The document discusses the pros and cons of hybrid and native mobile app development, highlighting that hybrid apps are cost-effective and faster to develop but may lack performance and user experience compared to native apps. Native apps offer better performance and integration with device functionalities but come with higher development costs and complexity. The choice between hybrid and native development ultimately depends on factors such as budget, time constraints, and desired app features.

1. Deal With The
Dilemma Of
Hybrid And Native

2. Mobile Development | Native Vs Hybrid

3. Introduction
• There are two kinds of platforms that can be used to build an app, Hybrid or
Cross platforms and Native platforms. Hybrid and Native technologies have
their own pros and cons although it is still debatable which framework is better.
• Businesses fail to take an apt decision when it comes to Mobile App
Development as it is difficult to determine which technology is better or suits
their needs.
• If the budget and time are constraints for you Hybrid Apps may be a better
choice. Hybrid Apps are multi-platform apps developed using Cross
Compatible technology.
• Developing an app using Hybrid technology requires lesser time as there is no
need to develop separate codes for different Operating Systems. This also helps
in reducing the overall development cost as the same HTML code components
can be reused on different operating systems. These apps are easy to integrate
with devices or web view.

4. Hybrid Vs Native
• However, hybrid apps fail to provide a functioning as smooth as the apps built using
Native technology. It is hard cater a rich user experience with a single code base for
various platforms. They lack some of the features available exclusively to Native Apps
and have a higher chance of rejection at app stores.
• On the other hand, if you are looking for an app that provides a smooth functioning and
great user experience then, it is better to use Native technology to build your app. Native
App is a phone or tablet application developed for a specific Operating System.
• These apps are encoded in a specific programming language. They perform faster and
more efficiently than Hybrid Apps and have access to various mobile features such as
GPS and contacts. Native technology is used to build various video game apps since it
provides a great User Interface and Design.

5. Hybrid Vs Native
• These great Native features come with a cost. Native apps are very complex as they have
a different codebase for various platforms. A lot of time and efforts are required to
maintain these apps.
• Also, the cost to develop these apps is higher since the developer has to write separate
codes for different OS. More developers who specialize in different platforms are
required to build the app.
• Which technology to use for mobile app development depends on various factors such as
viability, financial feasibility, time required to build the app and the features that users
expect to be in the app. The below points will help you understand the same.

6. Advantages of Hybrid Apps:
It is Cost and Time Effective:
• As you do not have to create separate code bases for Android and iOS you save on a lot
of time and money. Also, with the help and proficiency of JavaScript and HTML it
becomes easier for the developers to build great mobile apps at a lesser cost.
Best solution for BYOD Programs:
• If you are planning to implement a BYOD policy in your company then, Hybrid App is
the ideal solution for you. As it works across various platforms and devices your
employees will be able to access it from different devices and Operating Systems.

7. Advantages of Hybrid Apps:
Lower Requirements:
• The developers do not need to learn specific languages for the development of Hybrid
Apps. A web developer with the skills of HTML 5, JavaScript and CSS can develop a
Hybrid App.
Offline Availability:
• Hybrid Apps provide offline support with local storage. You can have access to the data
in your app even when there is no internet connectivity and this enhances the overall user
experience.

8. Disadvantages of Hybrid Apps:
User Interface (UI) :
• The UI of a Hybrid App is not up to the mark. Hybrid apps most of the times do not
follow the interface guidelines set by Apple and Google and thus fail to give the users a
Native feel.
Performance:
• You may encounter lags while using a Hybrid App. It fails to provide a seamless user
experience as some parts of the app may function smoothly with iOS but lag on Android.

9. Disadvantages of Hybrid Apps:
Animation and graphics:
• The Hybrid Apps has poor video and audio processing. The apps that are graphic and
animation heavy do not work smoothly.
Debugging:
• Debugging can be a major issue in Hybrid apps because of the extra layer present
between the source code and the mobile app platform.
• Since developers do not have a deep knowledge of the targeted platform, figuring out the
issue can be difficult. This was about the Hybrid Apps, now let us try to understand the
Native Apps.

10. Advantages of Native Apps:
Great performance:
• Native Apps are perfect for high-performance applications and games. As they are
developed for a specific platform, they are faster and offer a better performance than
Hybrid Apps.
Better UX:
• As the Native Apps follow the platform specific UI standards, they offer a smooth
functioning and a better user experience. The users can smoothly navigate through the
app thus providing a seamless user experience.

11. Advantages of Native Apps:
Device Integration:
• Native Apps make full use of the device’s functionality and hardware. They can access
functions like GPS, push notifications, address book, SMS messaging etc. The users get
to enjoy more features as compared to the Hybrid Apps.
Availability in App Store:
• Native Apps are easily accessible in the App Store. As they are easily accessible they
catch users’ attention and thus monetization goals can be achieved.

12. Disadvantages of Native Apps:
High Development Cost:
• Native Apps are more expensive than their Hybrid counterparts. Native Apps are
complicated and multiple code bases are required to build a Native App, this demands
for greater number of Android and iOS developers and increases the overall
expenditure.
Time Consuming:
• An API interface is required to build a Native app and building it is a time consuming
process. Also, different codes are required for Android and iOS platforms and it takes a
lot of time.

13. Disadvantages of Native Apps:
App approval and authorization:
• The process of getting a Native app approved and authorized by the App store is long
and there is no guarantee that the app will be approved. The App updates also need to be
authorized by the App store.
Complex Maintenance:
• The Native Apps have a complex framework hence, it is difficult to troubleshoot or
update the app. Several Android and iOS developers are required to maintain the native
apps across different platforms.

14. Conclusion:
• Hybrid apps are basically a combination of native technology, HTML5, CSS and Java
Script. Xamarin and Phone Gap are a part of the cross platform framework.
• Native apps are made for a specific Operating System. Android and iOS developers use
tools such as Android Studio and X-code to develop Native Apps. Native Apps use Swift
or Objective-C to write iOS apps, Java to write Android apps and C# to write Windows
Apps.

15. About Mobile Lab:
• Leo Techno Soft introduced Mobile Lab for the development and testing of applications
running on Android, iOS, Windows and Blackberry, along with infrastructure
and scalability for start-ups and ISV.

16. About Leo TechnoSoft
• Leo TechnoSoft offers strategic IT services in Product Engineering, Mobility and
Blockchain to global clientele. As a technology partner, Leo TechnoSoft is specialized in
building, serving, managing and extending technology on Cloud, Enterprise and IOT
environment to deliver next generation technologies effectively.
• To know more about Mobile Lab, contact us at enquiry@leosys.net or call us at 407-
965-5509.

17. Leo TechnoSoft Snapshot
Value offeringIndustries
Overview
- Global partner product development provider with delivery centers in Los Angeles, Chicago
and India (Offshore).
- Specializes in Cloud, SaaS and Enterprise Product Engineering for Startups, Entrepreneurs,
ISV(SME).
 Technology
 Healthcare/Life Sciences
 Finance
 Retail
 Manufacturing
 Real Estate
 Partnered Product Development
 Technical, Operation and Sales
Management
 Expertise SaaS & Cloud solutions
 Customer Relationship Management
 Sales and Marketing
 VC Connections and relationships
www.leotechnosoft.net 11

18. OUR PRESENCE
 Adequate infrastructure to scale up at the drop of a hat
 Backend Data Center / Infrastructure set up
 Global Offices to support 24x7 Client Operations
For more information email us at enquiry@leosys.net.
www.leotechnosoft.net

19. THANK YOU
13