Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

PowerPoint Multimedia Presentations in Computer Science Education: What do Users Need?

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
  Multimedia presentation
Multimedia presentation
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 21 Ad

PowerPoint Multimedia Presentations in Computer Science Education: What do Users Need?

Download to read offline

Presentation given at USAB 2008, Fourth International Symposium on Usability and HCI for Education and Work, Graz, Austria, November 2008

ABSTRACT: PowerPoint is one of the most frequently used tools to present multimedia for educational purposes. Nevertheless, little is known about the users' needs when using PowerPoint during lecturing. Our study focused on the presenter's needs in this context of use. We interviewed nine university lecturers from the computer science department by means of a questionnaire. The results show that users require features that are not yet realised with PowerPoint. For example, the control and use of other media should be adequately integrated. Or the navigation within the slide collection should be improved to better meet the users' needs. Based on our findings, we outline required system features and suggest solutions in form of a prototype.

Presentation given at USAB 2008, Fourth International Symposium on Usability and HCI for Education and Work, Graz, Austria, November 2008

ABSTRACT: PowerPoint is one of the most frequently used tools to present multimedia for educational purposes. Nevertheless, little is known about the users' needs when using PowerPoint during lecturing. Our study focused on the presenter's needs in this context of use. We interviewed nine university lecturers from the computer science department by means of a questionnaire. The results show that users require features that are not yet realised with PowerPoint. For example, the control and use of other media should be adequately integrated. Or the navigation within the slide collection should be improved to better meet the users' needs. Based on our findings, we outline required system features and suggest solutions in form of a prototype.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (20)

More from Beat Signer (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

PowerPoint Multimedia Presentations in Computer Science Education: What do Users Need?

  1. 1. PowerPoint Multimedia Presentations in Computer Science Education What Do Users Need? Elke I. Reuss, Beat Signer and Moira C. Norrie http://www.beatsigner.com Institute for Information Systems, ETH Zurich 8092 Zurich, Switzerland USAB 2008, November 21
  2. 2. Motivation  PowerPoint is one of the most commonly used presentation tools  Little is known about user needs for delivering lectures with PowerPoint  Our goal: investigate these user needs and develop an enhanced PowerPoint based presentation tool USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  3. 3. Study Design  9 computer science faculty members, age 25-62  ETH Zurich and University of Zurich  Method  structured interviews (on average 37 minutes)  collected a sample presentation from each participant  Questions  status quo of PowerPoint in lectures  does PowerPoint satisfy the user needs or what additional functionality is desired USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  4. 4. Results Setup  Hardware  laptop (n=8) and tablet PC (n=1)  pointing device: laser pointer (n=7) or stick (n=1)  remote control (n=6)  Software  PowerPoint 2007 (n=4), PowerPoint 2004 (n=1) and PowerPoint 2003 (n=4)  All participants use PowerPoint since more than 7 years USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  5. 5. Results Content and Organisation 100 90  all participants sort the 80 slides in the order they 70 intend to present them 60 Measure 50  most participants (n=8) 40 30 access the slides in a 20 linear order 10 0 min SL ID max mean SL ID SL ID _ _ _ MIN AX AN M ME number of slides Trial USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  6. 6. Results Content and Organisation … % 100 90  most participants (n=8) 80 use extra slides 70  filed at the end (n=6) 60 Measure 50  filed as hidden slide (n=2) 40  stored in separate file (n=2) 30 20 10 0 text TEXT formulas GRAPH FORM graphics Trial type of content USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  7. 7. Results Presenting Information  All participants like to move around during a presentation  Most participants use additional types of media  black-/whiteboard (n=9)  overhead slides (n=7)  videos (n=6)  software/application demos (n=2)  flipcharts (n=1) USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  8. 8. Implications Feature Description F01 Highlight and annotate slide content F02 Use blank "sheets" F03 Use video controls F04 Use system mobile F05 Orientate efficiently within slide collection F06 See content of current and nearby slides USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  9. 9. PaperPoint  Interactive PowerPoint paper handouts  Mobile presentation tool (F04)  Based on  Anoto's Digital Pen and Paper technology  iServer/iPaper platform USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  10. 10. Digital Pen and Paper  Pattern license and camera technology offered by Anoto  virtual paper space of 60 million km2  Pen manufacturers  Nokia  Maxell  Adapx  Livescribe USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  11. 11. PaperPoint Architecture USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  12. 12. Authoring of Handout Templates USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  13. 13. PaperPoint Prototype (F05 and F06) USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  14. 14. Structure (F05) USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  15. 15. Navigational and Video Controls (F03) USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  16. 16. Pointer and Annotation Controls (F1) USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  17. 17. Interactive Note Sheets (F02) USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  18. 18. Other PaperPoint Features  Support for multiple pens  collaborative presentations  brainstorming sessions  Recording and replay of entire presentations  Digital and physical customisation of PaperPoint handout layout  General PaperPoint interface  integration of other presentation tools (e.g. Keynote) USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  19. 19. Conclusions  Investigation of user needs for "PowerPoint lecturing"  features F01-F06  Interactive paper-based PaperPoint prototype (addressing F01-F06)  Future work: evaluation of PaperPoint prototype USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  20. 20. Further Information  Interactive Paper and Augmented Reality  http://wise.vub.ac.be/content/interactive-paper-and- augmented-reality  Beat Signer and Moira C. Norrie, PaperPoint: A Paper- Based Presentation and Interactive Paper Prototyping Tool, Proceedings of TEI 2007, Baton Rouge, USA, February 2007  Beat Signer, Fundamental Concepts for Interactive Paper and Cross-Media Information Spaces, ISBN 978- 3-8370-2713-6, May 2008 USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be
  21. 21. Further Information …  Elke I. Reuss, Beat Signer and Moira C. Norrie, PowerPoint Multimedia Presentations in Computer Science Education: What Do Users Need?, Proceedings of USAB 2008, 4th Symposium on Usability & HCI for Education and Work, Graz, Austria, November 2008 USAB 2008, November 21 Beat Signer, bsigner@vub.ac.be

Editor's Notes

×