Gastric GISTs
Dr. Harsh Shah
MS, DNB(GI), MCh (GI)
GI & HPB Surgeon
Kaizen Hospital
Ahmedabad
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours
• Most common mesenchymal tumour of GI Tract
• Interstitial cells of Cajal
• Wide spectrum of clinical activity
• Low risk
• High risk
• Imatinib (Gleevec) revolutionized the management
GIST Location
• Esophagus(<1%)
• Stomach(60%)
• Duodenum(5%)
• Small bowel(30%)
• Colon-rectum(4%)
Demitri et al, 2010, JNCCN
Diagnosis
• CT scan/MRI
• UGIE/Biopsy
• Diagnosis doubtful -
Lymphoma
• Neo-adjuvant therapy
planned
• IHC Markers
• cd-117
• DOG-1
• CD-34
• SDHB
Principles of Surgical Treatment
• R0 resection
• Histologically negative margins - adequate
• Lymphadenectomy not required except for
• Pathologically enlarged nodes
• SDHB Deficient GIST
Aim:
• Organ preservation
• Prevention of tumour rupture
Surgical Techniques
• Open
• Minimally invasive
• Laparoscopic wedge
resection
• Laparoscopic intragastric
surgery (LIGS)
• Laparoscopic &
endoscopic co-operative
surgery (LECS)
Laparoscopic wedge resection of GIST
• Favorable lesion
• Exophytic
• Anterior wall
• Greater curvature
• Localization – Dye, Lap ultrasound
• Minimal handling
• Prevent tumour rupture
• Preserve tumour pseudocapsule
• Removal in specimen bag
• Spillage
• Port site seeding
Laparoscopic Intragastric surgery(LIGS)
Ohashi et al 1995
• <5 cm
• Posterior wall or upper half of stomach
• Laparoscope or endoscope guidance
• Cuffed ports
• Specimen removal (Orally/Trans
abdominally)
• Trauma to gastric wall
LIGS
LECS
(Laparoscopic & Endoscopic Cooperative surgery)
Hiki et al, Surg Endosc 2008
• Upto 5 cm, without mucosal ulceration
• Located near EGJ & Pylorus
• Causes minimal gastric transformation
• Spillage of gastric contents & tumour cells
LECS
Locally Advanced GIST
Definition
• Margin negative resection not possible
• Major organ resection required
• Multi-organ resection
Plan of treatment
• Neo-adjuvant therapy  Surgery  Adjuvant therapy
• Bleeding, Obstructing, Perforation – Emergency surgery
Neo-adjuvant Therapy
• Atleast 6-12 months
• Imatinib (400mg/day) to be stopped immediately prior to surgery
• Sunitinib (50mg/day, 4+2) to be stopped 1 week in advance
• Regorafenib (160mg/day, 3+1) as a third line
Mutation analysis & Targeted therapy
• Kit exon 11 Sensitive to low dose Imatinib
• kit exon 9  Imatinib 800mg
• Kit Exon 13,17
• PDGFRA D842V
• WT(SDHB)
• WT GIST (SDHB)  Sunitinib
Not sensitive to Imatinib
Prognostic Factors
Response Evaluation
Response evaluation
• PET – reduced activity at 2 weeks
• Contrast CT/MRI – reduced density,
enhancement at 8 weeks
‘Nodule within Nodule’ appearance
of Imatinib Resistance
Locally advanced GIST
Adjuvant therapy
• Intermediate & high risk GIST (Easily resectable GIST)
• >10% risk of recurrence
• All cases of locally advanced GIST
• 3 years Imatinib Joensuu et al, JAMA, 2010
Metastatic GIST
• Imatinib (6-12 months)
• Surgery to be offered
• Responsive
• Limited progression
• Macroscopically complete
resection
‘GIST’ of today’s talk
• Mutation analysis – for drug selection
• Surgery is mainstay for easily resectable >2cm lesions
• Neoadjuvant therapy(6-12 months) surgery for locally advanced
tumours
• Adjuvant therapy for 3 years all GIST with >10% risk of metastasis
• Imatinib for metastatic disease
Gastric GIST by Dr Harsh Shah(www.gastroclinix.com)

Gastric GIST by Dr Harsh Shah(www.gastroclinix.com)

