Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byTKMG, Inc.
Value Stream Analysis: Beyond the Mechanics - Part 2 (Mapping Execution)
The document outlines a webinar focused on value stream analysis, emphasizing the mapping process and its significance in Lean transformation. Participants will learn to facilitate current and future state maps while recognizing key performance metrics and strategies for improving transformation plans. The session is led by Karen Martin, who provides insights into effective value stream mapping techniques and benefits for businesses.
In this document
Powered by AI
Webinar introduction on Value Stream Analysis, welcoming attendees from various countries, and outlining previous and future events.
Announcement of upcoming webinars on Value Stream Mapping, including details on learning objectives for effective facilitation and mapping processes.
Explanation of Value Stream concept, its importance in visualizing work processes, and benefits in revealing overall workflow.
Overview of the structure of basic current and future state value stream maps illustrating metrics such as lead time and process time.
Discussion on mapping levels, methods for creating current state maps, and the significance of effective process mapping details.
Steps to prepare for the current state mapping process, including information gathering, barriers to flow, and data collection techniques.
Focus on quantifying Work-In-Process (WIP), understanding lead vs. process time, and improving information flow quality metrics.
Establishing future state maps through defined steps, emphasizing ownership, KPIs, and execution plans for improvements.
Key success factors for effective execution of Value Stream Mapping, facilitation techniques, and contact information for further inquiries.
More Related Content
Similar to Value Stream Analysis: Beyond the Mechanics - Part 2 (Mapping Execution)
Value Stream Analysis: Beyond the Mechanics - Part 2 (Mapping Execution)
- 1. Value Stream Analysis: Beyondthe Mechanics (Part 2 of 3) Webinar January 21, 2014
- 2.
- 3. Coach / Facilitator / Consultant / Trainer: Lean transformation & business performance improvement in all industries. Teacher: University of California, San Diego Author & Speaker: Karen Martin, President The Karen Martin Group, Inc. www.ksmartin.com 2013 Shingo Prize winner! www.ksmartin.com/subscribe 3
- 4. Before the webinar… • The materials are available on: – www.ksmartin.com/files/webinarmaterials/01‐21‐ 2014_slides.pdf (or _handout.pdf) After the webinar… •Recordings: – – – – www.vimeo.com/karenmartingroup www.youtube.com/karenmartingroup www.slideshare.net/karenmartingroup www.ksmartin.com/webinars • Materials: – www.slideshare.net/karenmartingroup © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 4
- 5. More VSM Webinars! 11:00 am‐12:15 pm PT • Tuesday, February 18, 2014 – Value Stream Analysis: Beyond the Mechanics –Part 3 of 3 (Executing the Transformation Plan) – https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/154959186 • Thursday, March 27, 2014 – Value Stream Mapping: Case Studies – https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/288652530 If you missed Part 1: www.ksmartin.com/webinars or www.vimeo.com/karenmartingroup © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 5
- 6.
- 7. You will learn… • How to facilitate a two‐stage mapping process. • The importance of walking the value stream— even if you can't "see" the work. •Facilitation tips for constructing the current state map and designing the future state map. • Tips for successful briefings. © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 7
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12. Basic Value Stream Map: Future State 1 Customer IT interface Standard work Error proof IT-1 Crosstrain Modified approvals 2 Process 1 3 Crosstrain Process2 Function A 1 items IT-2 LT = 1 days PT = 10 mins. %C&A = 99% Process 3 Function C 5 items 5 4 Standard work Function E 10 items 3 LT = 2 days PT = 120 mins. %C&A = 95% 4 LT = 0.5 days PT = 30 mins. %C&A = 95% 1 days 2 days 0.5 days Total LT = 3.5 days 10 mins. 120 mins. 30 mins. Total PT = 160 mins. Activity Ratio = 9.5% Rolled %C&A = 89.3% © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 12
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16. Create the Current State Map: 5 Steps Prepare Understand Current State Design Future State Develop Transformation Plan Execute Transformation Plan 1. Value stream walk #1 2. Layout the map 3.Value stream walk #2 4. Add map details 5. Add timeline; calculate summary metrics 16
- 17. Value Stream Walk #1 • Purpose – To identify: –What? (Processes) • High level description of the work accomplished • Work received; work passed on • Aim for 5‐15 process blocks across the value stream – Who? (Functions involved) – When? (Sequence and handoffs) • • • • Avoid getting into the details Approach from a place of humility and curiosity Capture thoughts, but avoid problem solving Entire team walks & stays together © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 17
- 18.
