Mbti for mana 5338 abbrev. 06232010

793 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Mbti for mana 5338 abbrev. 06232010

  1. 1. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
  2. 2. EXTRAVERSION    Direct energy outward toward people and things Orientation – after thinkers Work Environment  Action-oriented  Prefer to be around others  Many interests INTROVERSION    Direct energy inward toward ideas and concepts Orientation – fore thinkers Work Environment  Quiet and concentrated  Prefer to be alone  Interests have depth
  3. 3. SENSING    Focus on five senses(experience) Details, practicality, reality Work Environment  Prefer learned skills  Pay attention to details  Make few factual errors INTUITION    Focus on the possibilities(sixth sense) Patterns and expectations Work Environment  Prefer adding new skills  Looks at the big picture  Patient with complexity
  4. 4. THINKING    Focus – logic of a situation, truth and principles Work Environment – brief and businesslike Contributions – intellectual criticism, solutions to problems FEELING    Focus – human values and needs, people and harmony Work Environment – friendly and personal Contributions – loyal support, care and concern for others
  5. 5. JUDGING   Attitude – decisive, planful, selfregimented, purposeful Work Environment – focus on completing tasks, makes decisions quickly PERCEPTION   Attitude – curious, spontaneous, flexible, adaptable, tolerant Work Environment – focus on starting tasks, postpones decisions
  6. 6. ST Function SF Function NF Function NT Function ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ ISTP ISFP INFP INTP ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJ
  7. 7. ST Function Pay attention to details and the reality of any given situation  Focus on the past and the present and are often characterized by a serious, no nonsense demeanor  Communication to others is often about costs, schedules and other basic facts 
  8. 8. SF Function     Pay attention to facts and details of a situation and organize this concrete information according to the values they hold and the importance the info has for themselves and others Focus on the immediate past and current needs of each person in their care Often characterized by a friendly demeanor Communication is based on their own and others’ needs
  9. 9. NF Function      Pay attention to insights and to what could be done instead of what is. Like to discuss values and relationships Concerned about the future and how people’s goals and aspirations can be achieved Characterized by an inspirational demeanor Organize their communication by paying attention to what people in general value Communicate easily with others about team, community, and organizational needs & values
  10. 10. NT Function Focus on relationships between theories and structures and organize this info by logical analysis of cause and effect  Focus on the future  Often characterized by an analytical, quizzical demeanor  Communicate with others about strategies, visions, and potentials 
  11. 11. ST ISTJ SF ISFJ NF NT INFJ INTJ INFP INTP ENFP ENTP ENFJ ENTJ SJ SJ ISTP ISFP SP SP ESTP ESFP SP SP ESTJ ESFJ SJ SJ
  12. 12. Type Differences in Close Relationships (E vs. I) Extraverts Need:  Sufficient external stimulation  Reach decisions by talking them out and getting feedback  May experience I’s style as excluding them and robbing them of mutual sharing Introverts Need:  Sufficient “alone time”  Reach decisions by processing them internally and sharing final decision  May experience E’s style as intrusive and controlling
  13. 13. Type Differences in Close Relationships (S vs. N)  Sensing partners with strong grounding in reality can make Intuitive partners feel impractical and unobservant  Intuitive partners with rapid insights can make Sensing partners feel slow and mundane
  14. 14. Type Differences in Close Relationships (T vs. F)   Thinking favors an objective , logical approach to arrive at truth Can become irritated when Feeling type appears to ignore the logic of a situation   Feeling favors a subjective, personal approach that arrives at harmony Can feel hurt when Thinking type appears to be cold, uncaring, and hypercritical
  15. 15. Differences in Thinking and Feeling are Prone to Gender Stereotyping     Thinking is often confused with intellectual competence and lack of emotion Feeling is often confused with intellectual fuzziness and excessive emotinality Thinking is often perceived as the province of males and Feeling for females Thinking-Feeling differences are often seen as gender differences (e.g., Thinking women may see Feeling men as unmasculine and Feeling men may perceive Thinking women as unfeminine)
  16. 16. Thinking Types can Improve Relationships with Feeling Types by: Voicing appreciation before giving criticism  Making critical comments only when necessary rather than as a natural, automatic response to the partner and the world 
  17. 17. Type Differences in Close Relationships (J vs. P)    Judging partner likely to value order and predictability in his or her surroundings More likely to value careful planning Like closure and concrete plans (vacations)    Perceiving partner more likely to value spontaneity and freedom More likely to value “flying by the seat of their pants” Like weighing all the options (furniture)
  18. 18. Occupational Trends of 16 Types ISTJ Management, Administration Law enforcement , Accounting Or any other occupations where they can use their experiences and attention to detail to get the task done ISFJ Education, Health Care, Religious settings Or any other occupations where they can draw on their base experience to personally help people in a behind-thescenes manner ISTP Skilled trades, technical fields, agriculture, law enforcement, Military Or any other occupations where they can use their hands-on, analytical work with data or things ISFP Health care, Business, Law Enforcement Or any other occupations where they can use their gentle, service-related attentiveness to detail
