FACTORS AFFECTING SECOND LANGUAGE
LEARNING STRATEGIES
LEARNERS’ LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY
īƒ’ Chen (1990), in a study on the relationship
  between communication strategies and and the
  proficiency level L2 learner found that low-
  proficiency students employed more
  communication strategies than high-proficiency
  ones.
īƒ’ The results indicated that high-proficiency
  learners mainly employed linguistic-based
  communication strategies such as synonyms
  more frequently than low-proficiency learners.
īƒ’ Cognitive and metacognitive strategies
  showed very high correlations with the
  proficiency level of the students and were
  used by high-proficiency learners.
īƒ’ Compensation strategies, however , were
  shown to be favoured by both high- and low-
  proficiency.
MOTIVATION
īƒ’ McIntyre and Noels (1996) examined the
  relationship between LLSs and motivational
  level among undergraduate foreign language
  learners.
īƒ’ They reported that compared with less
  motivated learners, those who were
  substantially motivated, tended to adapt
  more learning strategies and used them
  more frequently.
īƒ’ A study showed that that both integrative and
  instrumental motivation had a significant
  effect on learners’ choice of LLSs.
īƒ’ MacLeod (2002) found that strategy used
  was not affected by the participants’particular
  motivational orientation(whether instrumental
  or integrative) but, rather,by motivational
  level.
PERSONALITY TYPES

īƒ’ Ehrman and Oxford (1990) studied that
  extrovert show a strong preference for social
  srategies, while introvert use metacognitive
  strategies more frequently.
īƒ’ Meanwhile, Rossi-Le (1995), learners who
  favor group study are shown to use social
  and interactive strategies such as working
  with peers or requesting clarification.
īƒ’ Closure-oriented students are serious, and
  hardworking learners who like to be given
  written information and enjoy specific tasks
  with deadline.
īƒ’ In contrast,open learners take second
  language learning less seriously, treating it
  like a game to be enjoyed rather than a set of
  task to be completed.
GENDER
īƒ’ Gardner and Lambert (1972) observed that not
  only females had more positive attitudes toward
  the speakers of a second language but they
  were also more motivated toward learning
  second language than males were.
īƒ’ Arabski (1999) also found out in his study that
  the girls differed in their strategy use with regard
  to finding out about language learning, asking
  for correction and looking opportunity to speak
  in English.
ETHNICITY

īƒ’ Sheorey (1999) found that Indian learners
  concentrated on strategies they perceived
  useful to help them succeed in examination.
īƒ’ Nuril Huda (1998) stated that Malaysian
  learners tend to avoid affective strategies
  because they do not feel comfortable
  expressing their feelings.
īƒ’   Oh (1992) , metacognitive strategies appear
    to be popular with Korean students and
    Aliweh (1998) found that Egyptian preferred
    metacognitive and memory strategies to
    cognitive strategies.
BELIEFS
īƒ’ All learners have strong beliefs about how
  languages are learned and this will determine
  their strategy use because research has shown
  that their strategy use is consistent with the
  beliefs they have about learning.
īƒ’ Yu (2007) surveyed learning beliefs and learning
  strategies used by third-year college students
  in China and found that the students had very
  strong form-focused beliefs and disagreed with
  the use of mother tongue to learn language.
THE END

Factors affecting second language learning strategies

  • 1.
    FACTORS AFFECTING SECONDLANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES
  • 2.
    LEARNERS’ LEVEL OFPROFICIENCY īƒ’ Chen (1990), in a study on the relationship between communication strategies and and the proficiency level L2 learner found that low- proficiency students employed more communication strategies than high-proficiency ones. īƒ’ The results indicated that high-proficiency learners mainly employed linguistic-based communication strategies such as synonyms more frequently than low-proficiency learners.
  • 3.
    īƒ’ Cognitive andmetacognitive strategies showed very high correlations with the proficiency level of the students and were used by high-proficiency learners. īƒ’ Compensation strategies, however , were shown to be favoured by both high- and low- proficiency.
  • 4.
    MOTIVATION īƒ’ McIntyre andNoels (1996) examined the relationship between LLSs and motivational level among undergraduate foreign language learners. īƒ’ They reported that compared with less motivated learners, those who were substantially motivated, tended to adapt more learning strategies and used them more frequently.
  • 5.
    īƒ’ A studyshowed that that both integrative and instrumental motivation had a significant effect on learners’ choice of LLSs. īƒ’ MacLeod (2002) found that strategy used was not affected by the participants’particular motivational orientation(whether instrumental or integrative) but, rather,by motivational level.
  • 6.
    PERSONALITY TYPES īƒ’ Ehrmanand Oxford (1990) studied that extrovert show a strong preference for social srategies, while introvert use metacognitive strategies more frequently. īƒ’ Meanwhile, Rossi-Le (1995), learners who favor group study are shown to use social and interactive strategies such as working with peers or requesting clarification.
  • 7.
    īƒ’ Closure-oriented studentsare serious, and hardworking learners who like to be given written information and enjoy specific tasks with deadline. īƒ’ In contrast,open learners take second language learning less seriously, treating it like a game to be enjoyed rather than a set of task to be completed.
  • 8.
    GENDER īƒ’ Gardner andLambert (1972) observed that not only females had more positive attitudes toward the speakers of a second language but they were also more motivated toward learning second language than males were. īƒ’ Arabski (1999) also found out in his study that the girls differed in their strategy use with regard to finding out about language learning, asking for correction and looking opportunity to speak in English.
  • 9.
    ETHNICITY īƒ’ Sheorey (1999)found that Indian learners concentrated on strategies they perceived useful to help them succeed in examination. īƒ’ Nuril Huda (1998) stated that Malaysian learners tend to avoid affective strategies because they do not feel comfortable expressing their feelings.
  • 10.
    īƒ’ Oh (1992) , metacognitive strategies appear to be popular with Korean students and Aliweh (1998) found that Egyptian preferred metacognitive and memory strategies to cognitive strategies.
  • 11.
    BELIEFS īƒ’ All learnershave strong beliefs about how languages are learned and this will determine their strategy use because research has shown that their strategy use is consistent with the beliefs they have about learning. īƒ’ Yu (2007) surveyed learning beliefs and learning strategies used by third-year college students in China and found that the students had very strong form-focused beliefs and disagreed with the use of mother tongue to learn language.
  • 12.