Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Network-Growth Rule Dependence of Fractal Dimension of Percolation Cluster on Square Lattice

8,666 views

Published on

Our paper entitled “Network-Growth Rule Dependence of Fractal Dimension of Percolation Cluster on Square Lattice" was published in Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. This work was done in collaboration with Dr. Ryo Tamura (NIMS).
http://journals.jps.jp/doi/abs/10.7566/JPSJ.82.053002

NIMSの田村亮さんとの共同研究論文 “Network-Growth Rule Dependence of Fractal Dimension of Percolation Cluster on Square Lattice" が Journal of the Physical Society of Japan に掲載されました。
http://journals.jps.jp/doi/abs/10.7566/JPSJ.82.053002

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Network-Growth Rule Dependence of Fractal Dimension of Percolation Cluster on Square Lattice

  1. 1. Network-Growth Rule Dependence of Fractal Dimension of Percolation Cluster on Square Lattice Shu Tanaka and Ryo Tamura Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 82, 053002 (2013)
  2. 2. Main Results We studied percolation transition behavior in a network growth model. We focused on network-growth rule dependenceR.of J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82 (2013) 053002 L S. T and T percolation cluster geometry. Person-to-person distribution by the author only. Not permitted for publication for institutional repositories or on personal Web sites. ETTERS ANAKA AMURA (b) 1 5 5 1 1 5 1 2.00 5 5 (a) 5 1 1 1 1 1.95 5 3 3 3 3 1 np 104 2 2 1 1 10 2 10 Rp 3 10 10 1 2 10 Rp 1 3 10 10 2 10 Rp 3 10 101 2 10 Rp 3 10 101 2 10 Rp 1 3 10 10 2 10 Rp 10 3 2 4 2 1 1.85 3 4 1 4 4 2 2 2 -1 4 4 2 1 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 4 5 2 5 3 3 4 5 3 3 3 random 2 inverse 2 Achlioptas 2 2 10-6 10-4 10-2 1 3 3 3 À5 À2 Fig. 5. (Color online) (a) (Upper panels) Snapshots at the percolation point for q ¼ À1 (inverse Achlioptas rule), À10 , 0 (random rule), 10 , 10 , and þ1 (Achlioptas rule) from left to right. The dark and light points depict elements in the percolation cluster and in the second-largest cluster, respectively. (Lower panels) Number of elements in the percolation cluster np as a function of gyradius Rp for corresponding q. The dotted lines are obtained by least-squares estimation using Eq. (2) and the fractal dimensions D are displayed in the bottom right corner. (b) q-dependence of fractal dimension. The dotted lines indicate the fractal dimensions for q ¼ þ1 (Achlioptas rule), q ¼ 0 (random rule), and q ¼ À1 (inverse Achlioptas rule) from top to bottom. 2 1 4 2 1 2 4 2 1 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 1 - A generalized network-growth rule was constructed. 4 4 4 q À2 2 4 4 2 -10-2 -10-4 -10-6 4 2 1 5 4 2 6 6 4 1 6 4 3 1.90 1 10 5 10 3 3 106 3 6 6 5 Achlioptas 5 5 5 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - As the speed of growth increases, the roughness parameter of conventional self-similar structure. The upper panels of In this study we focused on the case of a two-dimensional percolation the percolation cluster and the Fig. 5(a) show snapshots of cluster decreases.square lattice. To investigate the relation between the spatial second-largest cluster at the percolation point for q ¼ À1 (inverse Achlioptas rule), À10À2 , 0 (random rule), 10À5 , 10À2 , and þ1 (Achlioptas rule) from left to right. The corresponding gyradius dependence of np is shown in the lower panels of Fig. 5(a), which are obtained by calculation on lattice sizes from L ¼ 64 to 1280. The dotted lines dimension and more detailed characteristics of percolation (e.g., critical exponents) for our proposed rule is a remaining problem. Since our rule is a general rule for many networkgrowth problems, it enables us to design the nature of percolation. In this paper, we studied the fixed q-dependence of the percolation phenomenon. However, for instance, in a - As the speed of growth increases, the fractal dimension of percolation cluster increases.
  3. 3. Background ordered state: A cluster spreads from the edge to the opposite edge. low density percolation point high density Materials Science: electric conductivity in metal-insulator alloys magnetic phase transition in diluted ferromagnets Dynamic Behavior: spreading wildfire, spreading epidemics Interdisciplinary Science: network science, internet search engine Percolation transition is a continuous transition.
