Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Dumb cities – a “better tomorrow” for Rome?Davide Gallino for #IDCAMP – Viterbo 20 - 22 July 2012tviproject [at] gmail.com
Summary•   Smart cities (SM) vs Dumb cities (DC)•   Dumb cities: not just dumb but mean, too•   Examples, metrics for eval...
Dumb cities                              While not an Italian specialty, many                               Italian cities...
MOBILITY ISSUES
Public transport in Rome                           28 : 72                                 Private (motor) transport      ...
Italy has three of the first 10 most           congested cities in Europe25 most congested cities in EU             10 mos...
Metrics for “congestion”• In the US, the assumed number of annual commute  trips is assumed at 440 – equivalent to traveli...
How to measure• Sensor network for air/noise pollution, water,  traffic, waste• Cooperative sensing:  – Wedu + other apps ...
However, monitoring does not necessarily trigger                    action   Key roads around Rome monitored since 2005! A...
WASTE MANAGEMENT
NO CURATION = NIMBY
Wien Energie Fernwärme Spittelauer          Lände 45 1090
Tele-heating and energy from waste in           an urban context• Spittelau - in Downtown Vienna• Public, real time monito...
Major obstacles to overcome for successful       Smart City implementations (Source: IDC)• Key inhibitors are city governa...
Worrysome facts in building smart cities• Big players (large companies) are driving the process –  can they produce real i...
From dumber to smarter:    need for a vision
Smart city – definition, Italian agency for the digitalization of public                                 administration•  ...
Traditional notion:           http://www.smart-cities.eu/model.html• A Smart City is a city well  performing in 6  charact...
Which targets for a smart city?•   The European definition of smart city     •   At the World City Summit in    comes from...
In other words:
La città - piattaformaBologna 29-31 ottobre 2012
Governance
From relabel to reliable• Turin has renamed its Environmental agency  into a "Smart City Torino Foundation for  Sustainabl...
Downtown Torino
Co design
Data vs assumption: key to co-design• Hertfordshire county decided to turn off 70% of public lighting between  Midnight an...
Lighting modulation map
Density models (Milano)• Provide data on density  of a specific phenomena• In this map: number of  new regular jobs in the...
Universal design approaches• UDA comes from willingness to facilitate use  of phisycal space for disabled users• UDA set o...
Bring your own garbage: an example          of well applied UDACo-mingled system for separatewaste in Pisa                ...
Translate small ideas into some form                of concrete action.Experience showed that online and offline suggestio...
Social network of sensors+humans
Current issues - Rome• “Urban development in Rome is a jungle”• Any Municipality (Comune) has a big conflict of  interest ...
The way forward – a smarter Rome• Strategic plan + stop using property development  fees (Oneri di urbanizzazione) for cur...
Smart: Ensure continuity of administrative processes -• Will the current local administration of Rome  participate in the ...
Need for a White knight?            • You/we are the white              knights, I’m afraid….            • Let’s make 1, 1...
Dumb cities davide gallino #idcamp, smart cities, Rome, Roma, smart mobility
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Dumb cities davide gallino #idcamp, smart cities, Rome, Roma, smart mobility

1,091 views

Published on

Indigeni Digitali #idcamp, July 21, 2012. Speech on Dumb cities (as opposed to smart cities) and real life examples of using co-design to move from dumber to smarter. Focus on Rome, Italy, with examples from Vienna, Turin, Pisa etc.

