Local peoples’ perspectives on the effectiveness of REDD+ in changi...

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

Ad

THINKING beyond the canopy
The effectiveness of REDD+ initiatives in changing local people’s
emission-generating activitie...

THINKING beyond the canopy
REDD+ effectiveness
REDD+ intervention
activities
•Conditional
Livelihood
enhancement
•Non-cond...

THINKING beyond the canopy
Classification of interventions
 Conditional livelihood enhancement
 Non-conditional liveliho...

THINKING beyond the canopy
Research Questions
 RQ1: To what extent are HHs involved in REDD+
interventions?
 RQ2: Do RED...

THINKING beyond the canopy
HH involvement in interventions
42 42
26
32
23
8
33
0
20
40
60
80
100
Incidences of involvement...

THINKING beyond the canopy
Have interventions affected HH land use?
27
51
62
34
45
37
42
0
20
40
60
80
100
Land use change...

THINKING beyond the canopy
Have interventions affected HH land use?
247
481
364
431
94
218
12
# Land Use Change
Conditiona...

THINKING beyond the canopy
How have interventions affected HH land use?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Conditional
livel...

THINKING beyond the canopy
HH motivations to change and retain land use
practices
 Motivation to change
• Regulatory envi...

THINKING beyond the canopy
Conclusions
 3/4 of HHs directly participated in interventions
 Only 1/3 of all interventions...

Financial support for GCS-REDD+:
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation,
Australian Agency for International Develop...

You are reading a preview.

Activate your 30 day free trial to continue reading.

Share SlideShare

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Embed

Size (px)

Show related SlideShares at end

WordPress Shortcode

Link

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Email

Replay

Top clipped slide

1 of 11 Ad

1 of 11 Ad