Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Class 3       Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




          1
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Class Exercise           Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




             So…What does
        Context Sensitive Solutions
              mean to you?



                     2
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Class Exercise           Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




                 Context?




                     3
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Class Exercise            Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




                 Sensitive?




                      4
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Class Exercise            Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




                 Solutions?




                      5
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
What is CSS?                      Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




 More than Mitigation . . .

 More than Enhancements . . .

 More than a Fad . . .




                                                                  Michigan DOT
                              6
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Principles              Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




    • Strive towards a shared stakeholder
      vision to provide a basis for decisions
    • Demonstrate a comprehensive
      understanding of contexts




                          7
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Principles              Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




   • Foster continuing communication and
     collaboration to achieve consensus
   • Exercise flexibility and creativity to shape
     effective transportation solutions, while
     preserving and enhancing community and
     natural environments




                          8
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Characteristics                Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




 • Establishes/Involves an interdisciplinary team early
    – full range of stakeholders in all phases of a transportation
      program (including transportation officials)
    – skills based on the needs of the transportation activity
 • Seeks to understand
    –   the landscape
    –   the community
    –   valued resources
    –   role of all appropriate modes of transportation in each
        unique context before developing engineering solutions



                                 9
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Characteristics                Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




 • Communicates early and continuously with all
   stakeholders
    – open, honest, and respectful manner
    – tailors public involvement to the context and phase


 • Utilizes a clearly defined decision-making process

 • Tracks and honors commitments through the life
   cycle of projects



                                10
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Characteristics                 Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




 • Clearly defines the purpose and seeks consensus
    – shared stakeholder vision
    – scope of projects and activities
    – incorporates transportation, community, and
      environmental elements
 • Secures process commitments from local leaders
 • Tailors the transportation development process
    – to fit the circumstances
    – process that examines multiple alternatives, including all
      appropriate modes of transportation
    – results in consensus

                                 11
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Characteristics                 Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design



 • Encourages agency and stakeholder participants to
   jointly monitor how well the agreed-upon process is
   working
   – to improve as needed
   – to identify any lessons learned
 • Encourages mutually supportive and coordinated
   multimodal transportation and land-use decisions
 • Draws upon a full range of communication and
   visualization tools
   – to better inform stakeholders
   – encourage dialogue
   – increase credibility of the process
                                 12
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Myths               Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




 CSS is not about . . .
 • Compromising safety and standards
 • Responding only to the “squeaky wheel”
 • Spending more time and money
 • Tacking on enhancements




                     13
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Outcomes                     Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design


 Qualities of Excellence in Transportation Design
  • Satisfies the purpose and needs of stakeholders
    forged early in the project and amended
    throughout project development

  • Safe facility for the user and the community

  • In harmony with the community, preserves
    environmental, scenic, aesthetic, historic, and
    natural resource values of the area, i.e., exhibits
    context sensitive design


                              14
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Outcomes                    Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design


 Qualities of Excellence in Transportation Design
  • Exceeds expectations of designers and stakeholders
    and achieves a level of excellence in people's minds

  • Involves efficient and effective use of the resources
    (time, budget, community) of all involved parties

  • Designed and built with minimal disruption to the
    community

  • Seen as having added lasting value to the community

                             15
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Why Use CSS?                 Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




       Decide      Design            Defend


                 Re-Design

                   Delay



        Listen       Design                  Build


                                                             Michigan DOT
                        16
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Stakeholders                      Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design



             Potential CSS Stakeholders
  • Neighborhood associations and civic organizations
    (communities)
  • Land developers and builders
  • Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs)
  • City and county regional planners
  • State DOT transportation planners & engineers
  • Federal and state resource agencies
  • Regional transit authorities
                             17
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Special Interests?        Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




                     18
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Benefits                      Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design


  • Solves the right problem
    – reaches consensus with all stakeholders before the design
      process begins.
  • Conserves environmental and community resources
  • Facilitates and streamlines NEPA process compliance
  • Saves time
    – gains consensus early
    – minimizes litigation and redesign
    – expedites permit approvals
  • Saves money
    – shortens project development process
    – eliminates/minimizes obstacles
                               19
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Benefits                      Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design



  • Builds support from the public and from the
    regulators
     – partnering with the transportation agency
     – parties bring full cooperation
     – often additional resources
  • Helps prioritize and allocate scarce transportation
    funds in a cost-effective way
  • Group decisions are generally better than individual
    decisions
     – more accepted and mutually satisfactory when made by
       all who must live with them
  • Serves the public interest, helps build communities
    and leaves a better place behind
                               20
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Case Study                           Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design


Woodville, Texas                           Project Location
TxDOT Beaumont District
Goal of the study:
Develop design alternatives for a
major transportation corridor
through the rural community of
Woodville, Texas.