Published in: Design, Technology, Real Estate
  • Be the first to comment

Dumb cities davide gallino #idcamp, smart cities, Rome, Roma, smart mobility

  1. 1. Dumb cities – a “better tomorrow” for Rome?Davide Gallino for #IDCAMP – Viterbo 20 - 22 July 2012tviproject [at] gmail.com
  2. 2. Summary• Smart cities (SM) vs Dumb cities (DC)• Dumb cities: not just dumb but mean, too• Examples, metrics for evaluation• From dumber to smarter – Vision and political commitment + white knight + roadmap + technologies + social interaction = success• If there is no white knight, let’s make one, ten, a hundred? By co-design
  3. 3. Dumb cities While not an Italian specialty, many Italian cities are just dumb, non cooperative communities. The sheer sense of individualism that typifies old as well as modern Italians does not help, too. Someone has pointed out that Italy has a problem ofCan cooperative design, abudance (in terms of itsshared rules and public huge cultural, historical funds help? and landscape heritage), which does not incentivize fruition Sometimes, there is an Technology can help address abusive behaviour of those some issues, but (private or public bodies) in commitment, a vision and charge, coupled with very roadmaps are paramount for short-sighted approaches to success “development”
  4. 4. MOBILITY ISSUES
  5. 5. Public transport in Rome 28 : 72 Private (motor) transport • London 50-50 • Paris 64-36 • Berlin 66-44 • Barça 67-32
  6. 6. Italy has three of the first 10 most congested cities in Europe25 most congested cities in EU 10 most congested cities in Italy and hrs wasted in congestion (in addition to average commuting time) 1. Milano, Italia 2. Bruxelles, Belgio 3. Anversa, Belgio 1.Milano: 59 hrs, worst slot = FRI 19:00-20:00 4. Parigi, Francia 5. Manchester, Regno Unito 6. Rotterdam, Paesi Bassi 2.Roma: 41 hrs , worst slot = FRI 17:00-18:00 7. Roma, Italia 8. Londra, Regno Unito 3.Firenze: 36 hrs , worst slot = THU 19:00-20:00 9. Utrecht, Paesi Bassi 10. Firenze, Italia 4.Palermo: 29 hrs , worst slot = MON 10:00- 11. Liverpool, Regno Unito 12. Barcellona, Spagna 13. Madrid, Spagna 11:00 14. Gent, Belgio 15. Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi 5.Torino: 28 hrs worst slot = TUE 7:00-8:00 16. Belfast, Irlanda del Nord 17. Stoccarda, Germania 6.Genova: 28 hrs , worst slot = THU 7:00-8:00 18. Colonia, Germania 19. Lione, Francia 20. Bordeaux, Francia 7.Verona: 28 hrs , worst slot = TUE 6:00-7:00 21. Amburgo, Germania 22. Newcastle, Regno Unito 8.Napoli: 27 hrs , worst slot = FRI 19:00-20:00 23. Nottingham, Regno Unito 24. Sevilla, Spagna 25. S. Gravenhage, Paesi Bassi 9.Brescia: 25 hrs, worst slot = THU 7.00-8.00 10.Catania: 24 hrs = FRI 18:00-19:00 (Source: INRIX Traffic Scorecard 2012)
  7. 7. Metrics for “congestion”• In the US, the assumed number of annual commute trips is assumed at 440 – equivalent to traveling to and from work 5 days a week for 44 weeks. “Wasted Hour” Estimates are annualized and to create a monthly estimate of wasted hours, the annual result is divided by 12.• In Europe and Canada, government published trip time estimates are used where credible and aligning with the metropolitan areas being analyzed. Otherwise a 30 minute trip time is used.• Source: Inrix traffic scorecard, 2012
  8. 8. How to measure• Sensor network for air/noise pollution, water, traffic, waste• Cooperative sensing: – Wedu + other apps for civic use – Crowdsourcing traffic byGoogle
  9. 9. However, monitoring does not necessarily trigger action Key roads around Rome monitored since 2005! And possibly well before that
  10. 10. WASTE MANAGEMENT
  11. 11. NO CURATION = NIMBY
  12. 12. Wien Energie Fernwärme Spittelauer Lände 45 1090
  13. 13. Tele-heating and energy from waste in an urban context• Spittelau - in Downtown Vienna• Public, real time monitoring of emissions:• This is curation, i.e.putting citizens in the comfort zone, not “technology”.
  14. 14. Major obstacles to overcome for successful Smart City implementations (Source: IDC)• Key inhibitors are city governance and cross-domain collaboration, budgets and funding processes, long- term political will, and the democratic process).• How to form an effective Smart City process and what group(s) should oversee these initiatives? Is it the CIOs office? The city council or Mayors office? A new Smart Cities office? What is the most effective department to move cities towards collaboration across silos?• How are Smart Cities sustained? How do cities maintain citizen engagement in the projects and maintain sustainable behaviors? How is a Smart City culture created and institutionalized so that it can last even as elected officials change?
  15. 15. Worrysome facts in building smart cities• Big players (large companies) are driving the process – can they produce real innovation to the benefit of citizens? Are their systems open and interoperable? Can public administrations stay ahead of the curve?• Big companies complain that research and development funds (such as the ongoing MIUR calls) are not meant to sustain demand they have already developed products, now they need early adopters to reach critical mass)• Often plans are well structured, but not implemented: take the Traffic master plan (PUT) in Rome (last updated in 2005!)
  16. 16. From dumber to smarter: need for a vision
