A DFT & TDDFT study of
Hybrid Halide Perovskite
Quantum Dots
Athanasios Koliogiorgos
Advanced Materials Group
Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
Previous research:
● ABX3
ultrasmall perovskites, where A
= Cs, MA (CH3
NH3
), B = Pb, Ge, Sn,
Ca, Sr and X = Cl, Br, I
●
Publication: A. Koliogiorgos et al, ACS
Omega 2018, 3, 12, 18917-24.
Previous research:
● ABX3
ultrasmall perovskites, where A
= Cs, MA (CH3
NH3
), B = Pb, Ge, Sn,
Ca, Sr and X = Cl, Br, I
●
Publication: A. Koliogiorgos et al, ACS
Omega 2018, 3, 12, 18917-24.
Continuation:
● FA (NH2
CNH2
) in place of MA (stable)
●
Larger sizes; convergence to
experimental QDs
Materials & initial structures
96 atoms
324 atoms
768 atoms
● FABX3
stoichiometry
●
B = Pb, Ge, Sn
●
X = Cl, Br, I
Computational approach
●
Problems:
– Big sizes (96 – 324 – 768 atoms; ~1 – 3 nm)
– Heavy atoms (I, Pb, …)
●
Limits of DFT computation ability
●
Combination of methods/functionals
●
Finite systems, real space
Computational approach
First optimization with tight binding (TB)
Fine tuning of geometry with GGA/DFT
Electronic ground states with hybrid DFT
Excited states with TDDFT
Computational approach
●
First optimization: tight-binding (TB), GFN-xTB code
GFN1-xTB
GFN2-xTB
•
S. Grimme, C. Bannwarth, P. Shushkov, J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 2017, 13(5), 1989-2009
•
C. Bannwarth, S. Ehlert, S. Grimme, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15(3), 1652-1671
Computational approach
●
Final geometry optimization
●
PBE functional, def2-SVP
basis set, ORCA software
●
Accurate geometry, gross
underestimation of gaps
Computational approach
●
Electronic ground states
●
PBE0 functional
●
Def2/SVP + def/J basis sets
●
Accurate HOMO-LUMO gaps
Computational approach
●
Electronic ground states
●
PBE0 functional
●
Def2/SVP + def/J (auxiliary) basis sets
●
Accurate HOMO-LUMO gaps
●
Excited states
●
sTD-DFT: fast, large deviations
●
Tamm-Dancoff Approximation: very close/same to full TDDFT,
method of choice
●
Wavefunctions from ground state, geometry from PBE
●
Absorption spectra, optical gap, exciton binding energy
Results
●
Smooth convergence to bulk
band gap
●
Exciton binding energy
(=HOMO-LUMO gap – Optical
gap): decreasing accordingly
with increasing size
●
Respective bulk gaps
calculated with PAW method +
PBC + HSE06 hybrid functional
(VASP code)
Results
●
Density of states
Results: HOMO-LUMO/optical gaps
System H-L gap (eV) Opt.gap (eV) Exb
(meV)
FAPbCl3
“2” 4.742 4.344 398
FAPbCl3
“3” 4.315 3.999 316
FAPbCl3
“4” 4.003 - -
FAPbBr3
“2” 4.217 3.747 470
FAPbBr3
“3” 3.755 3.367 388
FASnI3
“2” 2.864 2.456 408
FASnI3
“3” 2.412 2.099 313
FASnBr3
“2” 3.467 3.073 394
FASnBr3
“3” 2.550 2.271 279
FASnCl3
“2” 3.667 3.369 298
FASnCl3
“3” 2.992 2.797 195
System H-L gap (eV) Opt.gap (eV) Exb
(meV)
FAGeI3
“2” 3.105 2.671 434
FAGeI3
“3” 1.998 1.793 205
FAGeBr3
“2” 2.584 2.321 263
FAGeBr3
“3” 2.399 1.969 430
FAGeCl3
“2” 4.491 4.209 282
FAGeCl3
“3” 3.218 3.038 180
FASnI2
Cl “2” 3.856 3.302 554
•
“2”, “3”, “4”: sizes of 2, 3, or 4 B cations
per dimension (96, 324, 768 atoms resp.)
•
HOMO-LUMO gap calc. with PBE0
•
Optical gap calc. with TDA-TDDFT
Results: HOMO-LUMO/optical gaps
● FAGeX3
, X = Cl, Br, I
●
Size: 3 Ge/dimension
●
HOMO-LUMO and optical gaps
narrow as we move from
lighter to heavier halogen
● Exb
does not decrease the
same way; indicator for
applications (FAGeBr3
)
● FAGeI3
gaps: below 2 eV
Results: Absorption spectra
Results: Exciton binding E and absorption
• Higher Exb
correspond roughly to
higher optical absorption, with
notable exceptions
•
Promising case of mixed halide
QD FASnI2Cl, with very high Exb
.
Conclusions
●
Narrowing of gaps with increasing size and convergence to
bulk
●
Narrowing of gaps from lighter to heavier halogen
● Decrease of Exb with increasing size – exceptions
●
Redshift of absorption for increasing size
●
No rule for increase of absorption strength with increasing size
→ focus on cases of increase
●
Next: focus on suitable gaps, dipole moments and absorption
➔
Study of FRET
www.nano.cvut.cz

A DFT & TDDFT Study of Hybrid Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots

  • 1.