Specific Objective:
Avoid possible environmental
impacts and improve community
impacts due to construction of the
proposed U.S. Highway 69.
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Site Conditions                          Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design


Rolling terrain covered with pines and
oaks, and rich bottomlands with tall
hardwoods and some wetland areas.

City is surrounded by units of the Big
Thicket National Preserve, the
Angelina National Forest is to the
north, and to the east is the Sam
Houston National Forest.

Turkey Creek, a 30-mile long
watercourse flows through Tyler and
Hardin Counties. This creek has
been proposed as a connecting
corridor in the "String of Pearls"
concept for Big Thicket National Park.
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Existing Conditions               Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design



                        Existing Railroad
 Weland Area            Right-of-Way               Turkey Creek




          Weland Area                      Existing Tree Cover
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Site Conditions   Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives               Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




          Elevated Roadway on Embankment
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives                       Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




                Elevated Roadway on Embankment
                          Cross-Section




Frontage Road               Main Lanes                     Frontage Road

                           Embankment
            Appoximately 350’ Wide Structure Footprint
                   Excluding Frontage Roads
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives                 Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




  Elevated Roadway on Mechanically Stabilized Earth
            Walls (MSE) and Embankment
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives                Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




           Elevated Roadway on MSE Walls
     and Embankment. Bridge over Existing Wetlands
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives                 Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




Elevated Roadway on MSE. Bridge over Existing Wetlands
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives                       Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design



                Cross-Section with MSE Walls




Frontage Road               Main Lanes                 Frontage Road

                            MSE Walls
           Approximately 228’ Wide Structure Footprint
                     with Frontage Roads
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives                                                     Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design

                                                                   Alternative A                                 Estimated Quantities*      Estimated Costs **
                                                                   Embankment: Item 132 0509                          713,524 CY                $3,125,233
                                                                   MS W ls: Item 423 0503
                                                                     E al                                                 N/A                       N/A
                                                                   Bridge: Girder, Prestressed, I-Shape (GP-1)          130,928 SF               $4,895,667
                                                                  Portland Cement R Mix: Item 275 0505
                                                                                   oad                                  33,081 T S
                                                                                                                               ON                $2,883,094
                                                                   H M T D
                                                                    ot ix: ype                                          7,748 T S
                                                                                                                              ON                 $259,727

                                                                                                                                         Total: $11,163,721

    Cost Comparisons                                               Alternative B                                 Estimated Quantities*      Estimated Costs **

    March 2008
                                                                  Embankment: Item 132 0509                           625,493 CY                $2,739,661
                                                                  MS W ls: Item 423 0503
                                                                    E al                                              49,742 SF                  $501,892
                                                                  Bridge: Girder, Prestressed, I-Shape (GP-1)         130,928 SF                $4,895,667
                                                                  Portland Cement R Mix: Item 275 0505
                                                                                   oad                                33,017 T S
                                                                                                                             ON                 $2,883,094
                                                                  H M T D
                                                                   ot ix: ype                                         7,748 T S
                                                                                                                            ON                   $259,727

                                                                                                                                         Total: $11,280,041
.

* Notes:                                                           Alternative C                                 Estimated Quantities*     Estimated Costs **
1.) Calculated costs are meant for comparison purposes only       Embankment: Item 132 0509                           348,082 CY                $1,524,600

and do not represent actual construction costs of the roadway.    MS W ls: Item 423 0503
                                                                    E al                                              86,755 SF                 $875,358

2.) Same extents were used to calculate the costs of each
                                                                  Bridge: Girder, Prestressed, I-Shape (GP-1)         204,168 SF                $7,634,239
                                                                  Portland Cement R Mix: Item 275 0505
                                                                                   oad                                30,385 T S
                                                                                                                             ON                 $2,653,173
alternative.                                                      H M T D
                                                                   ot ix: ype                                         7,131 T S
                                                                                                                            ON                  $239,020