- 19. Create the Current State Map: 5 Steps Prepare Understand Current State Design Future State Develop Transformation Plan Execute Transformation Plan 1. Value stream walk #1 2. Layout the map 3.Value stream walk #2 4. Add map details 5. Add timeline; calculate summary metrics 19
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23. Create the Current State Map: 5 Steps Prepare Understand Current State Design Future State Develop Transformation Plan Execute Transformation Plan 1. Value stream walk #1 2. Layout the map 3.Value stream walk #2 4. Add map details 5. Add timeline; calculate summary metrics 23
- 24. 2nd Walk ‐ Gain a Deeper Understanding •Work input & output; trigger; prioritization • 3 key metrics for each process block: – Process Time (PT) – Lead Time (LT) – Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A) • WIP – quantity of work‐in‐process (queued work) • Information flow; IT Systems used • Significant barriers to flow – Batching, system downtime, inaccessible resources, long setup, etc. • # of people who do the work (if relevant) 24
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31. Create the Current State Map: 5 Steps Prepare Understand Current State Design Future State Develop Transformation Plan Execute Transformation Plan 1. Value stream walk #1 2. Layout the map 3.Value stream walk #2 4. Add map details 5. Add timeline; calculate summary metrics 31
- 32.
- 33. Create the Current State Map: 5 Steps Prepare Understand Current State Design Future State Develop Transformation Plan Execute Transformation Plan 1. Value stream walk #1 2. Layout the map 3.Value stream walk #2 4. Add map details 5. Add timeline; calculate summary metrics 33
- 34.
- 35. Golden State Equipment, Inc. Capital Equipment Value Stream Metric Current State Timeline PT Projected% Improvement 46.0 hours* Timeline LT Projected Future State 44.0 days* LT – RFQ (CS blocks 2-4) LT – PO-Dev (CS blocks 6-10) Activity Ratio (full value stream) Rolled %C&A 11 days 27 days 13.1% 4.8% * Specify whether business hours or clock hours; whether business days or calendar days. ** Based on 1,000 orders per year and 1,950 available work hours per employee per year. © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 35
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
- 39. Value Stream MappingCharter Scope Accountable Parties Logistics Executive Allen Ward Sponsor Value Stream Capital equipment Specific Engineer to order, requires both hardware & Conditions software customization Event Dates July 24-26, 2013 & Times 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Value Stream Nancy Little Champion Demand Rate 1,000 per year Base-camp Surf's Up - Room A Location Facilitator Dave Parks Trigger Customer submits RFQ First Step Sales reviews the RFQ Logistics Dave Parks Coordinator Last Step Production ships product Boundaries & No new software; only minor changes to existing IT Limitations systems; no additional staff; no budget changes Meals Continential breakfast & lunch Provided Briefing ** Allen W (COO), Joe M (CIO), Attendees Sal T (VP Sales) ** required * Bruce R (VP Ops), Carlos P *optional (HR), Su T (CFO), Bill M (VP CS) Improvement Time Future state design is fully realized by Frame December 31, 2013. Current State Problems & Business Needs Briefing July 24, 25, & 26 Dates & 4:00-5:00 pm Times Mapping Team 1 Desire to stay ahead of the competition & deepen customer loyalty. Function / Title Name 2 Forecasted growth of 15% for next fiscal year. 1 Sales, Director Sean Michaels 3 Unclear & incorrect information flowing through value stream. 2 IT, Director Diana Marie 4 Lead time for RFQ turnaround = 2 weeks; PO to software dev = 5 weeks 3 Finance, Controller Dave Gerald 5 (Competition's RFQ LT is 1 wk and PO to delivery is 4 wks) 4 Scrum Master Ryan Austin 5 Engineering, Vice President Nancy Little 1 Reduce RFQ lead time by a minimum of 50%. 6 Manufacturing, Director Ambreen Motiwala 2 Reduce PO to software development lead time by a minimum of 50%. 7 Customer Service, Manager Danny Tran 3 Improve quality of information flowing throughout value stream. 8 Customer (contract manufacturer) Contact Information JR Hunt Goals & Measurable Target Conditions 4 9 5 10 Benefits to Customers & Business On-Call Support 1 Faster delivery; less hassle; less cost. Function Name 2 Better working relationships between sales, estimating & engineering. 1 Planning / Purchasing, Planner Lourdes Dwyer 3 Freed capacity to absorb additional business w/o increasing staff. 2 Production Supervisor 4 Contact Information 3 5 Tom St. James 4 Relevant Data Agreement 1 Sales effectiveness: RFQ conversion rate. Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion Facilitator 2 Financial: Estimate-to-actual cost comparison. 3 Operational: LT in segments (RFQ to quote; PO to development). Signature: Signature: Signature: 4 Date: Date: Date: © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 39
- 40.