  19. 19. Occupational Trends of 16 Types INFJ Religion, counseling, teaching, arts Or any other occupations where they can facilitate emotional, intellectual, or spiritual development INTJ Scientific or technical fields, computers, law Or any other occupations where they can use their intellectual creativity and technical knowledge to conceptualize, analyze, and get the task done. INFP Counseling, Writing, Arts Or any other occupations where they can use their creativity and focus on their values INTP Scientific or Technical Fields Or any other occupations where they can use their solitary, objective analysis of problems based on their technical expertise
  20. 20. Occupational Trends of 16 Types ESTP Marketing, skilled trades, Business, Law enforcement, Applied Technology Or any other occupations where they can use their action-oriented focus to attend to the necessary details ESFP Health care, Teaching, Coaching, Childcare worker, Skilled Trades Or any other occupations where they can use their outgoing nature and enthusiasm to help people with their practical needs ESTJ Management, Administration, Law Enforcement Or any other occupations where they can use logic and organization of the facts to get the task done ESFJ Education, Health Care, Religion Or any other occupations where they can use their personal concern to provide services to others
  21. 21. Occupational Trends of 16 Types ENFP Counseling, Teaching, Religion, Arts Or any other occupations where they can use creativity and communication to foster the growth of others ENTP Science, Management, Technology, Arts Or any other occupations where they have the opportunity to take on new challenges continually ENFJ Religions, Arts, Teaching Or any other occupations where they can help others with their emotional, intellectual, and spiritual growth ENTJ Management, Leadership Or any other occupations where they can use tough-minded analysis, strategic planning, and organization to get the task done
  22. 22. Type and Work Environments Extraverts..  Like variety and action  Tend to be faster, dislike complicated procedures (ES)  Good “greeters” (EF)  Impatient with long, slow jobs done alone Introverts  Like quiet for concentration  Careful with details (IS)  Trouble with names & faces (IT)  Can work for long periods of time on a project without interruptions
  23. 23. Type and Work Environments Extraverts..  Interested in activities of their job, getting it done, and how others do it  Do not mind telephone (EF)  Act quickly, sometimes without thinking it through  Like people around (EF)  Communicate freely (EF) Introverts..  Interested in details & ideas behind job  Dislike telephone (IT)  Think before acting, sometimes without acting  Work alone (IT)  “In their heads” (IT)
  24. 24. Type and Work Environments Sensing..  Focus on here and now and reality  Standard ways of solving problems  Preferred established order for doing things (SJ)  Preferring using and perfecting learned skills  Steady workers with realistic assessment of time (ISJ) Intuitive..  Focus on future and what might be  Solving problems in new ways  Dislike routine (NP)  Enjoy learning new skill more than using it  Bursts of energy with slack times (ENP)
  25. 25. Type and Work Environments        Sensing.. Intuitive.. Reach a conclusion step by step  Reach an understanding (ISJ) quickly (ENP)  Impatient with routine details Patient with details (ISJ) (ENP) Impatient when situations get  Patient with complex situations (IN) complicated (ES)  Follow inspirations Not often inspired, mistrust regardless of data inspiration  Make errors of fact, Seldom make factual errors preferring big picture Good at precise work (IS)  Dislike precision (time) Create new by adapting old  Create something new with
  26. 26. Type and Work Environments       Thinking..  Like analysis and ordering Can get along without harmony  Tend to be firm minded Do not show emotion readily  and often uncomfortable with  others’ feelings May hurt others’ feelings without knowing it  Decide impersonally, sometimes insufficient attention  to others’ wishes Feeling.. Like harmony Office feud by impair efficiency Tend to be sympathetic Aware of other people and their feelings (EF) Enjoy pleasing others Allow decisions to be influenced by likes and dislikes
  27. 27. Type and Work Environments    Thinking.. Need to be treated fairly in  accordance with prevailing standards  Able to reprimand people impersonally, though they may not like doing so  More analytically-oriented, respond best to others’ thoughts (IT) Feeling.. Need praise and attention Dislike, even avoid unpleasant encounters More people oriented, respond more easily to others values
  28. 28. Type and Work Environments   Judging.. Work best when they plan work and follow plan Like to get things settled      May decide too quickly (EJ) Dislike interrupting project for more urgent one (ISJ)  Perceiving.. Adapt well to changing situations Prefer leaving things open for alterations May postpone decisions (IP) May start too many projects and have difficulty finishing them (ENP)
  29. 29. Type and Work Environments    Judging.. May not notice new things that need to be done while completing what they are doing Want only the essentials needed to begin their work (ESJ) Satisfied once they reach a judgment on a thing, situation, or person    Perceiving.. May postpone unpleasant jobs while finding other things more interesting in the moment Want to know all about a new job (INP) Curious and welcome a new light on a thing, situation, or person
  30. 30. Organizational Values of 16 Types ISTJ ISFJ High: Happy Family Low: Visible Autonomy ISTP Low: Variety and challenge Visible autonomy ISFP High: Happy Family Low: Outgoing Affiliation Financial Analysis Low: Variety and challenge
  31. 31. Organizational Values of 16 Types INFJ INTJ High: Financial Analysis Low: Business Sociability INFP High: Nurturing Affiliation INTP High: Visible Autonomy
  32. 32. Organizational Values of 16 Types ESTP ESFP High: Visible Autonomy High: Happy Family Low: Achievement within system Financial Analysis Low: Achievement within system ESTJ High: Achievement within system ESFJ High: Happy Family Outgoing Affiliation Business Sociability
  33. 33. Organizational Values of 16 Types ENFP ENTP High: Variety and challenge Visible Autonomy Low: Achievement within system ENFJ High: Nurturing Affiliation Low: Happy Family ENTJ High: Financial Analysis Low: Nurturing Affiliation

×