3.) Frontage road embankments, underpasses and culverts                                                                                  Total: $12,926,390
were not included in estimates.
4.) For cost estimate, median between main lanes was
considered paved.                                                 Alternative D
                                                                   Embankment: Item 132 0509
                                                                                                                 Estimated Quantities*
                                                                                                                      226,981 CY
                                                                                                                                            Estimated Costs **
                                                                                                                                                 $994,177
5.) See appendix, page 19, for detailed cost descriptions          MS W ls: Item 423 0503
                                                                     E al                                             102,147 SF                 $1,030,661
                                                                   Bridge: Girder, Prestressed, I-Shape (GP-1)        204,168 S
                                                                                                                              F                 $7,634,239
                                                                  Portland Cement R Mix: Item 275 0505
                                                                                   oad                                29,040 T S
                                                                                                                             ON                 $2,535,737
                                                                   H M T D
                                                                    ot ix: ype                                        6,815 T S
                                                                                                                            ON                   $228,435

                                                                                                                                         Total: $12,423,249
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives     Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




               Structure Aesthetics
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives            Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design



 Visual Impact

                 Existing View
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
Alternatives       Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design



 Visual Impact   Alternative Improvements
Context Sensitive Solutions in Transportation
CSS - Benefits        Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design




                 35

Css class 3 definition and benefits 120309

  • 1.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Class 3 Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design 1
  • 2.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Class Exercise Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design So…What does Context Sensitive Solutions mean to you? 2
  • 3.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Class Exercise Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Context? 3
  • 4.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Class Exercise Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Sensitive? 4
  • 5.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Class Exercise Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Solutions? 5
  • 6.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation What is CSS? Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design More than Mitigation . . . More than Enhancements . . . More than a Fad . . . Michigan DOT 6
  • 7.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Principles Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design • Strive towards a shared stakeholder vision to provide a basis for decisions • Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of contexts 7
  • 8.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Principles Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design • Foster continuing communication and collaboration to achieve consensus • Exercise flexibility and creativity to shape effective transportation solutions, while preserving and enhancing community and natural environments 8
  • 9.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Characteristics Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design • Establishes/Involves an interdisciplinary team early – full range of stakeholders in all phases of a transportation program (including transportation officials) – skills based on the needs of the transportation activity • Seeks to understand – the landscape – the community – valued resources – role of all appropriate modes of transportation in each unique context before developing engineering solutions 9
  • 10.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Characteristics Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design • Communicates early and continuously with all stakeholders – open, honest, and respectful manner – tailors public involvement to the context and phase • Utilizes a clearly defined decision-making process • Tracks and honors commitments through the life cycle of projects 10
  • 11.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Characteristics Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design • Clearly defines the purpose and seeks consensus – shared stakeholder vision – scope of projects and activities – incorporates transportation, community, and environmental elements • Secures process commitments from local leaders • Tailors the transportation development process – to fit the circumstances – process that examines multiple alternatives, including all appropriate modes of transportation – results in consensus 11
  • 12.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Characteristics Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design • Encourages agency and stakeholder participants to jointly monitor how well the agreed-upon process is working – to improve as needed – to identify any lessons learned • Encourages mutually supportive and coordinated multimodal transportation and land-use decisions • Draws upon a full range of communication and visualization tools – to better inform stakeholders – encourage dialogue – increase credibility of the process 12
  • 13.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Myths Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design CSS is not about . . . • Compromising safety and standards • Responding only to the “squeaky wheel” • Spending more time and money • Tacking on enhancements 13
  • 14.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Outcomes Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Qualities of Excellence in Transportation Design • Satisfies the purpose and needs of stakeholders forged early in the project and amended throughout project development • Safe facility for the user and the community • In harmony with the community, preserves environmental, scenic, aesthetic, historic, and natural resource values of the area, i.e., exhibits context sensitive design 14