    A DFT &TDDFT study of Hybrid Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots Athanasios Koliogiorgos Advanced Materials Group Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
  • 2.
    Previous research: ● ABX3 ultrasmallperovskites, where A = Cs, MA (CH3 NH3 ), B = Pb, Ge, Sn, Ca, Sr and X = Cl, Br, I ● Publication: A. Koliogiorgos et al, ACS Omega 2018, 3, 12, 18917-24.
  • 3.
    Previous research: ● ABX3 ultrasmallperovskites, where A = Cs, MA (CH3 NH3 ), B = Pb, Ge, Sn, Ca, Sr and X = Cl, Br, I ● Publication: A. Koliogiorgos et al, ACS Omega 2018, 3, 12, 18917-24. Continuation: ● FA (NH2 CNH2 ) in place of MA (stable) ● Larger sizes; convergence to experimental QDs
  • 4.
    Materials & initialstructures 96 atoms 324 atoms 768 atoms ● FABX3 stoichiometry ● B = Pb, Ge, Sn ● X = Cl, Br, I
  • 5.
    Computational approach ● Problems: – Bigsizes (96 – 324 – 768 atoms; ~1 – 3 nm) – Heavy atoms (I, Pb, …) ● Limits of DFT computation ability ● Combination of methods/functionals ● Finite systems, real space
  • 6.
    Computational approach First optimizationwith tight binding (TB) Fine tuning of geometry with GGA/DFT Electronic ground states with hybrid DFT Excited states with TDDFT
  • 7.
    Computational approach ● First optimization:tight-binding (TB), GFN-xTB code GFN1-xTB GFN2-xTB • S. Grimme, C. Bannwarth, P. Shushkov, J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 2017, 13(5), 1989-2009 • C. Bannwarth, S. Ehlert, S. Grimme, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15(3), 1652-1671
  • 8.
    Computational approach ● Final geometryoptimization ● PBE functional, def2-SVP basis set, ORCA software ● Accurate geometry, gross underestimation of gaps
  • 9.
    Computational approach ● Electronic groundstates ● PBE0 functional ● Def2/SVP + def/J basis sets ● Accurate HOMO-LUMO gaps
  • 10.
    Computational approach ● Electronic groundstates ● PBE0 functional ● Def2/SVP + def/J (auxiliary) basis sets ● Accurate HOMO-LUMO gaps ● Excited states ● sTD-DFT: fast, large deviations ● Tamm-Dancoff Approximation: very close/same to full TDDFT, method of choice ● Wavefunctions from ground state, geometry from PBE ● Absorption spectra, optical gap, exciton binding energy
  • 11.
    Results ● Smooth convergence tobulk band gap ● Exciton binding energy (=HOMO-LUMO gap – Optical gap): decreasing accordingly with increasing size ● Respective bulk gaps calculated with PAW method + PBC + HSE06 hybrid functional (VASP code)
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Results: HOMO-LUMO/optical gaps SystemH-L gap (eV) Opt.gap (eV) Exb (meV) FAPbCl3 “2” 4.742 4.344 398 FAPbCl3 “3” 4.315 3.999 316 FAPbCl3 “4” 4.003 - - FAPbBr3 “2” 4.217 3.747 470 FAPbBr3 “3” 3.755 3.367 388 FASnI3 “2” 2.864 2.456 408 FASnI3 “3” 2.412 2.099 313 FASnBr3 “2” 3.467 3.073 394 FASnBr3 “3” 2.550 2.271 279 FASnCl3 “2” 3.667 3.369 298 FASnCl3 “3” 2.992 2.797 195 System H-L gap (eV) Opt.gap (eV) Exb (meV) FAGeI3 “2” 3.105 2.671 434 FAGeI3 “3” 1.998 1.793 205 FAGeBr3 “2” 2.584 2.321 263 FAGeBr3 “3” 2.399 1.969 430 FAGeCl3 “2” 4.491 4.209 282 FAGeCl3 “3” 3.218 3.038 180 FASnI2 Cl “2” 3.856 3.302 554 • “2”, “3”, “4”: sizes of 2, 3, or 4 B cations per dimension (96, 324, 768 atoms resp.) • HOMO-LUMO gap calc. with PBE0 • Optical gap calc. with TDA-TDDFT
  • 14.
    Results: HOMO-LUMO/optical gaps ●FAGeX3 , X = Cl, Br, I ● Size: 3 Ge/dimension ● HOMO-LUMO and optical gaps narrow as we move from lighter to heavier halogen ● Exb does not decrease the same way; indicator for applications (FAGeBr3 ) ● FAGeI3 gaps: below 2 eV
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Results: Exciton bindingE and absorption • Higher Exb correspond roughly to higher optical absorption, with notable exceptions • Promising case of mixed halide QD FASnI2Cl, with very high Exb .
  • 17.
    Conclusions ● Narrowing of gapswith increasing size and convergence to bulk ● Narrowing of gaps from lighter to heavier halogen ● Decrease of Exb with increasing size – exceptions ● Redshift of absorption for increasing size ● No rule for increase of absorption strength with increasing size → focus on cases of increase ● Next: focus on suitable gaps, dipole moments and absorption ➔ Study of FRET
  • 18.