Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Researchingresearchers

368 views

Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Researchingresearchers

  1. 1. Researching researchers: developing a one-stop-shop for research support Michelle Schneider, Academic Skills Development Officer Lilac Conference, March 2010
  2. 2. Researching Researchers <ul><li>Background to Researcher@Library </li></ul><ul><li>Researcher needs in relation to online resources </li></ul><ul><li>Researcher feedback on our online resource </li></ul><ul><li>Conclusions / further issues </li></ul>
  3. 3. Background <ul><li>Increasing IL support for researchers </li></ul><ul><li>Popular half-day courses for PhDs </li></ul><ul><li>Various workshops on offer for staff </li></ul><ul><li>Time constraints on staff </li></ul><ul><li>Variety of information / resources online </li></ul><ul><li>Roberts funding </li></ul>
  4. 4. Developing an online resource: our vision and aims <ul><li>an interactive e-learning package, focusing on library resources and IL skills, taking a step-by-step approach to supporting the research process </li></ul><ul><ul><li>an alternative to face to face teaching sessions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>suitable for research staff (and students) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>catering for part-time staff / those with other commitments </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>aimed at Faculty of Medicine and Health initially </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. User Needs Analysis <ul><li>Focus groups, email questionnaires, face to face interviews with members of Faculty of Medicine and Health, including research staff, lecturers, PhD students </li></ul><ul><li>Meetings with subject librarians within Library & information officers within Faculty </li></ul><ul><li>Meetings with other research support services within the University such as Research Support, Staff Development, IT training </li></ul>
  6. 6. What researchers wanted: <ul><li>a bank of information for whole research process </li></ul><ul><li>researcher- (not library-) focused </li></ul><ul><li>easy to dip into to fulfil specific information / skills gap </li></ul><ul><li>quick, clear and simple navigation </li></ul><ul><li>some knowledge to be assumed (not too basic) </li></ul><ul><li>Up-to-date content, no broken links </li></ul>
  7. 7. What researchers did NOT want: <ul><li>an interactive tutorial </li></ul><ul><li>a package they would have to follow step-by-step </li></ul><ul><li>tests / exercises / self-assessments </li></ul><ul><li>whizzy graphics / images </li></ul><ul><li>to have to login </li></ul>
  8. 8. Our vision? <ul><li>an interactive e-learning package, focusing on library resources and IL skills, taking a step-by-step approach to supporting the research process </li></ul><ul><li>Our revised vision </li></ul><ul><li>an easily accessible online resource for researchers to develop and refresh their IL skills, and raise awareness of the variety of resources available to them in the Library and beyond </li></ul>
  9. 9. What should the resource cover? <ul><li>Researchers: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Others working in their research area </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Research methods </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Finding tricky sources of information </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Funding / research proposals </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Librarians: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wide range of sources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Researcher portal </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Support offered by librarians </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>REF </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Digitisation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Open access publishing </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Literature searching, managing and disseminating information, keeping up-to-date </li></ul>
  10. 11. Feedback from researchers <ul><li>Navigation </li></ul><ul><li>“ a bit overwhelming and difficult to pick out useful information” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Technical issues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Large sections or lots of sub-sections </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Presenting complex information </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ it is difficult to balance the sophistication of the information and the efficiency in finding the right information” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Manageable chunks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Too text-heavy and too guided for some </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>No negative comments about generic information </li></ul></ul>
  11. 12. Conclusions <ul><li>Researchers: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>want to pick and choose information at the specific point they need it </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>are very time restricted – want answers not questions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>don’t want to be restricted by library boundaries </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>are happy with generic information in some contexts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>aren’t so bothered that online info looks flashy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>have different needs / approaches to research students </li></ul></ul>

×