  • 15.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Outcomes Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Qualities of Excellence in Transportation Design • Exceeds expectations of designers and stakeholders and achieves a level of excellence in people's minds • Involves efficient and effective use of the resources (time, budget, community) of all involved parties • Designed and built with minimal disruption to the community • Seen as having added lasting value to the community 15
  • 16.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Why Use CSS? Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Decide Design Defend Re-Design Delay Listen Design Build Michigan DOT 16
  • 17.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Stakeholders Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Potential CSS Stakeholders • Neighborhood associations and civic organizations (communities) • Land developers and builders • Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) • City and county regional planners • State DOT transportation planners & engineers • Federal and state resource agencies • Regional transit authorities 17
  • 18.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Special Interests? Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design 18
  • 19.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Benefits Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design • Solves the right problem – reaches consensus with all stakeholders before the design process begins. • Conserves environmental and community resources • Facilitates and streamlines NEPA process compliance • Saves time – gains consensus early – minimizes litigation and redesign – expedites permit approvals • Saves money – shortens project development process – eliminates/minimizes obstacles 19
  • 20.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Benefits Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design • Builds support from the public and from the regulators – partnering with the transportation agency – parties bring full cooperation – often additional resources • Helps prioritize and allocate scarce transportation funds in a cost-effective way • Group decisions are generally better than individual decisions – more accepted and mutually satisfactory when made by all who must live with them • Serves the public interest, helps build communities and leaves a better place behind 20
  • 21.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Case Study Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Woodville, Texas Project Location TxDOT Beaumont District Goal of the study: Develop design alternatives for a major transportation corridor through the rural community of Woodville, Texas. Specific Objective: Avoid possible environmental impacts and improve community impacts due to construction of the proposed U.S. Highway 69.
  • 22.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Site Conditions Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Rolling terrain covered with pines and oaks, and rich bottomlands with tall hardwoods and some wetland areas. City is surrounded by units of the Big Thicket National Preserve, the Angelina National Forest is to the north, and to the east is the Sam Houston National Forest. Turkey Creek, a 30-mile long watercourse flows through Tyler and Hardin Counties. This creek has been proposed as a connecting corridor in the "String of Pearls" concept for Big Thicket National Park.
  • 23.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Existing Conditions Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Existing Railroad Weland Area Right-of-Way Turkey Creek Weland Area Existing Tree Cover
  • 24.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Site Conditions Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design
  • 25.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Elevated Roadway on Embankment
  • 26.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Elevated Roadway on Embankment Cross-Section Frontage Road Main Lanes Frontage Road Embankment Appoximately 350’ Wide Structure Footprint Excluding Frontage Roads
  • 27.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Elevated Roadway on Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls (MSE) and Embankment
  • 28.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Elevated Roadway on MSE Walls and Embankment. Bridge over Existing Wetlands
  • 29.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Elevated Roadway on MSE. Bridge over Existing Wetlands
  • 30.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Cross-Section with MSE Walls Frontage Road Main Lanes Frontage Road MSE Walls Approximately 228’ Wide Structure Footprint with Frontage Roads
  • 31.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Alternative A Estimated Quantities* Estimated Costs ** Embankment: Item 132 0509 713,524 CY $3,125,233 MS W ls: Item 423 0503 E al N/A N/A Bridge: Girder, Prestressed, I-Shape (GP-1) 130,928 SF $4,895,667 Portland Cement R Mix: Item 275 0505 oad 33,081 T S ON $2,883,094 H M T D ot ix: ype 7,748 T S ON $259,727 Total: $11,163,721 Cost Comparisons Alternative B Estimated Quantities* Estimated Costs ** March 2008 Embankment: Item 132 0509 625,493 CY $2,739,661 MS W ls: Item 423 0503 E al 49,742 SF $501,892 Bridge: Girder, Prestressed, I-Shape (GP-1) 130,928 SF $4,895,667 Portland Cement R Mix: Item 275 0505 oad 33,017 T S ON $2,883,094 H M T D ot ix: ype 7,748 T S ON $259,727 Total: $11,280,041 . * Notes: Alternative C Estimated Quantities* Estimated Costs ** 1.) Calculated costs are meant for comparison purposes only Embankment: Item 132 0509 348,082 CY $1,524,600 and do not represent actual construction costs of the roadway. MS W ls: Item 423 0503 E al 86,755 SF $875,358 2.) Same extents were used to calculate the costs of each Bridge: Girder, Prestressed, I-Shape (GP-1) 204,168 SF $7,634,239 Portland Cement R Mix: Item 275 0505 oad 30,385 T S ON $2,653,173 alternative. H M T D ot ix: ype 7,131 T S ON $239,020 3.) Frontage road embankments, underpasses and culverts Total: $12,926,390 were not included in estimates. 4.) For cost estimate, median between main lanes was considered paved. Alternative D Embankment: Item 132 0509 Estimated Quantities* 226,981 CY Estimated Costs ** $994,177 5.) See appendix, page 19, for detailed cost descriptions MS W ls: Item 423 0503 E al 102,147 SF $1,030,661 Bridge: Girder, Prestressed, I-Shape (GP-1) 204,168 S F $7,634,239 Portland Cement R Mix: Item 275 0505 oad 29,040 T S ON $2,535,737 H M T D ot ix: ype 6,815 T S ON $228,435 Total: $12,423,249
  • 32.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Structure Aesthetics
  • 33.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Visual Impact Existing View
  • 34.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation Alternatives Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design Visual Impact Alternative Improvements
  • 35.
    Context Sensitive Solutionsin Transportation CSS - Benefits Planning, Environmental Analysis and Design 35