  4. 4. Background Suppose we consider a network-growth model on square lattice. Assumption: All elements are isolated in the initial state. Initial state select a pair randomly. connect a selected pair. connect a selected pair. percolated cluster is made. time Assumption: Clusters are never separated. We refer to this network-growth rule as random rule. In this rule, a continuous percolation transition occurs.
  5. 5. Background Suppose we consider a network model on square lattice. Assumption: All elements are isolated in the initial state. Select two pairs. Compare the sums of num. of elements. Connect a selected pair. (smaller sum) 4+8=12, 3+10=13 Assumption: Clusters are never separated. We refer to this network-growth rule as Achlioptas rule. In this rule, a discontinuous percolation transition occurs !? D. Achlioptas, R.M. D’Souza, J. Spencer, Science 323, 1453 (2009).
  6. 6. Motivation We consider nature of percolation transition in network-growth model. ✔ Conventional percolation transition is a continuous transition. But it was reported that a discontinuous percolation transition can occur depending on network-growth rule (Achlioptas rule). This transition is called “explosive percolation transition”. ✔ Nature of explosive percolation transition has been confirmed well. But there are some studies which insisted “explosive percolation is actually continuous”. ✔ Which is the explosive percolation transition discontinuous or continuous? To understand this major challenge, we introduced a parameter which enables us to consider the network-growth model in a unified way. Scenario A There should be boundary between continuous and discontinuous. Scenario B Continuous transition always occurs? what happened in intermediate region? conventional rule discontinuous transition conventional rule continuous transition ??? Achlioptas rule continuous transition ??? Achlioptas rule continuous transition
  7. 7. A generalized parameter e e q 12 q 12 +e q 13 4+8=12, 3+10=13 4+8=12, 3+10=13 e e q= q=0 q= q 12 q 13 +e : Achlioptas rule : random rule : inverse Achlioptas rule q 13 4+8=12, 3+10=13
  8. 8. Procedures of network-growth rule Step 1: The initial state is set: All elements belong to different clusters. Step 2: Choose two different edges randomly. Step 3: We connect an edge with the probability given by wij = e e q[n( q[n( i )+n( j )] i )+n( j )] +e q[n( k )+n( l )] we connect the other edge with the probability wkl = 1 wij Step 4: We repeat step 2 and step 3 until all of the elements belong to the same cluster. e e q 12 q 12 +e q 13 4+8=12, 3+10=13 4+8=12, 3+10=13 e e q 12 q 13 +e q 13 4+8=12, 3+10=13
  9. 9. q-dependence of nmax 1 nmax : maximum of the number of elements. 256 x 256 square lattice 0.8 nmax/N q=-∞ q=+∞ 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 t q=-∞ (inverse Achlioptas), -1, -10-1, -10 -2, -10 -3, -10 -4, 0 (random), 2.5x10 -5, 5x10 -5, 10 -4, 2x10 -4, 10 -3, 10 -2, 10 -1, and +∞ (Achlioptas) 1
  10. 10. Geometric quantity ns/np np : the number of elements in the percolated cluster. percolated cluster np = 25 ns : the number of elements in contact with other clusters in the percolated cluster. percolated cluster ns = 20
  11. 11. Percolation step and geometric quantity tp (L) : the first step for which a percolation cluster appears. tp(L) 256 x 256 square lattice 1.00 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 Achlioptas random inverse Achlioptas (b) inverse Achlioptas ns/np 0.40 random 0.30 negative q 0.20 0.10 positive q (c) -1 Achlioptas -2 -10 -10 -4 -10 -6 q 10 -6 10 -4 10 -2 1 As q increases, the roughness parameter ns/np decreases!!
  12. 12. Size dependence of tp(L) tp (L = 1 ) tp (L) = aL1/ Achlioptas tp(L) 0.95 0.9 random 0.85 0.8 0.75 inverse Achlioptas (a) 0 400 800 1200 L q=-∞ (inverse Achlioptas), -1, -10-1, -10 -2, -10 -3, -10 -4, 0 (random), 2.5x10 -5, 5x10 -5, 10 -4, 2x10 -4, 10 -3, 10 -2, 10 -1, and +∞ (Achlioptas) Strong size dependence can be observed at intermediate positive q.
  13. 13. Fractal dimension Fractal dimension: Relation between area and characteristic length ex.) square ex.) sphere s or on personal Web sites. 0 x2 S. TANAKA and R. TAMURA D = d(= 2) (b) x2 D = d(= 3 2) 2.00 Achlioptas 1.95 1.90 random inverse Achlioptas 3 1.85 -1 -10-2 -10-4 -10-6 10-6 q 10-4 10-2 1 As q increases, the fractal dimension of percolation cluster increases!!
