Fundamentals of Seismic Data Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation
An introduction to seismic principles covering wave generation, reflection, data processing, acoustic impedance, wavelets, polarity conventions, and their impact on geological interpretation.
Fundamentals of Seismic Data Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation
1.
M O DU L E 0 1 · F U N D A M E N TA L S
Seismic in one sentence
Module 01 · What is seismic? 6
Seismic is a controlled echo experiment: we make a sound, and we listen for where the rock
changes.
1
We make a wave
Airgun offshore, vibroseis or
dynamite onshore. Energy
travels down as an elastic
wave.
2
Rock changes reflect it
Wherever acoustic impedance
changes, part of the energy
bounces back. No contrast, no
reflection.
3
We record arrival time
Geophones or hydrophones
record amplitude against two-
way travel time — not depth.
4
We process it into an
image
Stacking and migration turn
thousands of traces into a
volume that looks like a cross-
section.
The raw measurement is TIME and AMPLITUDE. Everything geological you get from seismic is an interpretation on top of those two
numbers.
2.
M O DU L E 0 1 · F U N D A M E N TA L S
From field to volume — and why it matters to you
Module 01 · What is seismic? 7
1
Acquisition
Geometry, fold, offsets,
azimuths. Sets the maximum
resolution you will ever have
— nothing downstream adds
it back.
2
Processing
Noise removal, deconvolution,
statics, velocity analysis. Every
step involves choices made by
a person.
3
Migration
Moves reflections to their true
position and collapses
diffractions. Time or depth
migrated — ask which.
4
Interpretation
Picking events, mapping
surfaces, extracting attributes.
Where geology finally re-
enters the story.
Three questions to ask about any volume
1. Is it pre-stack or post-stack migrated? 2. Time or depth migrated? 3. What
is the vintage, and has it been reprocessed since?
Why it matters
A 1998 volume and a 2020 reprocessing of the same field can differ by tens of
milliseconds on the same event — which becomes tens of metres on your map.
3.
M O DU L E 0 1 · F U N D A M E N TA L S
What the data actually looks like
Module 01 · What is seismic? 8
I M AG E P L AC E H O L D E R
Raw shot gather from your survey
Drop in a single shot record. Point out the direct arrival, the refraction, the
hyperbolic moveout of the reflections and the noise cone. This is what the
processor starts with — nothing here looks like geology yet.
I M AG E P L AC E H O L D E R
Migrated stack section through a well
Drop in an inline through a key well in your asset. Same rock, same physics, after
processing. Ask the room what changed — and how many of those changes were
decisions made by a person.
Between these two pictures sit hundreds of processing choices. That is why vintage and processing history matter.
4.
M O DU L E 0 1 · F U N D A M E N TA L S
Acoustic impedance and the reflection coefficient
Module 01 · What is seismic? 9
The only two equations today
AI = × V
ρ
RC = (AI − AI ) / (AI + AI )
₂ ₁ ₂ ₁
• Impedance is a rock property — density times velocity.
• The reflection is a CONTRAST, not a rock. Same shale above and below =
no reflection.
• Positive RC = harder rock below = a peak on normal polarity.
• Typical RC values are small: 0.05 to 0.20. Coal or a tight streak can reach
0.3+.
Worked example
Interface AI above AI below RC
Shale / Sand (gas) 8.4 6.1 −0.16
Shale / Sand (brine) 8.4 8.9 +0.03
Sand / Limestone 8.9 13.5 +0.21
Shale / Coal 8.4 4.5 −0.30
AI in 10⁶ kg·m⁻²·s⁻¹. Note how the brine sand almost disappears — a real reservoir
you cannot see.
A strong reflector is not the same as a good reservoir — and a good reservoir is not always a strong reflector.
5.
M O DU L E 0 1 · F U N D A M E N TA L S
The wavelet — why one boundary makes several loops
Module 01 · What is seismic? 10
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
5.55111512312578E-17
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Zero-phase Ricker wavelet, 30 Hz dominant frequency
Time (ms)
Amplitude
• The earth returns a spike; the wavelet is what we actually record.
• Dominant frequency sets resolution — high f, sharp wavelet.
• Bandwidth matters more than peak frequency. Broad band =
fewer side lobes.
• Side lobes are NOT geology. Do not pick them.
• Zero-phase: energy symmetric about the boundary, peak on the
interface.
• Minimum-phase: energy trails after the boundary — onset is the
interface.
One geological boundary produces a trough–peak–trough pattern. Three loops, one interface.
6.
M O DU L E 0 1 · F U N D A M E N TA L S
The convolutional model
Module 01 · What is seismic? 11
Earth reflectivity Wavelet + Noise = Seismic trace
⊛
S
e
r
i
e
s
1
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
2.77555756156289E-17
0.1
0.2
0.3
1. Reflectivity series from logs
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
2. Wavelet (extracted or theoretical)
S
e
r
i
e
s
1
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
3. Synthetic seismogram
Five clean spikes become a smeared, overlapping trace. Interference between nearby beds is not noise — it is the physics.
7.
M O DU L E 0 1 · F U N D A M E N TA L S
Polarity and phase — the classic silent error
Module 01 · What is seismic? 12
SEG Normal polarity
• Increase in impedance = PEAK
• Hard rock below a soft rock plots as a positive loop
• Most modern European / Asian datasets
SEG Reverse polarity
• Increase in impedance = TROUGH
• Common in older US Gulf Coast convention
• Flip it and every pick moves half a loop
How to check in 30 seconds
• Find the seabed or a known hard event (basalt, limestone, tight streak) — is it a peak or a trough?
• Check the polarity of your synthetic against the seismic before you trust the tie, not after.
• Write the convention in the project notes. Every mixed-vintage project has at least one flipped volume.
8.
M O DU L E 0 1 · F U N D A M E N TA L S
Polarity in practice — the same boundary, two conventions
Module 01 · What is seismic? 13
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
-1.1
-0.6
-0.1
0.4
0.9
SEG Normal — hard rock below plots as a PEAK
Time (ms)
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
-1.1
-0.6
-0.1
0.4
0.9
SEG Reverse — the same boundary as a TROUGH
Time (ms)
I M AG E P LA C E H O LD E R
Seabed or a known hard event from your own survey
Insert a shallow display showing the seabed reflection, or a strong limestone/basalt top. Whichever way that event plots is your convention — establish it before anyone picks
anything.
Editor's Notes
#1 Keep this deliberately simple — no wave equation. The one thing to hammer: the vertical axis is time, not depth. Most bad habits later in the day start with forgetting that.
#2 Processing is where the geophysicist's fingerprints are all over the data. You do not need to know the algorithms, but you should know that different processing gives different pictures of the same rock. That is not a scandal, it is normal.
#3 Use your own data if you possibly can — a generic textbook gather gets far less engagement than a shot record from a field they recognise. Two minutes on each image is plenty.
#4 The brine sand row is the punchline. Ask them what happens to a field mapped on gas-sand amplitude when the gas runs out laterally. This is where amplitude-driven optimism goes to die.
#5 Draw a single spike on the whiteboard and then the wavelet response beside it. The 'side lobes are not geology' line saves them a year of embarrassing picks. Ask them to look for a thin bed on the display and count the loops.
#6 Count the spikes on the left, then count the loops on the right. They will not match. That mismatch is the single most important idea in module 2 — you are already setting up resolution.
#7 This is the cheapest mistake to avoid and the most expensive to discover late. Tell the story of a map that came out half a loop too deep across the whole field. Someone in the room will already have lived it.
#8 Two charts, one message: the wiggle looks completely different for identical geology. Then send them to the seabed to prove it on their own data.