Design Team 5
Lowering Standby Power
Consumption Via Proximity
Detection
Kevin Harrison
Leslie Hodges
Eric Hosey
Nathan Kelly
Berna Saracoglu
• Anticipated ENERGY STAR standard
– Appliances need to operate under one watt in
standby mode
– Current appliances do not utilize standby
mode
– Standby mode would diminish customer
experience
• Need to smoothly enter and exit an
energy ethical standby mode to lower
energy consumption
The Problem
• Detection of user presence
– Implement a variety of
sensors for in room and
potential appliance use
detection
• Low-to-mid range and High-
end options
– Laundry and kitchen
appliances
– Cost differences
– User experience When you walk into your
kitchen, your kitchen turns on
Our Goal
• Power
– Less than 1 watt in standby mode
• Size
– Fit aesthetically into appliance and room
• Cost
– Limitations dependant on appliance price
• Flexibility
– Adapt intelligently to different environments
– Current and future appliances
• Accuracy
– Not interfere with appliance functionality
– Not susceptible to interference
• Safety
– Product used by general public
Design Specifications
Low-to-Mid Range
• Two sensors
– Passive infrared (PIR) sensor
• Monitors room for user presence
– Active infrared (IR) sensor
• Monitors for potential use of appliance
• Integration
– In standby mode PIR will monitor room
– Detection of user will turn on IR sensor
– Detection of potential use will exit from standby mode
Design Solutions
High-End
• Two sensors
– Passive infrared sensor
• Monitors room for user presence
– Ultrasonic sensor
• Capable of calculating user proximity
• Information density
• Integration
– In standby mode PIR will monitor room
– Detection of user will turn on ultrasonic sensor
– Will exit standby mode as user approaches appliance
Design Solutions
IR Sensor
• Very low cost
• Detection up to 4 ft
– Very little span
• Consumption less than 0.2 W
• No false triggers
Ultrasonic Sensor
• Detection up to 20 ft
– Span of appliance width
• 10 mW consumption
• Susceptible to false-on triggers
from air motion
Sensor Selection
PIR Sensor
• Power consumption of 0.5 mW
• Very low cost
• Detection up to 20 ft
– 180° hemispheric detection
• Resistant to false-on triggers
• Ideal for both design solutions
Sensor Selection
• Expected 1 watt standard
• Currently can save 35% with refrigerator
user interface
Power Consumption
• Voice commands
– Physically disabled
– Safety
• Voice announcements
– Visually impaired
– Appliance status
• LCD solution
– More common in future
– Proximity sensing improves power consumption and
marketability
Future of Product
Questions
?

ece480_dt5_final_presentation.ppt

  • 1.
    Design Team 5 LoweringStandby Power Consumption Via Proximity Detection Kevin Harrison Leslie Hodges Eric Hosey Nathan Kelly Berna Saracoglu
  • 2.
    • Anticipated ENERGYSTAR standard – Appliances need to operate under one watt in standby mode – Current appliances do not utilize standby mode – Standby mode would diminish customer experience • Need to smoothly enter and exit an energy ethical standby mode to lower energy consumption The Problem
  • 3.
    • Detection ofuser presence – Implement a variety of sensors for in room and potential appliance use detection • Low-to-mid range and High- end options – Laundry and kitchen appliances – Cost differences – User experience When you walk into your kitchen, your kitchen turns on Our Goal
  • 4.
    • Power – Lessthan 1 watt in standby mode • Size – Fit aesthetically into appliance and room • Cost – Limitations dependant on appliance price • Flexibility – Adapt intelligently to different environments – Current and future appliances • Accuracy – Not interfere with appliance functionality – Not susceptible to interference • Safety – Product used by general public Design Specifications
  • 5.
    Low-to-Mid Range • Twosensors – Passive infrared (PIR) sensor • Monitors room for user presence – Active infrared (IR) sensor • Monitors for potential use of appliance • Integration – In standby mode PIR will monitor room – Detection of user will turn on IR sensor – Detection of potential use will exit from standby mode Design Solutions
  • 6.
    High-End • Two sensors –Passive infrared sensor • Monitors room for user presence – Ultrasonic sensor • Capable of calculating user proximity • Information density • Integration – In standby mode PIR will monitor room – Detection of user will turn on ultrasonic sensor – Will exit standby mode as user approaches appliance Design Solutions
  • 7.
    IR Sensor • Verylow cost • Detection up to 4 ft – Very little span • Consumption less than 0.2 W • No false triggers Ultrasonic Sensor • Detection up to 20 ft – Span of appliance width • 10 mW consumption • Susceptible to false-on triggers from air motion Sensor Selection
  • 8.
    PIR Sensor • Powerconsumption of 0.5 mW • Very low cost • Detection up to 20 ft – 180° hemispheric detection • Resistant to false-on triggers • Ideal for both design solutions Sensor Selection
  • 9.
    • Expected 1watt standard • Currently can save 35% with refrigerator user interface Power Consumption
  • 10.
    • Voice commands –Physically disabled – Safety • Voice announcements – Visually impaired – Appliance status • LCD solution – More common in future – Proximity sensing improves power consumption and marketability Future of Product
  • 11.