  • 1.
    Gastric GISTs Dr. HarshShah MS, DNB(GI), MCh (GI) GI & HPB Surgeon Kaizen Hospital Ahmedabad
  • 2.
    Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours •Most common mesenchymal tumour of GI Tract • Interstitial cells of Cajal • Wide spectrum of clinical activity • Low risk • High risk • Imatinib (Gleevec) revolutionized the management
  • 3.
    GIST Location • Esophagus(<1%) •Stomach(60%) • Duodenum(5%) • Small bowel(30%) • Colon-rectum(4%) Demitri et al, 2010, JNCCN
  • 4.
    Diagnosis • CT scan/MRI •UGIE/Biopsy • Diagnosis doubtful - Lymphoma • Neo-adjuvant therapy planned • IHC Markers • cd-117 • DOG-1 • CD-34 • SDHB
  • 5.
    Principles of SurgicalTreatment • R0 resection • Histologically negative margins - adequate • Lymphadenectomy not required except for • Pathologically enlarged nodes • SDHB Deficient GIST Aim: • Organ preservation • Prevention of tumour rupture
  • 6.
    Surgical Techniques • Open •Minimally invasive • Laparoscopic wedge resection • Laparoscopic intragastric surgery (LIGS) • Laparoscopic & endoscopic co-operative surgery (LECS)
  • 7.
    Laparoscopic wedge resectionof GIST • Favorable lesion • Exophytic • Anterior wall • Greater curvature • Localization – Dye, Lap ultrasound • Minimal handling • Prevent tumour rupture • Preserve tumour pseudocapsule • Removal in specimen bag • Spillage • Port site seeding
  • 9.
    Laparoscopic Intragastric surgery(LIGS) Ohashiet al 1995 • <5 cm • Posterior wall or upper half of stomach • Laparoscope or endoscope guidance • Cuffed ports • Specimen removal (Orally/Trans abdominally) • Trauma to gastric wall
  • 10.
  • 11.
    LECS (Laparoscopic & EndoscopicCooperative surgery) Hiki et al, Surg Endosc 2008 • Upto 5 cm, without mucosal ulceration • Located near EGJ & Pylorus • Causes minimal gastric transformation • Spillage of gastric contents & tumour cells
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Locally Advanced GIST Definition •Margin negative resection not possible • Major organ resection required • Multi-organ resection Plan of treatment • Neo-adjuvant therapy  Surgery  Adjuvant therapy • Bleeding, Obstructing, Perforation – Emergency surgery
  • 14.
    Neo-adjuvant Therapy • Atleast6-12 months • Imatinib (400mg/day) to be stopped immediately prior to surgery • Sunitinib (50mg/day, 4+2) to be stopped 1 week in advance • Regorafenib (160mg/day, 3+1) as a third line
  • 15.
    Mutation analysis &Targeted therapy • Kit exon 11 Sensitive to low dose Imatinib • kit exon 9  Imatinib 800mg • Kit Exon 13,17 • PDGFRA D842V • WT(SDHB) • WT GIST (SDHB)  Sunitinib Not sensitive to Imatinib
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Response Evaluation Response evaluation •PET – reduced activity at 2 weeks • Contrast CT/MRI – reduced density, enhancement at 8 weeks ‘Nodule within Nodule’ appearance of Imatinib Resistance
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Adjuvant therapy • Intermediate& high risk GIST (Easily resectable GIST) • >10% risk of recurrence • All cases of locally advanced GIST • 3 years Imatinib Joensuu et al, JAMA, 2010
  • 21.
    Metastatic GIST • Imatinib(6-12 months) • Surgery to be offered • Responsive • Limited progression • Macroscopically complete resection
  • 22.
    ‘GIST’ of today’stalk • Mutation analysis – for drug selection • Surgery is mainstay for easily resectable >2cm lesions • Neoadjuvant therapy(6-12 months) surgery for locally advanced tumours • Adjuvant therapy for 3 years all GIST with >10% risk of metastasis • Imatinib for metastatic disease

Editor's Notes

  • #5  Risks tumour seeding rupture
  • #7 Re-resection for R1 resection not recommended
  • #16 Imatinib -
  • #20 Patient with response to imatinib over 3 months but lack of tumor shrinking; lesions that lost contrast enhancement were responding and became smaller over several more months. Arrows indicate lesions being tracked by imaging
  • #21 Large gastric primary GIST with radiological response (CT images left to right) to neoadjuvant imatinib enabling sleeve gastrectomy rather than total gastrectomy en bloc with wedge liver resection, distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy (post-resection view and resection specimen).
  • #24 Diffuse progression : 2nd line/3rd line therapy Better survival If single organ Liver
  • #28 Combination of laparoscopic & endoscopic approaches for neoplasia with a non-exposure technique