  14. 14. Person-to-person distribution by the author only. Not permitted for publication for institutional repositories o Snapshot L J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82 (2013) 053002 ETTERS (a) 106 np 10 5 104 10 3 1 10 2 10 Rp 3 10 10 1 2 10 Rp 1 3 10 10 2 10 Rp 3 10 101 2 10 Rp 3 10 101 2 10 Rp 1 3 10 10 2 10 Rp 10 3 Fig. 5. (Color online) (a) (Upper panels) Snapshots at the percolation point for q ¼ À1 (inverse Achlioptas rule), À10 and þ1 (Achlioptas rule) from left to right. The dark and light points depict elements in the percolation cluster a respectively. (Lower panels) Number of elements in the percolation cluster np as a function of gyradius Rp for correspondin s p by least-squares estimation using Eq. (2) and the fractal dimensions D are displayed in the bottom right corner. (b) q-depe dotted lines indicate the fractal dimensions for q ¼ þ1 (Achlioptas rule), q ¼ 0 (random rule), and q ¼ À1 (inverse Ac As q increases, the roughness parameter n /n decreases!! As q increases, the fractal dimension of percolation cluster increases!! conventional self-similar structure. The upper panels of In this study we focused on the
  15. 15. Main Results We studied percolation transition behavior in a network growth model. We focused on network-growth rule dependenceR.of J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82 (2013) 053002 L S. T and T percolation cluster. Person-to-person distribution by the author only. Not permitted for publication for institutional repositories or on personal Web sites. ETTERS ANAKA AMURA (b) 1 5 5 1 1 5 1 2.00 5 5 (a) 5 1 1 1 1 1.95 5 3 3 3 3 1 np 104 2 2 1 1 10 2 10 Rp 3 10 10 1 2 10 Rp 1 3 10 10 2 10 Rp 3 10 101 2 10 Rp 3 10 101 2 10 Rp 1 3 10 10 2 10 Rp 10 3 2 4 2 1 1.85 3 4 1 4 4 2 2 2 -1 4 4 2 1 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 4 5 2 5 3 3 4 5 3 3 3 random 2 inverse 2 Achlioptas 2 2 10-6 10-4 10-2 1 3 3 3 À5 À2 Fig. 5. (Color online) (a) (Upper panels) Snapshots at the percolation point for q ¼ À1 (inverse Achlioptas rule), À10 , 0 (random rule), 10 , 10 , and þ1 (Achlioptas rule) from left to right. The dark and light points depict elements in the percolation cluster and in the second-largest cluster, respectively. (Lower panels) Number of elements in the percolation cluster np as a function of gyradius Rp for corresponding q. The dotted lines are obtained by least-squares estimation using Eq. (2) and the fractal dimensions D are displayed in the bottom right corner. (b) q-dependence of fractal dimension. The dotted lines indicate the fractal dimensions for q ¼ þ1 (Achlioptas rule), q ¼ 0 (random rule), and q ¼ À1 (inverse Achlioptas rule) from top to bottom. 2 1 4 2 1 2 4 2 1 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 1 - A generalized network-growth rule was constructed. 4 4 4 q À2 2 4 4 2 -10-2 -10-4 -10-6 4 2 1 5 4 2 6 6 4 1 6 4 3 1.90 1 10 5 10 3 3 106 3 6 6 5 Achlioptas 5 5 5 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - As the speed of growth increases, the roughness parameter of conventional self-similar structure. The upper panels of In this study we focused on the case of a two-dimensional percolation the percolation cluster and the Fig. 5(a) show snapshots of cluster decreases.square lattice. To investigate the relation between the spatial second-largest cluster at the percolation point for q ¼ À1 (inverse Achlioptas rule), À10À2 , 0 (random rule), 10À5 , 10À2 , and þ1 (Achlioptas rule) from left to right. The corresponding gyradius dependence of np is shown in the lower panels of Fig. 5(a), which are obtained by calculation on lattice sizes from L ¼ 64 to 1280. The dotted lines dimension and more detailed characteristics of percolation (e.g., critical exponents) for our proposed rule is a remaining problem. Since our rule is a general rule for many networkgrowth problems, it enables us to design the nature of percolation. In this paper, we studied the fixed q-dependence of the percolation phenomenon. However, for instance, in a - As the speed of growth increases, the fractal dimension of percolation cluster increases.
  16. 16. Thank you ! Shu Tanaka and Ryo Tamura Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 82, 053002 (2013)

×