Skip to main content
Defects by design | 1
Defects by design
Ballots that fool voters
Whitney Quesenbery
Center for Civic Design
@civicdesign | @whitneyq
EAC / Design for Democracy Effective Designs for the Administration of Federal Elections (2007)
Better Ballots (2008), Better Design, Better Elections (2012) and Design Deficiencies and Lost Votes (2011)
Field Guides to Ensuring Voter Intent, Vol 01 Designing Usable Ballots
Anywhere Ballot
A failure of intent caused by
Typography
Ballot layout
Marking mechanisms
Instructions and messages
and election codes that require poor design
Election design challenges
affect all facets of voting
Perception
Interaction
Understanding
and civic literacy gaps
Defects by design | 5
43% of adults in the US read
at basic or below basic levels
U.S. National Assessment of Adult Literacy http://nces.ed.gov/naal/kf_demographics.asp
14% 29% 44% 13%
30
Million
63
Million
95
Million
28
Million
Defects by design | 6
If you can’t read the ballot effectively,
you can’t vote accurately
Look at all the
confusing text
and graphics
Defects by design | 7
If you can’t read the ballot effectively,
you can’t vote accurately
Good typography
can make even a
rows-and-
columns ballot
easier to use
Defects by design | 8
If you can’t find the correct marking location,
you can’t vote accurately
The layout on
the right makes
it easier to find
the correct
mark.
The layout on
the left skips
holes in
unpredictable
ways.
Defects by design | 9
If you don’t know how voting works,
you can’t vote accurately
Can you tell that you
should only vote on
one side of the
ballot?
And that your vote is
not counted if you
do?
Defects by design | 10
Make contest boundaries easy to see
1. A contest hidden below instructions
2. A contest hidden above another contest. Look
how much clearer when it’s on its own page.
2. A New York City ballot (the have gotten a little
better since this election!)
Defects by design | 11
Never - ever - split a contest across columns or pages
With 34 candidates for Senate, California election officials struggled to
find layouts that wouldn’t cause overvotes. See
https://civicdesign.org/breaking-the-ballot/
Defects by design | 12
A consistent and unambiguous relationship between
voting choice and marking mechanism
When the oval or arrow or
square is to the left of the
name, it’s got a stronger
association.
Multi-column ballots make
ovals on the right an even
worse problem.
Defects by design | 13
A consistent and unambiguous relationship between
voting choice and marking mechanism
A good mitigation in a
state whose election
code says that the
ovals must be on the
right – staggering the
rows.
Defects by design | 14
Give voters control of all actions that make or change a
ballot selection
Every ballot marking
device should have a
well-designed review
screen.
The Help America
Vote Act requires that
voters are warned of
overvotes, but
scanners don’t
usually warn about
undervotes.
Defects by design | 15
Don’t force voters into problem-solving
Tell voters what they can do.
Don’t make them do arithmetic.
Defects by design | 16
Don’t force voters into problem-solving
Don’t use terms that
voters won’t
understand.
Design messages to
help voters take
action to make their
ballot reflect their
intent.
Defects by design | 17
Clear, minimal, helpful instructions
in the right place
There is really nothing to say.
The short clean text, good layout
and visual illustration speaks for
itself.
Defects by design | 18
Clear, minimal, helpful instructions
in the right place
Our research to design better ranked
choice ballots and instructions
showed that it’s the right words, not
more words.
https://civicdesign.org/projects/rcv/
Ballot design can help
voters be successful
Follow proven election design principles
Meet voters' needs for easy interaction,
plain language, and clear design
Test with voters
Thank you
Whitney Quesenbery
whitneyq@civicdesign.org
@whitneyq
civicdesign.org
@civicdesign
Better Ballots
research on ballots that have fooled voters in real elections
https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/better-ballots