Successfully reported this slideshow.

Update on the 2005 Edutools LOR Review Project

0

Share

Loading in …3
×
1 of 19
1 of 19

Update on the 2005 Edutools LOR Review Project

0

Share

Download to read offline

Presentation given at WCET 2005 (San Francisco) on the partner project to investigate 6 new LORs (cf. http://www.edutools.info/static.jsp?pj=8&page=LOR). Includes an update on the 'state of LOR adoption'

Presentation given at WCET 2005 (San Francisco) on the partner project to investigate 6 new LORs (cf. http://www.edutools.info/static.jsp?pj=8&page=LOR). Includes an update on the 'state of LOR adoption'

More Related Content

Related Books

Free with a 14 day trial from Scribd

See all

Update on the 2005 Edutools LOR Review Project

  1. 1. LORs – Picking a Winner in the Software Derby Bruce Landon, Scott Leslie, Andrea Eastman-Mullins, Phil Moss November 4, 2005
  2. 2. Outline <ul><li>Overview of Project - Bruce </li></ul><ul><li>State of Play in LORs - Scott </li></ul><ul><li>Possible approaches and common features - Scott </li></ul><ul><li>Update from UNC System – Andrea </li></ul><ul><li>Update from Oklahoma State Regents - Phil </li></ul>
  3. 3. LO/LORs on the Gartner Hype Cycle 2004 We were here
  4. 4. Maturity of Problem LORs address <ul><li>LORs getting better at defining the problem they are trying to solve </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Is it discovery and sharing of resources? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is it the management of content development? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is it the facilitation of content re-use? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is it the creation of communities of practitioners? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is it the archiving of learning materials? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is it the ingestion and re-composition of complex multimedia objects? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>All of the above? </li></ul></ul>2005 2004
  5. 5. Maturity of LOR Market <ul><li>The market for learning object repository technology is very immature and has some fundamental risks involved </li></ul><ul><ul><li>unclear how large a market there will ever be for repository technology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>vendors are trying to amortize their R&D efforts across too few customers and too short a period leading to hefty licensing prices considering the actual technology involved </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>if the problem is expanded to include the LCMS field, it becomes a broader and deeper market, but pricing for corporate-style LCMS out of line with higher ed expectations and abilities to pay </li></ul></ul>2004
  6. 6. LOR Market Maturing…Slowly <ul><li>While the market for learning object repository technology is still quite immature </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Had a number large RFPs and purchases occur over the last 12 months </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>UNAM system in Mexico – 1million+ seats for Harvest Road </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Flordia Virtual School System – also Harvest Road </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>JISC JORUM Repository – UK-wide - Intrallect </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>BC/Alberta RFP – The Learning Edge </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Starting to see some leaders emerge and certain different approaches to sharing/re-use problem (DAM, LCMS, LOR, IR) </li></ul></ul>2005
  7. 7. LO/LORs on the Gartner Hype Cycle 2005!
  8. 8. Some phenomena shaping directions of LORs <ul><li>Service Oriented Architecture/Approaches </li></ul><ul><li>Modularization </li></ul><ul><li>E-Learning Frameworks </li></ul><ul><li>Course Management Systems </li></ul><ul><li>Peer-to-Peer Computing </li></ul><ul><li>‘Social Software’ </li></ul>
  9. 9. Seeing some evolution from ‘Repository as Application’…
  10. 10. To ‘Repository as Service and Application’
  11. 11. Types of Repository Approaches we’ve seen in Edutools project <ul><li>‘ Referatories’ </li></ul><ul><li>‘ Classic’ Repository </li></ul><ul><li>Learning Content Management System </li></ul><ul><li>Generic Content Management System </li></ul><ul><li>Digital Asset Management </li></ul><ul><li>Institutional Repository </li></ul><ul><li>Repository as part of Course Management vendor solution </li></ul><ul><li>Repository as “Service” </li></ul>
  12. 12. <ul><li>We found that the defining characteristics of these systems, in terms of widespread feature support, were: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Support for searching and browsing of records </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Metatagging tools, and standards-based schema support </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Support for federation and harvesting </li></ul></ul>2004
  13. 13. <ul><li>2005, we found that the defining characteristics of these systems, in terms of widespread feature support, were: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Support for searching and browsing of records </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Metatagging tools, and standards-based schema support </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Support for federation and harvesting </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More support for content packaging and aggregation, content management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Increased support for syndication, and notification </li></ul></ul>
  14. 14. <ul><li>Overall, we found support lacking for the following features across all of the products: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Syndication and Notification </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Community & Evaluation features (e.g. evaluation system, wish lists and context of usage illustrators) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Time-based Media support </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Content Aggregation and Packaging tool </li></ul></ul>2004
  15. 15. <ul><li>In 2005, generally we found support lacking for the following features across all of the products: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Time-based Media support </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>XML Content Supports </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>DRM, specifically Payment and Fulfillment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>User Profiles </li></ul></ul>
  16. 16. 6 Products <ul><li>CWIS - Collection Workflow Integration System </li></ul><ul><li>Fedora - Flexible Extensible Digital Object and Repository Architecture </li></ul><ul><li>COL-LOR </li></ul><ul><li>Blackboard Content System </li></ul><ul><li>Desire2Learn Repository </li></ul><ul><li>The Learning Edge </li></ul>
  17. 17. Edutools Research Results <ul><li>More details available at </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.edutools.info/lor/ </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. The University of North Carolina TLT Collaborative “ How can we do more together in teaching and learning with technology?”
  19. 19. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education

Editor's Notes

×