Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.



Published on

Published in: Education, Sports
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this


  1. 1. Generic Development <ul><li>Following on from the work of Christian Metz, Thomas Schatz put forward the view that genres tend to pass through a number of ‘stages’, in a predictable pattern or cycle, through their lifespan </li></ul>
  2. 2. Stage 1 - Innovative <ul><li>Genre texts offer a high degree of innovation, experimenting with genre conventions or merging existing genres to create new forms. </li></ul><ul><li>At this stage, genre texts are likely to challenge audiences and to attain popularity through their originality. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Stage 2 - Classical <ul><li>Genre conventions are well established and boundaries between genres tend to be well-defined and more stable </li></ul><ul><li>At this stage, genre texts are likely to generate pleasure through the reinforcement of predictable elements and the repetition of popular structures </li></ul>
  4. 4. Stage 3 - Parody <ul><li>Genre texts take advantage of the audience’s familiarity with their conventions by self-consciously drawing attention to their form and style. </li></ul><ul><li>Audience pleasure is generated by the acknowledgement of the shared experience, often in the form of exaggerated or humourous use of generic conventions </li></ul>
  5. 5. Stage 4 - Deconstruction <ul><li>Genre texts begin to challenge their generic elements by reformulating the conventions – breaking, ignoring or altering the shared understanding of genre. </li></ul><ul><li>Audience pleasure is generated through the genre text’s ability to recognise and to subvert its forms and meanings. </li></ul><ul><li>The process of transformation may sometimes lead the genre through to the beginning of the cycle once more </li></ul>
  6. 6. The Schatz Cycle <ul><li>Innovation phase </li></ul><ul><li>Classical phase </li></ul><ul><li>Parodic phase </li></ul><ul><li>Deconstruction phase </li></ul><ul><li>“ As a genre’s classic conventions are refined and eventually parodied and subverted, its transparency gradually gives way to opacity; we no longer look through the form…rather we look at the form itself to examine and appreciate its structure and its cultural appeal” </li></ul>
  7. 7. Problems with Schatz’ Cycle <ul><li>Schatz’s work depends upon a closed view of genre, in which texts that do not fit the pattern are rejected or ignored </li></ul><ul><li>The cycle ignores the issue of sub-genres which can splinter from the original genre template </li></ul><ul><li>No time-frame is offered for this view of genre development </li></ul><ul><li>The cycle addresses how genre changes, but offers no attempt to say why genre changes </li></ul><ul><li>The cycle implies that genre development is ‘internal’ or that genres have a ‘natural’ lifespan. This ignores the institutional and social/cultural forces which must have an impact on the ways in which genres change. </li></ul>