Evaluating websites for learners ‘ A wise teacher does not lead you into  the house of wisdom but the threshold of your own mind ” Kahlil Gibran
Outcomes Why the need to evaluate? Criteria educators could use Criteria for learners to start using Alternatives: kid safe search engines/directories Google Custom Search Teaching website referencing.
A sign of the times
Why do teachers need to evaluate Websites? www.adcet.edu.au/.../web_Design.chpx
Web is like a jumble sale – anybody with internet access can contribute a website, but finding that prize item or website gem is relatively hard work. Prevent the ‘million hits syndrome’ Steer learners towards educator-evaluated web sources
More reasons to evaluate Ready list of annotated web sources – focus Information Literacy Skills on synthesis and engagement with the sources Share resources – bookmark, collect under learning areas e.g. use social bookmarking tools like Delicious, DiggIt With older learners especially, model web evaluation for learners to mimic
Last but not least … Teachers - evaluate so that YOU are not hoodwinked! For example, do you know the difference between the following two websites?
www.whitehouse.gov
www.whitehouse.org
www.whitehouse.org
http://whitehouse.georgewbush.org/index.asp
 
 
 
 
Create a checklist
Criteria for educators Dozens of Web evaluation tools online.  Many different types of Web sites and no one way to judge them all.  Purpose of a checklist/criteria/form is to guide you through the evaluation process into asking appropriate questions.  After using the forms several times, you will develop an intuitive feeling about which Web sites will be successful with learners.
Where to find Web evaluation examples On Weblogs -  http://philbradley.typepad.com/phil_bradleys_weblog/2006/12/fake_websites_a.html   On Video sites like YouTube; TeacherTube;  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_qR5lpnXBE   On SlideShare-  http://www.slideshare.net/betchaboy/5-factors-for-evaluating-website s   Via Images -  www.favors.fit.qut.edu.au
Evaluation Criteria Authority Content Design
Evaluation criterion AUTHORITY
Authority (Individuals) Do the author’s credentials show experience and expertise on the topic? How reputable is the author in said field? Is the information credible and trustworthy?
Authority clues Author’s contact details X-check author’s authenticity on other websites Check if author associated with any reputable organisations or institutions
Authority: Organisations & Institutions  Is the domain - .ac, .edu, .org credible? How reputable is the organisation? Is the organisation’s mission statement available? Are their contact details provided?
Organisation’s clues Look at the domain - .ac, .edu, .org for credibility Click on the Home page to find out more about the organisation Click on “about this site” to read about the organisation’s purpose
Evaluation criterion CONTENT
Content Accuracy/ Correctness Scope/Coverage Relevancy Currency
Content: Accuracy/Correctness What is the intention of this site? Is this site for entertainment or education or is it persuading me to buy something? Is the information error free and reliable?
Accuracy clues Read the “about us” for intention Typos, spelling and language errors indicate poor editing X-check factual information with other sites
Content: Scope How in depth is the coverage? How unique is the content?
Scope clues: A webpage of information with mostly hyperlinks to other articles won’t satisfy depth of coverage  A student’s essay or personal rant about a topic is not usually original or worthwhile citing
Content: relevancy Who is the audience for this site? Is the content at the right level for the audience? Does the content assist in answering the question?
Content: Currency How up to date is the page? Does the information require constant updates or is it not time-bound? Are the links still working?
Evaluation criterion DESIGN
Design Is the site designed with ease of use and  is it aesthetically pleasing?
Design clues Site does not take long to load Colour & graphics enhance content Navigation is easy Site map is evident Links are clearly visible Activity pages are printable Games are playable Limited “bells & whistles” Site is disability friendly
Web Evaluation Checklists  for  teachers
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html
Learner Web evaluation checklists/forms Kathy Schrock’s Critical evaluation of a website for Senior phase learners  http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/evalelem.html   For Intermediate Phase learners try  http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/rtrieger/rubric2-3.htm
 
Alternatives to evaluating websites yourself …use specialised search engines
Search Engines for learners Yahoo for kids  (http://kids.yahoo.com/) for IP & SP learners Kidsclick  database compiled by librarians. Over 6 400 sites. Search a subject directory or by key word. Can limit search by reading level! Ask  Jeeves  for Kids  (www.askkids.com)the natural language search tool Awesome Library  over 30 000 reviewed resources with ‘doors’ for kids, teens, teachers, librarians, or parents
More search engines for kids Kids.Net.Au  an Australian search engine for kids Berit’s  best sites for children   (http://www.beritsbest.com/)  directory of selected, rated sites for children 14 and under Barbara Feldman’s   Surfing the Net with Kids Archive   http://www.surfnetkids.com/
 
 
 
 
Creating a customized search engine Google allows us to create our own search engine which can be added to our Weblog, Website or customized Homepage As the creator, you can decide whether or not you want outside contributors So, you can create a child appropriate search engine with selections of your choice
 
Referencing websites Why?  Learn to acknowledge Web source Learn difference between a search engine and a website Learn to scrutinize a website
Referencing a website How? Author/s or organisation – if available Date on which the site created Title of webpage  Uniform Resource Locator (URL) including the ‘http://’ part Date when you, the user, accessed the site
For example Foods Standards Agency (2003).  What is BSE?  [Online]. Available  http:// www.foodstandards.gov.uk/bse  [Accessed 4 April 2006]
Thank You! Questions? Contact:  [email_address]