  17. 17. Smart city – definition, Italian agency for the digitalization of public administration• Smart city -”città intelligente”. Una città può essere definita “smart” quando gli investimenti in capitale umano, sociale e in infrastrutture tradizionali e ICT, producono uno sviluppo economico sostenibile migliorando al contempo la qualità della vita degli abitanti. Una smart city è quindi uno spazio urbano, ben diretto da una politica lungimirante, che affronta la sfida che la globalizzazione e la crisi economica pongono in termini di competitività e di sviluppo sostenibile, con un’attenzione particolare alla coesione sociale, alla diffusione e disponibilità della conoscenza, alla creatività, alla libertà e mobilità effettivamente fruibile, alla qualità dell’ambiente naturale e culturale. Gli assi su cui si sviluppano le azioni di una Smart City sono molteplici: mobilità, ambiente ed energia, qualità edilizia, economia e capacità di attrazione di talenti e investimenti, partecipazione e coinvolgimento dei cittadini. Condizioni indispensabili sono una connettività diffusa e la digitalizzazione delle comunicazioni e dei servizi….• Source: Documento di consultazione pubblica per le amministrazioni – Digit PA – July 2012• IS THIS DEFINITION REALLY SUITABLE FOR A ROADMAP?
  18. 18. Traditional notion: http://www.smart-cities.eu/model.html• A Smart City is a city well performing in 6 characteristics, built on the ‘smart’ combination of endowments and activities of self-decisive, independent and aware citizens.• Source: SmartCities.eu 2007
  19. 19. Which targets for a smart city?• The European definition of smart city • At the World City Summit in comes from the SETIS project – Singapore,(July 2012), as pointed out Strategic Energy Technologies by IDC: Information System - and is focussing • “ Economic growth, urban on energy issues from consumption revitalization and livable cities are all to efficiency key goals for city leaders, though the priorities and steps to meet these• In Italy there are different goals vary by region and city”. approaches and examples, which I would call “holistic” (vs. targeted): • “Some cities focus on crime, transportation, or disaster• [Milano] la “realizzazione di un management (a key topic, not modello di città intelligente specifico surprisingly, for Japanese Mayors) or rispetto alle risorse nazionali: il other areas”. patrimonio culturale, i centri storici, le città di media dimensione, il • “Water was a key priority area turismo, specifici modelli di coesione throughout the Summit ,including sociale….”. water conservancy, water quality, flooding, drainage and sewage”.
  20. 20. In other words:
  21. 21. La città - piattaformaBologna 29-31 ottobre 2012
  22. 22. Governance
  23. 23. From relabel to reliable• Turin has renamed its Environmental agency into a "Smart City Torino Foundation for Sustainable Development“, with the aim of developing an integrated model for flexible financing and management of strategic planning.• Turin also initiated the construction of a platform for Smart City to Turin, from experience and from the indications emerging from TAPE (Turin Action Plan for Energy).
  24. 24. Downtown Torino
  25. 25. Co design
  26. 26. Data vs assumption: key to co-design• Hertfordshire county decided to turn off 70% of public lighting between Midnight and 6 AM• Citizen survey to identify areas where lighting can be modulated• More patrols + information to population• Results – No impact on crime rate – No increase of road accidents Estimated cut in emissions and budget: 30%
  27. 27. Lighting modulation map
  28. 28. Density models (Milano)• Provide data on density of a specific phenomena• In this map: number of new regular jobs in the first 6 months of 2011. High resolution down to a single building. (Source: lavoce.info)
  29. 29. Universal design approaches• UDA comes from willingness to facilitate use of phisycal space for disabled users• UDA set out a high minimum standard for engagement. This is making services better for everyone, by thinking through the needs of the most demanding ‘extreme’ users of physical spaces.• Can be applied to most services, not just spaces!
  30. 30. Bring your own garbage: an example of well applied UDACo-mingled system for separatewaste in Pisa Pisa ti differenzia• Pisa incentivizes waste sorting by citizen• Discounts on waste collection tax based on a point system• Savings from reduced expenditure in sorting are passed on to citizen (up to 30% of total tax, 208 € saved for larger families)
  31. 31. Translate small ideas into some form of concrete action.Experience showed that online and offline suggestion boxes do not work –people need to see, quite quickly, how their idea is being incorporated into thedesign of a solution that is relevant to them.The Ei je een idee ‘egg’ in the streets made it clear that a suggestion forimproving things would not fall on deaf ears, or into the bottom of a‘suggestion box’, but that someone – even if it is an egg – would hear it and dosomething with it.
  32. 32. Social network of sensors+humans
  33. 33. Current issues - Rome• “Urban development in Rome is a jungle”• Any Municipality (Comune) has a big conflict of interest as long as they can use up to 75% of land conversion and property development fees (It. = oneri di urbanizzazione) for current expenses = lead to underinvested cities!• The Urban master plan dictates future developments of any “smart application”, starting with mobility plans.• I.e. (Metro lines cannot chase low density areas)
  34. 34. The way forward – a smarter Rome• Strategic plan + stop using property development fees (Oneri di urbanizzazione) for current expenses• Roadmap and deadlines• Clear cut responsibilities: governance 2.0?• Participation of many, but also better stakeholders (Public/private/universities)• Inclusion of citizens• Social innovation• Co-design
  35. 35. Smart: Ensure continuity of administrative processes -• Will the current local administration of Rome participate in the calls for european and national funds for smart cities?• Time is running :• MIUR – smart cities bid – deadline 17 november 2012;• European Innovation Partnership: Launch of the Smart Cities and Communities Call for Proposals deadline: 4 december 2012
  36. 36. Need for a White knight? • You/we are the white knights, I’m afraid…. • Let’s make 1, 10, 100 of them!

×