technology/0/steps/26314
 Heidegger, Martin. “The question concerning
technology (W. Lovitt, Trans.) The question
concerning technology: and other essays (pp. 3-
35).” (1977).
 Seubold, Günter. Heideggers Analyse der
neuzeitlichen Technik. Freiburg-München: Alber,
1986.

Human flourishing in science and technology: Technology as a Mode of Revealing

  • 1.
    Human Flourishing in Scienceand Technology Technology as a Mode of Revealing By: Prof. Liwayway Memije-Cruz
  • 2.
    Flourishing  a statewhere people experience positive emotions, positive psychological functioning and positive social functioning, most of the time," living "within an optimal range of human functioning."
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Human Flourishing  aneffort to achieve self-actualization and fulfillment within the context of a larger community of individuals, each with the right to pursue his or her own such efforts.
  • 5.
    Human flourishing  involvesthe rational use of one's individual human potentialities, including talents, abilities, and virtues in the pursuit of his freely and rationally chosen values and goals.
  • 6.
    Human civilizations andthe development of science and technology.  Human person as both the bearer and beneficiary of science and technology. bearer – a person or thing that carries or holds something. beneficiary-
  • 7.
     Human flourishesand finds meaning in the world that he/she builds.
  • 8.
     Human mayunconsciously acquire, consume or destroy what the world has to offer.
  • 9.
    Science and Technology must be treated as part of human life that needs reflective and meditative thinking.
  • 10.
  • 12.
    Meditative thinking  kindof thinking that thinks the truth of being, that belongs to being and listens to it.
  • 13.
    Science and Technology must be examined for their greater impact on humanity as a whole.
  • 14.
    TECHNOLOGY AS AMODE OF REVEALING
  • 15.
    MARTIN HEIDEGGER  aGerman philosopher and a seminal thinker in the Continental tradition of philosophy.  widely acknowledged to be one of the most original and important philosophers of the 20th century.
  • 16.
  • 17.
     He stronglyopposes the view that technology is “a means to an end” or “a human activity.”
  • 18.
     These twoapproaches, which he calls, respectively, the “instrumental” and “anthropological” definitions, are indeed “correct”, but do not go deep enough; as he says, they are not yet “true.”
  • 19.
     Heidegger pointsout, technological objects are means for ends, and are built and operated by human beings, but the essence of technology is something else entirely.
  • 20.
     Since theessence of a tree is not itself a tree, he points out, so the essence of technology is not anything technological.
  • 21.
    What, then, istechnology, if it is neither a means to an end nor a human activity?
  • 22.
     Technology, accordingto Heidegger must be understood as “a way of revealing” (Heidegger 1977, 12).
  • 23.
     Revealing ishis translation of the Greek word alètheuein, which means ‘to discover’ – to uncover what was covered over. Related to this verb is the independent noun alètheia, which is usually translated as “truth,” though Heidegger insists that a more adequate translation would be “un- concealment.”
  • 24.
    What is reality? according to Heidegger, it is not given the same way in all times and all cultures (Seubold 1986, 35-6).  not something absolute that human beings can ever know once and for all  is relative in the most literal sense of the word – it exists only in relations.  inaccessible for human beings. As soon as we perceive or try to understand it, it is not ‘in itself’ anymore, but ‘reality for us.’
  • 25.
    How can technologybe ‘a way of revealing’?
  • 26.
    1. What doesthis have to do with technology? 2. What does Heidegger mean when he says that technology is “a way of revealing”?
  • 27.
     everything weperceive or think of or interact with “emerges out of concealment into unconcealment,  by entering into a particular relation with reality, reality is ‘revealed’ in a specific way.
  • 28.
     technology isthe way of revealing that characterizes our time.
  • 29.
     technology embodiesa specific way of revealing the world, a revealing in which humans take power over reality.
  • 30.
     While theancient Greeks experienced the ‘making’ of something as ‘helping something to come into being’ – as Heidegger explains that modern technology is rather a ‘forcing into being’.
  • 31.
     Technology revealsthe world as raw material, available for production and manipulation.
  • 32.
    WHY IS TECHNOLOGYNOT A HUMAN ACTIVITY?
  • 33.
     According toHeidegger, there is something wrong with the modern, technological culture we live in today. In our ‘age of technology’ reality can only be present as a raw material (as a ‘standing reserve’). This state of affairs has not been brought about by humans; the technological way of revealing was not chosen by humans.
  • 34.
     Rather, ourunderstanding of the world - our understanding of ‘being’, of what it means ‘to be’ - develops through the ages. In our time ‘being’ has the character of a technological ‘framework’, from which humans approach the world in a controlling and dominating way.
  • 35.
     Every attemptto climb out of technology throws us back in. The only way out for Heidegger is “the will not to will”.
  • 36.
     We needto open up the possibility of relying on technologies while not becoming enslaved to them and seeing them as manifestations of an understanding of being.
  • 37.
    References:  https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/philosophy- of-technology/0/steps/26314  Heidegger,Martin. “The question concerning technology (W. Lovitt, Trans.) The question concerning technology: and other essays (pp. 3- 35).” (1977).  Seubold, Günter. Heideggers Analyse der neuzeitlichen Technik. Freiburg-München: Alber, 1986.