Evaluating Websites For Learners

  • 1.
    Evaluating websites forlearners ‘ A wise teacher does not lead you into the house of wisdom but the threshold of your own mind ” Kahlil Gibran
  • 2.
    Outcomes Why theneed to evaluate? Criteria educators could use Criteria for learners to start using Alternatives: kid safe search engines/directories Google Custom Search Teaching website referencing.
  • 3.
    A sign ofthe times
  • 4.
    Why do teachersneed to evaluate Websites? www.adcet.edu.au/.../web_Design.chpx
  • 5.
    Web is likea jumble sale – anybody with internet access can contribute a website, but finding that prize item or website gem is relatively hard work. Prevent the ‘million hits syndrome’ Steer learners towards educator-evaluated web sources
  • 6.
    More reasons toevaluate Ready list of annotated web sources – focus Information Literacy Skills on synthesis and engagement with the sources Share resources – bookmark, collect under learning areas e.g. use social bookmarking tools like Delicious, DiggIt With older learners especially, model web evaluation for learners to mimic
  • 7.
    Last but notleast … Teachers - evaluate so that YOU are not hoodwinked! For example, do you know the difference between the following two websites?
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Criteria for educatorsDozens of Web evaluation tools online. Many different types of Web sites and no one way to judge them all. Purpose of a checklist/criteria/form is to guide you through the evaluation process into asking appropriate questions. After using the forms several times, you will develop an intuitive feeling about which Web sites will be successful with learners.
  • 18.
    Where to findWeb evaluation examples On Weblogs - http://philbradley.typepad.com/phil_bradleys_weblog/2006/12/fake_websites_a.html On Video sites like YouTube; TeacherTube; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_qR5lpnXBE On SlideShare- http://www.slideshare.net/betchaboy/5-factors-for-evaluating-website s Via Images - www.favors.fit.qut.edu.au
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Authority (Individuals) Dothe author’s credentials show experience and expertise on the topic? How reputable is the author in said field? Is the information credible and trustworthy?
  • 22.
    Authority clues Author’scontact details X-check author’s authenticity on other websites Check if author associated with any reputable organisations or institutions
  • 23.
    Authority: Organisations &Institutions Is the domain - .ac, .edu, .org credible? How reputable is the organisation? Is the organisation’s mission statement available? Are their contact details provided?
  • 24.
    Organisation’s clues Lookat the domain - .ac, .edu, .org for credibility Click on the Home page to find out more about the organisation Click on “about this site” to read about the organisation’s purpose
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Content Accuracy/ CorrectnessScope/Coverage Relevancy Currency
  • 27.
    Content: Accuracy/Correctness Whatis the intention of this site? Is this site for entertainment or education or is it persuading me to buy something? Is the information error free and reliable?
  • 28.
    Accuracy clues Readthe “about us” for intention Typos, spelling and language errors indicate poor editing X-check factual information with other sites
  • 29.
    Content: Scope Howin depth is the coverage? How unique is the content?
  • 30.
    Scope clues: Awebpage of information with mostly hyperlinks to other articles won’t satisfy depth of coverage A student’s essay or personal rant about a topic is not usually original or worthwhile citing
  • 31.
    Content: relevancy Whois the audience for this site? Is the content at the right level for the audience? Does the content assist in answering the question?
  • 32.
    Content: Currency Howup to date is the page? Does the information require constant updates or is it not time-bound? Are the links still working?
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Design Is thesite designed with ease of use and is it aesthetically pleasing?
  • 35.
    Design clues Sitedoes not take long to load Colour & graphics enhance content Navigation is easy Site map is evident Links are clearly visible Activity pages are printable Games are playable Limited “bells & whistles” Site is disability friendly
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
    Learner Web evaluationchecklists/forms Kathy Schrock’s Critical evaluation of a website for Senior phase learners http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/evalelem.html For Intermediate Phase learners try http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/rtrieger/rubric2-3.htm
  • 39.
  • 40.
    Alternatives to evaluatingwebsites yourself …use specialised search engines
  • 41.
    Search Engines forlearners Yahoo for kids (http://kids.yahoo.com/) for IP & SP learners Kidsclick database compiled by librarians. Over 6 400 sites. Search a subject directory or by key word. Can limit search by reading level! Ask Jeeves for Kids (www.askkids.com)the natural language search tool Awesome Library over 30 000 reviewed resources with ‘doors’ for kids, teens, teachers, librarians, or parents
  • 42.
    More search enginesfor kids Kids.Net.Au an Australian search engine for kids Berit’s best sites for children (http://www.beritsbest.com/) directory of selected, rated sites for children 14 and under Barbara Feldman’s Surfing the Net with Kids Archive http://www.surfnetkids.com/
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
    Creating a customizedsearch engine Google allows us to create our own search engine which can be added to our Weblog, Website or customized Homepage As the creator, you can decide whether or not you want outside contributors So, you can create a child appropriate search engine with selections of your choice
  • 48.
  • 49.
    Referencing websites Why? Learn to acknowledge Web source Learn difference between a search engine and a website Learn to scrutinize a website
  • 50.
    Referencing a websiteHow? Author/s or organisation – if available Date on which the site created Title of webpage Uniform Resource Locator (URL) including the ‘http://’ part Date when you, the user, accessed the site
  • 51.
    For example FoodsStandards Agency (2003). What is BSE? [Online]. Available http:// www.foodstandards.gov.uk/bse [Accessed 4 April 2006]
  • 52.
    Thank You! Questions?Contact: [email_address]