- 41.
- 42. Golden State Equipment, Inc. Capital Equipment Value Stream Current State Projected Future State Projected% Improvement Timeline PT 46.0 hours 34.3 hrs 25.4% Timeline LT 44.0 days 23.0 days 47.7% 11 days 7 days 36% 27 days 9 days 67% 13.1% 18.6% 42% 4.8% 53.4% 1,013% Metric LT – RFQ (CS blocks 2-4) LT – PO-Dev (CS blocks 6-10) Activity Ratio (full value stream) Rolled %C&A © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 42
- 43. Create the Future State Map: 5 Steps Prepare Understand Current State Design Future State Develop Transformation Plan Execute Transformation Plan 1. Determine the “right work” 2. Make the right work flow 3.Manage the right work Ownership KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) Visual Management Frequency of Improvement 43
- 44.
- 45.
- 46. Value Stream TransformationPlan Value Stream Outpatient Imaging Scheduled Review Dates Executive Sponsor Allen Ward Value Stream Champion Paul Scanner Value Stream Mapping Facilitator Dave Parks 1-Nov-12 21-Nov-12 13-Dec-12 Date Created 10/18/2012 FS VSM Block # Measurable Target 10-Jan-13 Proposed Countermeasure Exec. Method* Owner Improve quality of referral to 85% Implement standard work for referral process KE Cross-train and co-locate work teams Proj Only one check in per patient Collect copays in Imaging KE Reduce wait time in waiting area by 50% Balance work / level demand KE Eliminate 6 hour lead time associated with transcription step Implement voice recognition technology Proj Eliminate redundant data entry Auto populate between PACS and Meditech Proj Visually managed inventory; no outages or expired items 5S CT supplies area; implement kanban KE Reduce imaging LT to one hour Value-stream specific radiologists Proj Reduce report delivery LT to 30 minutes Increase % of physicians receiving electronic delivery Proj Reduce LT at image review to 1 day Visual metrics and indicators JDI 9 10 11 12 Status Martha Allen 7 8 Martha Allen 8 7 Michael O'Shea 6 6 Dave Gerald 5 5 Dave Gerald 7 4 Dianne Marie 6 3 Ryan Austin 4 2 Dianne Marie 4 1 Sean Michaels Reduce lead time between scheduling and preregistration step to 45 minutes Planned Timeline for Execution Dave Gerald 2 3,4 Agreement Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion Value Stream Mapping Facilitator Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: * Execution Method = JDI (Just-do-it), KE (Kaizen Event), or Proj (Project) © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 46
- 47. Value Stream Mapping Execution: Key Success Factors • • • • Whenever possible, walk the value stream. Use “the big 3” key metrics. Hold daily briefings. Facilitation techniques: – The fine line between letting the team go “off script” and sticking with a rigid agenda. – Use “count down” technique. –Stimulate innovation – Why? Why not? What if? – Refer back to the charter to keep the team focused. – Teach in the moment as needed. – Allow and/or stimulate “spirited conversation.” © 2014 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 47
- 48.
- 49.